[ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient HDD Mining | New 1.2.3 Fork block 92000

[unsoindovo]

multipool are runnig...
price it is rising...
all seems good!

But let's spread the news!!!
let's spread the news on the usual channels.
especially on twitter with #BurstCoin #Burst and if it is with the possibility of viral retweet.
If you have an account tweet to your followers about two multiPool not forgetting to mention that we did burst + 100% in the last 24 hours and that is for now the most profitable currency to mine!
use #BurstCoin and #Burst

if you do not have it, do it!!!  
will benefit you too ... because you're mining the currency.
if you are not mining burst maybe you have buy it... and you like if burst will rise  

The first developer is being joined by more and more developers because they see value in the project.
Now there are already 2 multiPool and are also planning a wallet with windowForm standard to use the money even for the less experienced!

i see good things for this coin!

[yellowduck2]

Question.

Is there any difference in terms of mining (not plot) when using stagger 1000 VS stagger 8000 ?

[Irontiga]

Question.

Is there any difference in terms of mining (not plot) when using stagger 1000 VS stagger 8000 ?

BIIIGGG difference, bigger stagger requires more RAM, but lowers disk stress.

[yellowduck2]

Question.

Is there any difference in terms of mining (not plot) when using stagger 1000 VS stagger 8000 ?

BIIIGGG difference, bigger stagger requires more RAM, but lowers disk stress.

i am talking about mining , is that true for mining ? I am not asking for plot

[jzhoulon]

WTF is this? I am running a machine with one external drive generating plots just fine but when I try to mine a pool I get a java heap memory error. Online says that there is a leak. This computer has 32 GB of RAM. Any ideas?



Running Win 7 64-bit SP1

you must run too many miners, what -xmx you have set, then * your miner's number, figure out how many memory have you used

I am running one miner and I did not think that you allocated for pool mining like you do for solo mining. My second computer has 4 HD generating plots and mining perfectly using the same bat:

Pool Mining BAT: C:\Windows\SysWOW64\java -cp pocminer_pool.jar;lib/*;lib/akka/*;lib/jetty/* pocminer_pool.POCMiner mine http://127.0.0.1:8125 http://178.62.39.204:8121

So are you saying I should have C:\Windows\SysWOW64\java -Xmx1000m -cp pocminer_pool.jar;lib/*;lib/akka/*;lib/jetty/* pocminer_pool.POCMiner mine http://127.0.0.1:8125 http://178.62.39.204:8121

what's your stagger size, it is used for temp memory swap for the disk, if you set 1000, then when mining, miner will read 1000 from the disk to memory

[Prototyp]

Question.

Is there any difference in terms of mining (not plot) when using stagger 1000 VS stagger 8000 ?

BIIIGGG difference, bigger stagger requires more RAM, but lowers disk stress.

i am talking about mining , is that true for mining ? I am not asking for plot

He said the mining

[yellowduck2]

Question.

Is there any difference in terms of mining (not plot) when using stagger 1000 VS stagger 8000 ?

BIIIGGG difference, bigger stagger requires more RAM, but lowers disk stress.

i am talking about mining , is that true for mining ? I am not asking for plot

He said the mining

I plot way faster with 1000 stagger than 8000 stagger. What does disk stress actually means ? I have to sacrifice plotting performance for less disk stress ?

[mushroomfour9]

 how many coins have been mined so far?

[fanepatent]

Question.

Is there any difference in terms of mining (not plot) when using stagger 1000 VS stagger 8000 ?

BIIIGGG difference, bigger stagger requires more RAM, but lowers disk stress.

i am talking about mining , is that true for mining ? I am not asking for plot

He said the mining

I plot way faster with 1000 stagger than 8000 stagger. What does disk stress actually means ? I have to sacrifice plotting performance for less disk stress ?

The idea behind the plots is that if you use 8000 stagger the disk will seek once. If you use 1000 stagger the disk will seek 8 times in the same file of 8000 nonces.
Thats the difference regarding disk stress.
The real difference in mining is that with a larger stagger you will be able to submit shares faster.
There is no memory usage difference in mining, unlike irontiga said.

[coinits]

WTF is this? I am running a machine with one external drive generating plots just fine but when I try to mine a pool I get a java heap memory error. Online says that there is a leak. This computer has 32 GB of RAM. Any ideas?



Running Win 7 64-bit SP1

you must run too many miners, what -xmx you have set, then * your miner's number, figure out how many memory have you used

I am running one miner and I did not think that you allocated for pool mining like you do for solo mining. My second computer has 4 HD generating plots and mining perfectly using the same bat:

Pool Mining BAT: C:\Windows\SysWOW64\java -cp pocminer_pool.jar;lib/*;lib/akka/*;lib/jetty/* pocminer_pool.POCMiner mine http://127.0.0.1:8125 http://178.62.39.204:8121

So are you saying I should have C:\Windows\SysWOW64\java -Xmx1000m -cp pocminer_pool.jar;lib/*;lib/akka/*;lib/jetty/* pocminer_pool.POCMiner mine http://127.0.0.1:8125 http://178.62.39.204:8121

what's your stagger size, it is used for temp memory swap for the disk, if you set 1000, then when mining, miner will read 1000 from the disk to memory

It is set to 1000 for plot generating. I went ahead and set the pool bats to C:\Windows\SysWOW64\java -Xmx1000m and no more crashes. So it seems that was my problem.

[Amph]

how many coins have been mined so far?

http://burst.cryptoport.io/

[yellowduck2]

Question.

Is there any difference in terms of mining (not plot) when using stagger 1000 VS stagger 8000 ?

BIIIGGG difference, bigger stagger requires more RAM, but lowers disk stress.

i am talking about mining , is that true for mining ? I am not asking for plot

He said the mining

I plot way faster with 1000 stagger than 8000 stagger. What does disk stress actually means ? I have to sacrifice plotting performance for less disk stress ?

The idea behind the plots is that if you use 8000 stagger the disk will seek once. If you use 1000 stagger the disk will seek 8 times in the same file of 8000 nonces.
Thats the difference regarding disk stress.
The real difference in mining is that with a larger stagger you will be able to submit shares faster.
There is no memory usage difference in mining, unlike irontiga said.

All miner only submit share once, is there any benefit for submitting share faster other than if ur share is a block find ? Even if it took me 10 sec to submit share , as long as within that 10 sec no block is found , it's no difference submitting share in 1 sec or 10 sec. Am i right ?

If i am right, lower stagger actually work way better if CPU is not i7 , 8 gb ram because i can plot faster and there is no difference in mining.

[mushroomfour9]

how many coins have been mined so far?

http://burst.cryptoport.io/

 that site won't work on my phone, can you just tell me  how many coins have been mined so far?

[ReDPoiSoN]

how many coins have been mined so far?

http://burst.cryptoport.io/

 that site won't work on my phone, can you just tell me  how many coins have been mined so far?

9607 * 10'000 = 96'070'000

[mushroomfour9]

how many coins have been mined so far?

http://burst.cryptoport.io/

 that site won't work on my phone, can you just tell me  how many coins have been mined so far?

9607 * 10'000 = 96'070'000

  Thank you.

[fanepatent]

Question.

Is there any difference in terms of mining (not plot) when using stagger 1000 VS stagger 8000 ?

BIIIGGG difference, bigger stagger requires more RAM, but lowers disk stress.

i am talking about mining , is that true for mining ? I am not asking for plot

He said the mining

I plot way faster with 1000 stagger than 8000 stagger. What does disk stress actually means ? I have to sacrifice plotting performance for less disk stress ?

The idea behind the plots is that if you use 8000 stagger the disk will seek once. If you use 1000 stagger the disk will seek 8 times in the same file of 8000 nonces.
Thats the difference regarding disk stress.
The real difference in mining is that with a larger stagger you will be able to submit shares faster.
There is no memory usage difference in mining, unlike irontiga said.

All miner only submit share once, is there any benefit for submitting share faster other than if ur share is a block find ? Even if it took me 10 sec to submit share , as long as within that 10 sec no block is found , it's no difference submitting share in 1 sec or 10 sec. Am i right ?

If i am right, lower stagger actually work way better if CPU is not i7 , 8 gb ram because i can plot faster and there is no difference in mining.

I guess you are right. But for example, if I had a 6 Tb drive, and for the sake of this example I have 80 plots with 1000 stagger. Lets say 1 second per file, although it takes more than 2 (depending on size). Thats 80 second right there. If you have 10 files with 8000 stagger the same operation would take 10 seconds.

[yellowduck2]

Question.

Is there any difference in terms of mining (not plot) when using stagger 1000 VS stagger 8000 ?

BIIIGGG difference, bigger stagger requires more RAM, but lowers disk stress.

i am talking about mining , is that true for mining ? I am not asking for plot

He said the mining

I plot way faster with 1000 stagger than 8000 stagger. What does disk stress actually means ? I have to sacrifice plotting performance for less disk stress ?

The idea behind the plots is that if you use 8000 stagger the disk will seek once. If you use 1000 stagger the disk will seek 8 times in the same file of 8000 nonces.
Thats the difference regarding disk stress.
The real difference in mining is that with a larger stagger you will be able to submit shares faster.
There is no memory usage difference in mining, unlike irontiga said.

All miner only submit share once, is there any benefit for submitting share faster other than if ur share is a block find ? Even if it took me 10 sec to submit share , as long as within that 10 sec no block is found , it's no difference submitting share in 1 sec or 10 sec. Am i right ?

If i am right, lower stagger actually work way better if CPU is not i7 , 8 gb ram because i can plot faster and there is no difference in mining.

I guess you are right. But for example, if I had a 6 Tb drive, and for the sake of this example I have 80 plots with 1000 stagger. Lets say 1 second per file, although it takes more than 2 (depending on size). Thats 80 second right there. If you have 10 files with 8000 stagger the same operation would take 10 seconds.

luckily block time target is 4 mins

[fanepatent]

Question.

Is there any difference in terms of mining (not plot) when using stagger 1000 VS stagger 8000 ?

BIIIGGG difference, bigger stagger requires more RAM, but lowers disk stress.

i am talking about mining , is that true for mining ? I am not asking for plot

He said the mining

I plot way faster with 1000 stagger than 8000 stagger. What does disk stress actually means ? I have to sacrifice plotting performance for less disk stress ?

The idea behind the plots is that if you use 8000 stagger the disk will seek once. If you use 1000 stagger the disk will seek 8 times in the same file of 8000 nonces.
Thats the difference regarding disk stress.
The real difference in mining is that with a larger stagger you will be able to submit shares faster.
There is no memory usage difference in mining, unlike irontiga said.

All miner only submit share once, is there any benefit for submitting share faster other than if ur share is a block find ? Even if it took me 10 sec to submit share , as long as within that 10 sec no block is found , it's no difference submitting share in 1 sec or 10 sec. Am i right ?

If i am right, lower stagger actually work way better if CPU is not i7 , 8 gb ram because i can plot faster and there is no difference in mining.

I guess you are right. But for example, if I had a 6 Tb drive, and for the sake of this example I have 80 plots with 1000 stagger. Lets say 1 second per file, although it takes more than 2 (depending on size). Thats 80 second right there. If you have 10 files with 8000 stagger the same operation would take 10 seconds.

luckily block time target is 4 mins

I was giving you an example where the stagger size mattered.
I am making the plots at 40000 stagger.

[jzhoulon]

it is great that now have 209.16 MH on scrypt multipool , but i was wonder there the multipool dump and buy burst? polo or c-cex

[gigica viteazu`]

The idea behind the plots is that if you use 8000 stagger the disk will seek once. If you use 1000 stagger the disk will seek 8 times in the same file of 8000 nonces.
Thats the difference regarding disk stress.

how would you guys like to have a stagger of 40960 or bigger ?

i did my plotting on chunks, files of 10Gb (easier to generate in one place and move via network in other places) with a stagger of 8191 then use the merge utility provided by dcct to rearrange/merge the content of the files from a stagger of 8191 to the number of nouances in the file (in my case 40960)