[XCR] Crypti | Dapps | Sidechains | Dapp Store | OPEN SOURCE | 100% own code | DPoS

[CoinHolder]

For me forging should be increased to 10000-20000 Xcr. 1000 is very small no volume at all.

[1714942886]

1714942886

[1714942886]

1714942886

[1714942886]

1714942886

[jari76]

For me forging should be increased to 10000-20000 Xcr. 1000 is very small no volume at all.

i dont get what you mean, forging is the way the network is kept online, increasing the limit only lessensreduces the amount op people forging

[jiuge]

I think there should some plan for the third party check the source code,I think it is responsible for our investors.We like this project,but still need some official proof.
@Dev What do you think?
We don't want to copy and make clone so a professional 3rd party is a good choice,anyway.
Regards

[crypti]

I think there should some plan for the third party check the source code,I think it is responsible for our investors.We like this project,but still need some official proof.
@Dev What do you think?
We don't want to copy and make clone so a professional 3rd party is a good choice,anyway.
Regards

We already contacted authoritative members of community to source code review and audit.
We discuss conditions, NDA and etc now.

[i.shad0w]

I don't know why the price is dropping.Looks like things are going smooth,who dump their coin?

[CoinHolder]

For me forging should be increased to 10000-20000 Xcr. 1000 is very small no volume at all.

i dont get what you mean, forging is the way the network is kept online, increasing the limit only lessensreduces the amount op people forging

Amount would be the same because price will increase if you need 10000xcr for forging and forging will be more profitable (more nodes) if price will be higher.

[atleticofa]

I don't know why the price is dropping.Looks like things are going smooth,who dump their coin?

You can ask the same question for Bitcoin.

And you will have the same answer: manipulation.

[GreXX]

@GreXX

Do you have any update for the roadmap : http://blog.crypti.me/crypti-development-roadmap/ ?

You mentioned that you were going to do a more in depth write up of the roadmap.

I have the descriptions prepared. Sending to SyRenity for review prior to posting to make sure theres nothing in there we don't want to put out yet. Then I will add it to the roadmap document at the bottom. Should be this weekend.

[GreXX]

Until the source code is not released I can't see this coin succeed. Bitcoin is a completely open source sentiment. When greedy people try to make money on the great work/idea of Satoshi Nakamoto with all kind of closed source projects, then the backbone of the market, the original BTC community doesn't like that, and therefore you don't make a lot money. With your greedy attitude your price will stagnate, max you will get 1-2 pumps and then go back to the original level. With the right attitude your price would be already 30k and could stay there.

Be transparent, don't be greedy, release your source code.

Crypti is a totally new code, so it has nothing to do with bitcoin.

Yes genius, I got that the Nodejs code base of Crypti has nothing to do with the Bitcoin source. I wouldn't assume you Javascript guys would comfortable coding in C anyway. I was talking about the general concept of crypto currency and the open source sentiment that had a decisive role in the success of Bitcoin and consequently alt crypto currencies. If Bitcoin would not be successful as it is then ppl like yourself with your closed source project wouldn't be able to fuck around to get out your few BTCs from the altcoin market.

And OS will only cause clones etc.

Precisely. That's what happened to the work of Linus Torvalds and Satoshi Nakamoto. That's why we have this forum software, many applications on your computers not to mention NodeJs, the completely open source framework that your shit is based on.

If you do not like that we are not OS go find a other coin that is so you wouldnt have to nag here.

No, I don't like you try to make a few bucks with your closed source software in the open sourced crypto currency world. You are here for the dollar, you asked the money from investors by publishing your project in this forum, therefore as I am an investor in this forum you have to put up with my opinion about greedy fuckers like yourself. As simple as that.

Now lets get to the point, when are you going to release your source code?

Perhaps you should try reading through and finding the information before insulting the community here? It was posted from day 1 that the source would be released quarterly to give us time to finish vital features before releasing the source to our competition to create clones. If you have a problem with the way we are going about it, that is your opinion and you are allowed to have it.

That being said, we will under no circumstances change our timeline or initial stance because of it. The source will be released when we release it and that is pretty much all there is to it.

You can call us greedy, I don't care. Go back 100-200 pages in this thread and every person on here was throwing around accusations and calling us greedy and scammers. I am happy to say that most of them are investors now and huge members of the community.

This project will still be around when you aren't, it will be much bigger than you think it will be, and we are ok with being stagnant or under the radar for now. We don't want the exposure really until custom block chain functionality is out next month.

In the meantime, we are in the final stages of negotiations for the code audit which will prove our code is unique to those who are still holding out.

Your belligerence here does nothing for you. There are positive ways to criticize and discuss your dislike for the 3 month waiting period for the source.

[GreXX]

Yes genius, I got that the Nodejs code base of Crypti has nothing to do with the Bitcoin source. I wouldn't assume you Javascript guys would comfortable coding in C anyway. I was talking about the general concept of crypto currency and the open source sentiment that had a decisive role in the success of Bitcoin and consequently alt crypto currencies. If Bitcoin would not be successful as it is then ppl like yourself with your closed source project wouldn't be able to fuck around to get out your few BTCs from the altcoin market.

The general concept of crypto currency is change. You are trying to apply bitcoin and clonecoin prinicples to a second generation crypto.

You simple can't opensource a pure PoS coin from the beginning, because you will have clones the same day. As they don't depend on hashing power to secure the network the clone will be as secure as the original. So if you publish the code right away you shooting yourself in the foot. You need at least a few months of lead time until your community have time to mature.

Not one PoS coin published the source from day one, and not one will.

You don't even understand the "second generation crypto" market dynamics what you referring to. The greed makes you blind and you ignore the reality. Otherwise you would understand that open sourced "second generation crypto" projects like Ethereum with its 20 miilion US$ makes money despite they are open sourced and comply with the very fundamental principle of Satoshi Nakamoto. Go to github and grab their source if you want, they don't care. You do, because you are greedy.  

I fully get that you are here for the dollar, and generally speaking nothing wrong with that. It's just shameful that the greed of these East-European developers like the Crypti ppl disrupts to the open source idea of crypto currencies. The scams associated with greedy developers makes the general acceptance of crypto currencies more difficult. I understand in Siberia the moral has no meaning, the East-European/Chinese culture is built around greed and money, but if you take from the community you should always give back too - in this case in the form of open source software.

Well in their defense, they have $20 million. All of their code isn't available. They have a ton of in development work that hasn't seen the light of day. The simple functionality that will be the backbone of their currency is public but most of their network is built off of established PoW concepts that are already open source anyways. Crypti is completely different. Literally nothing like it exists right now.

[Wulfcastle]

@GreXX

Do you have any update for the roadmap : http://blog.crypti.me/crypti-development-roadmap/ ?

You mentioned that you were going to do a more in depth write up of the roadmap.

Any update GreXX?

[imd1]

@GreXX

Do you have any update for the roadmap : http://blog.crypti.me/crypti-development-roadmap/ ?

You mentioned that you were going to do a more in depth write up of the roadmap.

Any update GreXX?

GreXX replied above. check this :
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=654463.msg8583327#msg8583327

[Wulfcastle]

@GreXX

Do you have any update for the roadmap : http://blog.crypti.me/crypti-development-roadmap/ ?

You mentioned that you were going to do a more in depth write up of the roadmap.

Any update GreXX?

GreXX replied above. check this :
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=654463.msg8583327#msg8583327

Ah okay, thanks ☺

[Passion_ltc]

A first go-to point. http://crypti.ws/

I'm currently thinking about several project ideas. But for these I need more API information and calls.

[Wulfcastle]

A first go-to point. http://crypti.ws/

I'm currently thinking about several project ideas. But for these I need more API information and calls.

Great work bud. Could you open-source it to GitHub so that we can help contribute to it as well?

[Passion_ltc]

A first go-to point. http://crypti.ws/

I'm currently thinking about several project ideas. But for these I need more API information and calls.

Great work bud. Could you open-source it to GitHub so that we can help contribute to it as well?

What do you want to open-source? The project I want to start or the current crypti.ws?

[Wulfcastle]

A first go-to point. http://crypti.ws/

I'm currently thinking about several project ideas. But for these I need more API information and calls.

Great work bud. Could you open-source it to GitHub so that we can help contribute to it as well?

What do you want to open-source? The project I want to start or the current crypti.ws?

The current Crypti.ws, I could push a few commits to the website and help you tidy it up a bit. 

[Passion_ltc]

A first go-to point. http://crypti.ws/

I'm currently thinking about several project ideas. But for these I need more API information and calls.

Great work bud. Could you open-source it to GitHub so that we can help contribute to it as well?

What do you want to open-source? The project I want to start or the current crypti.ws?

The current Crypti.ws, I could push a few commits to the website and help you tidy it up a bit. 

Just write me the commits in private or via the contact formular. We can also write via skype if you want.

[Wulfcastle]

A first go-to point. http://crypti.ws/

I'm currently thinking about several project ideas. But for these I need more API information and calls.

Great work bud. Could you open-source it to GitHub so that we can help contribute to it as well?

What do you want to open-source? The project I want to start or the current crypti.ws?

The current Crypti.ws, I could push a few commits to the website and help you tidy it up a bit. 

Just write me the commits in private or via the contact formular. We can also write via skype if you want.

Great, I'll send you the commits later on tonight.

[atleticofa]

LOL crazy people selling at 1500 satoshis