hurricandave
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
|
|
December 03, 2014, 08:53:21 AM |
|
Got one now
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4606
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
December 03, 2014, 09:20:06 AM |
|
Got one now Heh yeah - 525% Though, still waiting on a confirm ... 36 minutes and counting Confirmed
|
|
|
|
HellDiverUK
|
|
December 03, 2014, 11:42:07 AM |
|
Why does math make you so mad?
Because you're a dumbass.
|
|
|
|
techgeeks
Member
Offline
Activity: 71
Merit: 10
|
|
December 03, 2014, 06:21:37 PM |
|
I wouldn't say S0br is a dumb ass, I think it is a valid question. The last 2 very large blocks before this one, Kano mentioned them being flooded with bad packets that might have caused some of the issue. It certainly is worth looking at, as when he fixed those, the blocks were found quickly.
|
|
|
|
MrGreenHat
|
|
December 03, 2014, 06:37:50 PM |
|
I wouldn't say S0br is a dumb ass, I would disagree with you on that point. I think it is a valid question. The last 2 very large blocks before this one, Kano mentioned them being flooded with bad packets that might have caused some of the issue. It certainly is worth looking at, as when he fixed those, the blocks were found quickly.
You're wrong, its not a valid question. s0br came to this thread and made that post in an attempt to suggest that due to bad luck , that there must be something wrong with the pool software. Hours later, the pool solved a block. Do you understand how bitcoin mining works? Yes, it is unlikely to have a few long rounds, but that doesn't mean that it doesn't happen. Do you really think that s0br (or you, yourself) have a better idea of how mining/pool software works than ck and kano, the developers of cgminer? Seriously?
|
|
|
|
HellDiverUK
|
|
December 03, 2014, 07:07:28 PM |
|
Well said MrGreenHat. I couldn't have put it as eloquently.
|
|
|
|
techgeeks
Member
Offline
Activity: 71
Merit: 10
|
|
December 03, 2014, 09:12:46 PM |
|
Not going to get in a pissing match, and I really do appreciate all the work pool operators, and CK have put into this eco-system. If you go back and read all the thread, and cross ref the dates, you will see that even great programmers make mistakes, or evil people try to ruin your day. Kano, and CK - again, thanks for all the hard work, and time it takes to run the pool. I've done well here.
|
|
|
|
wajiminer
|
|
December 04, 2014, 02:22:24 AM |
|
I'm moving my miners over.. I'll be under volley Want the hashrate to stay diversified.. Hopefully, I'll bring some good luck
|
|
|
|
mahrens917
|
|
December 04, 2014, 03:13:46 AM |
|
I've added another section in the opening post:
Transactions The pool will mine any and all transactions that the standard bitcoind will accept. The relevant setting I currently use in bitcoin.conf is: blockmaxsize=850000 I do not currently change the default on any other of the txn control options, I do not blacklist addresses, I do not prioritise transactions for any companies. If this should ever change, I will post the full details when I do the change with the reasons why.
Kano, great pool. Just curious but why only change blockmaxsize and why 850,000? If it was larger wouldn't we collect more transaction fees? Or perhaps it is not worth the increased performance needed to handle a larger block max size than that? Also, what about decreasing mixtxfee or minrelaytxfee to process more transactions and increase transaction fees when a block is found? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
norgan
|
|
December 04, 2014, 03:48:48 AM |
|
Edit: never mind that's an old payment. Must be an old text notification or something....
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4606
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
December 04, 2014, 08:21:17 AM |
|
332679 payout sent and confirmed - slight delay coz I was out cold under a scalpel when it matured
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4606
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
December 04, 2014, 08:25:27 AM |
|
I've added another section in the opening post:
Transactions The pool will mine any and all transactions that the standard bitcoind will accept. The relevant setting I currently use in bitcoin.conf is: blockmaxsize=850000 I do not currently change the default on any other of the txn control options, I do not blacklist addresses, I do not prioritise transactions for any companies. If this should ever change, I will post the full details when I do the change with the reasons why.
Kano, great pool. Just curious but why only change blockmaxsize and why 850,000? If it was larger wouldn't we collect more transaction fees? Or perhaps it is not worth the increased performance needed to handle a larger block max size than that? Also, what about decreasing mixtxfee or minrelaytxfee to process more transactions and increase transaction fees when a block is found? Thanks. The default was 750000 so I put it up to 850000 - but that was also on the slower server I started the pool on. main.h:static const unsigned int DEFAULT_BLOCK_MAX_SIZE = 750000; I'll prolly put it up to 950000 some time - but of course will say here if/when I do.
|
|
|
|
Trademan1
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
December 04, 2014, 09:30:32 AM |
|
332679 payout sent and confirmed - slight delay coz I was out cold under a scalpel when it matured Sent you a PM ref last payout. Hope your all good after being under the knife.
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4606
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
December 04, 2014, 09:45:14 AM |
|
332679 payout sent and confirmed - slight delay coz I was out cold under a scalpel when it matured Sent you a PM ref last payout. Hope your all good after being under the knife. Just my hand - nothing major
|
|
|
|
Trademan1
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
December 04, 2014, 10:07:53 AM Last edit: December 04, 2014, 10:25:16 AM by Trademan1 |
|
332679 payout sent and confirmed - slight delay coz I was out cold under a scalpel when it matured Sent you a PM ref last payout. Hope your all good after being under the knife. Just my hand - nothing major Depends if your a southpaw or an orthodox, and then if you can update script with your good hand only or even better still, if you can type with your toes like some extraordinary people out there can. Just pointed my miners back to the pool, hope we don't see any more blood red blocks.
|
|
|
|
wajiminer
|
|
December 04, 2014, 08:32:18 PM |
|
Can someone tell me what the colors on the blocks mean.. I can guess but figured I'd just ask
|
|
|
|
techgeeks
Member
Offline
Activity: 71
Merit: 10
|
|
December 04, 2014, 10:47:25 PM |
|
Is anyone seeing a payment in yet from the last block that matured? - I am not yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademan1
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
December 05, 2014, 06:48:43 AM |
|
Nice fresh block 332947 1 confirm. Keep em comin !!
|
|
|
|
|