prodigy8
|
|
March 16, 2015, 11:23:33 PM |
|
there is DarkSend in the source code ?
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
|
|
March 16, 2015, 11:45:43 PM |
|
Updated the links on the SPR pool in case someone wants to mine
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
|
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 16, 2015, 11:56:40 PM |
|
WTB 60k SPR
|
|
|
|
georgem
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1007
spreadcoin.info
|
|
March 17, 2015, 12:24:34 AM |
|
I also voted spreadnodes on spreadcointalk
I first chose servernodes, but I have changed my vote to servicenodes, because it just sounds more compelling.
|
|
|
|
georgem
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1007
spreadcoin.info
|
|
March 17, 2015, 12:29:45 AM |
|
there is DarkSend in the source code ?
Yes, but it's not actually used and will be removed.
|
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 17, 2015, 12:35:13 AM |
|
I also voted spreadnodes on spreadcointalk
I first chose servernodes, but I have changed my vote to servicenodes, because it just sounds more compelling. +101 I've come to really love the concept of "Servicenodes" If you place a copyright mark against it, then you begin to place a marker in the sand that you intend to protect that name or you rely on it for commercial reasons. If someone else makes an application to trademark that name, you can object on the basis that it was in ordinary use and you made a point of assigning some reliance on the distinct name for the benefit of the network. You can also use evidence of when you started using the name for the benefit of the network. This is useful to establish priority rights. edit ServiceNodes TM
|
|
|
|
njs811
|
|
March 17, 2015, 12:41:39 AM |
|
I also voted spreadnodes on spreadcointalk
I first chose servernodes, but I have changed my vote to servicenodes, because it just sounds more compelling. +101 I've come to really love the concept of "Servicenodes" If you place a copyright mark against it, then you begin to place a marker in the sand that you intend to protect that name or you rely on it for commercial reasons. If someone else makes an application to trademark that name, you can object on the basis that it was in ordinary use and you made a point of assigning some reliance on the distinct name for the benefit of the network. You can also use evidence of when you started using the name for the benefit of the network. This is useful to establish priority rights. edit ServiceNodes TM I could get on board with ServiceNodes....just want to see them come out.
|
|
|
|
|
njs811
|
|
March 17, 2015, 12:59:32 AM |
|
Then I say, lock it, pack it, and sell it.
|
|
|
|
georgem
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1007
spreadcoin.info
|
|
March 17, 2015, 01:26:02 AM |
|
Who cares about *.net and *.com, most valuable TLD in cryptoland is *.org anyway. That's why I just registed servicenode(s).org
|
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 17, 2015, 01:32:23 AM |
|
Who cares about *.net and *.com, most valuable TLD in cryptoland is *.org anyway. That's why I just registed servicenode(s).org That is cool. I only care because of priority rights arguments. But those sites are blank, so you are good to go. Contribution incoming (well, incoming tomorrow)
|
|
|
|
Jesse Livermore
|
|
March 17, 2015, 02:25:18 AM |
|
Thanks for this head's up! Amazed at how many here seemed to miss your post completely. I just read through all 34 pages of that ANN and the dev there seems legit and quite skilled...almost Mr. Spread-like. Definitely worth watching the masternode implementation (March 31 I think). JL
|
I own a DASH Masternode.... And you should too.
|
|
|
antonio8
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 17, 2015, 02:34:26 AM |
|
Thanks for this head's up! Amazed at how many here seemed to miss your post completely. I just read through all 34 pages of that ANN and the dev there seems legit and quite skilled...almost Mr. Spread-like. Definitely worth watching the masternode implementation (March 31 I think). JL He actually has some pretty good ideas he is implementing besides the MN.
|
If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks
|
|
|
gjhiggins
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2254
Merit: 1290
|
|
March 17, 2015, 03:55:08 AM |
|
Thanks for this head's up!
I wish I could comment in more technical depth but I'm still building an understanding of the implementation strategy. Cheers Graham
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
March 17, 2015, 05:35:44 AM |
|
Thanks for this head's up!
I wish I could comment in more technical depth but I'm still building an understanding of the implementation strategy. Cheers Graham you seem to be doing better than i am at the moment mate ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
Belligerent Fool
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 17, 2015, 06:29:46 AM |
|
Whoever wants to mine this can get in with the difficulty low at under 11, way better than the 60 when things where happening for SPR.
|
|
|
|
chup
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 736
Merit: 262
Me, Myself & I
|
|
March 17, 2015, 07:31:40 AM |
|
Updated the links on the SPR pool in case someone wants to mine
Looks like I have to repeat the question every 10 pages: Did You published source code for Your "pool miner"? Anyone successfully compiled from source? If not than any one full enough to run closed binaries should go after cointellect "miner". Pays at least 10 times more than your "pool miner"...
|
|
|
|
e1ghtSpace
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
Crypto since 2014
|
|
March 17, 2015, 09:51:07 AM |
|
Updated the links on the SPR pool in case someone wants to mine
Where are the links?? I must have missed it. Also, I am going to say this again but very simply... (how to remove pools) We make it so that block is just a hash and does not relate to a mining address at all. Then once a miner finds a valid block, we somehow get masternodes to confirm that a specific address mined it. (the miner submits his address to the masternodes with the block data) This means that when a pool's miners finds a block, the block finder can swap out the pool's address with his address when he submits it to the masternodes. No one will know if he was mining as part of the pool or not because the submitted block has no information that relates it to the pool.
|
|
|
|
restless
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 17, 2015, 10:21:30 AM |
|
Updated the links on the SPR pool in case someone wants to mine
Looks like I have to repeat the question every 10 pages: Did You published source code for Your "pool miner"? Anyone successfully compiled from source? If not than any one full enough to run closed binaries should go after cointellect "miner". Pays at least 10 times more than your "pool miner"... I didn't try his miners but it seems linux version are with full source .cc/index.php?page=gettingstarted
|
|
|
|
|