Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 02:21:01 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Minerals development - top priority
E-sports Betting services + wallet betting features - 254 (48.7%)
Anonymity development - 135 (25.9%)
Multipool further development - 28 (5.4%)
SC2 tournaments - 56 (10.7%)
Wallet improvements (chat, price, better design) - 49 (9.4%)
Total Voters: 522

Pages: « 1 ... 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 [131] 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 ... 453 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][MIN] Minerals - POS | Developing own anon solution |  (Read 742147 times)
uray
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 505


View Profile
June 20, 2014, 06:46:33 PM
 #2601

What about bittrex exchange ?

they are thinking about it still

<@bittrex-richie> Allcryptocoins: yeah we get a lot of that feedback.. like i said.. its super polarizing...
<@bittrex-richie> we either are a) pool operator bitches and part of the mafia or b) destroying crypto by setting a bad precendent.

so they do understand that it would look bad if they don't add MIN. I have no idea what is the precendent he's talking about tho..

Makes no sense to me.

i do understand what bittrex thinking, they are on confusing situation
1. if they dont add MIN, our community will say bittrex is controlled by pool operator and part of their mafia
2. if they do add MIN, pool community will say bittrex is destroying crypto by accepting MIN which they said MIN is bad example for centralized control by dev at launch
1714789261
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714789261

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714789261
Reply with quote  #2

1714789261
Report to moderator
1714789261
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714789261

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714789261
Reply with quote  #2

1714789261
Report to moderator
1714789261
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714789261

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714789261
Reply with quote  #2

1714789261
Report to moderator
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, but full nodes are more resource-heavy, and they must do a lengthy initial syncing process. As a result, lightweight clients with somewhat less security are commonly used.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714789261
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714789261

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714789261
Reply with quote  #2

1714789261
Report to moderator
1714789261
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714789261

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714789261
Reply with quote  #2

1714789261
Report to moderator
jc12345
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1638
Merit: 1013


View Profile
June 20, 2014, 06:47:44 PM
 #2602

What about bittrex exchange ?

they are thinking about it still

<@bittrex-richie> Allcryptocoins: yeah we get a lot of that feedback.. like i said.. its super polarizing...
<@bittrex-richie> we either are a) pool operator bitches and part of the mafia or b) destroying crypto by setting a bad precendent.

so they do understand that it would look bad if they don't add MIN. I have no idea what is the precendent he's talking about tho..

The precedent would be that if there is something new in a coin that is part of innovation or taking crypto forward, even if it is an experiment, and a certain part of the community don't like it, and they veto the coin, then it would pave the way for selective crypto coins in future that suits only certain parts of the community. Lets say in future a new coin is launched with some method that makes pool operators redundant, then and they bitch about it, then the precedent would be there to exclude the coin from exchanges.

No, the correct way is to stick with ethics and maintain integrity and give each coin with its characteristics an equal chance on the exchanges, even if it pisses off a certain part of the community.  That piece of innovation might now be unpopular, but might just be the thing taking crypto forward a few steps and build the body of knowledge.
lnt900
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 20, 2014, 06:48:22 PM
 #2603

MIN going up to 5000 sat, yay !
jc12345
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1638
Merit: 1013


View Profile
June 20, 2014, 06:49:17 PM
 #2604

What about bittrex exchange ?

they are thinking about it still

<@bittrex-richie> Allcryptocoins: yeah we get a lot of that feedback.. like i said.. its super polarizing...
<@bittrex-richie> we either are a) pool operator bitches and part of the mafia or b) destroying crypto by setting a bad precendent.

so they do understand that it would look bad if they don't add MIN. I have no idea what is the precendent he's talking about tho..

Makes no sense to me.

i do understand what bittrex thinking, they are on confusing situation
1. if they dont add MIN, our community will say bittrex is controlled by pool operator and part of their mafia
2. if they do add MIN, pool community will say bittrex is destroying crypto by accepting MIN which they said MIN is bad example for centralized control by dev at launch

If pool operators could be trusted not to leak the source and to not break ranks by dropping the hash limits, then it could be done in a decentralised fashion. Unfortunately you just need one weak link and the whole coin POW goes down the drain. For now the only way to ensure integrity is to do it centralised, until an acceptable decentralised way can be found that would guarantee integrity.
barryzand
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500


Growcoin Chief


View Profile
June 20, 2014, 06:50:17 PM
 #2605

What about bittrex exchange ?

they are thinking about it still

<@bittrex-richie> Allcryptocoins: yeah we get a lot of that feedback.. like i said.. its super polarizing...
<@bittrex-richie> we either are a) pool operator bitches and part of the mafia or b) destroying crypto by setting a bad precendent.

so they do understand that it would look bad if they don't add MIN. I have no idea what is the precendent he's talking about tho..

Makes no sense to me.

i do understand what bittrex thinking, they are on confusing situation
1. if they dont add MIN, our community will say bittrex is controlled by pool operator and part of their mafia
2. if they do add MIN, pool community will say bittrex is destroying crypto by accepting MIN which they said MIN is bad example for centralized control by dev at launch

this exactly....

I would listen too demand... and ignore the people who dont like it... its not like they MUST trade min...
bit1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 20, 2014, 06:50:56 PM
 #2606

https://c-cex.com/?p=min-btc        rising! Wink
uray
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 505


View Profile
June 20, 2014, 06:53:17 PM
 #2607

MIN going up to 5000 sat, yay !

r u from the future?
or ur message goes trough worm hole and ended up in the past
or u r drunk
iawgoM
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 20, 2014, 06:55:34 PM
 #2608

When is next multipool payout?
coincrow
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 20, 2014, 06:57:44 PM
 #2609

What about bittrex exchange ?

they are thinking about it still

<@bittrex-richie> Allcryptocoins: yeah we get a lot of that feedback.. like i said.. its super polarizing...
<@bittrex-richie> we either are a) pool operator bitches and part of the mafia or b) destroying crypto by setting a bad precendent.

so they do understand that it would look bad if they don't add MIN. I have no idea what is the precendent he's talking about tho..

Makes no sense to me.

i do understand what bittrex thinking, they are on confusing situation
1. if they dont add MIN, our community will say bittrex is controlled by pool operator and part of their mafia
2. if they do add MIN, pool community will say bittrex is destroying crypto by accepting MIN which they said MIN is bad example for centralized control by dev at launch

You said it right Uray. Conspiracy is good  Wink
bit1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 20, 2014, 07:00:51 PM
 #2610

What about bittrex exchange ?

they are thinking about it still

<@bittrex-richie> Allcryptocoins: yeah we get a lot of that feedback.. like i said.. its super polarizing...
<@bittrex-richie> we either are a) pool operator bitches and part of the mafia or b) destroying crypto by setting a bad precendent.

so they do understand that it would look bad if they don't add MIN. I have no idea what is the precendent he's talking about tho..

Makes no sense to me.

i do understand what bittrex thinking, they are on confusing situation
1. if they dont add MIN, our community will say bittrex is controlled by pool operator and part of their mafia
2. if they do add MIN, pool community will say bittrex is destroying crypto by accepting MIN which they said MIN is bad example for centralized control by dev at launch
_______________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________

 the only way to control the whales at least 50% is about MIN is doing,  but what about the small miners
finally someone is helping so   bittrex is not  destroying crypto by accepting MIN on the contrary is helping

liominer
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 20, 2014, 07:04:32 PM
 #2611

I can't mine thousands of coin cause of big Farms and asics, pls just stop with this bullshit of centralized.

uray
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 505


View Profile
June 20, 2014, 07:07:19 PM
 #2612

I can't mine thousands of coin cause of big Farms and asics, pls just stop with this bullshit of centralized.



well you can mine million of doge coins using farm and asics..
kirilvvbg
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 213
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 20, 2014, 07:09:59 PM
 #2613

I think it is becoming more and more clear... BIG ones are united in order to gain more power, more control and more advantage over the ordinary crypto guys (independent devs, miners, small pools, small exchanges...)...

Isn't it clear for everyone the circle this mafia is trying to create?!
1. Puppet developer offers new coin with no innovation or whatsoever in it. (0 - Everything is set and agreed by the parties in advance.)
2. Big pools are among the first to offer their service for mining.
3. Big multipools point the hashpower there to create "big expectations" among ordinary miners. Meanwhile - pointing 90%+ of the hash in the "right direction".
4. After 1-2 days, when multipools have already mined enough quantity - big exchanges (a hate to admit it - Bittrex seems to be on the front line) list the shitcoin to create interest.
5. Pump is created - multipools get a good pie (and then distribute just a small part of it to the ordinary miners, using MP's services). Pools get their 2% of all mined coins + decent % from transactions. Exchanges do the same...
6. I could even imagine that the rest of the big pie is furthermore divided between multipool-pool-exchange-dev.

So, I do not really think, Bittrex will add us.
We better focus on voting on Poloniex and Mintpal... And helping C-Cex, Kingcoiney, etc. to grow by trading there. Because diversity, strong competition and variety of pools, honest multipools, non-greedy exchanges - all these are the weapons to fight with mafia, monopolies and similar bad practices...
Starscream
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 20, 2014, 07:19:17 PM
 #2614

Made a thread about the various things I've read here, feel free to chime in.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=659485.0
grolll
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1014


View Profile
June 20, 2014, 07:19:43 PM
 #2615

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=497351.new#new (Bittrex)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=463202.100 (Bittrex)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=420836.1180 (Poloniex)
jc12345
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1638
Merit: 1013


View Profile
June 20, 2014, 07:19:59 PM
 #2616

Bittrex is needed and it is an excellent exchange. I must however take my hat off to C-CEX for coming to the party and maintaining their integrity under a lot of peer pressure. C-CEX did not fold and give in to the pressure. I will therefore support CCEX a lot in the future.

Bittrex however is needed and we should try to pursade them not to give in to the peer pressure and also to maintain their integrity.
bit1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 20, 2014, 07:29:11 PM
 #2617

while we are a community MIN will be raising, keep mining, positive attitude,giving support,following C-CEX,things will go well as far, MIN has inovation!!!!
coincrow
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 20, 2014, 07:39:44 PM
 #2618

Bittrex is needed and it is an excellent exchange. I must however take my hat off to C-CEX for coming to the party and maintaining their integrity under a lot of peer pressure. C-CEX did not fold and give in to the pressure. I will therefore support CCEX a lot in the future.

Bittrex however is needed and we should try to pursade them not to give in to the peer pressure and also to maintain their integrity.

I'm sure Bittrex team is watching and its just a matter of time they list Minerals.
ereborltc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 20, 2014, 07:40:53 PM
 #2619

we need to get on bittrex! this will blow up there...

Legendary / Hero Member

█████
█████   ▄▄██████▄▄
█████▄██████████████▄▄
██████████▀▀▀▀▀▀███████▄
███████▀  ▄▄██▄▄  ▀█████▄
██████   ██▀  ▀██   █████
█████▌   ██▄▄▄
█████▌    ▀▀▀███▄
 █████   ██▄  ▄██   █████
 ▀█████▄  ▀▀██▀▀  ▄█████▀
  ▀███████▄▄▄▄▄▄███████▀
    ▀▀██████████████▀▀
        ▀▀██████▀▀

.BILLSCASH.

██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
.Decentralized Microtask Platform on the Blockchain.
.With Encrypted User to User Messages.
  ───────
▄▄████████▄▄
▄████████████████▄
▄████████████████████▄
███████████████▀▀  █████
████████████▀▀      ██████
▐████████▀▀   ▄▄     ██████▌
▐████▀▀    ▄█▀▀     ███████▌
▐████████ █▀        ███████▌
████████ █ ▄███▄   ███████
████████████████▄▄██████
▀████████████████████▀
▀████████████████▀
▀▀████████▀▀
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit

LinkedIn
Github
Bfljosh
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 500


Skol!


View Profile
June 20, 2014, 07:49:16 PM
 #2620

This coin is the start of a new fair standard. Many coins will follow. Combine it with Starcraft tournaments.. BOOM! Price explosion incoming.
Pages: « 1 ... 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 [131] 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 ... 453 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!