jasemoney
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1008
Forget-about-it
|
 |
July 28, 2014, 05:21:58 AM |
|
oh my god you guys didnt get coins for 25 minutes of work, complain more!
|
$MAID & $BTC other than that some short hodls and some long held garbage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to achieve higher forum ranks, you need both activity points and merit points.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
syyyn
|
|
July 28, 2014, 05:23:22 AM |
|
Dev spent 10's of thousands of dollars starting this coin? Hahahaha more BS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
catia
|
|
July 28, 2014, 05:25:36 AM |
|
I can't get a transaction from block 1 by the hash.
Can anybody check it?
What's wrong?
Couple things. It was printing the wrong txid, a what you really want to use it getrawtransaction txid 1 This is fixed in github and binaries are building. Ok. Please, notify when the build will be available. New binaries http://gpile.it/mbc/ 800/801 vintage |
|
|
|
|
|
WilderX
|
|
July 28, 2014, 05:31:19 AM |
|
Well dev seems to be working so far I did not re-download the dll's tho? No matter? Still have to say the shit that went down with this launch is not cool. |
|
|
|
|
jly77
|
|
July 28, 2014, 05:31:36 AM |
|
I can't get a transaction from block 1 by the hash.
Can anybody check it?
What's wrong?
Couple things. It was printing the wrong txid, a what you really want to use it getrawtransaction txid 1 This is fixed in github and binaries are building. Ok. Please, notify when the build will be available. New binaries http://gpile.it/mbc/ 800/801 vintage Can the old wallet be used? |
|
|
|
|
|
catia
|
|
July 28, 2014, 05:35:18 AM |
|
Can the old wallet be used?
Yeah just run the new exe. No delete/upgrade or anything required. |
|
|
|
|
bitfreak! (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1536
Merit: 1000
electronic [r]evolution
|
|
July 28, 2014, 05:37:07 AM |
|
Dev spent 10's of thousands of dollars starting this coin? Hahahaha more BS.
Many members here will remember that I had a 28 BTC bounty for anyone capable of developing the mini-blockchain scheme: [CLOSED] $20,000 Mini-Blockchain ImplementationAdmittedly BTC was worth much more at that point in time, and I didn't spend 28 BTC on development, but it was more than 20 BTC. And so far I've only been able to mine 2 blocks myself. So I'm sorry if Windows users feel some how robbed, but there were no guarantees when you decided to use this coin and we have a big obvious red warning plastered on the website which explains how experimental this coin is. |
XCN: CYsvPpb2YuyAib5ay9GJXU8j3nwohbttTz | BTC: 18MWPVJA9mFLPFT3zht5twuNQmZBDzHoWF Cryptonite - 1st mini-blockchain altcoin | BitShop - digital shop script Web Developer - PHP, SQL, JS, AJAX, JSON, XML, RSS, HTML, CSS |
|
|
|
jly77
|
|
July 28, 2014, 05:40:51 AM |
|
Can the old wallet be used?
Yeah just run the new exe. No delete/upgrade or anything required. block time still too fast. Is this normal? |
|
|
|
|
|
catia
|
|
July 28, 2014, 05:44:43 AM |
|
What do you mean too fast?
Currently we are
"blocks" : 982,
"headers" : 982,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"connections" : 7,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 13371.59862808,
Block time is a little short because difficulty is still increasing.
|
|
|
|
|
suppersz
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
There is a day to be born, and another to die
|
|
July 28, 2014, 05:46:06 AM |
|
Dev spent 10's of thousands of dollars starting this coin? Hahahaha more BS.
Many members here will remember that I had a 28 BTC bounty for anyone capable of developing the mini-blockchain scheme: [CLOSED] $20,000 Mini-Blockchain ImplementationAdmittedly BTC was worth much more at that point in time, and I didn't spend 28 BTC on development, but it was more than 20 BTC. And so far I've only been able to mine 2 blocks myself. So I'm sorry if Windows users feel some how robbed, but there were no guarantees when you decided to use this coin and we have a big obvious red warning plastered on the website which explains how experimental this coin is. They also claim to have SMALLER BLOCKCHAIN,What is the difference? [NUD ₦ ] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=640933.0SECURE
NUD is based on bcrypt, a key-stretching hashing algorithm that exists for 13 years and is based on functions that are more than 30 years old.
COMPLETELY ANONYMOUS
Unlike other alternatives NUD is not just pseudoanonymous but completely anonymous on both the protocol level (TOR) and the blockchain level.
SMALLER BLOCKCHAIN
Other cryptocurrencies blockchains are ever growing and could potentially become so large within the coming years that only centralized servers could store them, NUD actively works on introducing a significantly smaller blockchain which will not compromise on security.
|
|
|
|
|
robinf
|
|
July 28, 2014, 05:49:30 AM |
|
Relaunch!!!!!
Ok???
|
|
|
|
provenceday
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 28, 2014, 05:51:32 AM |
|
Dev spent 10's of thousands of dollars starting this coin? Hahahaha more BS.
Many members here will remember that I had a 28 BTC bounty for anyone capable of developing the mini-blockchain scheme: [CLOSED] $20,000 Mini-Blockchain ImplementationAdmittedly BTC was worth much more at that point in time, and I didn't spend 28 BTC on development, but it was more than 20 BTC. And so far I've only been able to mine 2 blocks myself. So I'm sorry if Windows users feel some how robbed, but there were no guarantees when you decided to use this coin and we have a big obvious red warning plastered on the website which explains how experimental this coin is. |
|
|
|
|
|
jly77
|
|
July 28, 2014, 05:52:40 AM |
|
What do you mean too fast?
Currently we are
"blocks" : 982,
"headers" : 982,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"connections" : 7,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 13371.59862808,
Block time is a little short because difficulty is still increasing.
Mine is different from yours, using the latest windows binary.  |
|
|
|
|
|
ajeef
|
|
July 28, 2014, 05:54:11 AM |
|
What do you mean too fast?
Currently we are
"blocks" : 982,
"headers" : 982,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"connections" : 7,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 13371.59862808,
Block time is a little short because difficulty is still increasing.
Mine is different from yours, using the latest windows binary.  { "blocks" : 1021, "currentblocksize" : 1000, "currentblocktx" : 0, "difficulty" : 14037.06897652, "errors" : "", "genproclimit" : 7, "networkhashps" : 677793586, "pooledtx" : 0, "testnet" : false, "generate" : true, "hashespersec" : 783617 } |
|
|
|
|
|
ThatDandyMan
|
|
July 28, 2014, 05:56:48 AM |
|
Anyone who mined on Windows before block 443 can retrieve their coins on the correct blockchain. Stop bitching and load your old wallet.dats onto the fixed QT.
|
|
|
|
|
wuqingfang
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
|
July 28, 2014, 05:58:18 AM |
|
Dev spent 10's of thousands of dollars starting this coin? Hahahaha more BS.
Many members here will remember that I had a 28 BTC bounty for anyone capable of developing the mini-blockchain scheme: [CLOSED] $20,000 Mini-Blockchain ImplementationAdmittedly BTC was worth much more at that point in time, and I didn't spend 28 BTC on development, but it was more than 20 BTC. And so far I've only been able to mine 2 blocks myself. So I'm sorry if Windows users feel some how robbed, but there were no guarantees when you decided to use this coin and we have a big obvious red warning plastered on the website which explains how experimental this coin is. They also claim to have SMALLER BLOCKCHAIN,What is the difference? [NUD ₦ ] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=640933.0SECURE
NUD is based on bcrypt, a key-stretching hashing algorithm that exists for 13 years and is based on functions that are more than 30 years old.
COMPLETELY ANONYMOUS
Unlike other alternatives NUD is not just pseudoanonymous but completely anonymous on both the protocol level (TOR) and the blockchain level.
SMALLER BLOCKCHAIN
Other cryptocurrencies blockchains are ever growing and could potentially become so large within the coming years that only centralized servers could store them, NUD actively works on introducing a significantly smaller blockchain which will not compromise on security.
They earlier. . |
|
|
|
|
bitfreak! (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1536
Merit: 1000
electronic [r]evolution
|
|
July 28, 2014, 06:00:24 AM |
|
They also claim to have SMALLER BLOCKCHAIN,What is the difference?
Well the NUD wiki has nothing about why they have a smaller blockchain so I can't tell you, but I'm very sure it's nothing like the mini-blockchain scheme. If NUD uses script then I doubt it's even much smaller than a normal blockchain and I doubt it allows new nodes to sync without requiring the full blockchain. |
XCN: CYsvPpb2YuyAib5ay9GJXU8j3nwohbttTz | BTC: 18MWPVJA9mFLPFT3zht5twuNQmZBDzHoWF Cryptonite - 1st mini-blockchain altcoin | BitShop - digital shop script Web Developer - PHP, SQL, JS, AJAX, JSON, XML, RSS, HTML, CSS |
|
|
|
hankrules
|
|
July 28, 2014, 06:01:50 AM |
|
Has anybody been able to compile the source on ubuntu?
|
|
|
|
|
Coindgr
|
|
July 28, 2014, 06:04:59 AM |
|
Anyone in the correct chain can post getpeerinfo command result?
No nodes here...
|
|
|
|
suppersz
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
There is a day to be born, and another to die
|
|
July 28, 2014, 06:05:22 AM |
|
They also claim to have SMALLER BLOCKCHAIN,What is the difference?
Well the NUD wiki has nothing about why they have a smaller blockchain so I can't tell you, but I'm very sure it's nothing like the mini-blockchain scheme. If NUD uses script then I doubt it's even much smaller than a normal blockchain and I doubt it allows new nodes to sync without requiring the full blockchain. NUD use BCRYPT,new algorithm  I mine a bit,CPU coin... |
|
|
|
|
