PRCDice.eu - Largest Dice invest site - Open since 2013! Chat, Play, Invest!

[Haves]

I can't agree more with gamblingbad. I'm following this thread since the beginning and I felt the urgent need to make an account when I read all this "trolling".
Mostly I just read in this forum and I have a high amount of respect for dooglus (loved doge-dice).

Let's face the facts, this is the only dice rolling side where you can both gamble and invest (in doge as far as I know). If this will be payed out the site will definitely go down. And most of the players on the prcdice wouldn't like this I guess. We could discuss this over and over again, but to which use?

I don't think tha sjess should get this money (my personal oppinion). But if we want a place like this we should more work together and not raging against each other. Especially when a page like prcdice is only since a few days you should rather report a "bug" than to abuse it. I would rather gamble/invest in a beta place where the admin really really cares about my problems than not having this possibility...

[waterpile]

Why do you still insisting that he should pay sjess? He already said his final decision. jeezz

[FastBluff]

Why do you still insisting that he should pay sjess? He already said his final decision. jeezz

It shows that no one should be using PRCDice because of this horrible decision, that at anytime he can change the TOS to benefit his site, showing he is dishonest.

[waterpile]

Why do you still insisting that he should pay sjess? He already said his final decision. jeezz

It shows that no one should be using PRCDice because of this horrible decision, that at anytime he can change the TOS to benefit his site, showing he is dishonest.

do you have any proof that really changed the TOS? or maybe you're bashing the site so that you can have a chance to gain people to play at ur site?

[FastBluff]

Why do you still insisting that he should pay sjess? He already said his final decision. jeezz

It shows that no one should be using PRCDice because of this horrible decision, that at anytime he can change the TOS to benefit his site, showing he is dishonest.

do you have any proof that really changed the TOS? or maybe you're bashing the site so that you can have a chance to gain people to play at ur site?

Yes he admitted that he had no TOS for this situation and pulled information from other sites to just create this new hybrid TOS out of his mind.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=663326.msg7738948#msg7738948


This makes him a dishonest person, and this coming with proof so obviously I am not doing this for publicity of my site.

[a1choi]

Why do you still insisting that he should pay sjess? He already said his final decision. jeezz

It shows that no one should be using PRCDice because of this horrible decision, that at anytime he can change the TOS to benefit his site, showing he is dishonest.

do you have any proof that really changed the TOS? or maybe you're bashing the site so that you can have a chance to gain people to play at ur site?

Yes he admitted that he had no TOS for this situation and pulled information from other sites to just create this new hybrid TOS out of his mind.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=663326.msg7738948#msg7738948


This makes him a dishonest person, and this coming with proof so obviously I am not doing this for publicity of my site.

This does not in any way show that he is dishonest.  At worst, it shows he was unprepared for this type of situation.  But would we really want a shit-ton of legalese to read and agree to before using a site like this?

[FastBluff]

Why do you still insisting that he should pay sjess? He already said his final decision. jeezz

It shows that no one should be using PRCDice because of this horrible decision, that at anytime he can change the TOS to benefit his site, showing he is dishonest.

do you have any proof that really changed the TOS? or maybe you're bashing the site so that you can have a chance to gain people to play at ur site?

Yes he admitted that he had no TOS for this situation and pulled information from other sites to just create this new hybrid TOS out of his mind.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=663326.msg7738948#msg7738948


This makes him a dishonest person, and this coming with proof so obviously I am not doing this for publicity of my site.

This does not in any way show that he is dishonest.  At worst, it shows he was unprepared for this type of situation.  But would we really want a shit-ton of legalese to read and agree to before using a site like this?

The proper way to handle it would be to pay out sjess and then implement the new TOS with new rules, the other way makes him dishonest, but I guess you enjoy keeping your bitcoins with dishonest people.

You don't need a lot of legal stuff, but enough to keep a good site running.

[waterpile]

The proper way to handle it would be to pay out sjess and then implement the new TOS with new rules, the other way makes him dishonest, but I guess you enjoy keeping your bitcoins with dishonest people.

You don't need a lot of legal stuff, but enough to keep a good site running.

The decision has been made can't you understand?

[PocketRocketsCasino]

Fastbluff still failing to understand I did not change or implement any new TOS.
The post where I quoted other sites started with the sentence "As a side note to all the people saying OTHER sites would pay". Then I pointed out how two of the largest online casinos in the UK would not.

No dishonesty on my part.

[FastBluff]

Fastbluff still failing to understand I did not change or implement any new TOS.
The post where I quoted other sites started with the sentence "As a side note to all the people saying OTHER sites would pay". Then I pointed out how two of the largest online casinos in the UK would not.

No dishonesty on my part.

So prove me wrong what was the TOS on this situation?

The proper way to handle it would be to pay out sjess and then implement the new TOS with new rules, the other way makes him dishonest, but I guess you enjoy keeping your bitcoins with dishonest people.

You don't need a lot of legal stuff, but enough to keep a good site running.

The decision has been made can't you understand?

I understand that... But what don't you understand about being dishonest. Even dooglus called them dishonest!

[wayshegoes]

If you don't like the site, don't use it. It's as simple as that really. I love the website, have the utmost respect for Dean and will continue to use the site.

Fastbluff is a direct competitor and will obviously do any say anything to make the site less appealing to new users, as it's in their best interest. I would not personally trust fastbluff since it was for sale 6 weeks ago, and the owner was willing to go as low as 1 BTC for the entire package (I know because I was going to buy it myself). Right now the only activity is bots betting 0 bets over and over. Maybe they want some PRC regulars to play there?

uvwvj, I don't think is a correct way of running a gambling site. More often than not it's legitimate owners trying to make the best of a bad situation should they arise. When nakowa lost 7,000 BTC back to the house on just-dice.com, the owner dooglus changed max profit from 1% down to 0.25%, essentially stopping nakowa recouping his former winnings. Was it fair, or the right thing to do? I really don't know; how dooglus ran his site is absolutely none of my business. He claims it was to allow investors to chose their own risk level, and it probably was. If i was nakowa I would have been furious, but I'm not nakowa, or dooglus, so it doesn't matter.

Either way, I'm happy with how Dean handles his website. He's dedicated, puts a huge amount of time in and sides with legitimate players and bankrollers rather than a lone conman trying to pull a fast one, trying to bankrupt a site operator and investors out of self interest and greed. If you don't agree with his methods, go back to the gambling websites that you own or the ones that pay you.

[FastBluff]

If you don't like the site, don't use it. It's as simple as that really. I love the website, have the utmost respect for Dean and will continue to use the site.

Fastbluff is a direct competitor and will obviously do any say anything to make the site less appealing to new users, as it's in their best interest. I would not personally trust fastbluff since it was for sale 6 weeks ago, and the owner was willing to go as low as 1 BTC for the entire package (I know because I was going to buy it myself). Right now the only activity is bots betting 0 bets over and over. Maybe they want some PRC regulars to play there?

uvwvj, I don't think is a correct way of running a gambling site. More often than not it's legitimate owners trying to make the best of a bad situation should they arise. When nakowa lost 7,000 BTC back to the house on just-dice.com, the owner dooglus changed max profit from 1% down to 0.25%, essentially stopping nakowa recouping his former winnings. Was it fair, or the right thing to do? I really don't know; how dooglus ran his site is absolutely none of my business. He claims it was to allow investors to chose their own risk level, and it probably was. If i was nakowa I would have been furious, but I'm not nakowa, or dooglus, so it doesn't matter.

Either way, I'm happy with how Dean handles his website. He's dedicated, puts a huge amount of time in and sides with legitimate players and bankrollers rather than a lone conman trying to pull a fast one, trying to bankrupt a site operator and investors out of self interest and greed. If you don't agree with his methods, go back to the gambling websites that you own or the ones that pay you.

Can you please not spread FUD and false information. We have no bots betting and are profitable and you can see that by all expanding we are doing!

[wayshegoes]

How do you profit from 0 BTC bets?

If you check PMs on your account (assuming you bought it from the same person I was talking to), I can confirm what messages were from me. The previous site owner said he made over 4 BTC profit from the website, but I see only 130.xx BTC wagered. 3% of the wagered amount would certainly be a nice return for a house with a 1% edge, but would only be true if he was the only one bankrolling. The site seems to allow anyone to bankroll, so something does not add up. Also, there is no total site profit, or max profit listed. Why?

I see zero changes to flastbluff.com since I was interested in purchasing it, literally nothing. I am not spreading FUD; I am commenting on your website and position as accurately and as "fairly" as I can. If your site is as brilliant and as profitable as you claim, you really do not need to keep posting here. You ask people to not spam competitors in your thread on these forums; you should show the same courtesy for other site operators.

[factor280]

Did this site stop taking investments?

[wayshegoes]

You can invest any time. Investments are currently at an all time high.

Total Invested:
560.90744986 ฿

If you want to invest, make an account, click the red "Account" tab at the top left corner of the page and deposit your BTC (instant deposit after 1 confirmation now). On the same page you will see the red "Investment" tab where you can invest some, or all of your balance.

https://prcdice.eu/

If you need any help, come into chat on the website and any number of users will be happy to help you out. If you stick around long enough you might get lucky and get some "rain" from user Bazza's rainbot. Perfect for testing out the dice.

[factor280]

Thank you for the answer way! Ill definitely check the site out.

Do you know what the investment % or profit is?

[wayshegoes]

Investing on PRCdice.eu is a little different to most sites with crowdsourced bankrolling, as you are investing in not only dice, but blackjack and sports bets too (the world cup has been mostly good to the house, so far).

Since the bankroll is essentially 10-11 times larger since I joined the website, it's hard to get an idea of expected profits since max profit adjusts dynamically depending on how much is invested when anyone bets. Dice has a 1% edge, blackjack edge varies depending on the player, and sport bets edges can probably be calculated if you check out the odds at http://sports.williamhill.com/bet/en-gb

That is where the site operator gets his odds, so it's really no different to any sport betting, just with BTC!

[Haves]

Thank you for the answer way! Ill definitely check the site out.

Do you know what the investment % or profit is?

The profit for your investment should be overall 1% of the wagered amount. So as you can see the Bitcoin profit is at around 1% and the Dogecoin profit is at ~1,4%. How much you get from this amount depends on your percentage of the overall deposit. I made a profit of 5% of my invested amount during last week. But to be fair, it was also a quite a good week.

[powerguy]

Thank you for the answer way! Ill definitely check the site out.

Do you know what the investment % or profit is?

The profit for your investment should be overall 1% of the wagered amount. So as you can see the Bitcoin profit is at around 1% and the Dogecoin profit is at ~1,4%. How much you get from this amount depends on your percentage of the overall deposit. I made a profit of 5% of my invested amount during last week. But to be fair, it was also a quite a good week.

Sounds Good, 1% is not bad at all

[PocketRocketsCasino]

uvwvj, I don't think is a correct way of running a gambling site. More often than not it's legitimate owners trying to make the best of a bad situation should they arise. When nakowa lost 7,000 BTC back to the house on just-dice.com, the owner dooglus changed max profit from 1% down to 0.25%, essentially stopping nakowa recouping his former winnings. Was it fair, or the right thing to do? I really don't know; how dooglus ran his site is absolutely none of my business. He claims it was to allow investors to chose their own risk level, and it probably was. If i was nakowa I would have been furious, but I'm not nakowa, or dooglus, so it doesn't matter.

And you can ask Doog to verify but I hounded his ass here (deleted most of my posts) and the chat room for doing that to in middle of Nakowas deposits as I thought Doog did the right move but he should have shut down site for 24 hours when he did it to announce the new rules.  Difference he just limited bets not changed the math to be in his favor.

What Dean did is not payout a winner because he could personally not take the liability imo.  We essentially knew Dooglus portion of the bankroll in case something happened do you know Deans?

Doesn't matter what the amount was, 20BTC or 0.002BTC, scammers and cheats will not be cashed out funds they try to steal from investors or other players.