[NUD ₦ ] New Universal Dollar | Bcrypt | 0% Pre-mine | First Anonymous Crypto

[leozhenping]

No need to blame C-Cex. The NUD core team created an update which makes it impossible to include transaction into the blockchain, so withdrawing won't even work. The NUD saga continues...

Hmm... No?

It is possible to include transactions into the blockchain, and we did notify C-Cex, and they didn't apply the newest patch and continued support.

Overall I think we can both benefit from the situation with C-Cex, I didn't want to include them in the official post to begin with but it ended up there due to our dev.

Two months is too long,  want your team a good grasp of the market, do not miss the opportunity as before. We very much look forward and grow with the team, thanks!

Well if you want you can give us like 10,000$ and so we will deliver the code faster.

The attitude really kills me, it's as if we're employed by someone here except that we're a bunch of volunteers and tech savvy investors willing to go out of our way for this project. Who cares if you think it's too long or not too long, this is what we've brought to the table with our blood and tears.

NUD has been very optimistic about the long-term development, incorporating investment plans. But the way is very disappointing, there are people like you in the team, I believe very little room for growth. Good community, there must be a good way of doing things, attitudes

[1714682096]

1714682096

[1714682096]

1714682096

[1714682096]

1714682096

[1714682096]

1714682096

[neojin]


{
"blocks" : 46615,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.02593284,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 2809,
"networkhashps" : 730285,
"pooledtx" : 4,
"testnet" : false
}

[doldgigger]

Fix for the 0.0.0.5 bug

It seems that the network forked, we are still early in development with no serious resources allocated so things are moving slow. They will move significantly faster now.

We have came up with a fix:
1. Re-download the client from http://nud.fi/downloads
2. Download the blockchain from the same page or http://nud.fi/blockchain.zip
3. Unzip the blockchain into %appdata%/NUD directory on Windows or ~/.NUD directory on Linux
4. Launch the client and wait for the blockchain to get rescanned

This will keep your client synchronized to the proper/official fork of the network.

If you require users to download the blockchain instead of having the nodes distribute it, why bother with a blockchain and peer-to-peer at all? Wouldn't it be easier if you make your coin a mere wallet website where people can login and view their balance, transmit coins etc.? Then you can edit the balances as you wish, without creating synchronization issues. This would also cut your development costs as you would not have to bother with all that cryptocurrency stuff anymore (which seems to go wrong regularly, anyway).

[prdomain]

Is there a dev still around on this?  If so, please contact us @bittrex

thanks,
richie@bittrex

Julian!  Keep our one good exchange happy!

Handling it now with the dev and bittrex.

What happen?  bad news ?

[NUD]

What happen?  bad news ?

No. We had to pay bittrex 35k NUD to cover the expenses of the last hardfork for them, this is exactly why we got ourselves the NUD. Doubt we could round up 35k at demand instantly.

If you require users to download the blockchain instead of having the nodes distribute it, why bother with a blockchain and peer-to-peer at all? Wouldn't it be easier if you make your coin a mere wallet website where people can login and view their balance, transmit coins etc.? Then you can edit the balances as you wish, without creating synchronization issues. This would also cut your development costs as you would not have to bother with all that cryptocurrency stuff anymore (which seems to go wrong regularly, anyway).

The logic is still peer to peer and not centralized as you seem to suggest, it's like the bitcoin blockchain which is available via torrent.


In any case the new website is up! It's still an early version but that's what we have going on for now.

[JulianSheen]

The new site is up, we feel the end result is very nice, minimalistic and beautiful  

nud.fi

[TheCoinFinder]

The new site is up, we feel the end result is very nice, minimalistic and beautiful 

nud.fi

Any external miner or working pool hash module available as yet? I made one but no way to test it.

[shadowduck]

need a MAC client.

[yoyo2]

shit coin.
The author can get countless free COINS next time. Want nud just direct split ends.
Who go to buy or to dig is a fool.

[AizenSou]

Well I accidentally sent some coins to Bittrex through the fork. Now of course Bittrex wallet doesn't get any of my coins. I try to fix the wallet but found out that repairwallet rpc command is not available. Anyone has the same problem before? Thanks in advance.

[sdcyxiaolong]

bittrex has no pay, and the author himself playing himself dead, no one go to buy, this currency is dead

[cawson]

no zuo no die.

[LOL1993]

Another dead coin,haha,and dev have run away!!!

[NUD]

I have paid bittrex the moment he asked for it you silly little FUDsters.

[DenisZabar]

Another dead coin,haha,and dev have run away!!!

No it is NOT dead.

[shadowduck]

I have paid bittrex the moment he asked for it you silly little FUDsters.

For long term project, FUD does not mean too much while development does.

So, can you give us roadmap/schedule/status on development?

[doldgigger]

It seems that the network forked, we are still early in development with no serious resources allocated so things are moving slow. They will move significantly faster now.

This is not a surprise at all. Anyone who compared 0.0.0.4 and 0.0.0.5, and who also has some background in cryptocurrency implementation, would see that the patch that was applied would be highly likely to lead to forks. It seems unlikely that it wasn't known before releasing 0.0.0.5 (unless the developers were hobbyists, but that seems out of the question - I read something about a brilliant team of engineers being involved).

2. Download the blockchain from the same page or http://nud.fi/blockchain.zip

How should users proceed whose transactions are not included in the blockchain available for download? Overwriting the consensus-generated blockchain created by the wallet client by the one crafted by the developer team might lead to loss of balances, so I assume the losses can be compensated somehow.

[doldgigger]

What happen?  bad news ?

No. We had to pay bittrex 35k NUD to cover the expenses of the last hardfork for them, this is exactly why we got ourselves the NUD. Doubt we could round up 35k at demand instantly.

On the long run, it may be cheaper to hire experienced developers who can handle wallet upgrading without creating losses for NUD businesses.

If you require users to download the blockchain instead of having the nodes distribute it, why bother with a blockchain and peer-to-peer at all? Wouldn't it be easier if you make your coin a mere wallet website where people can login and view their balance, transmit coins etc.? Then you can edit the balances as you wish, without creating synchronization issues. This would also cut your development costs as you would not have to bother with all that cryptocurrency stuff anymore (which seems to go wrong regularly, anyway).

The logic is still peer to peer and not centralized as you seem to suggest, it's like the bitcoin blockchain which is available via torrent.

One tiny difference: With Bitcoin, the torrent-distributed blockchain is the same as the one you get when letting the client download it from other peers. So, it is just a speedup. With NUD, the blockchain is rather small until now, so no real point in doing so if it was for mere speeding up the download. However, it turns out that the consensus-driven process that gets you a blockchain by running the wallet leads to a different blockchain than what is available for donload by HTTP. So, it seems like someone on nud.fi wants to override the consensus from the network by his own transactions.

[YarkoL]

How should users proceed whose transactions are not included in the blockchain available for download? Overwriting the consensus-generated blockchain created by the wallet client by the one crafted by the developer team might lead to loss of balances, so I assume the losses can be compensated somehow.

The fact that so far no one has complained about missing
mining rewards is interesting.

Perhaps the mining with reduced difficulty after
copying and installing the chain with postmine blocks was
satisfying compensation.

[Cebuu]

Looks gread friends! -Invest!