Bitcoin Forum
February 03, 2023, 08:11:36 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 24.0.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 [302] 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 ... 434 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) | Testing New Masternodes  (Read 809973 times)
MemoryShock
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 12, 2015, 03:43:05 AM
 #6021

Are we really having the bit/satoshi argument here.

Refer to it as the industry standard reference. No name change necessary.

I am just happy that we have our original thread back. hahaha.

See how such discussions keep us entertained and the trolls away? I love it.

Everything we say here is just thinking out loud, to be taken with a grain of salt.

Ofcourse.  Roll Eyes

I'll buy that foe a dolla...spit balling is fine.  But there is no reason to start implementing a name so that we have to explain everything again.  People know what Masternodes are.  The Masternodes here provide the same function and people already know what that entails.  If anything, refer to them as 'easier Masternodes'.

That said, I think that there is no harm in the discussion...I also think that Mr. Spread has the final say.  If he continues to use the terminology that he has been using then there it is, perhaps.

Of course, there is something to be said about a mildly heated discussion focused on SPR that keeps the trolls at bay...even if it is mildly fallacious...and I loled at the ape analogy.  Let's use this as the main selling point when we market SPR in the Bible Belt...Cheesy

██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
  I/O DIGITAL
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
iodigital.io & iocoin.io

█████████████████
███████████████████
████████▌████████▐████
███████████████████████
████████████████████████
█████▌██████████████▐███
█████▌██████████████▐███
█████▌██████████████▐███
████████████████████████
███████████████████████
████████▌████████▐████
███████████████████
█████████████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
1675411896
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1675411896

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1675411896
Reply with quote  #2

1675411896
Report to moderator
"I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1675411896
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1675411896

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1675411896
Reply with quote  #2

1675411896
Report to moderator
1675411896
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1675411896

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1675411896
Reply with quote  #2

1675411896
Report to moderator
njs811
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 12, 2015, 03:45:29 AM
 #6022

Are we really having the bit/satoshi argument here.

Refer to it as the industry standard reference. No name change necessary.

I am just happy that we have our original thread back. hahaha.

See how such discussions keep us entertained and the trolls away? I love it.

Everything we say here is just thinking out loud, to be taken with a grain of salt.

Ofcourse.  Roll Eyes

I'll buy that foe a dolla...spit balling is fine.  But there is no reason to start implementing a name so that we have to explain everything again.  People know what Masternodes are.  The Masternodes here provide the same function and people already know what that entails.  If anything, refer to them as 'easier Masternodes'.

That said, I think that there is no harm in the discussion...I also think that Mr. Spread has the final say.  If he continues to use the terminology that he has been using then there it is, perhaps.

Of course, there is something to be said about a mildly heated discussion focused on SPR that keeps the trolls at bay...even if it is mildly fallacious...and I loled at the ape analogy.  Let's use this as the main selling point when we market SPR in the Bible Belt...Cheesy

I still don't know why there is no ChristCoin. You know "in God we trust" that kinda thing. I bet it would go BIG.
georgem
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1006


spreadcoin.info


View Profile WWW
February 12, 2015, 03:47:09 AM
 #6023

Are we really having the bit/satoshi argument here.

Refer to it as the industry standard reference. No name change necessary.

I am just happy that we have our original thread back. hahaha.

See how such discussions keep us entertained and the trolls away? I love it.

Everything we say here is just thinking out loud, to be taken with a grain of salt.

Ofcourse.  Roll Eyes

I'll buy that foe a dolla...spit balling is fine.  But there is no reason to start implementing a name so that we have to explain everything again.  People know what Masternodes are.  The Masternodes here provide the same function and people already know what that entails.  If anything, refer to them as 'easier Masternodes'.

That said, I think that there is no harm in the discussion...I also think that Mr. Spread has the final say.  If he continues to use the terminology that he has been using then there it is, perhaps.

Of course, there is something to be said about a mildly heated discussion focused on SPR that keeps the trolls at bay...even if it is mildly fallacious...and I loled at the ape analogy.  Let's use this as the main selling point when we market SPR in the Bible Belt...Cheesy

I honestly think that we can only keep the trolls away, if we ourselves start acting a little more erratic than usual.

This is the jungle called BCT... let's have some fun.

If you wanna let it all hang out, that's the place to do it!

 Grin

georgem
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1006


spreadcoin.info


View Profile WWW
February 12, 2015, 03:48:20 AM
 #6024

I still don't know why there is no ChristCoin. You know "in God we trust" that kinda thing. I bet it would go BIG.

I'm sure they are working on it.... but it's probably difficult for them to find good christian mathematicians!  Grin

njs811
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 12, 2015, 03:52:16 AM
 #6025

I still don't know why there is no ChristCoin. You know "in God we trust" that kinda thing. I bet it would go BIG.

I'm sure they are working on it.... but it's probably difficult for them to find good christian mathematicians!  Grin

I'm just imagining all of the backwoods republicans who will refused to buy into virtual currency. This would be perfect for them. And let's face it, republicans are great at holding back progress. 
njs811
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 12, 2015, 03:58:25 AM
 #6026

I still don't know why there is no ChristCoin. You know "in God we trust" that kinda thing. I bet it would go BIG.

I'm sure they are working on it.... but it's probably difficult for them to find good christian mathematicians!  Grin

lol with GodX11 algo and HolyGhostSend

...actually guys this might be infallible.
MemoryShock
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 12, 2015, 03:58:51 AM
 #6027

I still don't know why there is no ChristCoin. You know "in God we trust" that kinda thing. I bet it would go BIG.

Oh...they tried...https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=399681.0

I'm still amazed that it didn't go to the moon...but then again, I think people who believe in Jesus don't necessarily believe in the moon...; )

██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
  I/O DIGITAL
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
iodigital.io & iocoin.io

█████████████████
███████████████████
████████▌████████▐████
███████████████████████
████████████████████████
█████▌██████████████▐███
█████▌██████████████▐███
█████▌██████████████▐███
████████████████████████
███████████████████████
████████▌████████▐████
███████████████████
█████████████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
njs811
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 12, 2015, 04:01:26 AM
 #6028

I still don't know why there is no ChristCoin. You know "in God we trust" that kinda thing. I bet it would go BIG.

Oh...they tried...https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=399681.0

I'm still amazed that it didn't go to the moon...but then again, I think people who believe in Jesus don't necessarily believe in the moon...; )

It looks like someone made a joke coin. I'm serious though this could take off. Think about it. You could rip off any coin and few people would dare calling it a shitcoin. Especially if people thought God was backing it. It could not fail.
njs811
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 12, 2015, 04:07:57 AM
 #6029

If anyone does make a legit Jesuscoin please let me in on the pre-mine. Also I would prefer sha256, or X11 or both!

Edit: Also it should have a ridiculously low supply. Perhaps 10,000?

YES!
Matthew 7:14
But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it.
MemoryShock
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 12, 2015, 04:17:01 AM
 #6030

If anyone does make a legit Jesuscoin please let me in on the pre-mine. Also I would prefer sha256, or X11 or both!

Edit: Also it should have a ridiculously low supply. Perhaps 10,000?

YES!
Matthew 7:14
But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it.


Oh goodness...you found a scripture for it. 

Please stop...for all that is Holy!!!

lolz...

██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
  I/O DIGITAL
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
iodigital.io & iocoin.io

█████████████████
███████████████████
████████▌████████▐████
███████████████████████
████████████████████████
█████▌██████████████▐███
█████▌██████████████▐███
█████▌██████████████▐███
████████████████████████
███████████████████████
████████▌████████▐████
███████████████████
█████████████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
girino
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2296
Merit: 1170


Advertise Here - PM for more info!


View Profile
February 12, 2015, 04:19:23 AM
 #6031

Proper attribution (especially when it comes to open source attribution) doesn't mean that you need to put the name of the first guy who had that idea on your product...

Well, there is the problem. In my opinion, masternodes are NOT a product. They are a feature from the product, which is SpreadCoin. So while you're looking at naming a product, i'm looking at naming a feature. It makes simply no sense for me to rename a feature, while it makes no sense for you to NOT rename a product.

Still, i am unable to see masternodes as a product. The only product i see is "spreadcoin", and everything else are features included in it.

Advertise Here - PM for more info!
MemoryShock
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 12, 2015, 04:30:21 AM
 #6032

Proper attribution (especially when it comes to open source attribution) doesn't mean that you need to put the name of the first guy who had that idea on your product...

Well, there is the problem. In my opinion, masternodes are NOT a product. They are a feature from the product, which is SpreadCoin. So while you're looking at naming a product, i'm looking at naming a feature. It makes simply no sense for me to rename a feature, while it makes no sense for you to NOT rename a product.

Still, i am unable to see masternodes as a product. The only product i see is "spreadcoin", and everything else are features included in it.

Just wanted to say that I think you summed it up quite well.

Not disrespecting the debate but I'm rolling with that...

██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
  I/O DIGITAL
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
iodigital.io & iocoin.io

█████████████████
███████████████████
████████▌████████▐████
███████████████████████
████████████████████████
█████▌██████████████▐███
█████▌██████████████▐███
█████▌██████████████▐███
████████████████████████
███████████████████████
████████▌████████▐████
███████████████████
█████████████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
e1ghtSpace
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1001


Crypto since 2014


View Profile WWW
February 12, 2015, 06:13:12 AM
 #6033

Why don't we call our version of Masternodes Smartnodes. It makes more sense because a masternode isn't really the master of anything.  a Smartnode on the other hand is smarter than a normal node because it can do IX and mixing.

Plus, smartnode starts with an S.

What do you think?


Edit: also "Master" sounds centralised unlike "smart"
njs811
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 12, 2015, 06:18:23 AM
 #6034

Why don't we call our version of Masternodes Smartnodes. It makes more sense because a masternode isn't really the master of anything.  a Smartnode on the other hand is smarter than a normal node because it can do IX and mixing.

Plus, smartnode starts with an S.

What do you think?


Edit: also "Master" sounds centralised unlike "smart"

This is also a great idea.
devlin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 272
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 12, 2015, 07:04:16 AM
 #6035

Why don't we call our version of Masternodes Smartnodes. It makes more sense because a masternode isn't really the master of anything.  a Smartnode on the other hand is smarter than a normal node because it can do IX and mixing.

Plus, smartnode starts with an S.

What do you think?


Edit: also "Master" sounds centralised unlike "smart"

Smartnode is a good name, brilliant ideea to rename MN.

MemoryShock
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 12, 2015, 07:22:54 AM
 #6036

Going to place the downvote on smartnode.  

Ambiguous connotation, no direct association with prior terms and makes it more confusing.

There is no need for a renaming in my opinion...unless we go with SflarfinNodes!

██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
  I/O DIGITAL
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
iodigital.io & iocoin.io

█████████████████
███████████████████
████████▌████████▐████
███████████████████████
████████████████████████
█████▌██████████████▐███
█████▌██████████████▐███
█████▌██████████████▐███
████████████████████████
███████████████████████
████████▌████████▐████
███████████████████
█████████████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
sine_fuc
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 62
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 12, 2015, 07:25:15 AM
 #6037

I don't care about what its name is,I care about whether the pool mining issue can be fixed.

There is no issue. The coin was designed to make pool mining a ridiculous idea. If you pool mine then you will lose your coins. Unless you get into a pool that you completely trust. The likelihood of that happening is slim, which means that coins will be greatly decentralized. We may see a few small pools popping up, but they will not let in anyone they don't trust.  The coin is working perfectly as planned.
If you never mine at nonce-pool,please shut up!


I'm sorry, have you mined at nonce-pool? Do you know what is going on here? Perhaps your lost.
Yes,I do mine at nonce-pool.It works as well as any other coin with no difference.

Nthused
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1001



View Profile
February 12, 2015, 07:34:11 AM
 #6038

I don't care about what its name is,I care about whether the pool mining issue can be fixed.

There is no issue. The coin was designed to make pool mining a ridiculous idea. If you pool mine then you will lose your coins. Unless you get into a pool that you completely trust. The likelihood of that happening is slim, which means that coins will be greatly decentralized. We may see a few small pools popping up, but they will not let in anyone they don't trust.  The coin is working perfectly as planned.
If you never mine at nonce-pool,please shut up!


I'm sorry, have you mined at nonce-pool? Do you know what is going on here? Perhaps your lost.
Yes,I do mine at nonce-pool.It works as well as any other coin with no difference.

But the thing is you have to have 100% trust in the pool and its users as anyone can take the mined coins/blocks thats the difference with this coin and others, it is a Solo only coin which makes it Decentralized yes you could have pools but once all that big hashrate jumps on there will be a lot of greedy people stealing coins, it's as simple as that when you try to understand SPR.
e1ghtSpace
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1001


Crypto since 2014


View Profile WWW
February 12, 2015, 07:36:55 AM
 #6039

Going to place the downvote on smartnode.  

Ambiguous connotation, no direct association with prior terms and makes it more confusing.

There is no need for a renaming in my opinion...unless we go with SflarfinNodes!
Masternode is also an ambiguous connotation. It also sounds very centralised. And "node" is an association.
njs811
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 12, 2015, 07:57:46 AM
 #6040

I don't care about what its name is,I care about whether the pool mining issue can be fixed.

There is no issue. The coin was designed to make pool mining a ridiculous idea. If you pool mine then you will lose your coins. Unless you get into a pool that you completely trust. The likelihood of that happening is slim, which means that coins will be greatly decentralized. We may see a few small pools popping up, but they will not let in anyone they don't trust.  The coin is working perfectly as planned.
If you never mine at nonce-pool,please shut up!


I'm sorry, have you mined at nonce-pool? Do you know what is going on here? Perhaps your lost.
Yes,I do mine at nonce-pool.It works as well as any other coin with no difference.

Well since the pool function works perfectly go ahead and send me your login credentials.
Unless of course your lying, or you realize that I could steal from the other miners. But if neither of these things are true go ahead and send me the log in credentials. Once I take a picture to prove it to the world you can change your password and all will be well again.
Pages: « 1 ... 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 [302] 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 ... 434 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!