FORTUNEJACK.COM |Deposit 777 play with 1777 mBTC |Live Casino, Slots, Betting

[PaperWallet]

"FortuneJack has hijacked ****** of France out of a fortune", check out this report:

https://www.gamblinggrumbles.com/Reports/Fortunejack-Casino_paid-only-half

I apologize in advance, but I find this funny to read.
The author of the article is so naive.
In this and in any other casino you can read many cases of players not getting paid at all! Referring to a multi-account or the fact that the provider suddenly canceled the acceptance of bets!
It seems incredible to new players when your bet is accepted and then canceled for reasons unrelated to the sporting event.
Read a little more and you will understand that the casino never works honestly! They have your money! The rules that you accept when registering can be explained briefly - "whatever you do on our site, we can cancel any bets and block your balance for as long as we want!"

In your case, I can congratulate you on getting paid 100k - that's a big win! Thank you Fortunejack for paying =)
In the future, I do not advise you to bet on such large amounts! They can take away your deposit and give nothing at all!

Don't apologise, I know when you're not involved in something it's easier to laugh about it . You say the author is naive.... I don't think so. This is the administrator of a gambling mediation website who's been running for more than 10 years (maybe 15) so he knows what he's talking about.

If I follow your logic, as you state that this might happen in "any other casino", that's not true. Not everybody is mediocre. We humans have a natural sense of good and evil and a lot of people operate on these principles and usually don't do evil, and don't persist on doing evil in any way. It doesn't mean we should accept evil as a standard if some people, like the FortuneJack team, operate on this principle.

Take another example: have you ever heard a similar story with Rollbit? Not paying winning bets? Really?

And by the way, it's ridiculous to thank them paying 100k while they should:
-Be paying all of my winnings, which amounts to 240K.
-Be the ones to thank me gambling on their website since they make money off people like me, without the need to steal.

And a lot of online and landbased casinos work honestly. You accept a bet, the bet wins, you PAY without making that much noise.

[PaperWallet]

I stopped claiming such bonus codes a long time ago. Since hundreds of other users are doing the same thing at any given time, it is almost impossible to be fast enough. So, I decided to use my time in a more productive way instead.

Limited claim for bonus code and we know Fortune Jack is a very trusted and hot casino. It attracts so many gamblers and bonus code will be claimed very quickly.

Fortunately, at Fortune Jack, you can have many promotions and one of best for new gamblers on this casino is Guaranteed 20% Cashback on 1st Deposit! No Wagering Requirements!. No wagering requirements is very great condition for the Cashback program.

How stinky is your dirty money

[Dewi Aries]

Fortunejack is still consistent by providing free spins for users today i got 15 free spins and managed to win something
what's more interesting, the free spin win this time doesn't need a wager but it's still hampered min withdrawal
not bad this way will provoke me to make a new deposit because I see that Fortunejack has some new promotions.

[PaperWallet]

Hello everyone,
I have created a flag about FortuneJack, please support it:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=303298;page=iflags

[Sterbens]

Hello everyone,
I have created a flag about FortuneJack, please support it:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=303298;page=iflags

Don't be stupid, you think FortuneJack would do such a thing? No !!
I've been playing there long enough and don't get the crazy complaints you have. No one wants to vote for me on such accusations. FortuneJack has provided good service for me. So it's my duty to defend the casino that has been dedicated to providing the best service for me while playing there.

Note: now you are on my ignore list!!!

[PaperWallet]

Hello everyone,
I have created a flag about FortuneJack, please support it:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=303298;page=iflags

Don't be stupid, you think FortuneJack would do such a thing? No !!
I've been playing there long enough and don't get the crazy complaints you have. No one wants to vote for me on such accusations. FortuneJack has provided good service for me. So it's my duty to defend the casino that has been dedicated to providing the best service for me while playing there.

Note: now you are on my ignore list!!!

They're providing good service for you by stealing other players funds. Me too I had an excellent service until I had this big win. Your trust score says it all.

[buwaytress]

Hey Tornike/ampera, good to see you're still at it, season wrapping up, any chance we get a heads up on possible UCL/Europa/Conference League final action? Think you did some great ones in the UCL KO rounds but I barely had time to see them as they only arrived in inbox (in-game).

Anyway. Don't suppose we'll get MajSev Week 37 up before end of today? First match kicks off tomorrow =D

P.S. Withdrawal confirmation taking a bit longer than normal?

[Godzilliy]

"FortuneJack has hijacked ****** of France out of a fortune", check out this report:

https://www.gamblinggrumbles.com/Reports/Fortunejack-Casino_paid-only-half

I apologize in advance, but I find this funny to read.
The author of the article is so naive.
In this and in any other casino you can read many cases of players not getting paid at all! Referring to a multi-account or the fact that the provider suddenly canceled the acceptance of bets!
It seems incredible to new players when your bet is accepted and then canceled for reasons unrelated to the sporting event.
Read a little more and you will understand that the casino never works honestly! They have your money! The rules that you accept when registering can be explained briefly - "whatever you do on our site, we can cancel any bets and block your balance for as long as we want!"

In your case, I can congratulate you on getting paid 100k - that's a big win! Thank you Fortunejack for paying =)
In the future, I do not advise you to bet on such large amounts! They can take away your deposit and give nothing at all!

Don't apologise, I know when you're not involved in something it's easier to laugh about it . You say the author is naive.... I don't think so. This is the administrator of a gambling mediation website who's been running for more than 10 years (maybe 15) so he knows what he's talking about.

If I follow your logic, as you state that this might happen in "any other casino", that's not true. Not everybody is mediocre. We humans have a natural sense of good and evil and a lot of people operate on these principles and usually don't do evil, and don't persist on doing evil in any way. It doesn't mean we should accept evil as a standard if some people, like the FortuneJack team, operate on this principle.

Take another example: have you ever heard a similar story with Rollbit? Not paying winning bets? Really?

And by the way, it's ridiculous to thank them paying 100k while they should:
-Be paying all of my winnings, which amounts to 240K.
-Be the ones to thank me gambling on their website since they make money off people like me, without the need to steal.

And a lot of online and landbased casinos work honestly. You accept a bet, the bet wins, you PAY without making that much noise.

in your case there were no violations!
you have exceeded the maximum winnings specified in the rules! Therefore, it happened.
You bet a lot of money and at the same time were too lazy to check it. Why? Do you really think that the bookmaker can pay you any amount?
You write that there should be no acceptance of a bet if the potential winnings are greater than the maximum - that's where you're wrong! because it's impossible to do that! there is no guarantee that you will win on all bets. Yes, you can lose any amount, but you can win no more than 100 thousand.
You bet 200k at odds of 2.0 = you win 100k (not 200k). Do you understand? You still win!
What are you arguing with? that the casino does not have the right to set limits on winnings? Or do you think that you should have displayed a message like - "you can bet no more than 100 thousand at a factor of 2.0 because it exceeds the maximum win" ?! this will never happen! because there is no guarantee that you will win! Do you understand?

There is no point in blaming Fortunejack now. You've all been paid!

[FortuneJack]

                  🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　　　　　　
　　　　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　　　　
　　　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　　　
　　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　　
　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　
　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜🟧⬜🟧⬜🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟫⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜🟫🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟫⬜🟫⬜⬜⬜🟫🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜🟫🟧🟫⬜⬜🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜🟫🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜⬜🟧🟧⬜⬜🟫🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟫⬜⬜🟧🟧🟧🟫⬜⬜🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜🟧🟧🟫⬜⬜🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜🟫🟧🟫🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　
　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟫🟧⬜🟫🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　
　　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　　
　　　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　　　
　　　　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　　　　
　　　　　　   🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧

"T'R'U'S'T"

[PaperWallet]

You write that there should be no acceptance of a bet if the potential winnings are greater than the maximum - that's where you're wrong! because it's impossible to do that!

I mean I now understand more how FortuneJack is still running on so much stupid people. It's like the other story they were telling another player they couldn't pay because there was a problem with the etherum Network (of course not from their side)

[SATWAT]

                  🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　　　　　　
　　　　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　　　　
　　　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　　　
　　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　　
　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　
　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜🟧⬜🟧⬜🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟫⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜🟫🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟫⬜🟫⬜⬜⬜🟫🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜🟫🟧🟫⬜⬜🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜🟫🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜⬜🟧🟧⬜⬜🟫🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟫⬜⬜🟧🟧🟧🟫⬜⬜🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜🟧🟧🟫⬜⬜🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜🟫🟧🟫🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　
　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟫🟧⬜🟫🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　
　　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　　
　　　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　　　
　　　　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　　　　
　　　　　　   🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧

"T'R'U'S'T"

What is this any information about this?

Secondly I want to create account, but first I need some information about this casino is withdrawn possible without KYC, and I am using internet which is shared with many peoples in this building so if some other person also have account then what is condition for withdrawal mean any special requirement or still we can deposit and withdraw with sharing internet.

[PaperWallet]

                 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　　　　　　
　　　　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　　　　
　　　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　　　
　　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　　
　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　
　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜🟧⬜🟧⬜🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟫⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜🟫🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟫⬜🟫⬜⬜⬜🟫🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜🟫🟧🟫⬜⬜🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜🟫🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜⬜🟧🟧⬜⬜🟫🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟫⬜⬜🟧🟧🟧🟫⬜⬜🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜🟧🟧🟫⬜⬜🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜🟫🟧🟫🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　
　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟫🟧⬜🟫🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　
　　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　　
　　　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　　　
　　　　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　　　　
　　　　　　   🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧

"T'R'U'S'T"

What is this any information about this?

Secondly I want to create account, but first I need some information about this casino is withdrawn possible without KYC, and I am using internet which is shared with many peoples in this building so if some other person also have account then what is condition for withdrawal mean any special requirement or still we can deposit and withdraw with sharing internet.

No they force KYC when you withdraw. I had this with them. And a somewhat scammy website. Check out this summary report: https://www.cryptoinfowatch.com/is-fortunejack-a-panicky-casino-that-doesnt-pay-big-winnings/

And the reference with more details and evidence is here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5368279.0

As far as the words you were asking about, like the word "TRUST" in your example, these are supposed to be promotional codes, but only for a limited number of people who use them first. They might also be ghost codes (it means they're nothing just words to mislead people and keep them following their thread, which wouldn't be surprising as far as FortuneJack "policy" is concerned) that nobody can use, and even if someone were to claim he used them nobody can verify that. And they could be codes that are sometimes legit sometimes not. So nobody knows what these are.

[Emitdama]

Fortunejack could be under some "threat" right now that some player possesses, but scam accusations is the place for that and we need to hear from Fortunejack before we could make any decisions regarding this subject.

I mean maybe they are right, maybe they are not I would not know and as far as I know there is really nothing that would be anything similar to this getting a decision without hearing both sides of the story. I have to say fortunejack is clearly not the best ever casino in crypto if you ask me, but it is also not a terrible place and I would not expect it to have any problems regarding this issue, so let's wait and see what they say first.

[hd49728]

Fortunejack could be under some "threat" right now that some player possesses, but scam accusations is the place for that and we need to hear from Fortunejack before we could make any decisions regarding this subject.

Fortune Jack has good reputation and I witnessed several scam accusation against them that ended as false accusations. Gamblers tried to cheat and when their cheating cases found and restricted per rules, they opened false accusations.

I mean maybe they are right, maybe they are not I would not know and as far as I know there is really nothing that would be anything similar to this getting a decision without hearing both sides of the story. I have to say fortunejack is clearly not the best ever casino in crypto if you ask me, but it is also not a terrible place and I would not expect it to have any problems regarding this issue, so let's wait and see what they say first.

If they are a scam casino, they can not have good reputation and can not survive in this industry many years. In some serious cases, they opened to mediation with third party and honestly I see it is good initiative from FortuneJack to verify such cases. If the mediators said the case is right, cheater can not do anything more.

[PaperWallet]

Fortunejack could be under some "threat" right now that some player possesses, but scam accusations is the place for that and we need to hear from Fortunejack before we could make any decisions regarding this subject.

I mean maybe they are right, maybe they are not I would not know and as far as I know there is really nothing that would be anything similar to this getting a decision without hearing both sides of the story. I have to say fortunejack is clearly not the best ever casino in crypto if you ask me, but it is also not a terrible place and I would not expect it to have any problems regarding this issue, so let's wait and see what they say first.

Here's my flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=303298;page=iflags

You have here the link for the scam accusation, where you can also find their side of the story (a partial side, since a lot of questions went unanswered)

They are not "A" scam casino, as I have stated before, since their spectrum of selective scamming is still relatively thin, but still, you're not supposed to scam anyone.

[tokeweed]

Ey Tornike...  There's something wrong with this week's Majestic 7 list of match ups.  Well one of them.  You have Man United vs Chelsea and it doesn't look like they're playing this weekend.  The match is already over which ended in a draw 1 - 1.  I picked Ronaldo anyway.  Lol.

Here are my picks for the weekend guys:

Watkins
Ronaldo lol
Saka
Mane
Son
Vardy
KDB

That's the winning ticket. 

Anyway, what about you guys?  There's just one more match day after this right?

[buwaytress]

Final round of MajSev gentlemen! And I state heavy intent on heavy club favourites, but sprinkled with a healthy shine of underdogs on the opposite ends of the match.

Thus Saka, Ronaldo, Vardy (yes, despite injury), Toney, Salah and Kane make my lineup, but I think Countinho has his destiny boots waiting to be worn, so a strike from range is written in the stars heh.

[tokeweed]

^  Yup!  It's the last chance to win the big one...  I don't think anybody else won it after some guy did at the start of the season.  And it was so random too because the goal scorer from Brentford was the most unlikely guy to have made a goal but the guy picked him.  It's funny how that works out sometimes.

Anyway as for my picks, I got Saka, Ronaldo, Vardy, Wissa, Diaz, Grealish and Kane.  Leeezz gooo!

[notblox1]

Ey Tornike...  There's something wrong with this week's Majestic 7 list of match ups.  Well one of them.  You have Man United vs Chelsea and it doesn't look like they're playing this weekend.  The match is already over which ended in a draw 1 - 1.  I picked Ronaldo anyway.  Lol.

I did exactly the same thing like you did with Ronaldo, but I was thinking this match would be played in future rounds.
This shows I was not thinking at all when I made predictions because we have only one more round in Premier League after this one. 
I didn't have time to check my predictions but i am sure I had Vardy to score and he did two times.

[FortuneJack]

                   🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　　　　　　
　　　　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　　　　
　　　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　　　
　　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　　
　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　
　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜🟧⬜🟧⬜🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟫⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜🟫🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟫⬜🟫⬜⬜⬜🟫🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜🟫🟧🟫⬜⬜🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜🟫🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜⬜🟧🟧⬜⬜🟫🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟫⬜⬜🟧🟧🟧🟫⬜⬜🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜🟧🟧🟫⬜⬜🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜🟫🟧🟫🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　
　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟫🟧⬜🟫🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　
　　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　　
　　　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　　　
　　　　🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧　　　　
　　　　　　   🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧

'P'A'R'T'I'E'S