|
|
|
|
|
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
patmast3r
|
 |
February 09, 2016, 10:29:29 AM |
|
Thanks. I was under the impression that it was an additional feature besides multi-sig. |
|
|
|
|
|
starik69
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1367
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 09, 2016, 10:39:19 PM |
|
All this 6 months thing and "we delivered what promised" thing is complete bullshit.  Because Crypti team did not delivered stable decentralized coin network.  Because most votes and thus delegates in this DPoS system belong to Crypti team themselves.  So if they leave Crypti after 6 months this network will die because of absence of delegates (Crypti team will switch off their delegates and will not care about voting for others). RIP.  Same will someday happen with Lisk  |
|
|
|
|
|
GreXX
|
|
February 09, 2016, 11:07:25 PM |
|
All this 6 months thing and "we delivered what promised" thing is complete bullshit. Because Crypti team did not delivered stable decentralized coin network. Because most votes and thus delegates in this DPoS system belong to Crypti team themselves. So if they leave Crypti after 6 months this network will die because of absence of delegates (Crypti team will switch off their delegates and will not care about voting for others). RIP. Same will someday happen with Lisk Thanks for sticking around to troll till the end, we love you Starik. |
|
|
|
|
SISAR
|
|
February 10, 2016, 09:46:13 AM |
|
So, a few idiots burned all the money they got from XCR ICO and are now moving to yet another ICO to get more money to burn. Then they will move to yet another ICO and so on, very pathetic.
So, a genius developer and a few dedicated persons developed an amazing technology, which is better than any other at the moment, and at some point two people from the team envisioned their own way of bringing this amazing tech to the world, so they're launching their own project separate from the original one. Yes? So fuck off and leave XCR alone, we don't care about your scammy coin ICOs, swaps and other deals anymore. |
|
|
|
|
|
poornamelessme
|
|
February 10, 2016, 04:53:19 PM |
|
Yes? So fuck off and leave XCR alone, we don't care about your scammy coin ICOs, swaps and other deals anymore.
I'm not sure if every XCR holder realizes this, but for all intents and purposes, after the ICO, the new XCR is Lisk. Lead dev/coder of XCR will be an adviser to Lisk, two members of foundation running Lisk, and the rest of the foundation members will just go their separate ways. XCR probably won't survive more than 6 months after the ICO (unless someone else takes control of it). This isn't rumor stuff by the way, it's all in their chat logs and posted to the public. I can see XCR people being angry, but if you hold any XCR, it's counterproductive. Either convert to Lisk, or sell your XCR pre-during the ICO. Of course those who sold their XCR already may wish to go into fud/troll-mode if they want to buy into the ICO cheaply (cheap XCR to convert then). |
|
|
|
|
|
bitseedmike
|
|
February 10, 2016, 05:27:16 PM |
|
Yes, XCR holders should convert to Lisk. As can be seen from the tables posted by Mal, the dilution is likely to be quite low, even with a lot of BTC and ETH raised. There are even some scenarios where XCR holders end up with a higher stake, but this would be non-optimal since it would mean little funding to continue development and marketing.
Those who would like to see the original version continue can purchase the XCR back at what will probably be a very low rate and proceed with developing it and running nodes. It does not cost much to operate nodes, easily 4 delegates per $8 per month Vultr server with 1 Gb RAM and 1 CPU. This is an example of how lean the Crypti code is. Operations can be extended beyond the 6 months with minimal resources by community run delegates, including myself personally, if there is interest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
starik69
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1367
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 10, 2016, 11:26:24 PM |
|
Current Crypti devs have to answer simple question: will they develop Crypti further or not?  And we need clear answer before start of Lisk ICO |
|
|
|
|
|
bitseedmike
|
|
February 11, 2016, 05:04:44 AM |
|
Current Crypti devs have to answer simple question: will they develop Crypti further or not? And we need clear answer before start of Lisk ICO Current Crypti devs will be doing no further development on Crypti. We are encouraging people to convert over to Lisk. Since we are advising people to do this we cannot ethically do further development on Crypti to give it more value after the Lisk ICO. Any new development on the base Crypti platform or creation of new dapps for it will have to be community generated. We are maintaining Crypti for 6 months to allow people to join in and continue with it if they prefer the original version, or even take it in a different direction than Lisk. |
|
|
|
starik69
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1367
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 11, 2016, 10:44:55 AM |
|
Current Crypti devs will be doing no further development on Crypti.
Who are you? I would like to hear the same from TS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
wosch76
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 942
Merit: 1026
|
|
February 11, 2016, 10:15:06 PM |
|
when will the crypti blockchain move again?
or is it just me?
|
|
|
|
|
|
wosch76
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 942
Merit: 1026
|
|
February 12, 2016, 01:09:18 PM |
|
good. blockchain seems ok.
but why is the blockchain 2-3 days behind in webwallet?
in lite client it's even worse.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bitseedmike
|
|
February 12, 2016, 07:57:48 PM |
|
good. blockchain seems ok.
but why is the blockchain 2-3 days behind in webwallet?
in lite client it's even worse.
We're working the delegate forging first, then work from there. The Lite Wallet often connects to a node running an out of date version of Crypti. To anyone running delegates, please check the version of your software. It should be 0.5.4. |
|
|
|
|
tranzactionezlive
|
|
February 12, 2016, 09:36:19 PM
Last edit: February 12, 2016, 10:34:33 PM by tranzactionezlive |
|
I command you to instate POW. I urge you to initiate pow. Much insight.
You are welcome for your appreciation.
I'm sure that with your minds you can figure the right algo and the right ( small ) amount of coins to be mined in surplus to what exists at the moment.
An example : 10 minute blocks with 3 year block halving, or a 7.77% / 9.81% block reduction every 6 months. 1million coins mined in the first six months. Another idea would be halving every 2 years and the 7.77% reduction every 6 months,thus urging people to mine.
Let's not forget that mining is what drives the hives. And vice-versa. $o good.
Oh. Ticker should be changed.CTI or CRI or ICR or YCR ( maybe best ) or CRT. Maybe even CRY. maybe a CRY would bring people attention. Much CRY, very loud.
I would pick between ICR, YCR and CRY. I used to think back when i was hypnotized that person a would tell person b " i will give you some ... ". So, I SEE R i think is better then Why See R which is better than CRY which may not be better than EX SEE R. But the first two are better than EX SEE R.
The only good thing starting with an X would be EX SEED or XEED XSEED etc, as in exceed. the others are EX, as in former, which is not good.
Too many stuff starting with X and if you were assesing it's some sort of magnet, it was then, before a shitload of .. coins, started using X as their first letter, and before metcalf..pooped.
|
|
|
|
|
|
bitseedmike
|
|
February 13, 2016, 05:41:36 AM |
|
Actually I'd like to see Crypti go back to Proof of Time. While I originally suggested DPoS as an alternative to PoT/Proof of Spend, I would have rather corrected the scaling problem with PoT. Now that future development work of the current version of Crypti is continuing with Lisk, work could continue with the original PoT version after the Lisk ICO is complete if people in the community are interested in working on it.
|
|
|
|
|
