Prove to me that you have any Coins.
I don't. I'd be even more of an idiot than those who are ignoring the serious issues this coin has if I were to buy some when I already know that these issues are indicators of it being scammy.
Also calling something a scam and publishing without proof is slander. Any losses, anyone here can sue you for. Tread lightly.
HAhahahahahaaaaaaaaaaa! Kid, really, your mask is slipping. Go ask a grown-up what 'slander' means.
Libel, which is the legal term you are actually scrabbling for, is only applicable if it can be proven I knowingly wrote false statements with the intent of harming your reputation maliciously. Given that I have already clearly stated my reasons for declaring this coin a scam, and that those reasons are more than sufficient a justification for me to believe this coin to be a scam, you don't have a leg to stand on legally.
As for asserting that any losses incurred by people who buy this coin would be my liability, well, you're living in La-La-Land if you think that's anywhere near a realistic fact.
As far as my point about my wealth, it was proof that this coin has a backer and doesn't rely on anyone elses money.
No, it was proof you're a juvenile who believes that spouting off about having a ton of expensive suits, cars and, no doubt, a georgeous ex-model wife who is also a 'Siberian' sniper, would give you credibility. It did exactly the opposite. Particularly the fail on your spelling of Maserati, which only has one spelling, that one.
I really dont support full ANON on TrustPlus, it is made to hide and I am sure someone will figure out how to track down transactions if a person gets caught committing a crime.
Or, say, the NSA want to run it through their systems to, automatically, link everyone up to each other who uses this coin.
Kinda makes one wonder why, then, you are even bothering with 'not-quite-Anon' at all, given the price is going to require a new blockchain every year and it doesn't even provide full Anon for that price.
The only true ANON I have seen is VOOT, which I did not let die. This coin is about Good People making honest transactions and having fun doing it. The "Smoke Screen" is to keep the prying eyes out, but not law enforcement.
You are out of your fecking gourd if you believe that assertion even makes sense. Firstly, any coin that had Iconic Expert desperately scrabbling to encourage people to prove they had bought the most, in order to 'win' a few thousand from him, is not a coin standing on its own merits and, secondly, The "Smoke Screen" is selectively Anon then, is it? Who decides to open up the Anon transactions when Law Enforcement come knocking?
Holes, holes and more holes.
Poll
