ARG Puzzle with 3.5 BTC Private Key Prize, Game Over

[TheButterZone]

I just love that the bitcoin puzzle ratio is 99:1 Requires Rain Man:Doesn't Require Rain Man. /sarcasm

Kαλωσόρισες Λεβέντη μoυ,

Stick with us and you will be rain-proof

Walter Cronkite? LOL

[S4VV4S]

I just love that the bitcoin puzzle ratio is 99:1 Requires Rain Man:Doesn't Require Rain Man. /sarcasm

Kαλωσόρισες Λεβέντη μoυ,

Stick with us and you will be rain-proof

Walter Cronkite? LOL

Huh? I thought you were Greek judging by Leonidas saying you have on your signature....


On Topic:

New transactions:

0001
001
001001111
00100011
001000011
001001
00100001
001001011
001010101
001010011
001000101
00101001


I will ask once again,
can someone please post the list of ALL verified OP transactions?

[S4VV4S]

More incoming.....   https://blockchain.info/address/1HXUobwcB19cGDrghuh42HDdJdJvrJUEra

[shorena]

-snip-
I will ask once again,
can someone please post the list of ALL verified OP transactions?

I will try:


1BoRHtJva2L9YyqB1aS1zqgFUjjftNuZtJ

0.05 BTC
0.02 BTC
0.01011 BTC -> 01011000 - X
0.01011 BTC -> 01011000 - X
0.04 BTC
0.01 BTC
0.019 BTC
0.08 BTC
0.05 BTC
0.001011 BTC -> 00101100 - ,
0.001011 BTC -> 00101100 - ,
0.001011 BTC -> 00101100 - ,
0.001011 BTC -> 00101100 - ,
0.001011 BTC -> 00101100 - ,
0.001011 BTC -> 00101100 - ,
0.001011 BTC -> 00101100 - ,
0.001011 BTC -> 00101100 - ,
0.001011 BTC -> 00101100 - ,

Note all of the above can also be understood as 01011000 - X
9x the number 9 seems to be of relevance in the following sequence as well.
18 = 9x2
 9 = 9x1
both a "missing" 1 Satoshi

0.023 BTC
0.022 BTC
0.021 BTC
0.02 BTC
0.019 BTC
0.01799999 BTC
0.017 BTC
0.016 BTC
0.015 BTC
0.014 BTC
0.013 BTC
0.012 BTC
0.011 BTC
0.01 BTC
0.00899999 BTC
- nope no 8
0.007 BTC
0.006 BTC
- nope no 5
0.004 BTC
- nope no 3
0.002 BTC
0.001 BTC
0.023 BTC
0.001 BTC
0.05 BTC

-------------------------------
0.007 BTC - to 1sos
0.007 BTC - to 1rEDGrN
0.007 BTC - to 1rEDGrN
-------------------------------

0.06 BTC

-------------------------------
all of the following went to:
1PBsAHYQoczQh6mufENsR4tCkKToQKjMzz 0.01 BTC

0.01 BTC
0.01 BTC
0.1 BTC
0.05 BTC


will do the rest in a moment.


SOS Series
--------------------------------
1QJmVZyEF5wG9j2TdWeXLGcDLLdZCDzjzo
1BuopNHS4eeBnnqhe4DAagigvd6oe9o4q7
single TX
0.01010011 BTC -> 01010011 - S
--------------------------------
1MoaEzR1Sr9bA7xQwbeZr8LhocvH733Bz2
single TX
0.01001111 BTC -> 01001111 - O
--------------------------------
15VNozAfdMKQeCDXR7PeQ3i9BrJWqzJye9
single TX
0.01010011 BTC -> 01010011 - S
--------------------------------
1sosB9wN5ij84GKfo6Xxx8FWyh5fPXVXu
1x 0.0054321 BTC and later 0.001 BTC

1rEDGrN Series
Full address: 1rEDGrNbuqqtbJU12XiU4hvmfM4XaQVcD
--------------------------------
0.00098765 BTC - blockchain note "no more clues"
0.00404 BTC - blockchain note "http"
0.001 BTC - blockchain note "01100011 01100001 01101110 00100000 01101110 01101111 01110100 00100000 01100100 01101111 00100000 01101110 01101111 01110100 00100000 01100110 01100110 01110011"

-> can not do not ffs

currently believed to be a correction for one of the solutions found

"THEY CAN NOT ATTACK WHAT THEY CAN NOT SEE"

0.00057235 BTC


11PBsA Series
Full address: 1PBsAHYQoczQh6mufENsR4tCkKToQKjMzz
--------------------------------
0.00404 BTC
0.005 BTC
0.01 BTC
0.01001111 BTC - 01001111 - O
0.0009 BTC
- START NEW MSG-
0.00100011 BTC
0.01000011 BTC
0.01001 BTC
0.01000011 BTC
0.01001011 BTC
0.01010101 BTC
0.01010011 BTC
0.01000101 BTC
0.0101001 BTC
0.00404 BTC
0.00100001 BTC
0.010001 BTC
0.01001111 BTC
0.00100001 BTC
0.00100001 BTC
0.00100001 BTC
0.0010001 BTC
0.010001 BTC
0.01001111 BTC
0.0100111 BTC
0.01001111 BTC
0.010101 BTC
0.0010001 BTC
- END NEW MSG -
binary data for "new msg" (padded obviously)

Code:

00100011
01000011
01001000
01000011
01001011
01010101
01010011
01000101
01010010
00100001
01000100
01001111
00100001
00100001
00100001
00100010
01000100
01001111
01001110
01001111
01010100
00100010

-> #CHCKUSER!DO!!!"DONOT"

more coming
0.01001 BTC - 01001000 - H - could also be 0100100 $
0.010101 BTC - 01010100 - T - *
0.010101 BTC - 01010100 - T - *
0.0101 BTC - 01010000 - P - (

-> HTTP

various other address that are not confirmed (as in: they got no coins from 1BoRH):

1PrQb3VJLR6JvbfjNQVFchM6ePfTdD8XZM
single TX:

0.00101101 BTC -> 00101101 "-"
or 01011010 -> Z

--------------------------------
1ENnzep2ivWYqXjAodTueiZscT6kunAyYs
1F1FAfLxdamyZyeXzUdLXUYsLDE3DYPSGN
1Bet9gMZYgLMXkuvg2EDfyepFmGpytTAHD
1MEXrFi3KxTMBg2HnyAxp1nveNSwV3xkTV

2x group TX, not yet confirmed IMHO spam
https://blockchain.info/de/tx/dc08928ee4010c80febd5c2f1e20fd83a4bea3fc085756f28b49dfd6a8ee6963

--------------------------------
1B45EghVVgLCuF2eqNrj7tx6RkcgpV9VvP
1PszgWqsUujW4EYgn5nDapcUsc5K7GVVEE

single TX:

0.00111111 BTC -> 00111111 - ?
--------------------------------

-------- ZZZ series ------------
From:
- 1G7dmdKEJWx8vGW6mQZAkz7AMRaW1KEH6b
- 1FJxxi8bHvmwNKtEnayH59zgCJP8nxswq9
- 1D8xJXgAwnvHCKAPTqv3nGT9y85ioitQSt
- 1GK1vdqj3aMfW42CSzyqbHZRhRXvrTn6Jr
- 1G8RnUdAxRvea4LmrAbwRMUiHx7VA752j9
- 16njzRbXLYZCbNZyhbkN9iHSpJYJCpudZs
- 1679v52HJWiymdgcdsH68j3whzcVjvGnc3
and
16Xpxbo1NzEbp59dYmovLam4SXANapbXVo
1Di2GB5RqeoMrFd86FiGJocaaqXm9r8Mpa
each for 0.0101101 BTC - 01011010 - Z

[Kangaderoo]

Check the source of the payments, this eliminates the transaction fee binary mix/mess-up.
I also pad "0" to make it go to a single Sathosi.
 
Transactions from 1PBsAHYQoczQh6mufENsR4tCkKToQKjMzz

00100011 -> #
00100011 -> #
01001000 -> H
00100011 -> #
00100011 -> #
01010101 -> U
00100011 -> #
01000101 -> E
01010010 -> R

404 --> stands for "Not Found" I Guess

00100001 -> !
01000100 -> D
01001111 -> O
00100001 -> !
00100001 -> !
00100001 -> !

I guess we have to DO something.... :-)

[Mister S]

Worth pointing out the above strings are on lines six and seven.

[S4VV4S]

OK, this is what I have from the new transactions:

0001
001
001001111
00100011
001000011
001001
00100001
001001011
001010101
001010011
001000101
00101001
00100001
0010001
001001111
000100001
000100001
000100001
00010001

LOL     
The above led me to an address that starts 1MKJ    - Michael Jackson.....

Oh, sorry, key: 5Kbg5JxF5UsKBNtouwz65zgTvFS3XiMWUQhTgoKXwAGganiSi1Y

[Prospero]

I think the OP is choosing specific addresses to communicate specific pieces of the puzzle.

BoR - not sure what this means (main contributing address)

BoRH == bottom of right hand? that is where her initials (YT) are.

[Kangaderoo]

Just a thought, the last morse code wordt not(?) part of the phrase were STOP WORDS,
But as I understood the morse (dot)code continued.
morse numbers from this point? binary?

[Prospero]

This much discussion really calls for an IRC channel

[Remember remember the 5th of November]

This much discussion really calls for an IRC channel

Alright, irc.freenode.net ##argpuzzle

[shorena]

see my update above, there is a new msg.

I think we are to look behind the courtain.

[Kangaderoo]

This much discussion really calls for an IRC channel

or a WiKi

[Krona Rev]

[0.00404][0.005]@O[0.0009]#CHCKUSER[0.00404]!DO!!!"DONOT"HTTP

This is the message I decoded from the transactions from
1PBsAHYQoczQh6mufENsR4tCkKToQKjMzz
The values that I couldn't convert to ASCII are the ones between the brackets [...].

Does anyone know how to interpret this?

[S4VV4S]

Update, disregard my previous post.

This is all the new TX I have:

0001
001
001001111
00100011
001000011
001001
00100001
001001011
001010101
001010011
001000101
00101001
00100001
0010001
001001111
000100001
000100001
000100001
00010001
0010001
001001111
00100111
001001111
0010101
00010001
001001
0010101
0010101
00101

[Mitchell]

This much discussion really calls for an IRC channel

or a WiKi

I have been following this for a while and I really like reading about it, so a Wiki would be the way to go IMO. You can miss a lot in a IRC.

[S4VV4S]

Just a thought, the last morse code wordt not(?) part of the phrase were STOP WORDS,
But as I understood the morse (dot)code continued.
morse numbers from this point? binary?

Binary.
Anything more than 6 chars in morse is useless IMO.

[superbit]

Been following along but haven't posted.  I think a wiki is a great idea, and we can mark the users that made "breakthrough" discoveries so the eventual winner can donate to the clues that helped them the most (if they choose, I would for sure)

[S4VV4S]

Been following along but haven't posted.  I think a wiki is a great idea, and we can mark the users that made "breakthrough" discoveries so the eventual winner can donate to the clues that helped them the most (if they choose, I would for sure)

When it comes to these games it's mostly (well to the most part) about bragging

[superbit]

Been following along but haven't posted.  I think a wiki is a great idea, and we can mark the users that made "breakthrough" discoveries so the eventual winner can donate to the clues that helped them the most (if they choose, I would for sure)

When it comes to these games it's mostly (well to the most part) about bragging

Agreed, but the prize pool is starting to get up there.