[∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining USA/DE 255 blocks solved!

[tokona44]

The discussion regarding finding blocks with small miners has been moved here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1180754

Thanks!

[1715634493]

1715634493

[1715634493]

1715634493

[1715634493]

1715634493

[iegservers]

My arsenal...


Already Mining...
1 SP20
1 SP10
1 AMT 1.5th miner

Coming online this week.
2 CoinTera IV
7 BTC Garden V2's
4 SP35's
4 S3's
2 KNC November's 5 ports
1 KNC November 4 port

Update :  4 Antminer S7's ordered to add to farm.


[/quote]

[Mikestang]

My arsenal...


Already Mining...
1 SP20
1 SP10
1 AMT 1.5th miner

Coming online this week.
2 CoinTera IV
7 BTC Garden V2's
4 SP35's
4 S3's
2 KNC November's 5 ports
1 KNC November 4 port

Update :  4 Antminer S7's ordered to add to farm.

That's quite a power bill for solo lottery, good luck!

[realchlorum]

do you think with 100th/s i would have a good chance to hit a block in 24hrs?

[kano]

do you think with 100th/s i would have a good chance to hit a block in 24hrs?

Roughly one chance in 28.3

[realchlorum]

do you think with 100th/s i would have a good chance to hit a block in 24hrs?

Roughly one chance in 28.3

puh solo mining is expensive.

[o_solo_miner]

  my best value so far ...

"hashrate7d": "99.4G",
"lastupdate": 1442510723,
"workers": 2,

"bestshare": 4917714600.7218513
==========================

i am happy, even i don't hit a Block so far!

[WBF1]

Had some HW fail. Only chance for any sort of profit for me is to hit a block solo mining. Pointing 1850 GH here in the hopes I hit a block sometime in the next 6 months. My calculations say my chances are about 1:12 or 8% for that to happen (factoring in 5% diff jumps at each change). Can anyone comment on if I've run that number right?

[WBF1]

deleted

[thedreamer]

my best value so far ...

"hashrate7d": "99.4G",
"lastupdate": 1442510723,
"workers": 2,

"bestshare": 4917714600.7218513
==========================

i am happy, even i don't hit a Block so far!

For that hash rate that is phenomenal!

[sico2819]

Same, I will donate if I solve a block (and buy 2 S7 )

I don't think this will happen, I run 4 U3 with a hashrate of 240Gh/s ... but this is the solo mining fun !!

Good luck to everyone !

[WBF1]

2 questions about the stats function

1) if I hit a winning share, say 75G, will my stats page ever actually show that? (Best share resets every time a block is hit right?)

2) is there perhaps a different URL that gives hash rates in raw numbers vs suffixed numbers? (2500000000 vs. 2.5G for example)?

[edonkey]

I've written a script that sends notification emails when a block is found by the pool, or if a new best share for a given worker or user address has improved.

If the found block is one of your monitored addresses, the script congratulates you. Otherwise it wishes you better luck next time

Sure the best share value is a useless statistic. There are no near misses in the mining game, and past success is no indication of future success. However the best share value does provide a little bit of feedback that something is happening. And it's kind of fun to cheer on your miners. If you don't want best share notification, you can disable it.

In the future more notifications can be added, like hash rate warnings.

Here's where you can find the script:

http://edonkeycoin.github.io/ckpoolnotify/

The details are in the read me, but here's the overview of how you set up and use the script:

• Install a couple of needed python libraries
• Send a test message to validate your email credentials
• Run the script with your email settings plus the worker and user addresses you want to monitor
• Optionally configure as a daemon to run automatically at boot

Honestly I've only tested this on Mac OS X (Yosemite and the El Capitan GM). It probably works on Windows and Linux, but I haven't tried it. If you run into problems let me know.

[WBF1]

I also have this homegrown monitoring dashboard. It's really poorly written and a total hack, but it's good enough for me. If anyone wants it, I'll post to github as is with a short readme. I posted elsewhere with an older version here in the forums, but it didn't get a lot of traction (which is probably good, because like I said, it's poorly written).



Note that as edonkey said, almost all of these stats are not particularly useful, but it's kinda fun to look at.

[o_solo_miner]

maybe it is not perfectly written, but the result is nice!
I would like to have it.
Will you post me a link if you put it on Github please.



 

[wasikidding]

so 600th for 9 hours whats the prob. of hitting a block?

[-ck]

so 600th for 9 hours whats the prob. of hitting a block?

1 in 45

[-ck]

2 questions about the stats function

1) if I hit a winning share, say 75G, will my stats page ever actually show that? (Best share resets every time a block is hit right?)

2) is there perhaps a different URL that gives hash rates in raw numbers vs suffixed numbers? (2500000000 vs. 2.5G for example)?

1. Best share resets upon finding a block, so no.

2. No

[ezeminer]

2 questions about the stats function

1) if I hit a winning share, say 75G, will my stats page ever actually show that? (Best share resets every time a block is hit right?)

2) is there perhaps a different URL that gives hash rates in raw numbers vs suffixed numbers? (2500000000 vs. 2.5G for example)?

1. Best share resets upon finding a block, so no.

2. No

I've been stalking this thread for months now and I still chuckle every time someone asks about features to the pool. Like adding something.

"Can we have comma's on the numbers?" "No."
"Can we...?" "No."
"But.." "No."

And it's funny knowing that these answers are always the same. Why? You want the fastest speeds with low resource usage(server-side resources), so that your block will actually be confirmed by the network.

[-ck]

I've been stalking this thread for months now and I still chuckle every time someone asks about features to the pool. Like adding something.

"Can we have comma's on the numbers?" "No."
"Can we...?" "No."
"But.." "No."

And it's funny knowing that these answers are always the same. Why? You want the fastest speeds with low resource usage(server-side resources), so that your block will actually be confirmed by the network.

Sure I can add features but the pool hardly makes any money as it is and every feature added demands a restart which I go to great pains to avoid. If the pool was more profitable, or there was some other incentive, then sure I could add more features. None of the feature requests are really going to add any noticeable overhead - it's just there's a lack of any incentive to add features to a bare bones high performance no frills service. I doubt anyone can question the performance of the pool...