coolmyrig
|
|
July 29, 2014, 11:43:58 AM |
|
0.00007885 BTC/XCN ON cn.bter.com,! the price is too low.
|
|
|
|
Hix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1971
Merit: 1036
|
|
July 29, 2014, 11:58:14 AM |
|
I don`t understand standalone miner finding blocks or no?
|
|
|
|
myagui
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1154
Merit: 1001
|
|
July 29, 2014, 12:01:43 PM |
|
Yes. /Me found block #3406 using the standalone cpu miner about 50m ago. ~ Myagui
|
|
|
|
ajeef
|
|
July 29, 2014, 12:04:44 PM |
|
Yes. /Me found block #3406 using the standalone cpu miner about 50m ago. ~ Myagui
win 64?How long?
|
|
|
|
myagui
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1154
Merit: 1001
|
|
July 29, 2014, 12:10:28 PM |
|
Yes. /Me found block #3406 using the standalone cpu miner about 50m ago. ~ Myagui
win 64?How long? Win8 x64, latest wallet & using minerd (7 threads i7 @ stock clocks). See the 5m gap between starting the miner and finding a block Nothing for the following hour though. [12:03:15] 7 miner threads started, using M7 Proof-of-Work algorithm. [12:08:01] Found share ...000000000070debab5b188ca66ab9fb0d8b9b1e656e41f1a472c8a672743ce06: submitting [12:08:02] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted
Cheers, ~ Myagui
|
|
|
|
prix
|
|
July 29, 2014, 12:15:04 PM |
|
I check the blockchain. Nothing strange. Total is 840k XCN. Block is 3455. It has about 400 addresses. About 200 addresses has > 100 XCN. About 40 addresses has > 1000 XCN. Top 10 (some is exchanges): CNCzEBdvxzKSsGGdeqdGv17zuyWLeyAFvw: 246445,61 CeRad61n2RprFzywneKAkYN9bwFBu4yW2H: 188345,31 CZXiHFhK13AMLFWSp4eZ54N3F64JDcVPV6: 113825,43 Cd8gZ8MxqzeubBVuAnP2DzeLpvLn51sBR5: 35787 CazXGa3A2pxPqNanW4Yyy7peWeGcwHKFwT: 28284,861 CM3niKEDbjkmy5VJFdJT355mo3u9mow1UC: 18994 CeBwh8ncuvyC2XUbHEThupnqC8eZQSmoTx: 18959,766 CVKRikdNU5waPmDpn5bqwAisxDdMDEG1hR: 12149,893 CURgxdxewKiKxNYPtRpaHFnTRBSbtUCAzU: 10450,023 Cd6uyTic26h48MMKtJdDuSzhkG2qGsGgBh: 9715,396
Maybe I made a error somewhere, a slightly different format output than bitcoins (simpler, inputs / outputs not exists), but the total number of coins converges and the number of coins in my address too. I have ~300kH/s (8 cores). Network has ~850MH/s. My share of the total is ~1/2833. It's mean I can mine 1 block per 2 days. Dev, will transaction info gone after 10000 blocks? Will someone be kept full version of the blockchain (from 0 block)? This is unusual - something really new, without any IPO and things like that.
|
|
|
|
Hix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1971
Merit: 1036
|
|
July 29, 2014, 12:22:32 PM |
|
Yes. /Me found block #3406 using the standalone cpu miner about 50m ago. ~ Myagui
win 64?How long? Win8 x64, latest wallet & using minerd (7 threads i7 @ stock clocks). See the 5m gap between starting the miner and finding a block Nothing for the following hour though. [12:03:15] 7 miner threads started, using M7 Proof-of-Work algorithm. [12:08:01] Found share ...000000000070debab5b188ca66ab9fb0d8b9b1e656e41f1a472c8a672743ce06: submitting [12:08:02] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted
Cheers, ~ Myagui thx
|
|
|
|
bitfreak! (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1536
Merit: 1000
electronic [r]evolution
|
|
July 29, 2014, 12:39:22 PM |
|
a slightly different format output than bitcoins (simpler, inputs / outputs not exists)
The transactions don't use scripts so they are much simpler, but they can have multiple inputs and/or outputs but I'm not sure if any transactions so far do. Keep in mind the inputs and outputs point to addresses, they don't point to other transactions like a normal bitcoin-based coin does. Dev, will transaction info gone after 10000 blocks? Will someone be kept full version of the blockchain (from 0 block)?
I'm sure lots of nodes will keep the full blockchain for one reason or another, it's their choice whether they want to delete old blocks or not. The network is basically designed to operate in "bitcoin mode" for the first two weeks, meaning all nodes will sync by downloading the full blockchain, but after that time it will switch over to "pruned mode", meaning brand new nodes will only require the previous 10k blocks to sync with the network and become a full node. It's going to be a bit scary when the switch happens but we've survived the switch before on the testnet during the month of testing we did. And I think catia has a plan to make sure everything goes as smoothly as possible. Note: To free up disk space by deleting old blocks when we enter pruned mode you could just run resync to delete all the old data and start again, but we'll also have a prune/purge command which will delete old blocks without requiring a resync.
|
XCN: CYsvPpb2YuyAib5ay9GJXU8j3nwohbttTz | BTC: 18MWPVJA9mFLPFT3zht5twuNQmZBDzHoWF Cryptonite - 1st mini-blockchain altcoin | BitShop - digital shop script Web Developer - PHP, SQL, JS, AJAX, JSON, XML, RSS, HTML, CSS
|
|
|
cubydu
|
|
July 29, 2014, 12:47:36 PM |
|
dev
how about list this on bittrex or poloniex?
also coinmarketcap?
|
|
|
|
frankkkkkkk
|
|
July 29, 2014, 12:52:05 PM |
|
why xcn can launth btc38 and bter as same time
|
|
|
|
wyj1888
|
|
July 29, 2014, 01:01:55 PM |
|
you konw , ahah!!
|
|
|
|
bitfreak! (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1536
Merit: 1000
electronic [r]evolution
|
|
July 29, 2014, 01:10:23 PM |
|
a slightly different format output than bitcoins (simpler, inputs / outputs not exists)
The transactions don't use scripts so they are much simpler, but they can have multiple inputs and/or outputs but I'm not sure if any transactions so far do. Keep in mind the inputs and outputs point to addresses, they don't point to other transactions like a normal bitcoin-based coin does. Dev, will transaction info gone after 10000 blocks? Will someone be kept full version of the blockchain (from 0 block)?
I'm sure lots of nodes will keep the full blockchain for one reason or another, it's their choice whether they want to delete old blocks or not. The network is basically designed to operate in "bitcoin mode" for the first two weeks, meaning all nodes will sync by downloading the full blockchain, but after that time it will switch over to "pruned mode", meaning brand new nodes will only require the previous 10k blocks to sync with the network and become a full node. It's going to be a bit scary when the switch happens but we've survived the switch before on the testnet during the month of testing we did. And I think catia has a plan to make sure everything goes as smoothly as possible. Note: To free up disk space by deleting old blocks when we enter pruned mode you could just run resync to delete all the old data and start again, but we'll also have a prune/purge command which will delete old blocks without requiring a resync. Just quoting my post from the bottom of the last page because I think it's important information.
|
XCN: CYsvPpb2YuyAib5ay9GJXU8j3nwohbttTz | BTC: 18MWPVJA9mFLPFT3zht5twuNQmZBDzHoWF Cryptonite - 1st mini-blockchain altcoin | BitShop - digital shop script Web Developer - PHP, SQL, JS, AJAX, JSON, XML, RSS, HTML, CSS
|
|
|
prix
|
|
July 29, 2014, 01:21:23 PM |
|
Just quoting my post from the bottom of the last page because I think it's important information.
Yes, it's important. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
freeworm
|
|
July 29, 2014, 01:27:01 PM |
|
why xcn can launth btc38 and bter as same time
Nope. Bter.com added one day ahead
|
|
|
|
jly77
|
|
July 29, 2014, 01:27:19 PM |
|
why xcn can launth btc38 and bter as same time
笑而不语
|
|
|
|
Passion_ltc
|
|
July 29, 2014, 01:49:58 PM |
|
WTB XCN, PM me with your offer. I'm buying in bulks!
|
|
|
|
btc38
Member
Offline
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
|
|
July 29, 2014, 01:58:10 PM |
|
why xcn can launth btc38 and bter as same time
Not the same time, we did a reserch for two days and found it is very good coin. the author have very good background.
|
|
|
|
aloney
|
|
July 29, 2014, 02:03:49 PM |
|
this coin is a shit, people can't compile in linux, and also there's wrong chain on win wallet, but it's curious that there's too much hashpower at the beginning because somebody prepared for everything without any errors, but the rest with many errors, i'm out of this coin
|
PPL:XunifRT3qvqnPi8kQ2PyLSSejHrSnUTHtX
|
|
|
vpncoin
|
|
July 29, 2014, 02:16:33 PM |
|
A good coin which break the record.
congratulations!
|
|
|
|
bitfreak! (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1536
Merit: 1000
electronic [r]evolution
|
|
July 29, 2014, 02:18:45 PM |
|
this coin is a shit, people can't compile in linux, and also there's wrong chain on win wallet, but it's curious that there's too much hashpower at the beginning because somebody prepared for everything without any errors, but the rest with many errors, i'm out of this coin
Look, the simple fact is this coin is way more fair than any of the other pre-mined IPO bullshit that you'll get around here. We didn't prepare anything to intentionally fail, if we were looking to make a good profit we simply would have pre-mined. But we didn't, we did everything we could to ensure a fair launch. We designed the difficulty adjustment algorithm to adapt quickly and prevent an instamine, we posted this announcement thread literally seconds after we started mining ourselves (ask the people who were on IRC at the time or examine the blockchain yourself), we didn't have any pre-mine or any type of IPO crap, we posted a pre-announcement thread a week before launch, we did over a month of public beta testing to weed out bugs. I'm sorry that we had a faulty Windows build near the start, but it still didn't prevent Windows people from mining any of the first 440 blocks and we released a fix in about an hour after the problem was noticed. And I believe the problem compiling on linux was due to a bad github upload, but that problem was also promptly fixed and people are now compiling on linux fine. Having said all that, let me get the door for you so I can see you out.
|
XCN: CYsvPpb2YuyAib5ay9GJXU8j3nwohbttTz | BTC: 18MWPVJA9mFLPFT3zht5twuNQmZBDzHoWF Cryptonite - 1st mini-blockchain altcoin | BitShop - digital shop script Web Developer - PHP, SQL, JS, AJAX, JSON, XML, RSS, HTML, CSS
|
|
|
|