staykc
Member
 Offline
Activity: 71
Merit: 10
Life is but a dream within a dream
|
 |
June 04, 2017, 07:43:09 AM |
|
It's high time fees in various exchanges should be lowered.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Bitcoin: mining our own business since 2009" -- Pieter Wuille
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gatilocoin
Member
Offline
Activity: 116
Merit: 10
|
|
June 04, 2017, 09:23:31 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
kocodile
Member
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
|
|
June 04, 2017, 04:47:37 PM |
|
i love this shit i want be a beta tester any link? |
|
|
|
|
CurlyBrace
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
June 04, 2017, 07:36:35 PM |
|
XEM are already stock @9k plus price. Is there a chance that it will pump next week?
Probably won't be any major changes in price until catapult. Why next week? |
|
|
|
|
schnötzel
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1041
Bitcoin is a bit**
|
|
June 04, 2017, 08:18:52 PM |
|
XEM are already stock @9k plus price. Is there a chance that it will pump next week?
Probably won't be any major changes in price until catapult. Why next week? He needs money for vacation next week  But NEM will rise...for sure! |
|
|
|
|
|
ch3llov3k
|
|
June 05, 2017, 01:18:49 AM |
|
Everyone is waiting for catapult I hope it will pups some gaZZZzzzz |
|
|
|
|
|
n3lz0n
|
|
June 05, 2017, 01:21:04 AM |
|
|
Go Bitcoin !!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
AceStep
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
June 05, 2017, 03:15:10 AM |
|
Hey what are the future plans for XEM, you guys have been making some serious progress just wondering what is next?
|
|
|
|
|
|
btcdiggingmaster
|
|
June 05, 2017, 07:06:01 AM |
|
This news makes more excitement in the market as NEM dev are kept working for future developments of the project. So in future, we have our own forum for spreading the news about XEM/NEM. Very good to know about it. |
|
|
|
|
Pamadar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2982
Merit: 1028
|
|
June 05, 2017, 09:15:53 AM |
|
This news makes more excitement in the market as NEM dev are kept working for future developments of the project. So in future, we have our own forum for spreading the news about XEM/NEM. Very good to know about it. yes this news will bring more and more new people to support nem as progress is ongoing and more news are spreading we will expect a much higher value in this coming days, good call to buy for sure it will not go down between 8-9k lets bring it on NEM team... |
|
|
|
|
revelacaogr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1021
2009 Alea iacta est
|
|
June 05, 2017, 09:49:43 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEMergizer
|
|
June 05, 2017, 12:30:58 PM |
|
With all respect to Albert and Atraura Organization, I am totally and completely against funding any third party organization using NEM funds. NEM funds should only get spent to expand the NEM dev team internally "NOT EXTERNALLY". Any third party organization can create their own crowd funding away from NEM dev funds. Moreover, the requested 15 Million XEM seems too high compared to the proposed solution. |
|
|
|
|
|
jor77
|
|
June 05, 2017, 12:39:07 PM |
|
With all respect to Albert and Atraura Organization, I am totally and completely against funding any third party organization using NEM funds. NEM funds should only get spent to expand the NEM dev team internally "NOT EXTERNALLY". Any third party organization can create their own crowd funding away from NEM dev funds.
Totally agree with this! Only internal use! |
|
|
|
|
gatilocoin
Member
Offline
Activity: 116
Merit: 10
|
|
June 05, 2017, 01:03:40 PM |
|
With all respect to Albert and Atraura Organization, I am totally and completely against funding any third party organization using NEM funds. NEM funds should only get spent to expand the NEM dev team internally "NOT EXTERNALLY". Any third party organization can create their own crowd funding away from NEM dev funds.
Totally agree with this! Only internal use! And I agree. Better 15 million XEM ( 3 329 355 $) to spend to expand the development team, a lot of smart advertising, creating videos and stuff. This is the basis and it is not enough. For this money, can win the hearts of all potential investors and make it so that they are satisfied with the economy NEM. Just see how the companies were built: Apple, Microsoft, Facebook, Tesla. Aggressive advertising and smart technologies. The Ethereum is gaining speed and soon there will be number 1. NEM system better Ethereum. We need to act aggressively. While there is time. |
|
|
|
|
gentlemand
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3013
Welt Am Draht
|
|
June 05, 2017, 01:05:25 PM |
|
With all respect to Albert and Atraura Organization, I am totally and completely against funding any third party organization using NEM funds. NEM funds should only get spent to expand the NEM dev team internally "NOT EXTERNALLY". Any third party organization can create their own crowd funding away from NEM dev funds.
Totally agree with this! Only internal use! That's ridiculous. There aren't very many of them and they're busy people and not exactly the most reactive or accessible bunch. There's a mountain of money waiting to be used to improve NEM. If an outsider can do it then it should be allocated. Ideas come from everywhere. I have no clue or opinion about this project, but for instance the upcoming Trezor integration comes from an outside programmer. He did a deal and is being paid by developer funds as far as I know. It's a vast benefit to everyone that wouldn't otherwise have happened. And this project isn't asking for all the funds upfront anyway. |
|
|
|
|
|
Scharfenberger
|
|
June 05, 2017, 01:08:37 PM |
|
With all respect to Albert and Atraura Organization, I am totally and completely against funding any third party organization using NEM funds. NEM funds should only get spent to expand the NEM dev team internally "NOT EXTERNALLY". Any third party organization can create their own crowd funding away from NEM dev funds.
Totally agree with this! Only internal use! It depends!!!! Before we dismiss this opportunity, what kind of contract would be created between NEM and this third party? In case they'd receive NEM funding, we should ask if they solely rely on NEM or on other platforms, too. If they only and entirely (!) rely on NEM, then I see no difference, why they should get treated differently in comparison to any other start-up that uses NEM. (Regardless the funding they're asking for at this stage as this should be questioned later on) Just my two NEMs! |
|
|
|
|
|
gadado
|
|
June 05, 2017, 01:43:42 PM |
|
15 million XEM is a lot to ask especially if you consider that the value of a XEM likely will still grow a good way in the comming months. So we are not talking just about 3 mil dollars which is already a lot but given time a lot more.
I can't judge Atraura because I don't know them but the request of such a sum for a more or less open outcome rises a question mark to me.
I dont really see the benefit of
"Our goal: Create the best open source framework for blockchain development."
When it is done by a third party. That might ask for trouble. My question would be how you maintain this after the project phase is over. How do you keep it up to date with the core development?
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEMergizer
|
|
June 05, 2017, 01:45:22 PM |
|
With all respect to Albert and Atraura Organization, I am totally and completely against funding any third party organization using NEM funds. NEM funds should only get spent to expand the NEM dev team internally "NOT EXTERNALLY". Any third party organization can create their own crowd funding away from NEM dev funds.
Totally agree with this! Only internal use! That's ridiculous. There aren't very many of them and they're busy people and not exactly the most reactive or accessible bunch. There's a mountain of money waiting to be used to improve NEM. If an outsider can do it then it should be allocated. Ideas come from everywhere. I have no clue or opinion about this project, but for instance the upcoming Trezor integration comes from an outside programmer. He did a deal and is being paid by developer funds as far as I know. It's a vast benefit to everyone that wouldn't otherwise have happened. And this project isn't asking for all the funds upfront anyway. Trezor is a different story and it is considered a lite project. It was a request from the NEM community not a request form a third party organization for funding. Totally different story. Please make sure to evaluate and compare apple to apple. |
|
|
|
|
|
NEMergizer
|
|
June 05, 2017, 01:55:59 PM |
|
I would rather vote for NEM funds to be spent on new internal researches then looking for dev teams around the world to apply and develop new NEM technologies. Similar to what ETC is doing now. Any external requests for funds is a red red red flag!
Consider all the failing insecure Ethereum dapps that just sucked money from crowd funding. NEM dev funds should never get trapped in any sort of crowd funding for projects or Dapps that operates on NEM unless the project/research is a core NEM piece that initially been developed internally by the NEM dev team. Only then we can vote.
A third party request for funds should not even open the door for any sort of voting! I would rather vote and debate such principal first.
|
|
|
|
|
|
