PepiX
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2014, 09:26:41 AM |
|
I like the last one.. white on dark background. (and the black on white after that..)
|
|
|
|
|
Minerals (OP)
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Minerals Dev
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2014, 10:07:00 AM |
|
The links have been fixed, thanks for pointing out. I think that c-cex has some problems if you deposit more than couple of transactions per hour. Please, contact them about this.
|
MVNWT9QtaryFdzexcHNyiJa3hzZB5Ja85P
|
|
|
neleonele
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2014, 10:29:05 AM |
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FBqUF11ACAAAhGpR.jpg%3Alarge&t=665&c=xlNcxQy6_T4MyQ) a new mineralscoin logo. very cool logo! I think we gotta vote for the best logo. Quite a few logos were posted here, I'll try to gether em all up in one post so it'll be easier to see what's the best one nice indeed i vote for this one +888 for this one!
|
|
|
|
ZacharyComstock
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2014, 10:57:25 AM |
|
the last logo is pretty cool but doesn't look like minerals or something starcraft related But overall logo looks really great
|
|
|
|
ASICrefugee
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2014, 11:07:59 AM |
|
Ok - I nip out for a smoke and the net hash rate jumps from 10GH/s to 20GH/s, difficulty currently 141 ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) The weird thing is there are less workers at 20GH/s than at 10GH's Where is all the extra hash coming from? Why does the hash double but the workers count go down? Am I missing something blindingly obvious? I know I can check the block explorer, but that doesn't tell me anything.......
|
|
|
|
tdenchev
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2014, 11:16:47 AM |
|
How do you check the number of users? You have to log into all 6 pools and see the statistics for the last block payout and see how many pages in 10s of users are there.
That's what I did when the 50mh/s limit per account was enforced and I saw on one pool the number of users jump gradually from 26-27 pages to 33-34 pages, meaning that we had on a single pool a 25% increase in users as soon as that limit was enforced.
So I guess if you take out statistics from the 6 pools which consist of current pool hashrate - current user count, then we might have some more info on this strange behavior.
|
|
|
|
Minerals (OP)
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Minerals Dev
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2014, 11:17:27 AM |
|
Ok - I nip out for a smoke and the net hash rate jumps from 10GH/s to 20GH/s, difficulty currently 141 ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) The weird thing is there are less workers at 20GH/s than at 10GH's Where is all the extra hash coming from? Why does the hash double but the workers count go down? Am I missing something blindingly obvious? I know I can check the block explorer, but that doesn't tell me anything....... The network hashrate and difficulty is not perfect (this is why you see them gradually going up and then down), but I would say that overall the number of miners across all 6 pools has increased a bit.
|
MVNWT9QtaryFdzexcHNyiJa3hzZB5Ja85P
|
|
|
ASICrefugee
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2014, 11:20:41 AM |
|
How do you check the number of users? You have to log into all 6 pools and see the statistics for the last block payout and see how many pages in 10s of users are there.
That's what I did when the 50mh/s limit per account was enforced and I saw on one pool the number of users jump gradually from 26-27 pages to 33-34 pages, meaning that we had on a single pool a 25% increase in users as soon as that limit was enforced.
So I guess if you take out statistics from the 6 pools which consist of current pool hashrate - current user count, then we might have some more info on this strange behavior.
I'm logged in to two - DRONE and PROBE, both showed the same behaviour - hash rate and difficulty up but miners down ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) Given the limit is working @ 50MH's, and it appears to be, how can more hash be generated from less workers?
|
|
|
|
Minerals (OP)
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Minerals Dev
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2014, 11:24:53 AM |
|
How do you check the number of users? You have to log into all 6 pools and see the statistics for the last block payout and see how many pages in 10s of users are there.
That's what I did when the 50mh/s limit per account was enforced and I saw on one pool the number of users jump gradually from 26-27 pages to 33-34 pages, meaning that we had on a single pool a 25% increase in users as soon as that limit was enforced.
So I guess if you take out statistics from the 6 pools which consist of current pool hashrate - current user count, then we might have some more info on this strange behavior.
I'm logged in to two - DRONE and PROBE, both showed the same behaviour - hash rate and difficulty up but miners down ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) Given the limit is working @ 50MH's, and it appears to be, how can more hash be generated from less workers? The only way to explain this is that the average hashrate per miner is going up, i.e. more miners are getting closer to the limit. Why is this happening - I don't really now, I guess people are pointing more of their hashing power to their workers.
|
MVNWT9QtaryFdzexcHNyiJa3hzZB5Ja85P
|
|
|
barryzand
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2014, 11:35:19 AM |
|
I myself rented some extra hash as well... I guess more people have done that... ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
DRPD
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2014, 11:50:17 AM |
|
I myself rented some extra hash as well... I guess more people have done that... ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) */raises hand* - guilty 2 ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif)
|
|
|
|
cryptouser
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 247
Merit: 100
O__o
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2014, 12:12:57 PM |
|
Yup, something not right definitely ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) hashrate changed 5gh/s in ~3-4 minutes and so the diff. decreased from 134 to 88
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1070
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2014, 12:36:31 PM |
|
miners can just create 1 worker per pool, with a total of 300mh/s each, there is no restriction for that apparently...
|
|
|
|
tdenchev
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2014, 12:38:52 PM |
|
Miners might create more than one account on more than one pool. I don't know if that is being monitored by Minerals and do those people's hashrate is being summed up to see if they are abusing the system. And this might go way beyond 300mh/s...
|
|
|
|
ASICrefugee
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2014, 12:44:08 PM |
|
miners can just create 1 worker per pool, with a total of 300mh/s each, there is no restriction for that apparently...
I think it is 50MH/s per pool/worker- haven't seen any whales since about hour 10 ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Of course, if your hash is distributed across multiple locations/ip then you can game the system pretty easily ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif)
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1070
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2014, 12:46:22 PM |
|
Miners might create more than one account on more than one pool. I don't know if that is being monitored by Minerals and do those people's hashrate is being summed up to see if they are abusing the system. And this might go way beyond 300mh/s...
6 pool 50mh/s limit each, should be 300 even if they abuse, unless you can make more account for every pool, which make the whole limit of 50mh/s truly pointless..
|
|
|
|
hamba
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2014, 12:56:04 PM |
|
6 pool 50mh/s limit each, should be 300 even if they abuse, unless you can make more account for every pool, which make the whole limit of 50mh/s truly pointless..
How could it be checked if somebody has more than one account? You even don't have to confirm your email address to signup. And even if you did, there are tons of disposable email services (more so, opening an email account on, for example, gmail is also not a trouble - you can easily have tens of emails). Blocking by IP address also can't prevent people with multiple accounts if they're mining with rented rigs... The system is easily abusable. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong...
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1070
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2014, 01:16:43 PM |
|
6 pool 50mh/s limit each, should be 300 even if they abuse, unless you can make more account for every pool, which make the whole limit of 50mh/s truly pointless..
How could it be checked if somebody has more than one account? You even don't have to confirm your email address to signup. And even if you did, there are tons of disposable email services (more so, opening an email account on, for example, gmail is also not a trouble - you can easily have tens of emails). Blocking by IP address also can't prevent people with multiple accounts if they're mining with rented rigs... The system is easily abusable. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong... dunno about what the dev is doing for this scenario, he said nothing about this
|
|
|
|
ASICrefugee
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2014, 01:19:22 PM |
|
6 pool 50mh/s limit each, should be 300 even if they abuse, unless you can make more account for every pool, which make the whole limit of 50mh/s truly pointless..
How could it be checked if somebody has more than one account? You even don't have to confirm your email address to signup. And even if you did, there are tons of disposable email services (more so, opening an email account on, for example, gmail is also not a trouble - you can easily have tens of emails). Blocking by IP address also can't prevent people with multiple accounts if they're mining with rented rigs... The system is easily abusable. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong... dunno about what the dev is doing for this scenario, he said nothing about this I don't know what the dev COULD do about it ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif)
|
|
|
|
|