Bitcoin Forum
October 23, 2017, 12:01:51 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.0.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 [76] 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 ... 150 »
  Print  
Author Topic: http://www.pyramining.com/ - Discussion thread (no advertising here)  (Read 314186 times)
maxl
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 221


View Profile
July 17, 2013, 06:47:31 PM
 #1501

Why does this show by my last transactions:

Date    Amount    Description
2013-06-29 10:25:02 UTC    0.00011802    reward on deposit [gz496dm2] (0.00015166:mining, 0.00001689:1st lev.ref., -0.00002527:1st lev.sp., -0.00001263:2nd lev.sp., -0.00001263:3rd lev.sp.)    

Why is the last transaction on 2013-06-29 and not newer?
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1508760111
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508760111

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508760111
Reply with quote  #2

1508760111
Report to moderator
1508760111
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508760111

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508760111
Reply with quote  #2

1508760111
Report to moderator
ArethusaF38
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14


View Profile
July 18, 2013, 12:17:48 AM
 #1502

Why does this show by my last transactions:

Date    Amount    Description
2013-06-29 10:25:02 UTC    0.00011802    reward on deposit [gz496dm2] (0.00015166:mining, 0.00001689:1st lev.ref., -0.00002527:1st lev.sp., -0.00001263:2nd lev.sp., -0.00001263:3rd lev.sp.)    

Why is the last transaction on 2013-06-29 and not newer?

I think it's the same for everyone.  My understanding is that Mr. Pyramining has been really busy setting up the new ASIC structure.  Would be nice to see an update soon, but I understand that it's a lot for one person to do.
pyramining
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 501


View Profile
July 18, 2013, 12:57:31 AM
 #1503

I have done a lot of work in the last two weeks, including change of pools. There was a slightly negative balance (around 6 BTC) and new pools (mainly P2Pool, which now is working very well) generates payout that are active after 120 confirmations. All summed up has caused some delays in the payouts. However don't worry, they will come again very soon and they will be a bit more "consistent".
maxl
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 221


View Profile
July 18, 2013, 02:54:47 AM
 #1504

Alright. Thank you pyramining!
btharper
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 389



View Profile
July 18, 2013, 04:34:21 AM
 #1505

Would it be possible to consider that when/if you go solo that you consider running your own pool?  I'd think some/many pyramining users who also mine on their own would consider mining on the pool that also supports their pyramining accounts, in full spirit of the pyramining model of business they could link their "pool" account to a "pyramining" account to get a boost based on the number of MH/s or GH/s they mine with and even have the option to directly ingest their earnings into their pyramining account, otherwise they cash out to wherever they want.

It's worth considering. As soon as I have time, I will work on it!

As long as you're looking at running a fast P2Pool node you could just open it to the public with a small fee (0.1?), something just over the expected bandwidth/hosting costs for running it publicly.
pyramining
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 501


View Profile
July 18, 2013, 08:50:26 AM
 #1506

As long as you're looking at running a fast P2Pool node you could just open it to the public with a small fee (0.1?), something just over the expected bandwidth/hosting costs for running it publicly.

Yes, it's what I was thinking about, for the moment (until I'll switch to solo), the only concern is that knowing an IP address could lead to DoS attacks... I will ponder it.
inaltoasinistra
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 134


View Profile
July 18, 2013, 11:33:44 AM
 #1507

I'm not undestandind: why the hashing power of old accounts is going up? Is it because of the referral speed of ASIC accounts has quickly freed some of the old hardware?

ASIC accounts add hashing power to the whole pool, and revenues are distributed proportionally to each deposit. This protects all the deposits, because the day when better devices are available, everyone will get advantages.

So, what's the meaning of pre-allocate ASIC power? I thought that the sharing of the ASIC power with the old accounts would be started after the activation of the ASIC pre-orders.

Thanks Cheesy Great work!

platti
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 251



View Profile WWW
July 18, 2013, 11:39:44 AM
 #1508

p2pool found block 3 minutes ago

platti
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 251



View Profile WWW
July 18, 2013, 12:41:45 PM
 #1509

and the next one 20 minutes later :-)

pyramining
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 501


View Profile
July 18, 2013, 02:12:52 PM
 #1510

So, what's the meaning of pre-allocate ASIC power? I thought that the sharing of the ASIC power with the old accounts would be started after the activation of the ASIC pre-orders.

Indeed the sharing is started when ASIC accounts are activated.
btharper
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 389



View Profile
July 18, 2013, 03:51:48 PM
 #1511

As long as you're looking at running a fast P2Pool node you could just open it to the public with a small fee (0.1?), something just over the expected bandwidth/hosting costs for running it publicly.
Yes, it's what I was thinking about, for the moment (until I'll switch to solo), the only concern is that knowing an IP address could lead to DoS attacks... I will ponder it.
Assuming you're using something like BFGMiner/CGminer you could setup the public p2pool as default and then have local solomining as backup (or another public p2pool node, or any other number of pools). A backup is probably something you've already started worry about of course. If there's a way to segregate the P2Pool server on a different IP (it could even be using the same instance of bitcoind on the backend). If the public pool gets DoS's (or fails for any other reason) the pyramining hashing power keeps moving on like nothing happened, but that's an extra level of abstraction.

For what it's worth I've not heard of any P2Pool nodes having DoS issues, but you're adding significant hashing power behind your node of course that may make it a bigger target. Given your overall size though I figure other pools are better targets anyway.
pyromaniac
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 662



View Profile
July 18, 2013, 04:32:34 PM
 #1512

I'd like to use my hash power as I see fit, e.g. for mining other crypto currencies if it more profitable, than bitcoin. Is it possible to realize this in future?

pyramining
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 501


View Profile
July 19, 2013, 12:52:15 PM
 #1513

I'd like to use my hash power as I see fit, e.g. for mining other crypto currencies if it more profitable, than bitcoin. Is it possible to realize this in future?

If there will be a real convenience, I may think about implementing it.
inaltoasinistra
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 134


View Profile
July 19, 2013, 04:22:11 PM
 #1514

So, what's the meaning of pre-allocate ASIC power? I thought that the sharing of the ASIC power with the old accounts would be started after the activation of the ASIC pre-orders.

Indeed the sharing is started when ASIC accounts are activated.
My ASIC deposits are not activated Shocked
4edr8f2k

liberty90
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 88



View Profile
July 19, 2013, 04:24:24 PM
 #1515

These accounts are activated gradually, not all at the same time (if I understand everything right).

BTC: 15oSR7bYNep3bTtVCh5wuXhQnG6qvDvHWY
seot
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 82


View Profile
July 19, 2013, 06:36:36 PM
 #1516

Transactions are  being updated!! Asic mining!!!

Date   Amount   Description
2013-07-19 10:29:04 UTC   0.00002049    reward on deposit [f4gtbsqc] (0.00000146:mining, 0.00002669:1st lev.ref., 0.00000049:2nd lev.ref., 0.00000057:3rd lev.ref., -0.00000438:1st lev.sp., -0.00000218:2nd lev.sp., -0.00000218:3rd lev.sp.)
pyramining
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 501


View Profile
July 19, 2013, 08:37:54 PM
 #1517

These accounts are activated gradually, not all at the same time (if I understand everything right).

Right.

Transactions are  being updated!! Asic mining!!!
Date   Amount   Description
2013-07-19 10:29:04 UTC   0.00002049    reward on deposit [f4gtbsqc] (0.00000146:mining, 0.00002669:1st lev.ref., 0.00000049:2nd lev.ref., 0.00000057:3rd lev.ref., -0.00000438:1st lev.sp., -0.00000218:2nd lev.sp., -0.00000218:3rd lev.sp.)

The little negative balance has been paired, and now payouts are restarting. Next ones will be bigger.
pyramining
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 501


View Profile
July 19, 2013, 10:45:23 PM
 #1518

Some new deposit with really small amounts ( < 0.01 BTC ) are going to be activated because they do not change almost anything in the mining scenario, and they are polluting the queued deposit database. Hope nobody will complain for this.
tex83rb
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 559



View Profile
July 20, 2013, 01:19:29 PM
 #1519

To thank everyone for their patience during the long wait, I will try to make an account with 50% deposit under the account of everyone who is in queue, even for those who deposited after the promotion was expired. I should have enough resources to cover all deposits.

thank you, i'm waiting it


 
 
           ▄████▄
         ▄████████▄
       ▄████████████▄
     ▄████████████████▄
    ████████████████████      ▄█▄                 ▄███▄                 ▄███▄                 ▄████████████████▀   ▄██████████

  ▄▄▄▀█████▀▄▄▄▄▀█████▀▄▄▄     ▀██▄             ▄██▀ ▀██▄             ▄██▀ ▀██▄             ▄██▀                   ██
▄█████▄▀▀▀▄██████▄▀▀▀▄█████▄     ▀██▄         ▄██▀     ▀██▄         ▄██▀     ▀██▄         ▄██▀        ▄█▄          ▀██████████████▄
████████████████████████████       ▀██▄     ▄██▀         ▀██▄     ▄██▀         ▀██▄     ▄██▀          ▀█▀                        ██
 ▀████████████████████████▀          ▀██▄ ▄██▀             ▀██▄ ▄██▀     ▄█▄     ▀██▄ ▄██▀                                       ██
   ▀████████████████████▀              ▀███▀                 ▀███▀       ▀█▀       ▀███▀      ▄███████████████████████████████████▀
     ▀████████████████▀
       ▀████████████▀
         ▀████████▀
           ▀████▀
║║


║║
.
.

║║
██
║║
.
.

║║
██
║║
.
║║


║║
miffman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1624


PGP ID: 78B7B84D


View Profile
July 20, 2013, 02:59:47 PM
 #1520

Some new deposit with really small amounts ( < 0.01 BTC ) are going to be activated because they do not change almost anything in the mining scenario, and they are polluting the queued deposit database. Hope nobody will complain for this.

maybe you could activate my small 0.04  Lips sealed














 

 

█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
BitBlender 

 













 















 












 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
Pages: « 1 ... 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 [76] 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 ... 150 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!