kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4494
Merit: 1808
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
January 09, 2016, 05:31:50 AM |
|
I would not mind betting that this is an all time record for any pool? Anyone know?
I have never noticed those luck stats at any pool in over 3 years...........
Heh look at the luck graph ... you'll see this is the 3rd time it's happened. The first time, we had 17 blocks in a row (under 100%) averaging ~30% diff Block 7 to block 23.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlike traditional banking where clients have only a few account numbers, with Bitcoin people can create an unlimited number of accounts (addresses). This can be used to easily track payments, and it improves anonymity.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
ryen123
|
|
January 09, 2016, 05:35:44 AM |
|
I would not mind betting that this is an all time record for any pool? Anyone know?
I have never noticed those luck stats at any pool in over 3 years...........
Heh look at the luck graph ... you'll see this is the 3rd time it's happened. The first time, we had 17 blocks in a row (under 100%) averaging ~30% diff Block 7 to block 23. The lines are off the chart. You need to expand to 1000% Luck.
|
|
|
|
VirosaGITS
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1068
|
|
January 09, 2016, 05:36:42 AM |
|
I would not mind betting that this is an all time record for any pool? Anyone know?
I have never noticed those luck stats at any pool in over 3 years...........
Heh look at the luck graph ... you'll see this is the 3rd time it's happened. The first time, we had 17 blocks in a row (under 100%) averaging ~30% diff Block 7 to block 23. You,re obviously padding the block reward out of your own pocket, by renting ghost hashrate and ghost substituting it with some "legit user"'s hashrate. I'm kidding, but people start saying "something must be wrong with the pool" when we're at 200-300% diff, but i don't see anyone saying "there must be something wrong with the pool" when we're at 600%+ luck. ^_^"
|
|
|
|
elduderino
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 143
Merit: 100
Using some expensive heaters
|
|
January 09, 2016, 05:44:41 AM |
|
lol... Simply amazing... Definitely the best luck of any pool I've been on! Thanks Kano & CK & the guys bringing all the hashing power.
|
Do the things you know you must do first, then worry about the stuff you're not sure about.
|
|
|
Hannu
|
|
January 09, 2016, 05:45:23 AM |
|
Hello, My shares AGAIN. AntMiner is Running 24/7 (180 GH/s). How many blocks are been last 24 hours?
|
BTC: 3Qnnx4cu45Gx4WcksNCnBPu3TaUZ5sKkLo LTC: LYX1ZH7f4qcXq52AzA6grUYDfDngVz7BEi XRP: rLrbZMJDdL8eQd7HsW314bCtvE16LTLYkM?dt=1113
|
|
|
usukan
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1590
Merit: 1002
|
|
January 09, 2016, 06:18:50 AM |
|
I would not mind betting that this is an all time record for any pool? Anyone know?
I have never noticed those luck stats at any pool in over 3 years...........
Heh look at the luck graph ... you'll see this is the 3rd time it's happened. The first time, we had 17 blocks in a row (under 100%) averaging ~30% diff Block 7 to block 23. You,re obviously padding the block reward out of your own pocket, by renting ghost hashrate and ghost substituting it with some "legit user"'s hashrate. I'm kidding, but people start saying "something must be wrong with the pool" when we're at 200-300% diff, but i don't see anyone saying "there must be something wrong with the pool" when we're at 600%+ luck. ^_^" Yes I did say this - must be something wrong https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789369.msg13492258#msg13492258I see its the third time for Kano to be above 500% luck Interesting graph which is worth close study - never noticed it before today. Thanks Kano. should we expect some DDOS? Somebody somewhere will be pissed
|
--
--
|
|
|
Exoskeleton
|
|
January 09, 2016, 06:43:57 AM |
|
I would not mind betting that this is an all time record for any pool? Anyone know?
I have never noticed those luck stats at any pool in over 3 years...........
Heh look at the luck graph ... you'll see this is the 3rd time it's happened. The first time, we had 17 blocks in a row (under 100%) averaging ~30% diff Block 7 to block 23. Yes I did say this - must be something wrong https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789369.msg13492258#msg13492258I see its the third time for Kano to be above 500% luck Interesting graph which is worth close study - never noticed it before today. Thanks Kano. should we expect some DDOS? Somebody somewhere will be pissed Uhhhhhh.... WTF man. Expect some DDOS? Yeah, in the everybody sucks universe maybe. We are fine. Suck ittttttt!!!
|
|
|
|
thesmokingman
|
|
January 09, 2016, 06:55:52 AM |
|
Is the pool website only showing 10TH for anyone else? Only showing 7 workers out of the 6000+ we usually have...
|
|
|
|
flikflak
|
|
January 09, 2016, 06:57:20 AM |
|
I guess the pool just had a reboot.
"Pool Uptime: 10min"
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4494
Merit: 1808
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
January 09, 2016, 07:11:13 AM |
|
The header in the web site is now completely messed up.
Don't worry, it's not affecting any of the work accounting or mining or anything else (and it still shows your hash rate correctly)
I'll need to restart ckdb to fix it.
Cause was my mistake, I had to restart the nonce proxy due to a user having problems on it, so I updated to the latest code there also. Unfortunately I pointed it at ckdb and ckdb was a little confused about who has the right pool performance stats from both the pool and the proxy. The restart will fix it - don't worry, no shares or anything else were or are being lost as you can still see those numbers properly on all the pages, just the header is messed up.
CKDB restart will be in about 10 minutes and will not affect anyone's miners.
|
|
|
|
n200UG
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
|
|
January 09, 2016, 07:26:02 AM |
|
What a day It's time for me to go to sleep but I'm afraid I might miss something! Crazy! I add enough of the 4% fee on F2pool and came back here Jan 3... Boy Ho Boy .. Am I glad of the decision ... Looking forward to a 30PH+ soon
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4494
Merit: 1808
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
January 09, 2016, 07:52:55 AM |
|
The header in the web site is now completely messed up.
Don't worry, it's not affecting any of the work accounting or mining or anything else (and it still shows your hash rate correctly)
I'll need to restart ckdb to fix it.
Cause was my mistake, I had to restart the nonce proxy due to a user having problems on it, so I updated to the latest code there also. Unfortunately I pointed it at ckdb and ckdb was a little confused about who has the right pool performance stats from both the pool and the proxy. The restart will fix it - don't worry, no shares or anything else were or are being lost as you can still see those numbers properly on all the pages, just the header is messed up.
CKDB restart will be in about 10 minutes and will not affect anyone's miners.
Restart happening in 1 minute - no miners affected. Web site will be lots of '?' for about 20 minutes this time since it will have to reload an extra hour of data. I'll post again when it's done. Reload complete. The header is still wrong ... working on it.
|
|
|
|
usukan
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1590
Merit: 1002
|
|
January 09, 2016, 08:02:06 AM |
|
I would not mind betting that this is an all time record for any pool? Anyone know?
I have never noticed those luck stats at any pool in over 3 years...........
Heh look at the luck graph ... you'll see this is the 3rd time it's happened. The first time, we had 17 blocks in a row (under 100%) averaging ~30% diff Block 7 to block 23. Yes I did say this - must be something wrong https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789369.msg13492258#msg13492258I see its the third time for Kano to be above 500% luck Interesting graph which is worth close study - never noticed it before today. Thanks Kano. should we expect some DDOS? Somebody somewhere will be pissed Uhhhhhh.... WTF man. Expect some DDOS? Yeah, in the everybody sucks universe maybe. We are fine. Suck ittttttt!!! huh? Yes indeed its happened before after good luck and screwed things up for a few hours here on Kano - and just recently. This is earth and many do suck on this planet. We are not fine - if that means immune from DDOS.............but certainly looking good at present
|
--
--
|
|
|
VirosaGITS
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1068
|
|
January 09, 2016, 08:16:11 AM |
|
The whole website is messed now.it s not even showing the rewards per block.please tell me you haven't lost these
Kano already said many time, last time minutes ago, that the stats server derping out is not parent to the backend in any way. (2 post right above yours)
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4494
Merit: 1808
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
January 09, 2016, 08:17:45 AM |
|
The header in the web site is now completely messed up.
Don't worry, it's not affecting any of the work accounting or mining or anything else (and it still shows your hash rate correctly)
I'll need to restart ckdb to fix it.
Cause was my mistake, I had to restart the nonce proxy due to a user having problems on it, so I updated to the latest code there also. Unfortunately I pointed it at ckdb and ckdb was a little confused about who has the right pool performance stats from both the pool and the proxy. The restart will fix it - don't worry, no shares or anything else were or are being lost as you can still see those numbers properly on all the pages, just the header is messed up.
CKDB restart will be in about 10 minutes and will not affect anyone's miners.
Restart happening in 1 minute - no miners affected. Web site will be lots of '?' for about 20 minutes this time since it will have to reload an extra hour of data. I'll post again when it's done. Reload complete. The header is still wrong ... working on it. Header now fixed. I had to do a 2nd restart of ckdb after deleting the poolstats that snuck into the database that confused ckdb. (yep my mistake again I missed deleting those 2 poolstats records the first time)
|
|
|
|
Xunknown
Member
Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
|
|
January 09, 2016, 08:27:45 AM |
|
BTC Help, please. Kano sent me from the IRC Node to ask for help in solving this problem. I have recently switched from another pool to Kano's (kano.is) because I was having this problem and now it is occurring on kano.is. I am registered on the site and have put in the stratum .3333 at kano.is for my configuration. And then of course I click save and apply. However, immediately upon doing so, this screen appears. Whenever this screen pops up I am immediately disconnected from the pool that I have (in this case kano's) put into my miner's configuration page whereas kano's URL was showing up under my status page's pool URL section. Now this Mr. Nice Hash appears. I have tried resets and reboots, disconnected the power, and shut down my miner altogether. The problem persists. I've got an s4. Please advise. Thank you. Only solution for this hack is re-imaging the SD card back to original firmware. It's fairly straightforward and easy to do. Send me a pm if you need help. X
|
|
|
|
mavericklm
|
|
January 09, 2016, 08:36:37 AM |
|
just woke up, wish i didn't go to bed so earlier(it was ~3am already over here) Last 5 Blocks 12.7hrs 100.8% 15.58% 15.58% 0.0013 642.04% that luck... 7 blocks in 24h.... Have a fine day!!! you beautiful people!
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4494
Merit: 1808
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
January 09, 2016, 09:26:08 AM |
|
Payout 392345 sent (2.5 hrs ago) a17a8511b1f7d36f17cde9c2602831193eeb48adf893d9b78e002803df51a203 and confirmed (about 15min ago)
|
|
|
|
SergES
Member
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
|
|
January 09, 2016, 09:28:46 AM |
|
ZACHMckpoolmonitor.zachmonroe.com/RewardEntry 392296 2016-01-08 03:47:33 392345 2016-01-08 10:50:46 392358 2016-01-08 12:46:16 392386 2016-01-08 16:50:55 392406 2016-01-08 19:19:35 392415 2016-01-08 20:32:49 392438 2016-01-08 23:32:25www.kano.is/index.php?k=mpayouts392438 9/Jan 04:32 392415 9/Jan 01:32 392406 9/Jan 00:19 392386 8/Jan 21:50 392358 8/Jan 17:46 392345 8/Jan 15:50 392296 8/Jan 08:47 why different dates?
|
|
|
|
pirangueiro
|
|
January 09, 2016, 10:00:11 AM |
|
Different time zone?
|
|
|
|
|