|
oVPN
|
 |
August 21, 2017, 01:53:02 PM |
|
this coin forked again.
some of our nodes @1449359, others @1449402
|
oVPN.to Anonymous Services
|
|
|
Abejorro
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
August 21, 2017, 01:54:19 PM |
|
Which pool is in the correct Blockchain? right know only TrasMaMod XMG pool and PoM Pool has the same values, that mean they are on the correct block chain?
|
|
|
|
|
what-is-in-it
Member
Offline
Activity: 119
Merit: 100
|
|
August 21, 2017, 01:58:12 PM |
|
ok heres what I don't get if everyone has connect=104.128.225.215 including pools if a block wasn't accepted by 104.128.225.215 wouldn't they just become orphan and pool would keep mining on correct chain?
Been wondering - this is what should have been happening. Orphan blocks and then following blocks added to the correct chain - but i reckon there was a delay amongst the biggest pools in switching between the versions of the blockchain - from a hashrate perspective.. which led to two chains. Once the right chain was confirmed, this should be the end of the story - blockchain wise. We need the wallets & exchanges to change to the new chain as well. but I guess we probably have folks on old wallets and those continuing to solo mine on the old chain or pools (suprnova). |
|
|
|
|
|
Myth888
|
|
August 21, 2017, 01:58:53 PM |
|
Which pool is in the correct Blockchain? right know only TrasMaMod XMG pool and PoM Pool has the same values, that mean they are on the correct block chain?
i think pom just forked. hashrate is higher than total network hashrate of network node provided my magi team. going solo for now |
|
|
|
|
|
edward0181
|
|
August 21, 2017, 02:02:04 PM |
|
Which pool is in the correct Blockchain? right know only TrasMaMod XMG pool and PoM Pool has the same values, that mean they are on the correct block chain?
i think pom just forked. hashrate is higher than total network hashrate of network node provided my magi team. going solo for now POM and Trasmamod on same blocks as Poolinfo... should be correct, right? |
|
|
|
|
malafaya
|
|
August 21, 2017, 02:04:16 PM |
|
ok heres what I don't get if everyone has connect=104.128.225.215 including pools if a block wasn't accepted by 104.128.225.215 wouldn't they just become orphan and pool would keep mining on correct chain?
Been wondering - this is what should have been happening. Orphan blocks and then following blocks added to the correct chain - but i reckon there was a delay amongst the biggest pools in switching between the versions of the blockchain - from a hashrate perspective.. which led to two chains. Once the right chain was confirmed, this should be the end of the story - blockchain wise. We need the wallets & exchanges to change to the new chain as well. but I guess we probably have folks on old wallets and those continuing to solo mine on the old chain or pools (suprnova). What I don't understand is why don't the forked wallets switch back to the "main" (longest, with the most work) chain after they fork. This is supposed to happen for every cryptocoin. For example, minerclaim is some 50 blocks behind. Why can't it detect there is a longer chain among peers and set it as best chain? |
|
|
|
|
|
Lightsplasher
|
|
August 21, 2017, 02:13:57 PM |
|
It looks a fork taking place that made suprnova firstly turn to a different chain, and then Zpool. This causes much increase in the block value to a higher value but unavailable to majority miners since they are still in suprnova and Zpool. In this case, it will be better to maintain the block value to a lower value until we fix the fork issue or the majority miners are able to mine on the main chain. I will update the source for the above purpose if we all agree.
This could go on and on. I think you will need to change the PoW algorithm and that could take some time to be done right and properly tested. I would remove PoW for now and just run on PoS. I believe this will probably stop the forking. This is an unfair situation that may become more difficult as things progress imho. |
|
|
|
|
iMaster
Member
Offline
Activity: 135
Merit: 14
|
|
August 21, 2017, 02:15:30 PM |
|
Send few thousands of XMG to Bittrex about 10 hours ago. They are visible as pending deposits but still 0 out of 6 confirmations. What to do to not lose this coins?
Just wait. Your transaction will go to the block, and then you will receive a confirmation. Your coins do not go anywhere. |
|
|
|
|
sohard4me
Member
Offline
Activity: 125
Merit: 10
|
|
August 21, 2017, 02:15:55 PM |
|
What cause this forking in the first place?
Isn't the chain been running for 3 years without issue?
|
|
|
|
|
edward0181
|
|
August 21, 2017, 02:16:10 PM |
|
Don't understand though, that POM is claiming max hashrate of 250 KH/s, and there are users running more then 900 at this moment.
|
|
|
|
The Frisian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1019
Merit: 1003
Senior Developer and founder of ViMeAv ICT
|
|
August 21, 2017, 02:18:26 PM |
|
This could go on and on. I think you will need to change the PoW algorithm and that could take some time to be done right and properly tested. I would remove PoW for now and just run on PoS. I believe this will probably stop the forking. This is an unfair situation that may become more difficult as things progress imho.
If we can conclude this is caused by PoW and not by PoS I vote for this. |
|
|
|
|
|
edward0181
|
|
August 21, 2017, 02:21:05 PM |
|
This could go on and on. I think you will need to change the PoW algorithm and that could take some time to be done right and properly tested. I would remove PoW for now and just run on PoS. I believe this will probably stop the forking. This is an unfair situation that may become more difficult as things progress imho.
If we can conclude this is caused by PoW and not by PoS I vote for this. Me 2. Can live with putting coins in PoS only and trade them on exchanges... If pools and mining can't work at this moment due to forking every odd day. |
|
|
|
|
malafaya
|
|
August 21, 2017, 02:25:35 PM |
|
This could go on and on. I think you will need to change the PoW algorithm and that could take some time to be done right and properly tested. I would remove PoW for now and just run on PoS. I believe this will probably stop the forking. This is an unfair situation that may become more difficult as things progress imho.
If we can conclude this is caused by PoW and not by PoS I vote for this. Just for the record, I have the feeling it's PoS that causes the fork... I've seen more hybrid/PoS coins having this kind of unexplained problems than pure PoWs. And seeing the printscreen that someone recently posted [EDIT: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=735170.msg21041520#msg21041520 ], with tens of stakes in a couple of minutes makes my belief stronger. |
|
|
|
|
sohard4me
Member
Offline
Activity: 125
Merit: 10
|
|
August 21, 2017, 02:25:45 PM |
|
Probably we can start with request all pools to shut down & left with 1 pool running to let the chain continue moving?
Then slowly turn back on the pool
|
|
|
|
Abejorro
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
August 21, 2017, 02:41:53 PM |
|
Wow... just change to Pom Pool and went to anther blockchain... i have less than 200k so i think im not the fork guilty.....
Really want to try this coin, but i think is too inestable at this moment, hope this doesnt affects the price on the exchanges...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kadok29
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 1
|
|
August 21, 2017, 02:55:52 PM |
|
xmgpool working again!
|
|
|
|
|
The Frisian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1019
Merit: 1003
Senior Developer and founder of ViMeAv ICT
|
|
August 21, 2017, 03:02:25 PM |
|
This could go on and on. I think you will need to change the PoW algorithm and that could take some time to be done right and properly tested. I would remove PoW for now and just run on PoS. I believe this will probably stop the forking. This is an unfair situation that may become more difficult as things progress imho.
If we can conclude this is caused by PoW and not by PoS I vote for this. Just for the record, I have the feeling it's PoS that causes the fork... I've seen more hybrid/PoS coins having this kind of unexplained problems than pure PoWs. And seeing the printscreen that someone recently posted [EDIT: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=735170.msg21041520#msg21041520 ], with tens of stakes in a couple of minutes makes my belief stronger. That was my screen, from that time Joe and I decided to stop staking. So the last fork(s) was/were without MY staking. |
|
|
|
|
|
jcreyesb
|
|
August 21, 2017, 03:03:07 PM |
|
This could go on and on. I think you will need to change the PoW algorithm and that could take some time to be done right and properly tested. I would remove PoW for now and just run on PoS. I believe this will probably stop the forking. This is an unfair situation that may become more difficult as things progress imho.
If we can conclude this is caused by PoW and not by PoS I vote for this. Just for the record, I have the feeling it's PoS that causes the fork... I've seen more hybrid/PoS coins having this kind of unexplained problems than pure PoWs. And seeing the printscreen that someone recently posted [EDIT: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=735170.msg21041520#msg21041520 ], with tens of stakes in a couple of minutes makes my belief stronger. That was my screen, from that time Joe and I decided to stop staking. So the last fork(s) was/were without MY staking. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
minerclaim.net
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 2
|
|
August 21, 2017, 03:03:49 PM |
|
@Poolowners: Please provide us some informations via pm or send us a mail (check our profile) with the following informations:
Hash value of block 1449360
Hash value of block 1449320
Hash value of block 1449280
This would be helpful for further analyzing.
Thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
|
