[ANN] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) | Testing New Masternodes

[stonehedge]

Like, one or two pages back, Mr Spread posted a preview of the MN GUI...

So that is why I should buy 50BTC of SPR instead of 50 BTC of DRK?

[zeca pagodinho]

Like, one or two pages back, Mr Spread posted a preview of the MN GUI...

So that is why I should buy 50BTC of SPR instead of 50 BTC of DRK?

Darkcoin is a good investment they have a great developer and already have a good market acceptance. Spreadcoin has a great developer and is still in development and market acceptance, it's up to you to decide which would be the best investment.

Now wish you good luck in your investments! 

[stonehedge]

Like, one or two pages back, Mr Spread posted a preview of the MN GUI...

So that is why I should buy 50BTC of SPR instead of 50 BTC of DRK?

Darkcoin is a good investment they have a great developer and already have a good market acceptance. Spreadcoin has a great developer and is still in development and market acceptance, it's up to you to decide which would be the best investment.

Now wish you good luck in your investments! 

Thanks. I'll just keep dipping in here every few weeks to see whether any detail or info has been posted. Good luck to you too!

[georgem]

Like, one or two pages back, Mr Spread posted a preview of the MN GUI...

So that is why I should buy 50BTC of SPR instead of 50 BTC of DRK?

If you really were to buy 50 BTC SPR, this action alone would make SPR a top 10 marketcap coin.

If instead you buy 50 BTC DRK, darkcoins price will not move at all. (meh, maybe 10%)
With darkcoin you have thousands of masternode owners and miners who are constantly selling their profits, they are big liquidity providers.

Not so much with SPR, where pretty much everyone is hodling, because we are early in the development cycle.

[eahmadov]

Like, one or two pages back, Mr Spread posted a preview of the MN GUI...

So that is why I should buy 50BTC of SPR instead of 50 BTC of DRK?

If you really were to buy 50 BTC SPR, this action alone would make SPR a top 10 marketcap coin.

Lack of information is a big concern for me as well. Very hard to invest in a coin when there is no update about upcoming development.

[fenghush]

Like, one or two pages back, Mr Spread posted a preview of the MN GUI...

So that is why I should buy 50BTC of SPR instead of 50 BTC of DRK?

If you really were to buy 50 BTC SPR, this action alone would make SPR a top 10 marketcap coin.

Lack of information is a big concern for me as well. Very hard to invest in a coin when there is no update about upcoming development.

Here is how GUI for masternodes will look like:


Checkboxes are only for your masternodes, they allow you to start or stop your masternode (of course you will also be able to do it with speadcoin.conf).
Other useful information is also shown, e.g. deposit amount and time before next payment for each masternode.
Addresses don't start with S because this is testnet.

[georgem]

Lack of information is a big concern for me as well. Very hard to invest in a coin when there is no update about upcoming development.

I'll make it easy for you.

Go to Mr.Spread user page here, and list his last posts:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=360096;sa=showPosts

The only thing Mr.Spread does all the time is give us update about development and answering questions .

You have to read it yourself, am not gonna chew it for you.

[stonehedge]

Lack of information is a big concern for me as well. Very hard to invest in a coin when there is no update about upcoming development.

I'll make it easy for you.

Go to Mr.Spread user page here, and list his last posts:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=360096;sa=showPosts

The only thing Mr.Spread does all the time is give us update about development and answering questions .

You have to read it yourself, am not gonna chew it for you.

But there is nothing to chew! 

Am I really reading that the only benefit that SPR offers over DRK is that it is at an earlier stage so its a better time to buy in?  That, apart from the little bit that Mr Spread posts, is all I can find.

[defunctec]

Lack of information is a big concern for me as well. Very hard to invest in a coin when there is no update about upcoming development.

I'll make it easy for you.

Go to Mr.Spread user page here, and list his last posts:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=360096;sa=showPosts

The only thing Mr.Spread does all the time is give us update about development and answering questions .

You have to read it yourself, am not gonna chew it for you.

But there is nothing to chew! 

Am I really reading that the only benefit that SPR offers over DRK is that it is at an earlier stage so its a better time to buy in?  That, apart from the little bit that Mr Spread posts, is all I can find.

There is an abundance of info on upcoming development.

MrSpread and the community have talked alot about SPR MN's.

DRK MN's amount needed are set to 1000DRK where as SPR MN's are dynamic (the minimum amount needed for a SPR MN will fluctuate).

We already know SPR is solo mining only, this combined with DRK's features will make SPR a real competitor to DRK. Not just a copycat coin with its unique forward thinking pool prevention and the safety it brings.

SPR is currently at 0.000582BTC, with a supply of 1,630,000 SPR.
Making a marketcap of only $200K

For me, that's enough to salivate over for the time being.

[thelonecrouton]

But there is nothing to chew! 

I support Spread because I support the Masternode model. More users, more developers, more ideas, more innovation, more adoption, more progress. Darkcoin will benefit from Spread. Open source FTW basically.

Incidentally, Spread has so far earned me another Darkcoin Masternode. With a whole lot of upside I believe still to come.

Chew on that. 

[stonehedge]

Lack of information is a big concern for me as well. Very hard to invest in a coin when there is no update about upcoming development.

I'll make it easy for you.

Go to Mr.Spread user page here, and list his last posts:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=360096;sa=showPosts

The only thing Mr.Spread does all the time is give us update about development and answering questions .

You have to read it yourself, am not gonna chew it for you.

But there is nothing to chew! 

Am I really reading that the only benefit that SPR offers over DRK is that it is at an earlier stage so its a better time to buy in?  That, apart from the little bit that Mr Spread posts, is all I can find.

There is an abundance of info on upcoming development.

MrSpread and the community have talked alot about SPR MN's.

DRK MN's amount needed are set to 1000DRK where as SPR MN's are dynamic (the minimum amount needed for a SPR MN will fluctuate).

We already know SPR is solo mining only, this combined with DRK's features will make SPR a real competitor to DRK. Not just a copycat coin with its unique forward thinking pool prevention and the safety it brings.

SPR is currently at 0.000582BTC, with a supply of 1,630,000 SPR.
Making a marketcap of only $200K

For me, that's enough to salivate over for the time being.

Thanks, that's good info.  I didn't catch the bit about dynamic priced masternodes.  How is that value and frequency of chance going to be set or is that still in discussion stages?

[georgem]

Thanks, that's good info.  I didn't catch the bit about dynamic priced masternodes.  How is that value and frequency of chance going to be set or is that still in discussion stages?

dynamic price will not be set, instead it will be decided by the "free market", allowing for a very healthy competition.

The amount of possible "masternode seats" is the thing that will be limited, and the more money you invest in your masternode the more secure your "seat reservation" gets.

Some people will invest only a few SPR (the minimum), others will invest 10x more SPR in their masternode.

Now if you only invest the bare minimum you run the risk of becoming "the weakest link" and a newcomer who just invests 1 SPR more than you might throw your masternode out of the race.
But you can always reenter the race by investing more than the new weakest link, etc...

[E9800]

Got the 290X to 47.35% (3.89MH/s) and the 280X to 36.65% (3.02MH/s).

What GPU and Memory Speeds?

[jpouza]

Got the 290X to 47.35% (3.89MH/s) and the 280X to 36.65% (3.02MH/s).

So , AMD earning some respect here...290X optimized doing the same as the 970GTX non-optimized

Consumption?

[E9800]

Got the 290X to 47.35% (3.89MH/s) and the 280X to 36.65% (3.02MH/s).

What GPU and Memory Speeds?

1125 core on both, 1500 mem on 280X, and 1600 mem on 290X.

Got the 290X to 47.35% (3.89MH/s) and the 280X to 36.65% (3.02MH/s).

So , AMD earning some respect here...290X optimized doing the same as the 970GTX non-optimized

Consumption?

Fuck if I know, my last two Kill-A-Watt meters melted.

Damn!!! My 290X won't stay stable past 1050 core and 1250 mem. I get a solid 2.7MH/s though.

[Hippie Tech]

Thanks, that's good info.  I didn't catch the bit about dynamic priced masternodes.  How is that value and frequency of chance going to be set or is that still in discussion stages?

dynamic price will not be set, instead it will be decided by the "free market", allowing for a very healthy competition.

The amount of possible "masternode seats" is the thing that will be limited, and the more money you invest in your masternode the more secure your "seat reservation" gets.

Some people will invest only a few SPR (the minimum), others will invest 10x more SPR in their masternode.

Now if you only invest the bare minimum you run the risk of becoming "the weakest link" and a newcomer who just invests 1 SPR more than you might throw your masternode out of the race.
But you can always reenter the race by investing more than the new weakest link, etc...

Yes ! A multi faceted ponzi is exactly what a dev making fraudulent claims of true decentralization needs !

Fyi.. the 800 mhash whales and insiders will use their unfair advantage to price 99% of you out of the market.

I'll let your imagination decide how their greed and (3rd party ) control of the network will affect things.

@eduffield and chums and/or wannabe's ..

Have you ever legitimately EARNED anything in life ?

[fenghush]

Is it any different in any area? Those with most resources, get most resources, and they have most at stake, what is your solution for everyone, including the little fish to get their fair share?

Thanks, that's good info.  I didn't catch the bit about dynamic priced masternodes.  How is that value and frequency of chance going to be set or is that still in discussion stages?

dynamic price will not be set, instead it will be decided by the "free market", allowing for a very healthy competition.

The amount of possible "masternode seats" is the thing that will be limited, and the more money you invest in your masternode the more secure your "seat reservation" gets.

Some people will invest only a few SPR (the minimum), others will invest 10x more SPR in their masternode.

Now if you only invest the bare minimum you run the risk of becoming "the weakest link" and a newcomer who just invests 1 SPR more than you might throw your masternode out of the race.
But you can always reenter the race by investing more than the new weakest link, etc...

Yes ! A multi faceted ponzi is exactly what a dev making fraudulent claims of true decentralization needs !

Fyi.. the 800 mhash whales and insiders will use their unfair advantage to price 99% of you out of the market.

I'll let your imagination decide how their greed and (3rd party ) control of the network will affect things.

@eduffield and chums and/or wannabe's ..

Have you ever legitimately EARNED anything in life ?

[thelonecrouton]

Have you ever legitimately EARNED anything in life ?

Yet to a hippie doing a hard days work...  

[georgem]

Have you ever legitimately EARNED anything in life ?

Yet to a hippie doing a hard days work...  

I ain't gonna let a hippie teach me about capitalism... he's clearly on an anti-capitalist crusade (just check his bumpersticker style signature)

[anarchist_rant]

I am against government. And true capitalism (the free market competition I like) has nothing to do with government.
Banks and corporations are government created entities, created under law. And it's government who gives all those criminals cover, and helps them with ridiculous patent law and regulations etc...
They are false capitalism, they are crapitalism.
How many bankers have gone to prison? None.
And you blame capitalism for that? That's silly.
Blame government.

[/anarchist_rant]

[stonehedge]

Thanks, that's good info.  I didn't catch the bit about dynamic priced masternodes.  How is that value and frequency of chance going to be set or is that still in discussion stages?

dynamic price will not be set, instead it will be decided by the "free market", allowing for a very healthy competition.

The amount of possible "masternode seats" is the thing that will be limited, and the more money you invest in your masternode the more secure your "seat reservation" gets.

Some people will invest only a few SPR (the minimum), others will invest 10x more SPR in their masternode.

Now if you only invest the bare minimum you run the risk of becoming "the weakest link" and a newcomer who just invests 1 SPR more than you might throw your masternode out of the race.
But you can always reenter the race by investing more than the new weakest link, etc...

Yes ! A multi faceted ponzi is exactly what a dev making fraudulent claims of true decentralization needs !

Fyi.. the 800 mhash whales and insiders will use their unfair advantage to price 99% of you out of the market.

I'll let your imagination decide how their greed and (3rd party ) control of the network will affect things.

@eduffield and chums and/or wannabe's ..

Have you ever legitimately EARNED anything in life ?

Eduffield has nothing to do with SPR.

I agree on the false sense of decentralisation.  There are some mighty big farms out there.  I've rented X11 rigs with greater hash rate than the whole network hashrate of SPR.  I don't know whether they will perform as well using SpreadX11.  The big boys have already priced everybody out of the mining game anyway on SPR.