[ANN][DCM] Digital Commerce 1.35 Mil coins 100% POS/Soon Anon/Accounting wallet.

[jcarl987]

Plenty of coins have anon or are implementing it, I think the fad will be over soon or at least it won't be anything to make a coin stand out. I question the value of it beyond having a few coins that specialise in it. I mean look at how people pay for things outside of cyrpto, it obviously doesn't mean much to most people.

[Kreativekrypto]

I've heard that VRC has anon function where you can choose, either to pay anonymously or normally.

Please keep your advertisements off our thread, I wouldn't come to yours pushing DCM unless asked.


edit: I will be back later on if anyone needs me pm me here or in irc, have some family commitments today.

[poornamelessme]

Plenty of coins have anon or are implementing it, I think the fad will be over soon or at least it won't be anything to make a coin stand out. I question the value of it beyond having a few coins that specialise in it. I mean look at how people pay for things outside of cyrpto, it obviously doesn't mean much to most people.

If it's a truly unique solution, I think it's worth adding. Perhaps have it optional in the wallet. If it's just another mixer, or some grand plan that may work in theory, but nobody knows if it does in practice, I'd pass on it.

I think part of the problem isn't anonymity, just that there are too many coins trying to do it right now, and a lot of them appear to be scams or quick money grabs. They saw Drk shooting up, who I should add has been working on a solution for like half a year, and decided to tack on some anon feature which may or may not even exist. Coins said things like they'll add zerocoin functionality (while zerocoin doesn't exist), one stated they were adding DarkSend (not even opensourced yet), while some others have anon claims, but it's rather iffy if they even work.

So yeah, if it's just some generic solution a million other coins are using, and not better than existing coins, best to pass on it. If it's  a unique coding solution, sure, why not add it?

[exoton]

I've heard that VRC has anon function where you can choose, either to pay anonymously or normally.

Please keep your advertisements off our thread, I wouldn't come to yours pushing DCM unless asked.


edit: I will be back later on if anyone needs me pm me here or in irc, have some family commitments today.

however i think that would be good , why not get an anon feature if you can , if you are able to chose it would be perfect for both sides !

[exoton]

I've heard that VRC has anon function where you can choose, either to pay anonymously or normally.

Please keep your advertisements off our thread, I wouldn't come to yours pushing DCM unless asked.


edit: I will be back later on if anyone needs me pm me here or in irc, have some family commitments today.

however i think that would be good , why not get an anon feature if you can , if you are able to chose it would be perfect for both sides !

Because its useless.
An anon feature its not gonna help the coin to be accepted by legit business.

useless or not some people like it why not get it , you are not forced to use it , also since its current flavour of the month it would lead to an explosion in price which would certainly help creatring a big base of useres

[jcarl987]

I've heard that VRC has anon function where you can choose, either to pay anonymously or normally.

Please keep your advertisements off our thread, I wouldn't come to yours pushing DCM unless asked.


edit: I will be back later on if anyone needs me pm me here or in irc, have some family commitments today.

however i think that would be good , why not get an anon feature if you can , if you are able to chose it would be perfect for both sides !

Because its useless.
An anon feature its not gonna help the coin to be accepted by legit business.

useless or not some people like it why not get it , you are not forced to use it , also since its current flavour of the month it would lead to an explosion in price which would certainly help creatring a big base of useres

It would lead to an unsustainable explosion in price, creating a big base of pissed off bag-holders. No thanks.

[exoton]

I've heard that VRC has anon function where you can choose, either to pay anonymously or normally.

Please keep your advertisements off our thread, I wouldn't come to yours pushing DCM unless asked.


edit: I will be back later on if anyone needs me pm me here or in irc, have some family commitments today.

however i think that would be good , why not get an anon feature if you can , if you are able to chose it would be perfect for both sides !

Because its useless.
An anon feature its not gonna help the coin to be accepted by legit business.

useless or not some people like it why not get it , you are not forced to use it , also since its current flavour of the month it would lead to an explosion in price which would certainly help creatring a big base of useres

It would lead to an unsustainable explosion in price, creating a big base of pissed off bag-holders. No thanks.

why do you say the explosion is unsustainable ?
we have several great devs which should be able to somewhat sustain it , bagholding comes because people buy coins whose dev is unable to deliver for something that big , anyways everyone has the right to buy what they want if someone bagholds its their business , also a bagholder is kind of forced to be a community member and help get the price up
im buffled that people complain about rising prices i mean didnt you buy the coin to sell for profit ? , if you dont like anom dont use it ...

[dCom]

Putting it bluntly, jcarl is correct, it would be the very last thing we want for our currency and growing community. There are many other things to work on right now that are much more valuable, when the time comes and we release our practical theories it will be something every community member will have a say in, not just a way to push us to Saturn and bring in less productive people. I'll be back in a few hours, there are other devs available as well if someone has something urgent.



-Kreative

[poornamelessme]

It would lead to an unsustainable explosion in price, creating a big base of pissed off bag-holders. No thanks.

I think this is the first time I've read of someone complaining about a potential explosion in price with a coin. I do agree that organic price growth is best, and if whatever anonymous solution takes some time to be added, I expect it would be slow.

Also keep in mind an unsustainable explosion in price occurs quite often, with many, many coins, simply each time a news article comes out, or a coin goes on a new exchange. It's not like it can be avoided regardless, unless you it's a low volume type of coin with no price movement. Pumps are the domains of whales... it can't be controlled even if you try.

As for those saying businesses won't accept the coin, or anon features are evil, etc. Why not make it optional in the wallet? If you don't like that feature, simply don't use it.

[helping hands]

I've heard that VRC has anon function where you can choose, either to pay anonymously or normally.

Please keep your advertisements off our thread, I wouldn't come to yours pushing DCM unless asked.


edit: I will be back later on if anyone needs me pm me here or in irc, have some family commitments today.

I wasn't advertising.   I have none of the above coin 'of which we do not speak' and I have been in DCM from the IPO.  

[exoton]

I've heard that VRC has anon function where you can choose, either to pay anonymously or normally.

Please keep your advertisements off our thread, I wouldn't come to yours pushing DCM unless asked.


edit: I will be back later on if anyone needs me pm me here or in irc, have some family commitments today.

however i think that would be good , why not get an anon feature if you can , if you are able to chose it would be perfect for both sides !

Because its useless.
An anon feature its not gonna help the coin to be accepted by legit business.

useless or not some people like it why not get it , you are not forced to use it , also since its current flavour of the month it would lead to an explosion in price which would certainly help creatring a big base of useres

It would lead to an unsustainable explosion in price, creating a big base of pissed off bag-holders. No thanks.

why do you say the explosion is unsustainable ?
we have several great devs which should be able to somewhat sustain it , bagholding comes because people buy coins whose dev is unable to deliver for something that big , anyways everyone has the right to buy what they want if someone bagholds its their business , also a bagholder is kind of forced to be a community member and help get the price up
im buffled that people complain about rising prices , if you dont like anom dont use it ...

Lol, forced to be part of a community?
Do you at least hear yourself?

You think only about your money, and you think only to make more money on a short term.

obviously , are you telling me you arent in crypto for the money ... ?
why should i all in in a coin that goes x10 in 6 months while i can trade 50 coins that go x10 in that time ?
but fine if no one want anom dont get it

[ifightformerkel]

a lot of people want anon, but something new, something diffrent, not a mixer something unique, not a simple copy.

[Kreativekrypto]

I've heard that VRC has anon function where you can choose, either to pay anonymously or normally.

Please keep your advertisements off our thread, I wouldn't come to yours pushing DCM unless asked.


edit: I will be back later on if anyone needs me pm me here or in irc, have some family commitments today.

I wasn't advertising.   I have none of the above coin 'of which we do not speak' and I have been in DCM from the IPO.  

I humbly apologize then, I should have looked at post history first. Ok now I have to spend time with my family talk soon

[ifightformerkel]

In which countrys live the devs? (which time zone?)

here is 23:20 in Germany. 

[helping hands]

I've heard that VRC has anon function where you can choose, either to pay anonymously or normally.

Please keep your advertisements off our thread, I wouldn't come to yours pushing DCM unless asked.


edit: I will be back later on if anyone needs me pm me here or in irc, have some family commitments today.

I wasn't advertising.   I have none of the above coin 'of which we do not speak' and I have been in DCM from the IPO.  

I humbly apologize then, I should have looked at post history first. Ok now I have to spend time with my family talk soon

It's alright.  Luckily I found out about DCM in another coin's thread.

[ifightformerkel]

We will be in the next 24 hours on coinmarketcap. 

[ifightformerkel]

some weak hand dump 45k dcm, thank you  
so this coin will be better distributed and more people get it and hold it because they buy it @ 30k

pls dump more coins for better distribution

the price can only go up, also because the multipool

+ coinmarketcap in 24 hours

+ announcements in the next days

who dont buy this coin until it is under 100.000 satoshi will regret it in the future. 

[reRaise]

some weak hand dump 45k dcm, thank you  
so this coin will be better distributed and more people get it and hold it because they buy it @ 30k

pls dump more coins for better distribution

the price can only go up, also because the multipool

+ coinmarketcap in 24 hours

+ announcements in the next days

who dont buy this coin until it is under 100.000 satoshi will regret it in the future. 

I'm really tempted to buy 1BTC worth of DCM, but need to pay some bills arghh

[BitCoinDream]

1 BTC is equivalent to how many dCom at the moment ?

[ifightformerkel]

About 3100 dmc