FreeMoney
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1016
Strength in numbers
|
|
August 11, 2010, 07:16:10 AM |
|
Bitcoins are a commodity by almost any definition.
|
Play Bitcoin Poker at sealswithclubs.eu. We're active and open to everyone.
|
|
|
kiba
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1020
|
|
August 11, 2010, 02:49:55 PM |
|
Bitcoins are a commodity by almost any definition.
According to laughing libertarians, they're not.
|
|
|
|
bytemaster (OP)
|
|
August 11, 2010, 03:19:47 PM |
|
Bitcoins are certainty a commodity. They are rare, and are valued at about $0.06.
This distinction between "money" "currency" and what not is all linguistic masturbation. All things are governed by supply, demand, and free trade exchange rates.
People want bitcoins other people have bitcoins therefore they are traded. People want FRN others have them. Supply/demand.
Certainly one may question the sanity of people who decide to store their wealth in something with potential for unlimited supply or fiat debasement.
For those who expect a hyperinflationary economic collapse, war, EMP, loss of grid power or internet then Bitcoin isn't the best "store of wealth".
If we lived in a more stable world, then perhaps bitcoins would be a very good store of wealth.
For now the bitcoin commodity servers as a good temporary store of wealth and medium of exchange. But these are just properties of a comodity that make it useful to use as a money.
My definition of money = "most marketable commodity" where the buy/sell spread and marketing costs are practically 0. This makes it a suitable intermediary item in "barter" transactions.
|
|
|
|
caveden
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1004
|
|
August 11, 2010, 03:58:37 PM |
|
"Hard money" is a commodity that is 1) durable 2) divisable and 3) difficult to fake and 4) difficult to produce.
So bitcoins are even harder money than gold is. They verify all conditions, and even better than gold. It's harder to fake, will become impossible to produce after reaching the 21 million limit, and it's more divisible.
|
|
|
|
MoonShadow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1010
|
|
August 12, 2010, 02:01:50 AM |
|
"Hard money" is a commodity that is 1) durable 2) divisable and 3) difficult to fake and 4) difficult to produce.
So bitcoins are even harder money than gold is. They verify all conditions, and even better than gold. It's harder to fake, will become impossible to produce after reaching the 21 million limit, and it's more divisible. Bitcoins are no more a commodity than US Federal Reserve Notes are, and nor are they backed by any fixed commodity standard.
|
"The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank...sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world."
- Carroll Quigley, CFR member, mentor to Bill Clinton, from 'Tragedy And Hope'
|
|
|
MoonShadow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1010
|
|
August 12, 2010, 02:13:54 AM |
|
Bitcoins are certainty a commodity. They are rare, and are valued at about $0.06.
This distinction between "money" "currency" and what not is all linguistic masturbation. All things are governed by supply, demand, and free trade exchange rates.
You have a right to your own opinions, but not your own facts. It is impossible, by definition, for bitcoins to be a commodity. A commodity requires a utility outside of the context of a medium of exchange or a store of value; beyond being simply a currency. Not for you, personally, but for someone. Historicly, gold and silver both have (and still do) have utility as jewlery. Presently, silver has industrial utilities, and gold would also if it wasn't valued so much more than other alternatives. Bitcoins can *never* have any utility beyond their use as a medium of exchange or a store of value; and a FRN or a Euro wouldn't even make decent toilet paper.
|
"The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank...sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world."
- Carroll Quigley, CFR member, mentor to Bill Clinton, from 'Tragedy And Hope'
|
|
|
kiba
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1020
|
|
August 12, 2010, 02:14:36 AM |
|
"Hard money" is a commodity that is 1) durable 2) divisable and 3) difficult to fake and 4) difficult to produce.
So bitcoins are even harder money than gold is. They verify all conditions, and even better than gold. It's harder to fake, will become impossible to produce after reaching the 21 million limit, and it's more divisible. Bitcoins are no more a commodity than US Federal Reserve Notes are, and nor are they backed by any fixed commodity standard. FAIL HARD. Please provide an actual argument beyond your assertion.
|
|
|
|
NewLibertyStandard
|
|
August 12, 2010, 04:04:45 AM |
|
It just depends on which definition you choose. Bitcoins are useful, can be produced and sold, so they're a commodity. Bitcoins are already processed, can't be produced outside of the Bitcoin specifications and can't be manufactured into something else for resale, so they're not a commodity.
|
Treazant: A Fullever Rewarding Bitcoin - Backup Your Wallet TODAY to Double Your Money! - Dual Currency Donation Address: 1Dnvwj3hAGSwFPMnkJZvi3KnaqksRPa74p
|
|
|
jimbobway
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1304
Merit: 1015
|
|
August 12, 2010, 04:30:31 AM |
|
Bitcoins are certainty a commodity. They are rare, and are valued at about $0.06.
This distinction between "money" "currency" and what not is all linguistic masturbation. All things are governed by supply, demand, and free trade exchange rates.
You have a right to your own opinions, but not your own facts. It is impossible, by definition, for bitcoins to be a commodity. A commodity requires a utility outside of the context of a medium of exchange or a store of value; beyond being simply a currency. Not for you, personally, but for someone. Historicly, gold and silver both have (and still do) have utility as jewlery. Presently, silver has industrial utilities, and gold would also if it wasn't valued so much more than other alternatives. Bitcoins can *never* have any utility beyond their use as a medium of exchange or a store of value; and a FRN or a Euro wouldn't even make decent toilet paper. I can take an iPhone, write a bling-bling application that will show how many bitcoins I own. I can then tie the iPhone to a rope necklace, wear it, and show off how many bitcoins I have. Holla! Jewelry of the future, baby!
|
|
|
|
NewLibertyStandard
|
|
August 12, 2010, 05:42:09 AM |
|
The only way to prove you own bitcoins is to publish the coins' private keys. Please do write the program! Hahaha!
|
Treazant: A Fullever Rewarding Bitcoin - Backup Your Wallet TODAY to Double Your Money! - Dual Currency Donation Address: 1Dnvwj3hAGSwFPMnkJZvi3KnaqksRPa74p
|
|
|
jimbobway
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1304
Merit: 1015
|
|
August 12, 2010, 05:51:20 AM |
|
The only way to prove you own bitcoins is to publish the coins' private keys. Please do write the program! Hahaha!
It's all about the show. Cubic zirconia vs diamonds viewing at arm's distance? Same analogy.
|
|
|
|
FreeMoney
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1016
Strength in numbers
|
|
August 12, 2010, 06:02:55 AM |
|
The only way to prove you own bitcoins is to publish the coins' private keys. Please do write the program! Hahaha!
The only way! Ha!
|
Play Bitcoin Poker at sealswithclubs.eu. We're active and open to everyone.
|
|
|
caveden
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1004
|
|
August 12, 2010, 07:39:35 AM |
|
Bitcoins are no more a commodity than US Federal Reserve Notes are, and nor are they backed by any fixed commodity standard.
But the dollar is a commodity. And, by the way, what backs gold?
|
|
|
|
caveden
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1004
|
|
August 12, 2010, 07:49:31 AM |
|
You have a right to your own opinions, but not your own facts. It is impossible, by definition, for bitcoins to be a commodity. A commodity requires a utility outside of the context of a medium of exchange or a store of value;
A commodity is a good for which there is demand, but which is supplied without qualitative differentiation across a market. It is fungible, i.e. equivalent no matter who produces it.
It doesn't look that impossible to me. This definition of yours by the way doesn't even make much sense, since the utility of something is entirely subjective. Bitcoins can *never* have any utility beyond their use as a medium of exchange or a store of value; and a FRN or a Euro wouldn't even make decent toilet paper.
How can you make such a statement? How can you know which is the utility of bitcoins for other people? This is subjective. And, anyway, it isn't the definition of commodity either.
|
|
|
|
NewLibertyStandard
|
|
August 12, 2010, 08:37:44 AM |
|
Bitcoins absolutely are not a commodity according to the traditional business and financial definition. The word commodity is primarily a business and financial term, so that definition takes priority over y'all's loose definitions. Bitcoins are not a commodity. You can stretch the definition to make it fit, but it's like jamming a square peg through a round hole; only the special kid does it.
|
Treazant: A Fullever Rewarding Bitcoin - Backup Your Wallet TODAY to Double Your Money! - Dual Currency Donation Address: 1Dnvwj3hAGSwFPMnkJZvi3KnaqksRPa74p
|
|
|
caveden
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1004
|
|
August 12, 2010, 08:49:05 AM |
|
From your own link:
"The term also describes financial products, such as currency or stock and bond indexes."
|
|
|
|
NewLibertyStandard
|
|
August 12, 2010, 09:01:38 AM |
|
From your own link:
"The term also describes financial products, such as currency or stock and bond indexes."
Square peg, round hole.
|
Treazant: A Fullever Rewarding Bitcoin - Backup Your Wallet TODAY to Double Your Money! - Dual Currency Donation Address: 1Dnvwj3hAGSwFPMnkJZvi3KnaqksRPa74p
|
|
|
|
MoonShadow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1010
|
|
August 13, 2010, 09:22:55 PM |
|
Bitcoins are no more a commodity than US Federal Reserve Notes are, and nor are they backed by any fixed commodity standard.
But the dollar is a commodity. No, it is not. The US dollar is a fiat currency, and nothing more.
And, by the way, what backs gold?
Historicly the yellow metal was prized for it's beauty in jewelry. In our modern world, there are many uses for it in industry for which it is ideal even though it is too expensive. For example, lead is poisonous to humanity, but it's mass number makes it both a wonderful material for making ship ballasts and radiation shielding. Gold has been used for both these things in the past, but only in very specific situations.
|
"The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank...sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world."
- Carroll Quigley, CFR member, mentor to Bill Clinton, from 'Tragedy And Hope'
|
|
|
NewLibertyStandard
|
|
August 13, 2010, 09:43:54 PM |
|
Although gold is a commodity, gold coins are not a commodity. Electricity is a commodity and CPU cycles could be considered a commodity, but bitcoins are not. It's the same principle in both instances.
|
Treazant: A Fullever Rewarding Bitcoin - Backup Your Wallet TODAY to Double Your Money! - Dual Currency Donation Address: 1Dnvwj3hAGSwFPMnkJZvi3KnaqksRPa74p
|
|
|
|