Bitcoin Forum
April 24, 2024, 01:44:01 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 1893 1894 1895 1896 1897 1898 1899 1900 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916 1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940 1941 1942 [1943] 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 »
  Print  
Author Topic: NEM (XEM) Official Thread - 100% New Code - Easy To Use APIs  (Read 2984060 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
tyz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3360
Merit: 1530



View Profile
December 30, 2019, 08:43:02 PM
 #38841

Do I have to have XEM coins in personal wallet to receive same amount of new SYM coins? or can I just stay on the online exchange and receive the new SYM coins?

Since there has not been a forking date released yet, there are no information about whether and which exchanges will support the fork. Those information will surely be released before the fork. To make sure, however, you should hold your coins in your wallet.
1713923041
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713923041

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713923041
Reply with quote  #2

1713923041
Report to moderator
"Bitcoin: the cutting edge of begging technology." -- Giraffe.BTC
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713923041
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713923041

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713923041
Reply with quote  #2

1713923041
Report to moderator
gembira
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 508



View Profile
December 31, 2019, 07:11:07 AM
 #38842

Do I have to have XEM coins in personal wallet to receive same amount of new SYM coins? or can I just stay on the online exchange and receive the new SYM coins?

Since there has not been a forking date released yet, there are no information about whether and which exchanges will support the fork. Those information will surely be released before the fork. To make sure, however, you should hold your coins in your wallet.

Why they don't have any date of release? As far as I know Catapult launch should be launched in this year... But it seems they postponed release again?
1billionthgenius
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 31, 2019, 03:39:16 PM
 #38843

Do I have to have XEM coins in personal wallet to receive same amount of new SYM coins? or can I just stay on the online exchange and receive the new SYM coins?

I think it would be a good idea to have Your coins in a personal wallet.  Then You can choose to opt in early or wait until later.  No exchanges have said they will do the swap for their customers, and since it is opt in it will be very complicated for them to do so. 

ok, Thanks guys
lavenderp
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 26
Merit: 1


View Profile
January 03, 2020, 11:51:36 AM
 #38844

did the deep pockets form japan? dump on nem 2018? and core devs forgot to exit?
satb
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 202
Merit: 30

forum.nem.io


View Profile WWW
January 03, 2020, 01:40:54 PM
Last edit: January 04, 2020, 06:00:12 AM by satb
 #38845

The first draft of the Catapult whitepaper is ready for review:

https://nemtech.github.io/catapult-whitepaper/main.pdf

Preview:

"NEM had its humble beginnings as a ”call for participation” on a bitcointalk
thread in January 2014. The cryptospace had just experienced a boom at the
tail end of 2013 - although nowhere near where it would go a few years later
- and there was a lot of enthusiasm in the space. NXT had just launched as
one of the first PoS blockchains, and much of the early NEM community was inspired by
and had connections to the NXT community. This includes all three of the remaining core
developers.

Although there was some initial discussion on what to build, we quickly decided to
create something new from scratch. We wanted to challenge ourselves and see if we could
build something useful. As a result of lots of effort - mostly nights and weekends - this
culminated in the release of NIS1 mainnet in March 2015.We were pleased with what we
built, but knew we took a few shortcuts, and continued improving it. Eventually, we came
to the realization that the original solution would need a rearchitecture to fix some central
performance bottlenecks and allow faster innovation in the future.

We are grateful to TechBureau who provided support for us to build a completely new
chain from scratch - Catapult. We are hopeful that this fixes many of the problems inherent
in NIS1 and provides a solid foundation for future improvements and enhancements. Our
mandate was to build a high performance *blockchain* - not a DAG or dBFT based
system. In this, we think, we succeeded.

This has been a long journey for us, and we hope this is the last blockchain that we
build from scratch. We are excited to see what yet is to come and what novel things you
use Catapult to build. We would like to once again thank the contributors and the many
people who have inspired us. . .

Trustless, high-performance, layered-architecture, blockchain-based DLT protocol -
these are the first principles that influenced the development of Catapult.
While other DLT protocols were considered, including DAG and
dBFT, blockchain was quickly chosen as the protocol most true to the ideal of
trustlessness. Any node can download a complete copy of the chain and can independently
verify it at all times. Nodes with sufficient harvesting power can always create blocks and
never need to rely on a leader. These choices necessarily sacrifice some throughput relative
to other protocols, but they seem most consistent with the philosophical underpinnings of
Bitcoin.

As part of a focus on trustlessness, the following features were added relative to NEM: -
Block headers can be synced without transaction data, while allowing verification of chain
integrity - Transaction merkle trees allow cryptographic proofs of transaction containment
(or not) within blocks - Receipts increase the transparency of indirectly triggered state
changes - State proofs allow trustless verification of specific state within the blockchain. . ."

https://nemtech.github.io/catapult-whitepaper/main.pdf

tyz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3360
Merit: 1530



View Profile
January 03, 2020, 08:58:40 PM
 #38846

The first draft of the Catapult whitepaper is ready for review:

https://nemtech.github.io/catapult-whitepaper/main.pdf
....

Thanks for sharing!
Better quote the preview or you could be banned for plagiarizing.
1billionthgenius
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 05, 2020, 05:24:13 AM
 #38847

Do I have to have XEM coins in personal wallet to receive same amount of new SYM coins? or can I just stay on the online exchange and receive the new SYM coins?

I think it would be a good idea to have Your coins in a personal wallet.  Then You can choose to opt in early or wait until later.  No exchanges have said they will do the swap for their customers, and since it is opt in it will be very complicated for them to do so. 

ok, Thanks guys

Where can we opt in to participate in the swap please?
lemonandfriesonetwo
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 652
Merit: 11


View Profile
January 05, 2020, 04:22:04 PM
 #38848

The first draft of the Catapult whitepaper is ready for review:



"First draft", 3 years later and this is the best they can come up with. Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Are they going to release the new coin in phases also? When is phase 1?  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Pay attention to the warnings.
JanpriX
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1708
Merit: 606

Buy The F*cking Dip


View Profile
January 06, 2020, 01:22:51 AM
 #38849

ICYMI: NEM won for Extensibility (Scaling) in the Blockchain Mainnet Platform category and Council Member Jeff McDonald won the Blockchain Industry's Best Leader at the recent Decentralized People's Awards 2019 held in Korea.


Code: (RESOURCES)
Blockfolio Signal
https://tokenpost.com/TokenPost-identifies-and-awards-blockchain-and-crypto-trailblazers-in-DPA-2019-4592
lemonandfriesonetwo
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 652
Merit: 11


View Profile
January 06, 2020, 09:57:19 AM
 #38850

Anybody paying attention to the silver coin fund?

https://forum.nem.io/t/silver-coin-project/2827

It is over 200 million NEM!!

What will happen with this? Did the scammers that took over NEM lose access to the account and now are trying to pass off this Symbol coin as a NEM rebirth so they can have access to the lost funds?

What about Makoto? Why did he abandon NEM and is now working full time on his own project SORA?

Why did all the original developers cash out their NEM funds and are now working on their own projects?

More mysterious questions about NEM foundation true intentions and origins (hint: the NEM foundation of today just showed up one day and offered their managing services, they were never part of the original stake holders or team)
gsxrl3oi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 315
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 07, 2020, 01:51:09 AM
Last edit: January 07, 2020, 02:48:20 AM by gsxrl3oi
 #38851

quit the nonsense just distribute the silver funds to the original stakeholders that's the best way. We have been here since the
beginning trying and testing the tech before it went live. We deserve it. you have the list.

i feel like nem funds are being hijacked to further another project.
How about the original stakeholders get the same amount of CAT as well.
Now they're using nem money to enrich themselves. (I can be wrong of course).
Re-branding NEM means they created something new will that mean now they have full say and
control of NEM funds?
It must be nice to fund projects not using your own money to begin with.
gramufibus
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54
Merit: 2


View Profile
January 09, 2020, 06:41:57 PM
 #38852

From the final development contract notice dated March 31st 2015 (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_0Z9jDGHPxPbndmbm96eW1XaEk/view)

2.1.2 Silver Coins for Distribution to Initial Stakeholders

Based on community consensus, physical silver coins will be minted and distributed
to initial NEM stakeholders .


The silver coins shall be distributed as an asset (colored coin), effectively giving all
initial stakeholders a parallel, silver-backed digital currency that shall reside on the
NEM blockchain. To claim one physical silver coin, one whole silver coin asset is
needed.
Note: ​The execution of the silver coin project is not guaranteed and will only proceed
providing that XEM market cap and liquidity are sufficient to cover the expenses with
the allocated stakes. If this condition is met, all initial stakeholders will be issued
their silver coin asset. If the allocated stakes do not reach a high enough value to
fund the project (to pay the mint and cover all costs [shipping costs etc.]) until V1 is
released, the complete fund will be transferred to the community fund. "A high
enough value" can not be exactly fixed at this time, but to get a feeling: it is
estimated that the fund should reach at least USD 260,000 to be successful.

There are 211,885,446.63 XEM in the Silver Coins for Distribution to Stakeholders - - Dev-Fund

Even at today's price that is worth approx $7.5M (more than the $260K noted above).

If this was distributed to the original stake holders, they would get a few thousand dollars worth of coins each.



I hadn't read this, or perhaps I just forgot.  Honestly a physical silver coin shipped to remaining original stakeholders with access to their accounts is logistically messy.  As much as it would be great to just split up the xem and send send it to original stake accounts,  it seems like adding the silver fund to the community fund is inevitable.
fragout
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1279
Merit: 1018


View Profile
January 10, 2020, 12:22:19 AM
 #38853

From the final development contract notice dated March 31st 2015 (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_0Z9jDGHPxPbndmbm96eW1XaEk/view)

2.1.2 Silver Coins for Distribution to Initial Stakeholders

Based on community consensus, physical silver coins will be minted and distributed
to initial NEM stakeholders .


The silver coins shall be distributed as an asset (colored coin), effectively giving all
initial stakeholders a parallel, silver-backed digital currency that shall reside on the
NEM blockchain. To claim one physical silver coin, one whole silver coin asset is
needed.
Note: ​The execution of the silver coin project is not guaranteed and will only proceed
providing that XEM market cap and liquidity are sufficient to cover the expenses with
the allocated stakes. If this condition is met, all initial stakeholders will be issued
their silver coin asset. If the allocated stakes do not reach a high enough value to
fund the project (to pay the mint and cover all costs [shipping costs etc.]) until V1 is
released, the complete fund will be transferred to the community fund. "A high
enough value" can not be exactly fixed at this time, but to get a feeling: it is
estimated that the fund should reach at least USD 260,000 to be successful.

There are 211,885,446.63 XEM in the Silver Coins for Distribution to Stakeholders - - Dev-Fund

Even at today's price that is worth approx $7.5M (more than the $260K noted above).

If this was distributed to the original stake holders, they would get a few thousand dollars worth of coins each.



I hadn't read this, or perhaps I just forgot.  Honestly a physical silver coin shipped to remaining original stakeholders with access to their accounts is logistically messy.  As much as it would be great to just split up the xem and send send it to original stake accounts,  it seems like adding the silver fund to the community fund is inevitable.


I agree the actual silvercoin thing is not a runner anymore but the fund should then be given back to the original stakeholders as it was taken from their original allocation in the first place.
 What I suspect will happen though is noting and the fund will rot in the old Nem chain. The new catapult chain will have no such allocations. So they will grab all the dev funds, silvercoin funds, unclaimed stake funds and every other coin that is not claimed on the new chain.
The big flaw in their logic though is they will probably end up killing the whole Nem project and all these millions of coins will be worth zip.
boomboom
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1068
Merit: 523



View Profile
January 10, 2020, 01:56:50 AM
 #38854

From the final development contract notice dated March 31st 2015 (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_0Z9jDGHPxPbndmbm96eW1XaEk/view)

2.1.2 Silver Coins for Distribution to Initial Stakeholders

Based on community consensus, physical silver coins will be minted and distributed
to initial NEM stakeholders .


The silver coins shall be distributed as an asset (colored coin), effectively giving all
initial stakeholders a parallel, silver-backed digital currency that shall reside on the
NEM blockchain. To claim one physical silver coin, one whole silver coin asset is
needed.
Note: ​The execution of the silver coin project is not guaranteed and will only proceed
providing that XEM market cap and liquidity are sufficient to cover the expenses with
the allocated stakes. If this condition is met, all initial stakeholders will be issued
their silver coin asset. If the allocated stakes do not reach a high enough value to
fund the project (to pay the mint and cover all costs [shipping costs etc.]) until V1 is
released, the complete fund will be transferred to the community fund. "A high
enough value" can not be exactly fixed at this time, but to get a feeling: it is
estimated that the fund should reach at least USD 260,000 to be successful.

There are 211,885,446.63 XEM in the Silver Coins for Distribution to Stakeholders - - Dev-Fund

Even at today's price that is worth approx $7.5M (more than the $260K noted above).

If this was distributed to the original stake holders, they would get a few thousand dollars worth of coins each.



I hadn't read this, or perhaps I just forgot.  Honestly a physical silver coin shipped to remaining original stakeholders with access to their accounts is logistically messy.  As much as it would be great to just split up the xem and send send it to original stake accounts,  it seems like adding the silver fund to the community fund is inevitable.


I agree the actual silvercoin thing is not a runner anymore but the fund should then be given back to the original stakeholders as it was taken from their original allocation in the first place.
 What I suspect will happen though is noting and the fund will rot in the old Nem chain. The new catapult chain will have no such allocations. So they will grab all the dev funds, silvercoin funds, unclaimed stake funds and every other coin that is not claimed on the new chain.
The big flaw in their logic though is they will probably end up killing the whole Nem project and all these millions of coins will be worth zip.

Who thinks they have the authority to change the original silver coin plan, why don't they show themselves ...

The original stakeholders own the funds, who exactly is planning this theft, what are their names?
schnötzel
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1041

Bitcoin is a bit**


View Profile
January 10, 2020, 10:36:16 AM
 #38855

Maybe  "LauraBKK", but unfortunately she ´s "Mrs incapable".
satb
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 202
Merit: 30

forum.nem.io


View Profile WWW
January 10, 2020, 12:54:13 PM
 #38856

Public testnet and Symbol (Catapult) Launch

https://forum.nem.io/t/public-testnet-and-symbol-launch/24154

jelin1984
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408
Merit: 1004



View Profile
January 10, 2020, 01:47:44 PM
 #38857

http://explorer.nemtech.network/blocks

run super smooth Kiss
DenisZabar
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 614
Merit: 254



View Profile WWW
January 10, 2020, 10:20:57 PM
 #38858

From the final development contract notice dated March 31st 2015 (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_0Z9jDGHPxPbndmbm96eW1XaEk/view)

2.1.2 Silver Coins for Distribution to Initial Stakeholders

Based on community consensus, physical silver coins will be minted and distributed
to initial NEM stakeholders .


The silver coins shall be distributed as an asset (colored coin), effectively giving all
initial stakeholders a parallel, silver-backed digital currency that shall reside on the
NEM blockchain. To claim one physical silver coin, one whole silver coin asset is
needed.
Note: ​The execution of the silver coin project is not guaranteed and will only proceed
providing that XEM market cap and liquidity are sufficient to cover the expenses with
the allocated stakes. If this condition is met, all initial stakeholders will be issued
their silver coin asset. If the allocated stakes do not reach a high enough value to
fund the project (to pay the mint and cover all costs [shipping costs etc.]) until V1 is
released, the complete fund will be transferred to the community fund. "A high
enough value" can not be exactly fixed at this time, but to get a feeling: it is
estimated that the fund should reach at least USD 260,000 to be successful.

There are 211,885,446.63 XEM in the Silver Coins for Distribution to Stakeholders - - Dev-Fund

Even at today's price that is worth approx $7.5M (more than the $260K noted above).

If this was distributed to the original stake holders, they would get a few thousand dollars worth of coins each.



I hadn't read this, or perhaps I just forgot.  Honestly a physical silver coin shipped to remaining original stakeholders with access to their accounts is logistically messy.  As much as it would be great to just split up the xem and send send it to original stake accounts,  it seems like adding the silver fund to the community fund is inevitable.


I agree the actual silvercoin thing is not a runner anymore but the fund should then be given back to the original stakeholders as it was taken from their original allocation in the first place.
 What I suspect will happen though is noting and the fund will rot in the old Nem chain. The new catapult chain will have no such allocations. So they will grab all the dev funds, silvercoin funds, unclaimed stake funds and every other coin that is not claimed on the new chain.
The big flaw in their logic though is they will probably end up killing the whole Nem project and all these millions of coins will be worth zip.

They already killing it slowly. Price is dropping and people dumping every day this coin

https://global.bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-XEM
 

lemonandfriesonetwo
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 652
Merit: 11


View Profile
January 10, 2020, 10:29:24 PM
 #38859

The new NEM chain (CATAPULT or SYM or whatever that XRP wannabe is) will be completely centralized and private.

Give back the silver coin fund to the angel investors!

The fake NEM Foundation is robbing everyone from their NEM!  Angry
gentlemand
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2590
Merit: 3008


Welt Am Draht


View Profile
January 10, 2020, 11:26:35 PM
 #38860

I cannae believe the silver fund thing is still being discussed. There are rather more important things to be focusing on such as whether this project and its descendant has a future other than oblivion.

My own take on the silver thing is I never handed over any money for it or felt any ownership of it, I just got 70-75,000 less XEM and stakeholders paid chump change for what they did receive.

I seem to recall saying it was a fucking stupid idea at the time and my opinion has not wavered. It's been pathetically handled but it'll soon be five years ago and since then literally nothing has been done about it so it clearly never will by this point. They'll intend for the idea of it to fade away. I won't particularly care for one.



Pages: « 1 ... 1893 1894 1895 1896 1897 1898 1899 1900 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916 1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940 1941 1942 [1943] 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!