Moderation of (possible) FUD and insults

[junglecat]

After receiving a lot of PMs about this subject, seeing a lot of reports of this kind and after one of the global mods PMed me with suggestions regarding this topic, I thought that I should cover it:

Possible (or real, not for me to judge) FUD, accusations or statements are not moderated.

Moderators don't moderate for truth. However, trolling isn't allowed. If a user is habitually posting obviously false nonsense just to stir up trouble, then it's considered trolling, which is prohibited. However, such cases should be thoroughly documented in the report (There are tons of reports that just say "trolling", but moderators don't have time to look through each user's post).

Possible (since we don't have the time or resources to check) insults are also allowed as long as they contain any kind of constructive opinion, info or something else substantial and aren't off-topic. For example, posting something like "you are dumb" will be deleted as it contains no meaningful content. However, if the post is somehwere along the lines of "You are dumb. This is wrong because this website/thread/etc. has explained it's not right", it's in most cases accepted.

Possible scams aren't moderated either due to the fact that's it's extremely hard to make an unbiased decision on a limited amount of evidence and time. Moderators don't have time to be investigators.

Legal note: This is forum policy, not mine.

Trolling should be allowed because somebody is left judging if it is the "truth" or not. This obviously brings an abuse of power into the situation. Censorship leads nowhere.

[1679316702]

1679316702

[1679316702]

1679316702

[mprep]

After receiving a lot of PMs about this subject, seeing a lot of reports of this kind and after one of the global mods PMed me with suggestions regarding this topic, I thought that I should cover it:

Possible (or real, not for me to judge) FUD, accusations or statements are not moderated.

Moderators don't moderate for truth. However, trolling isn't allowed. If a user is habitually posting obviously false nonsense just to stir up trouble, then it's considered trolling, which is prohibited. However, such cases should be thoroughly documented in the report (There are tons of reports that just say "trolling", but moderators don't have time to look through each user's post).

Possible (since we don't have the time or resources to check) insults are also allowed as long as they contain any kind of constructive opinion, info or something else substantial and aren't off-topic. For example, posting something like "you are dumb" will be deleted as it contains no meaningful content. However, if the post is somehwere along the lines of "You are dumb. This is wrong because this website/thread/etc. has explained it's not right", it's in most cases accepted.

Possible scams aren't moderated either due to the fact that's it's extremely hard to make an unbiased decision on a limited amount of evidence and time. Moderators don't have time to be investigators.

Legal note: This is forum policy, not mine.

Trolling should be allowed because somebody is left judging if it is the "truth" or not. This obviously brings an abuse of power into the situation. Censorship leads nowhere.

That's the thing - it's usually easy to spot blatant trolling since it breaks other rules (low quality post, no arguments, posting off-topic gibberish, etc.).

[stoner19]

I fully understand that it would be impossible to moderate all the FUD, scams, etc that pop up on a daily basis. But why moderate/delete posts from legitimate altcoin exchanges that discuss coins being added to their marketplace?

[mprep]

I fully understand that it would be impossible to moderate all the FUD, scams, etc that pop up on a daily basis. But why moderate/delete posts from legitimate altcoin exchanges that discuss coins being added to their marketplace?

See: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=718124.0.

[mikeymillie]

The moderation is basically a libertarian approach just as the whole BTC thing has a libertarian concept around it.
To the ill educated ones who cant quite grasp the sensible moderation approach please visit your local library and read everything.
Seriously?  
Of all the places you would imagine the libertarian concept to be fully understood it would be here. But nah, we see
the same brainwashed hordes running around demanding their liberties be taken away from them.
Doesnt matter the reason, their always the same
Ultimately these people shoot themselves in the foot.

The mods approach is correct!

While there are a few libertarians on this board, they are in the minority - just like in real live.
As you stand on your pedestal castigating the "ill educated", keep in mind that

• [miners] are in complete control of Bitcoin's production in the absence of a central authority
• [miners] are remunerated proportionally for their effort
• The entire Bitcoin ecosystem is entirely dependent on a [consensus-based blockchain]

Now, replace
[miners] with [workers]
[central authority] with [factory owners, landowners, etc.]
[consensus-based blockchain] with [democratic blockchain]

What do you have? Limited socialism at play.

I also used to think the forum administrators were libertarians. Now I realize they are just apathetic.

It's almost as if Libertarian is a term for people who have Socialist views, but who refuse to recognize (or are just too self-centered to acknowledge) the economic input of a society larger than that which can be confined within the space of their own two footprints.  Anti-social Socialists, you might say. 

[farrukh]

As alt cryptocurrency forum is large enough to need more than one moderator, so that they can manage the alt cryptocurrencies section in a better way.

[mprep]

As alt cryptocurrency forum is large enough to need more than one moderator, so that they can manage the alt cryptocurrencies section in a better way.

I'm not the only one moderating this section. All global moderators and admins can moderate (and do moderate) this section. Patroller mods moderate all newbie posts around the forum.

[dzimbeck]

After receiving a lot of PMs about this subject, seeing a lot of reports of this kind and after one of the global mods PMed me with suggestions regarding this topic, I thought that I should cover it:

Possible (or real, not for me to judge) FUD, accusations or statements are not moderated.

Moderators don't moderate for truth. However, trolling isn't allowed. If a user is habitually posting obviously false nonsense just to stir up trouble, then it's considered trolling, which is prohibited. However, such cases should be thoroughly documented in the report (There are tons of reports that just say "trolling", but moderators don't have time to look through each user's post).

Possible (since we don't have the time or resources to check) insults are also allowed as long as they contain any kind of constructive opinion, info or something else substantial and aren't off-topic. For example, posting something like "you are dumb" will be deleted as it contains no meaningful content. However, if the post is somehwere along the lines of "You are dumb. This is wrong because this website/thread/etc. has explained it's not right", it's in most cases accepted.

Possible scams aren't moderated either due to the fact that's it's extremely hard to make an unbiased decision on a limited amount of evidence and time. Moderators don't have time to be investigators.

Legal note: This is forum policy, not mine.

Then remove this thread. This is not only illegal hosting of private content, but way beyond what you guys should be allowing.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=890221.0

[mprep]

After receiving a lot of PMs about this subject, seeing a lot of reports of this kind and after one of the global mods PMed me with suggestions regarding this topic, I thought that I should cover it:

Possible (or real, not for me to judge) FUD, accusations or statements are not moderated.

Moderators don't moderate for truth. However, trolling isn't allowed. If a user is habitually posting obviously false nonsense just to stir up trouble, then it's considered trolling, which is prohibited. However, such cases should be thoroughly documented in the report (There are tons of reports that just say "trolling", but moderators don't have time to look through each user's post).

Possible (since we don't have the time or resources to check) insults are also allowed as long as they contain any kind of constructive opinion, info or something else substantial and aren't off-topic. For example, posting something like "you are dumb" will be deleted as it contains no meaningful content. However, if the post is somehwere along the lines of "You are dumb. This is wrong because this website/thread/etc. has explained it's not right", it's in most cases accepted.

Possible scams aren't moderated either due to the fact that's it's extremely hard to make an unbiased decision on a limited amount of evidence and time. Moderators don't have time to be investigators.

Legal note: This is forum policy, not mine.

Then remove this thread. This is not only illegal hosting of private content, but way beyond what you guys should be allowing.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=890221.0

I do not know how this relates to the thread, but just like I informed you via PM, contact theymos regarding any legal concerns.

[farrukh]

As alt cryptocurrency forum is large enough to need more than one moderator, so that they can manage the alt cryptocurrencies section in a better way.

I'm not the only one moderating this section. All global moderators and admins can moderate (and do moderate) this section. Patroller mods moderate all newbie posts around the forum.

Thats pretty good if all global moderators and admins are moderating this section.

[LeongTap]

From: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=715435.6340

I don't care about what its name is,I care about whether the pool mining issue can be fixed.

There is no issue. The coin was designed to make pool mining a ridiculous idea. If you pool mine then you will lose your coins. Unless you get into a pool that you completely trust. The likelihood of that happening is slim, which means that coins will be greatly decentralized. We may see a few small pools popping up, but they will not let in anyone they don't trust.  The coin is working perfectly as planned.

If you never mine at nonce-pool,please shut up!

I'm sorry, have you mined at nonce-pool? Do you know what is going on here? Perhaps your lost.

Yes,I do mine at nonce-pool.It works as well as any other coin with no difference.

Well since the pool function works perfectly go ahead and send me your login credentials.
Unless of course your lying, or you realize that I could steal from the other miners. But if neither of these things are true go ahead and send me the log in credentials. Once I take a picture to prove it to the world you can change your password and all will be well again.

Well since you have a dick,show us your dick,otherwise we'll believe you are an eunuch.Is this your stupid logic ?

Connection Info: sgminer -o http://mine3.spr.nonce-pool.com:4400 -u username.worker -p password

Currently payouts run once every 24 hours.

Contributor Shares
Rank    Donor    User Name    Shares
1       antonio8    20,944
2       zorbo    6,546
3       Admin    3,216
no Donation 0%-2% Donation 2% or more Donation
Contributor Hashrates
Rank    Donor    User Name    KH/s    SPR/Day
1       antonio8    18,483    43.405
2       zorbo    7,298    17.139
3       Admin    3,607    8.471
no Donation 0%-2% Donation 2% or more Donation
General Statistics
Pool Hash Rate    24830.280 KH/s
Pool Efficiency    97.91%
Current Active Workers    4
Current Difficulty    53.50000638
Est. Next Difficulty    50.71192957 (Change in 1 Blocks)
Est. Avg. Time per Round (Network)    1 minute 3 seconds
Est. Avg. Time per Round (Pool)    2 hours 31 minutes 30 seconds
Est. Shares this Round    13696 (done: 224.2%)
Next Network Block    253,318    (Current: 253,317)
Last Block Found    253,088
Time Since Last Block    4 hours 7 minutes 31 seconds
These stats are also available in JSON format HERE
Last Found Blocks
Block    Finder    Time    Actual Shares
253088    antonio8    02/04/2015 14:49:09    3,460
253049    antonio8    02/04/2015 14:20:48    1,346
253034    zorbo    02/04/2015 14:10:04    36,500
252676    antonio8    02/04/2015 08:05:13    777
252665    Admin    02/04/2015 07:56:53    2,237
252639    antonio8    02/04/2015 07:33:26    908
252624    zorbo    02/04/2015 07:24:00    60,917
252271    chrysophylax    02/04/2015 01:34:55    9,744
252230    chrysophylax    02/04/2015 00:56:25    14,016
252196    zorbo    02/04/2015 00:01:22    9,705
Note: Round Earnings are not credited until 140 confirms.

https://i.imgur.com/Dg0LKMM.png

https://i.imgur.com/b2XLeqN.jpg



The solid proof of the existence of pools.  

happy to see my old post surfacing again~  

You deserve a reward for such bravery !

Now run and hide lest the burn you at the stake !

Thanks ,hippie.
I've already been rewarded for my wise judgement.

I treat spr ,eps spr mn,as a perfect speculative tool,which gives people a high expectation to boost the price to go up and up day by day .

It costs me $16 power fee to mine 62K spr with 2 I7 cpu in the early months and sold them between 55k-67k sato before spr mn test was launched.

I deeply understand spr mn is totally a gimmick without any use,that explains why the price halved after spr mn test was launched.

Let's wait for the second round of big fall after official mn is released. 

Say what you will about me and me not having any difference to this guy, but just to clarify so that i can do the same thing elsewhere, do the mods allow such spam ?

Quote himself

Quote himself again

Quote HIMSELF AGAIN AND AGAIN. Look at how long and distracting the post is intentionally made.

[mprep]

From: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=715435.6340


-quote snip-


Say what you will about me and me not having any difference to this guy, but just to clarify so that i can do the same thing elsewhere, do the mods allow such spam ?

Quote himself

Quote himself again

Quote HIMSELF AGAIN AND AGAIN. Look at how long and distracting the post is intentionally made.

Nope, quote pyramids are not allowed.

[1024KB]

From: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=715435.6340


-quote snip-


Say what you will about me and me not having any difference to this guy, but just to clarify so that i can do the same thing elsewhere, do the mods allow such spam ?

Quote himself

Quote himself again

Quote HIMSELF AGAIN AND AGAIN. Look at how long and distracting the post is intentionally made.

Nope, quote pyramids are not allowed.

so that post should be killed then, got it

[mprep]

From: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=715435.6340


-quote snip-


Say what you will about me and me not having any difference to this guy, but just to clarify so that i can do the same thing elsewhere, do the mods allow such spam ?

Quote himself

Quote himself again

Quote HIMSELF AGAIN AND AGAIN. Look at how long and distracting the post is intentionally made.

Nope, quote pyramids are not allowed.

so that post should be killed then, got it

It has already been deleted.

[RenegadeMan]

Hello mprep

I'm part of the Darkcoin community and spend most of my time on BCT in the [ANN][DRK] Darkcoin | First Anonymous Coin | Inventor of X11, DGW, Darksend and InstantX thread

As you would no doubt know, we've had many many examples of people posting FUD and undertaking concerted campaigns against Darkcoin. We currently have an individual who is posting lies and slander about the lead developer of Darkcoin, Evan Duffield and the Darkcoin community in general. Many of us have directed him to numerous posts and documents on why the issue he's constantly referencing isn't anything of concern to investors and the community and that it's something that was sorted long ago. But he's simply continuing on relentlessly determined to do damage.

INSTAMINE ALERT

Attention: The developers and insiders instamined 2+ million DRK in the first 48 hours of launch.

SCAM IN PROGRESS

I think it needs to be dealt with by a BCT mod.

regards

RenegadeMan

[mprep]

Hello mprep

I'm part of the Darkcoin community and spend most of my time on BCT in the [ANN][DRK] Darkcoin | First Anonymous Coin | Inventor of X11, DGW, Darksend and InstantX thread

As you would no doubt know, we've had many many examples of people posting FUD and undertaking concerted campaigns against Darkcoin. We currently have an individual who is posting lies and slander about the lead developer of Darkcoin, Evan Duffield and the Darkcoin community in general. Many of us have directed him to numerous posts and documents on why the issue he's constantly referencing isn't anything of concern to investors and the community and that it's something that was sorted long ago. But he's simply continuing on relentlessly determined to do damage.

INSTAMINE ALERT

Attention: The developers and insiders instamined 2+ million DRK in the first 48 hours of launch.

SCAM IN PROGRESS

I think it needs to be dealt with by a BCT mod.

regards

RenegadeMan

Read the OP:

Possible (or real, not for me to judge) FUD, accusations or statements are not moderated

[RenegadeMan]

Hello mprep

I'm part of the Darkcoin community and spend most of my time on BCT in the [ANN][DRK] Darkcoin | First Anonymous Coin | Inventor of X11, DGW, Darksend and InstantX thread

As you would no doubt know, we've had many many examples of people posting FUD and undertaking concerted campaigns against Darkcoin. We currently have an individual who is posting lies and slander about the lead developer of Darkcoin, Evan Duffield and the Darkcoin community in general. Many of us have directed him to numerous posts and documents on why the issue he's constantly referencing isn't anything of concern to investors and the community and that it's something that was sorted long ago. But he's simply continuing on relentlessly determined to do damage.

INSTAMINE ALERT

Attention: The developers and insiders instamined 2+ million DRK in the first 48 hours of launch.

SCAM IN PROGRESS

I think it needs to be dealt with by a BCT mod.

regards

RenegadeMan

Read the OP:

Possible (or real, not for me to judge) FUD, accusations or statements are not moderated

Okay, thanks. If you have any ideas on how to handle someone like this (apart from the usual everyone putting him on ignore) please let me know.

[mprep]

Hello mprep

I'm part of the Darkcoin community and spend most of my time on BCT in the [ANN][DRK] Darkcoin | First Anonymous Coin | Inventor of X11, DGW, Darksend and InstantX thread

As you would no doubt know, we've had many many examples of people posting FUD and undertaking concerted campaigns against Darkcoin. We currently have an individual who is posting lies and slander about the lead developer of Darkcoin, Evan Duffield and the Darkcoin community in general. Many of us have directed him to numerous posts and documents on why the issue he's constantly referencing isn't anything of concern to investors and the community and that it's something that was sorted long ago. But he's simply continuing on relentlessly determined to do damage.

INSTAMINE ALERT

Attention: The developers and insiders instamined 2+ million DRK in the first 48 hours of launch.

SCAM IN PROGRESS

I think it needs to be dealt with by a BCT mod.

regards

RenegadeMan

Read the OP:

Possible (or real, not for me to judge) FUD, accusations or statements are not moderated

Okay, thanks. If you have any ideas on how to handle someone like this (apart from the usual everyone putting him on ignore) please let me know.

You can always suggest OP to close the old thread and open up a self-moderated one.

[Gibbs187x]

have a look here please some guy keeps bashing and posting in big red letters all the time hes starting to get on my nerves enough with the FUD 

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=985920.0

[mprep]

have a look here please some guy keeps bashing and posting in big red letters all the time hes starting to get on my nerves enough with the FUD 

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=985920.0

Wrong board. Plus he only posted one post from what I can see. Also, have you even read the OP of this thread?