CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[sp_]

pm me with your email adress and tx id. I can't find you on my donator list. Where did you get the exe?

[sp_]

Spreadminer #14 released yesterday is working good on the gtx 1080ti. (around +4% from spreadminer #13)

0.05btc donation for the subsctiption pm for details




Spreadcoin price development:

[Deki1904]

Hi,

Possible to get a ccminer for Xevan algo? Would like to mine Amsterdam coin...

Cheers

[bensam1231]

Is funny that if a Pool has strong objection to a mining software, why would they find bypass to let the software mine on their Pool.  

They just use my thread. Spam.

Advertising, gloating, astroturfing, trying to promote their own names and products.

Cryptonight pascal is not for public distribution..

Its like a private miner or something?

Duh. His #1 fangirl bensam likes to pretend dude is all about community... so far from reality.

Guess that insult I left in slack really hurt you bad if you're still suffering after thoughts of it. Why don't you tell us the story of how you sold x11 bins to only a couple big farms during '14 and destroyed AMD mining at the time by doing so? Oh those were the good'ol days of community first. I guess if you kill the rest of them off, all that's left is you and the people lining your pockets. Now that's community!

You love twisting that story, don't you? I barely made shit, cause I held onto them until Heliox/Eliovp backstabbed me - this ring any bells? https://www.reddit.com/r/DRKCoin/comments/2o1yoz/rewritten_x11_binaries/

Yup and what happened after that? I'm sure you stopped developing completely. Also they were leaked much earlier before that post, somewhere in Sep. That was around the same time I made a big post on BCT about the profitability in x11.

Pretty much a post like this is a telling sign, started by someone else and was getting the 'space heater' excuse: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=811390.0

One I started, also you apparently didn't think you could optimize efficiency: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=854903.0

Does this look familiar? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=854257.0

And finally, just for you: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=632503.msg9764916#msg9764916

Your practices haven't changed much. 'Giving away' the kernel after it was leaked and the damage was done, then continuing to do what you did before it was leaked. Also me vouching for Claymores fee system before it was a 'thing' as the future.

Also you thinking that a 'fee' system wouldn't work at all no matter what. That changed a awful lot: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=854257.msg9719859#msg9719859

Also something about trying to sell some of your kernels for 45BTC (which at the time was around $45,000).

There is more... a lot more. Literally my entire other account in Dec~ '14 is just arguing back and forth with you in multiple threads about you fucking everyone over.

What I did AFTER the leak is kind of none of your business. Actually, I want to reference one of the only insightful things you've ever said:

You know the funny thing about your whole BS campaign against miners Wolf is after your kernel leaked, x11 difficulty has barely moved. Which means one of three things. Everyone is operating on Maxwell (I find this hard to believe), people didn't find it... OR more then likely it was already well distributed before it leaked.

Yeah, because Heliox/Eliovp was selling it for pennies behind my back for a long while. There's a lot more to the story than you actually know...

LOL, none of my business? I'm sorry, but cryptos aren't your world only. What you do influences and fucks other people over. When you do it on a massive scale and it screws me over, it IS most definitely my business. You can take your ego and shove it up your conceited ass. Also confirmation that you did indeed continue selling your custom bins and essentially fucked everyone over.

I really don't care what the story is, I do know you limit sales, you don't sell to just anyone (even if they have the money), and for the longest time you didn't even advertise that you were selling them, in addition to that they're more then what anyone can afford, and your greed goes so far as you're willing to put lots of small miners out of business. The ONLY time you show any sort of fair business practices is when there is competition and when the going gets tough, you just stop competing (like with Claymore).

That's why you throw breadcrumbs to the plebs and they think you're a nice guy (oh you helped me out with this memory error, thank you!), meanwhile anything of substance is only given to those with lots of money and you know it. Furthermore you attack anyone who DOES help small miners out like SP. Of course you want people to shit on SP, he's your competition, you actually have to try if there are more developers in the game. It's really quite silly that people in this thread root for you all the while you slip a knife in their back. I don't even understand it, but that's the kind of people mining attracts. They don't even understand how the game is played or what they're doing.


If you want to do something good and not just try and fuck people over, make something public that either people can buy or is fee based. That I can get behind, much the same way that I'll support any other developer that actually shows good faith through their actions and NOT just their words. Words are cheap, talk is cheap, it's all about what people do. 45BTC (which I'm sure you would be happy if you never saw that thread talked about again) is not helping. Claymore has proven the system works and miners of all sizes can work with it.

you know whats really ironic about SPs hate towards sweepstakecoin now that cwi has taken the project over .

  I first orginally learned about the coin here in THIS VERY THREAD back early may sometime when strasbourg was the dev and sp said something along these lines -


      "I LIKE THE IDEA OF THIS COIN AND IM CONSIDERING MAKING AN OPTIMISED MINER FOR THE ALGO , WHAT DO YOU GUYS THINK"   ive gone back to try to find the post so i could quote it , but sp musta deleted it ,,
 100% true this I swear on my life ...... does anyone else remember? Was only this comment that made me look into it further and get on board lol .

    
               Rather BIG CHANGE OF TUNE and it shows your hatred towards the coin is purley a personal issue with the developer . Its not a shitcoin , its a solid coin mate and thanks for putting me onto it way back then SP , as i mined it the whole time and its really paid off now ^^ so thankyou .

You have to be a shill. SP doesn't make miners for algos with essentially no volume. This is basic economics, Chyro is the only one perpetuating it as more. Why would you make a product when there is no market to buy it? Supply and demand. There is no demand, why would he create supply?

[valth]

any ETA on cryptonite fix? still not working on the latest driver

[sp_]

any ETA on cryptonite fix? still not working on the latest driver

I have tried. After I fixed the hash, the speed was reduced. So I need some more time. use 382.xx driver.

I've got the same problem in the nist5 mod. the 382.xx driver give 15-20% more speed on the 1080ti.

[sp_]

The Yiimp pool ( yiimp.ccminer.org ) has produced 125 BTC worth of signatum in just 1 month.

With 2% fee, thats 2.5 BTC to eplylons pocket every month on signatum alone. Mine on yiimp and support ccminer opensource development.
All the sp-mod's work good on the yiimp pool, and most of them come with working example bat files to mine on this pool.

[sp_]

I will release a new version of the spreadcoin miner with a fix for rigs with AMD cpu's and more speed

gigabyte g1 gaming gtx 1070 (with oc):

spreadminer 13: 9200
spreadminer 14: 9550 (+3.8%)

Update: I get 9700  with -500 on the memclock +160 on the coreclock and 100% tdp. Latest driver. (+5.4% from #13) Gigabyte 1070 G1 gaming

[Quarx2k]

Quarx2k, you've the same nick as one of the sigt devs. are you?
it's funny see what dev of coin try to mine another coin. or you're only a telegram channel admin?

I'm not signatum dev. I just admin of tg group and author of tg bot for sigt.

pm me with your email adress and tx id. I can't find you on my donator list. Where did you get the exe?

I sent all info to PM.  Exe from your message to my gmail.

[sp_]

37% of the signatum hash @ yiimp is sp-modded

[cashen]

I'm getting about 9.25GH/s on my 1080 TIs for Blake2s

[nu1mlock]

any ETA on cryptonite fix? still not working on the latest driver

I have tried. After I fixed the hash, the speed was reduced. So I need some more time. use 382.xx driver.

I've got the same problem in the nist5 mod. the 382.xx driver give 15-20% more speed on the 1080ti.

Not only does the miner not work with newer than 382.xx drivers, it also has no color coding. It looks like this:



I've PM'd sp_ regarding this. He said that adding the "-q" argument would add color. It does not, all that "-q" does is freeze the miner. sp_ haven't responded to my messages regarding that since.

A reply to issues with your current miner (small or not) would be expected since I paid for it. Yet, no reply had been given for weeks.

It's quite easy as well for sp_. I would've done it myself but I don't have his source (for obvious reasons). Just recompile it so that the color coding works.

[thinkfar]

any ETA on cryptonite fix? still not working on the latest driver

I have tried. After I fixed the hash, the speed was reduced. So I need some more time. use 382.xx driver.

I've got the same problem in the nist5 mod. the 382.xx driver give 15-20% more speed on the 1080ti.

Not only does the miner not work with newer than 382.xx drivers, it also has no color coding. It looks like this:

https://i.imgur.com/oOYf4SO.png

I've PM'd sp_ regarding this. He said that adding the "-q" argument would add color. It does not, all that "-q" does is freeze the miner. sp_ haven't responded to my messages regarding that since.

A reply to issues with your current miner (small or not) would be expected since I paid for it. Yet, no reply had been given for weeks.

It's quite easy as well for sp_. I would've done it myself but I don't have his source (for obvious reasons). Just recompile it so that the color coding works.

SP_ has said at previous post that nist5 mod has problem as well as blake256, he is working on it.

[nu1mlock]

SP_ has said at previous post that nist5 mod has problem as well as blake256, he is working on it.

I'm not interested in nist5 or blake256. What you said is irrelevant to my post.

[bathrobehero]

any ETA on cryptonite fix? still not working on the latest driver

I have tried. After I fixed the hash, the speed was reduced. So I need some more time. use 382.xx driver.

I've got the same problem in the nist5 mod. the 382.xx driver give 15-20% more speed on the 1080ti.

Not only does the miner not work with newer than 382.xx drivers, it also has no color coding. It looks like this:

https://i.imgur.com/oOYf4SO.png

I've PM'd sp_ regarding this. He said that adding the "-q" argument would add color. It does not, all that "-q" does is freeze the miner. sp_ haven't responded to my messages regarding that since.

A reply to issues with your current miner (small or not) would be expected since I paid for it. Yet, no reply had been given for weeks.

It's quite easy as well for sp_. I would've done it myself but I don't have his source (for obvious reasons). Just recompile it so that the color coding works.

Look up ansicon to get colors. -q is quiet mode, it removes hashrate reports, the miner mines silently basically.

[Schleicher]

any ETA on cryptonite fix? still not working on the latest driver

I have tried. After I fixed the hash, the speed was reduced. So I need some more time. use 382.xx driver.

I've got the same problem in the nist5 mod. the 382.xx driver give 15-20% more speed on the 1080ti.

Not only does the miner not work with newer than 382.xx drivers, it also has no color coding. It looks like this:



I've PM'd sp_ regarding this. He said that adding the "-q" argument would add color. It does not, all that "-q" does is freeze the miner. sp_ haven't responded to my messages regarding that since.

A reply to issues with your current miner (small or not) would be expected since I paid for it. Yet, no reply had been given for weeks.

It's quite easy as well for sp_. I would've done it myself but I don't have his source (for obvious reasons). Just recompile it so that the color coding works.

You will probably see colors if you use the powershell to start the miner.

[nu1mlock]

You will probably see colors if you use the powershell to start the miner.

It worked when using powershell, so thank you! I still would prefer it to just work - like all other miners, but at least it's better than nothing.

[Grim]

--quiet or -q not working for some new miners  

Also spreadcoin miners seems to send ALOT of data over the pci-e bus and therefore (system32.exe) takes alot of cpu power.  
(bus interface load 5-10% with riser, gpu in x16 slot less than 1%)

[brownfly]

the last update? I never seen such issue with previous versions, didn't try the last one yet.

[Amph]

I'm getting about 9.25GH/s on my 1080 TIs for Blake2s

is this with ccminer 2.0, i'm still at 8 gh, what setting are you using?