Zerovert - First Truly & Only Anonymous Coin with Zerocoin | Mandatory Upgrade !

[DragonSlayer]

Where did you mine?

I am on local p2pool.

[zerovert]

Maybe the Linux wallet is minable but the windows version is very broken, you can't mine on it! P2pool connects, goes nuts on got new merged mining data for about 60 seconds then the RPC connection goes dead and the wallet stops responding. When the wallet is restarted it gives an error about being corrupt and re-downloads the blockchain.

Can you paste the debug.log to us ?

[notbatman]

Maybe the Linux wallet is minable but the windows version is very broken, you can't mine on it! P2pool connects, goes nuts on got new merged mining data for about 60 seconds then the RPC connection goes dead and the wallet stops responding. When the wallet is restarted it gives an error about being corrupt and re-downloads the blockchain.

Can you paste the debug.log to us ?

The message exceeds the maximum allowed length (64000 characters).

[notbatman]

Here's some samples:

...

Code:

2014-11-18 05:25:54 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
2014-11-18 05:25:54 received block 21d8b739731266c968e95d6164d19e2d6b63c6026f4ad482c9788a1062aa5dc0
2014-11-18 05:25:54 SetBestChain: new best=21d8b739731266c968e95d6164d19e2d6b63c6026f4ad482c9788a1062aa5dc0  height=358  log2_work=44.834356  tx=400  date=2014-11-06 15:44:23 progress=0.027948
2014-11-18 05:25:54 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
2014-11-18 05:25:54 getblocks 349 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:25:54 received block 55cdab8f9fef19eb6b2c109e79fc1ba944e566d4e4f0e2315999ba9110bb814b
2014-11-18 05:25:54 SetBestChain: new best=55cdab8f9fef19eb6b2c109e79fc1ba944e566d4e4f0e2315999ba9110bb814b  height=359  log2_work=44.84246  tx=401  date=2014-11-06 15:46:28 progress=0.028019

...

Code:

2014-11-18 05:25:57 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
2014-11-18 05:25:57 getblocks 488 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:25:57 received block ff45d9f115f52e3a03f025328f4c4914f82c82ecd0370fe12405804f6042e2e8
2014-11-18 05:25:57 SetBestChain: new best=ff45d9f115f52e3a03f025328f4c4914f82c82ecd0370fe12405804f6042e2e8  height=500  log2_work=45.913789  tx=591  date=2014-11-07 11:15:59 progress=0.043723
2014-11-18 05:25:57 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
2014-11-18 05:25:57 getblocks 489 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:25:57 getblocks 490 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:25:57 getblocks 491 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:25:57 getblocks 492 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:25:57 getblocks 493 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:25:57 getblocks 494 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:25:57 getblocks 495 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:25:57 getblocks 496 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:25:57 getblocks 497 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:25:57 getblocks 498 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:25:57 getblocks 499 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:25:57 received block 97bf9fee5b97f7b4a2bdab42c99b0797a4f305231738816d3784c063ccd77872
2014-11-18 05:25:57 ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK, prev=ae9a7650e1523faf765887abaa2b34e4cd636baf9a57ab493b463b0a21991c9c
2014-11-18 05:25:57 getblocks 500 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:25:57 getblocks -1 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:25:58 received block 673154a46c6989ede352a783870e1036d9107fd9d97b72229694a7d3cc681d1c
2014-11-18 05:25:58 SetBestChain: new best=673154a46c6989ede352a783870e1036d9107fd9d97b72229694a7d3cc681d1c  height=501  log2_work=45.919279  tx=593  date=2014-11-07 11:27:02 progress=0.043895
2014-11-18 05:25:58 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
2014-11-18 05:25:58 received block fbb3551fe4777742fe885954c98d80a1701d1bf78ea2c13cdf45964d0eb0a91e
2014-11-18 05:25:58 SetBestChain: new best=fbb3551fe4777742fe885954c98d80a1701d1bf78ea2c13cdf45964d0eb0a91e  height=502  log2_work=45.924748  tx=594  date=2014-11-07 11:27:56 progress=0.043968

...

Code:

2014-11-18 05:30:18 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1976 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1966 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1971 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1968 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1971 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1984 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1977 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1967 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1972 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1969 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1972 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1985 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1978 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1968 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1973 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1970 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1973 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1986 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1979 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1969 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1974 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1971 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1974 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1980 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1970 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1975 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1972 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1975 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1981 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1971 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1976 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1973 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1976 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1982 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1972 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1977 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1974 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1977 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1983 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1973 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1978 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1975 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1978 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1984 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1974 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1979 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1976 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1979 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1985 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1975 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1980 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1977 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1980 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1986 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1976 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1981 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1978 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1981 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1977 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1982 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1979 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1982 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1978 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1983 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1980 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1983 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1979 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1984 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1981 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1984 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1987 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1980 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1985 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1982 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1985 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1981 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1986 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1983 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1986 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1987 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1982 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1984 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1983 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1985 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1984 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1985 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1986 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1986 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1987 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1987 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1987 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks 1987 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks -1 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks -1 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks -1 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks -1 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks -1 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:18 getblocks -1 to 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 limit 500
2014-11-18 05:30:19 connection timeout
2014-11-18 05:30:20 trying connection 180.151.89.46:8889 lastseen=25.2hrs
2014-11-18 05:30:25 connection timeout
2014-11-18 05:30:25 trying connection 87.242.236.155:8889 lastseen=7.0hrs
2014-11-18 05:30:30 connection timeout
2014-11-18 05:30:31 trying connection 84.175.63.240:8889 lastseen=4.8hrs
2014-11-18 05:30:36 connection timeout
2014-11-18 05:30:36 trying connection 74.192.120.8:8889 lastseen=108.4hrs
2014-11-18 05:30:41 connection timeout
2014-11-18 05:30:42 trying connection 184.96.99.47:8889 lastseen=27.9hrs
2014-11-18 05:30:47 connection timeout
2014-11-18 05:30:47 trying connection 23.252.58.79:8889 lastseen=149.3hrs
2014-11-18 05:30:52 connection timeout
2014-11-18 05:30:53 trying connection 120.146.143.87:8889 lastseen=5.0hrs
2014-11-18 05:30:58 connection timeout
2014-11-18 05:30:58 trying connection 5.12.144.66:8889 lastseen=12.3hrs
2014-11-18 05:31:03 connection timeout
2014-11-18 05:31:04 trying connection 92.240.58.234:8889 lastseen=10.9hrs
2014-11-18 05:31:09 connection timeout
2014-11-18 05:31:09 trying connection 50.201.240.98:8889 lastseen=11.8hrs
2014-11-18 05:31:14 connection timeout
2014-11-18 05:31:15 trying connection 185.61.148.186:8889 lastseen=2.5hrs
2014-11-18 05:31:15 connected 185.61.148.186:8889
2014-11-18 05:31:15 send version message: version 70002, blocks=1988, us=192.168.1.105:7889, them=185.61.148.186:8889, peer=185.61.148.186:8889
2014-11-18 05:31:16 Added time data, samples 9, offset +5 (+0 minutes)
2014-11-18 05:31:16 nTimeOffset = +0  (+0 minutes)
2014-11-18 05:31:16 Moving 185.61.148.186:8889 to tried
2014-11-18 05:31:16 receive version message: /Satoshi:0.8.7.1/: version 70002, blocks=2016, us=192.168.1.105:55971, them=185.61.148.186:8889, peer=185.61.148.186:8889
2014-11-18 05:31:17 Added 15 addresses from 185.61.148.186: 8 tried, 337 new
2014-11-18 05:31:23 ThreadRPCServer method=getauxblock
2014-11-18 05:31:23 keypool added key 102, size=101
2014-11-18 05:31:23 keypool reserve 2
2014-11-18 05:31:23 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2014-11-18 05:31:25 Flushing wallet.dat
2014-11-18 05:31:25 Flushed wallet.dat 138ms
2014-11-18 05:31:25 ThreadRPCServer method=getauxblock
2014-11-18 05:31:26 ThreadRPCServer method=getauxblock
2014-11-18 05:31:27 ThreadRPCServer method=getauxblock
2014-11-18 05:31:28 ThreadRPCServer method=getauxblock
2014-11-18 05:31:29 ThreadRPCServer method=getauxblock

...

Code:

2014-11-18 05:37:37 ID 34 Wallet Pubcoin = (null)
2014-11-18 05:37:38 ID 35 Wallet Pubcoin = (null)
2014-11-18 05:37:40 ID 36 Wallet Pubcoin = (null)
2014-11-18 05:37:41 ID 37 Wallet Pubcoin = (null)
2014-11-18 05:37:43 ERROR: CTransaction::CheckTransaction() : COIN SPEND TX DID NOT VERIFY!
2014-11-18 05:37:43 ERROR: CheckBlock() : CheckTransaction failed
2014-11-18 05:37:43 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
2014-11-18 05:37:43 Misbehaving: 192.241.202.108:8889 (0 -> 100) DISCONNECTING
2014-11-18 05:37:43 disconnecting node 192.241.202.108:8889
2014-11-18 05:37:43 msghand thread interrupt
2014-11-18 05:37:43 ThreadRPCServer method=getauxblock
2014-11-18 05:37:43 Shutdown : In progress...
2014-11-18 05:37:43 Flush(false)
2014-11-18 05:37:43 wallet.dat refcount=0
2014-11-18 05:37:43 wallet.dat checkpoint
2014-11-18 05:37:43 wallet.dat detach
2014-11-18 05:37:43 wallet.dat closed
2014-11-18 05:37:43 DBFlush(false) ended             145ms
2014-11-18 05:37:43 StopNode()
2014-11-18 05:37:43 Flushed 345 addresses to peers.dat  35ms
2014-11-18 05:37:43 Committing 0 changed transactions to coin database...
2014-11-18 05:37:43 Flush(true)
2014-11-18 05:37:43 wallet.dat refcount=0
2014-11-18 05:37:43 wallet.dat checkpoint
2014-11-18 05:37:43 wallet.dat detach
2014-11-18 05:37:43 wallet.dat closed
2014-11-18 05:37:43 DBFlush(true) ended             135ms
2014-11-18 05:37:43 Shutdown : done
2014-11-18 05:37:43 keypool return 2

EOF

[TheCoinFinder]

Have you got the latest version of the wallet?

[shmegal325i]

WHY ARE YOU NOT GIVING PEOPLE THEIR COINS?!

[notbatman]

Have you got the latest version of the wallet?

Code:

2014-11-18 05:24:52 zerovert version v0.8.7.1-unk-beta (2014-11-12 01:43:24 -0800)

[Cryptobro]

WHY ARE YOU NOT GIVING PEOPLE THEIR COINS?!

Why are you complaining so much about not receiving free coins?!

[shmegal325i]

WHY ARE YOU NOT GIVING PEOPLE THEIR COINS?!

Why are you complaining so much about not receiving free coins?!

trust? dedication?

Would you do business with someone who lied to you right from the start?

[jamesl22]

WHY ARE YOU NOT GIVING PEOPLE THEIR COINS?!

Why are you complaining so much about not receiving free coins?!

trust? dedication?

Would you do business with someone who lied to you right from the start?

I think he's busy fixing the bugs with the wallet. What would you prefer, free coins immediately or waiting a while so you can have a bug free wallet?

[illodin]

WHY ARE YOU NOT GIVING PEOPLE THEIR COINS?!

Why are you complaining so much about not receiving free coins?!

trust? dedication?

Would you do business with someone who lied to you right from the start?

I think he's busy fixing the bugs with the wallet. What would you prefer, free coins immediately or waiting a while so you can have a bug free wallet?

You mean it takes 5 full working days or something to send out some giveaway coins?

[fonyo]

So no give away coins from twitter at all? Has anyone ever got one? I tweeted a lot for those and now get nothing? BS.

Does the latest wallet work?

Didn't get coins. Can't believe how greedy they are. There've been probably 10 tweets max and they have huge premine and still can't give away few coins.

They probably want to sort out the network and the wallet issues first. You wouldn't be happy if you lost your received coins, huh? Because I did.

Wait..what? Can you please elaborate on that, did you mint zerovert and now its gone because of a bug? Lost forever? Was it user fault (you) or the chain messed up and now you can never retrieve them?

Page 21.

mhm i was aware of that before i asked you to elaborate. Can you please elaborate further. Right now you are saying your coins have gone missing. That, in case you are not aware is an extremely alarming claim. Can you elaborate please!
You minted coins and now they are gone isn't really enough for me sorry.

Geeze, everything about this project just gets my hairs standing on end its so strange. I cant put my finger on any of it but i know something doesn't sit right with me. Its so rushed, so reckless. Its everything opposed to a precise financial instrument. Its so left field with a stinking premine.

To me your problem seems to be that your wallet.dat file (acts as a mini database for transactions) has had the tx written in it but the tx hasn't been accepted by the chain. Meaning your coins are most prolly on the chain of course, it jsut wasnt verified because the accumulator algo failed. But because your wallet.dat is thinking you have sent them its telling the client not to allow it. The wallet.dat is your keys to the blockchain primarily, but it also acts as a mini block database, holding your transactions. They don't have to correlate with the blockchain of course, its just for convenience and saves checking the entire chain each time you turn your client on, am i making sense?

Unfortunately for you, right now there is no such thing as a "clearwallettransactions" (clears the transactions from the wallet.dat) so you can then build a fresh, more accurate and updated set using something like a "scanalltxn" Which would scan your blockchain and add all the tx you have. It would show a correct balance according to the blockchain, due to the keys you hold.

I would forget this weird project if i was you and come test ShadowCash. Its anon transactions are in public testing right now on a TESTNET unlike this reckless attempt at anon transactions on a mainet. I would cut this project a wide berth until it has proven itself and ironed out the issues it seems to have overlooked, of course. Hell, personally i'm not touching it with any kind of money and i'm certainly not going to spend any effort on supporting it with a crazy premine like they have.

Your best bet might be to try dumping your private keys, i really cant see many other options form the client options right now. That and trying to talk to the dev more. Let me know how you go please.

I'm sorry, that part is my bad (referencing to page 21) and I don't mean to be rude but missing is missing... User error is always possible but not likely in this case, I don't think. Every time I pressed spend (after each minting), wallet always created a new address with 1 ZVert but (probably because of the accumulator failure) those addresses didn't get added to my wallet in the end. Thank you for your suggestion and explaining things a bit more but -rescan did not work. Starting with or without -reindex, wallet gives transaction/address book  error no matter what and will reindex anyway. Thank you for offering me to try ShadowCoin. I don't really care about deep anon stuff, I'm a Vertcoin supporter for quite a while now and Vertcoin's Stealth addresses is more than what people could need, IMHO, unless someone wants to do very dodgy stuff that requires completely untraceable coin movements. I'm only trying to help out Bushido here. Cheers

Ahh ok so you cannot yet get access to your change from minting zerovert, which seems to be .9 last time i tried or 1 in your case and yes i knew rescan wouldn't work i was being polite. I encourage you to keep your wallet and try the new function they apparently have to help you recover your coins.

Btw shadow banking is worth a look, (google it) its mostly what has helped economies stay afloat over the years, so when you say "unless someone wants to do something dodgy" Well, i argue that remaining anonymous does not always have to mean you are up to no good. Just because its established that way by paranoid governments who really need to know everything that goes on.

The hope is to create economies that take the power back form the governments overreach. Remaining anonymous and supporting that is one of the ways we can ensure that happens. If we don't then we all just become and stay apart of their system where they dictate everything and we don't ever get a say. I encourage you to look deeper, it is not just about money but how we interact with the net and the world through it, that gives this tech power.

I don't believe bushido is fighting for that but mainly he seems to be trying to give vertcoin users an option to use a more anonymous transaction feature to keep them within the vert community. In a lot of ways that makes sense but i chose not to support it because i don't see it as a well put together solution just yet. But only a thing to fill a hole, which i understand is a programmers job but this is much more then programing. This is peoples money and their futures. Just my .2 SDC and good luck.

You have actually made a good point there. I can't argue with that. But that is the reason why many of the CCs were created and that's why I'll stick with Vert. You seem to be good fella so I will definitely check it out. Thank you. But what I can argue with, is the fact that none of is entitled to say who is fighting for what or not fighting at all for something until that is said by that exact same person. You are more than welcome to state your opinion but please do not use speculation on other people's intentions as a foundation when trying to make a point. That doesn't seem to be fair and sound, does it?

Huh? What new function? Please explain. I made a backup, deleted everything and generated a new wallet, imported all private keys just to try if it's there but it's not.
If I go to console and type "listreceivedbyaddress 0 true" it shows the correct amount (using the older wallet). I also exported the "used" TXs. Is there a way to manually "spend" them through the console in the new wallet?

Thank you for all your inputs.

[silverduck]

why the low volume?

[LongAndShort]

So no give away coins from twitter at all? Has anyone ever got one? I tweeted a lot for those and now get nothing? BS.

Does the latest wallet work?

Didn't get coins. Can't believe how greedy they are. There've been probably 10 tweets max and they have huge premine and still can't give away few coins.

They probably want to sort out the network and the wallet issues first. You wouldn't be happy if you lost your received coins, huh? Because I did.

Wait..what? Can you please elaborate on that, did you mint zerovert and now its gone because of a bug? Lost forever? Was it user fault (you) or the chain messed up and now you can never retrieve them?

Page 21.

mhm i was aware of that before i asked you to elaborate. Can you please elaborate further. Right now you are saying your coins have gone missing. That, in case you are not aware is an extremely alarming claim. Can you elaborate please!
You minted coins and now they are gone isn't really enough for me sorry.

Geeze, everything about this project just gets my hairs standing on end its so strange. I cant put my finger on any of it but i know something doesn't sit right with me. Its so rushed, so reckless. Its everything opposed to a precise financial instrument. Its so left field with a stinking premine.

To me your problem seems to be that your wallet.dat file (acts as a mini database for transactions) has had the tx written in it but the tx hasn't been accepted by the chain. Meaning your coins are most prolly on the chain of course, it jsut wasnt verified because the accumulator algo failed. But because your wallet.dat is thinking you have sent them its telling the client not to allow it. The wallet.dat is your keys to the blockchain primarily, but it also acts as a mini block database, holding your transactions. They don't have to correlate with the blockchain of course, its just for convenience and saves checking the entire chain each time you turn your client on, am i making sense?

Unfortunately for you, right now there is no such thing as a "clearwallettransactions" (clears the transactions from the wallet.dat) so you can then build a fresh, more accurate and updated set using something like a "scanalltxn" Which would scan your blockchain and add all the tx you have. It would show a correct balance according to the blockchain, due to the keys you hold.

I would forget this weird project if i was you and come test ShadowCash. Its anon transactions are in public testing right now on a TESTNET unlike this reckless attempt at anon transactions on a mainet. I would cut this project a wide berth until it has proven itself and ironed out the issues it seems to have overlooked, of course. Hell, personally i'm not touching it with any kind of money and i'm certainly not going to spend any effort on supporting it with a crazy premine like they have.

Your best bet might be to try dumping your private keys, i really cant see many other options form the client options right now. That and trying to talk to the dev more. Let me know how you go please.

I'm sorry, that part is my bad (referencing to page 21) and I don't mean to be rude but missing is missing... User error is always possible but not likely in this case, I don't think. Every time I pressed spend (after each minting), wallet always created a new address with 1 ZVert but (probably because of the accumulator failure) those addresses didn't get added to my wallet in the end. Thank you for your suggestion and explaining things a bit more but -rescan did not work. Starting with or without -reindex, wallet gives transaction/address book  error no matter what and will reindex anyway. Thank you for offering me to try ShadowCoin. I don't really care about deep anon stuff, I'm a Vertcoin supporter for quite a while now and Vertcoin's Stealth addresses is more than what people could need, IMHO, unless someone wants to do very dodgy stuff that requires completely untraceable coin movements. I'm only trying to help out Bushido here. Cheers

Ahh ok so you cannot yet get access to your change from minting zerovert, which seems to be .9 last time i tried or 1 in your case and yes i knew rescan wouldn't work i was being polite. I encourage you to keep your wallet and try the new function they apparently have to help you recover your coins.

Btw shadow banking is worth a look, (google it) its mostly what has helped economies stay afloat over the years, so when you say "unless someone wants to do something dodgy" Well, i argue that remaining anonymous does not always have to mean you are up to no good. Just because its established that way by paranoid governments who really need to know everything that goes on.

The hope is to create economies that take the power back form the governments overreach. Remaining anonymous and supporting that is one of the ways we can ensure that happens. If we don't then we all just become and stay apart of their system where they dictate everything and we don't ever get a say. I encourage you to look deeper, it is not just about money but how we interact with the net and the world through it, that gives this tech power.

I don't believe bushido is fighting for that but mainly he seems to be trying to give vertcoin users an option to use a more anonymous transaction feature to keep them within the vert community. In a lot of ways that makes sense but i chose not to support it because i don't see it as a well put together solution just yet. But only a thing to fill a hole, which i understand is a programmers job but this is much more then programing. This is peoples money and their futures. Just my .2 SDC and good luck.

You have actually made a good point there. I can't argue with that. But that is the reason why many of the CCs were created and that's why I'll stick with Vert. You seem to be good fella so I will definitely check it out. Thank you. But what I can argue with, is the fact that none of is entitled to say who is fighting for what or not fighting at all for something until that is said by that exact same person. You are more than welcome to state your opinion but please do not use speculation on other people's intentions as a foundation when trying to make a point. That doesn't seem to be fair and sound, does it?

Huh? What new function? Please explain. I made a backup, deleted everything and generated a new wallet, imported all private keys just to try if it's there but it's not.
If I go to console and type "listreceivedbyaddress 0 true" it shows the correct amount (using the older wallet). I also exported the "used" TXs. Is there a way to manually "spend" them through the console in the new wallet?

Thank you for all your inputs.

Np, i just think actions most of the time speak volumes. This reckless implementation, to be secure=bloat but this is not as big as most of the "secure" zerocoin studies imply, thus leading most of us to believe there has been a sacrifice in security. Hense the simple deduction made on it and the devs intentions. But i can see where you're coming from and prolly best if we don't continue banging on about it.

I am however concerned for you coins and anyone elses in the future, not only for them but for this industries image in the future. If we fail to regulate this ourselves in a mature and effective manner then there will be strong argument for a third party governed by even fewer people to do it. And we wont really like that, to put it lightly. It may be necessary but i would rather this system regulating itself. I think its possible, once we figure out who is here to leech and who is here to contribute.

But this situation you are in now (added your private keys to a new wallet) is the perfect one to use rescan. It should add the txn back. If not then, that function i'm referring to from the devs will prolly involve adding zerovert txn back in.

Code:

 -rescan                Rescan the block chain for missing wallet transactions

[jk_14]

Vertcoin's Stealth addresses is more than what people could need, IMHO

+1

in other words: privacy on demand
ideal solution (easier for worldwide adoption, than all those mixer or black-box coins)

[topcat363]

Vertcoin's Stealth addresses is more than what people could need, IMHO

+1

in other words: privacy on demand
ideal solution (easier for worldwide adoption, than all those mixer or black-box coins)

yea this coin looks great. once dev returns from fixing the little bugs, this coin will be back in business. I would advise to buy NOW if btc is available

[fonyo]

So no give away coins from twitter at all? Has anyone ever got one? I tweeted a lot for those and now get nothing? BS.

Does the latest wallet work?

Didn't get coins. Can't believe how greedy they are. There've been probably 10 tweets max and they have huge premine and still can't give away few coins.

They probably want to sort out the network and the wallet issues first. You wouldn't be happy if you lost your received coins, huh? Because I did.

Wait..what? Can you please elaborate on that, did you mint zerovert and now its gone because of a bug? Lost forever? Was it user fault (you) or the chain messed up and now you can never retrieve them?

Page 21.

mhm i was aware of that before i asked you to elaborate. Can you please elaborate further. Right now you are saying your coins have gone missing. That, in case you are not aware is an extremely alarming claim. Can you elaborate please!
You minted coins and now they are gone isn't really enough for me sorry.

Geeze, everything about this project just gets my hairs standing on end its so strange. I cant put my finger on any of it but i know something doesn't sit right with me. Its so rushed, so reckless. Its everything opposed to a precise financial instrument. Its so left field with a stinking premine.

To me your problem seems to be that your wallet.dat file (acts as a mini database for transactions) has had the tx written in it but the tx hasn't been accepted by the chain. Meaning your coins are most prolly on the chain of course, it jsut wasnt verified because the accumulator algo failed. But because your wallet.dat is thinking you have sent them its telling the client not to allow it. The wallet.dat is your keys to the blockchain primarily, but it also acts as a mini block database, holding your transactions. They don't have to correlate with the blockchain of course, its just for convenience and saves checking the entire chain each time you turn your client on, am i making sense?

Unfortunately for you, right now there is no such thing as a "clearwallettransactions" (clears the transactions from the wallet.dat) so you can then build a fresh, more accurate and updated set using something like a "scanalltxn" Which would scan your blockchain and add all the tx you have. It would show a correct balance according to the blockchain, due to the keys you hold.

I would forget this weird project if i was you and come test ShadowCash. Its anon transactions are in public testing right now on a TESTNET unlike this reckless attempt at anon transactions on a mainet. I would cut this project a wide berth until it has proven itself and ironed out the issues it seems to have overlooked, of course. Hell, personally i'm not touching it with any kind of money and i'm certainly not going to spend any effort on supporting it with a crazy premine like they have.

Your best bet might be to try dumping your private keys, i really cant see many other options form the client options right now. That and trying to talk to the dev more. Let me know how you go please.

I'm sorry, that part is my bad (referencing to page 21) and I don't mean to be rude but missing is missing... User error is always possible but not likely in this case, I don't think. Every time I pressed spend (after each minting), wallet always created a new address with 1 ZVert but (probably because of the accumulator failure) those addresses didn't get added to my wallet in the end. Thank you for your suggestion and explaining things a bit more but -rescan did not work. Starting with or without -reindex, wallet gives transaction/address book  error no matter what and will reindex anyway. Thank you for offering me to try ShadowCoin. I don't really care about deep anon stuff, I'm a Vertcoin supporter for quite a while now and Vertcoin's Stealth addresses is more than what people could need, IMHO, unless someone wants to do very dodgy stuff that requires completely untraceable coin movements. I'm only trying to help out Bushido here. Cheers

Ahh ok so you cannot yet get access to your change from minting zerovert, which seems to be .9 last time i tried or 1 in your case and yes i knew rescan wouldn't work i was being polite. I encourage you to keep your wallet and try the new function they apparently have to help you recover your coins.

Btw shadow banking is worth a look, (google it) its mostly what has helped economies stay afloat over the years, so when you say "unless someone wants to do something dodgy" Well, i argue that remaining anonymous does not always have to mean you are up to no good. Just because its established that way by paranoid governments who really need to know everything that goes on.

The hope is to create economies that take the power back form the governments overreach. Remaining anonymous and supporting that is one of the ways we can ensure that happens. If we don't then we all just become and stay apart of their system where they dictate everything and we don't ever get a say. I encourage you to look deeper, it is not just about money but how we interact with the net and the world through it, that gives this tech power.

I don't believe bushido is fighting for that but mainly he seems to be trying to give vertcoin users an option to use a more anonymous transaction feature to keep them within the vert community. In a lot of ways that makes sense but i chose not to support it because i don't see it as a well put together solution just yet. But only a thing to fill a hole, which i understand is a programmers job but this is much more then programing. This is peoples money and their futures. Just my .2 SDC and good luck.

You have actually made a good point there. I can't argue with that. But that is the reason why many of the CCs were created and that's why I'll stick with Vert. You seem to be good fella so I will definitely check it out. Thank you. But what I can argue with, is the fact that none of is entitled to say who is fighting for what or not fighting at all for something until that is said by that exact same person. You are more than welcome to state your opinion but please do not use speculation on other people's intentions as a foundation when trying to make a point. That doesn't seem to be fair and sound, does it?

Huh? What new function? Please explain. I made a backup, deleted everything and generated a new wallet, imported all private keys just to try if it's there but it's not.
If I go to console and type "listreceivedbyaddress 0 true" it shows the correct amount (using the older wallet). I also exported the "used" TXs. Is there a way to manually "spend" them through the console in the new wallet?

Thank you for all your inputs.

Np, i just think actions most of the time speak volumes. This reckless implementation, to be secure=bloat but this is not as big as most of the "secure" zerocoin studies imply, thus leading most of us to believe there has been a sacrifice in security. Hense the simple deduction made on it and the devs intentions. But i can see where you're coming from and prolly best if we don't continue banging on about it.

I am however concerned for you coins and anyone elses in the future, not only for them but for this industries image in the future. If we fail to regulate this ourselves in a mature and effective manner then there will be strong argument for a third party governed by even fewer people to do it. And we wont really like that, to put it lightly. It may be necessary but i would rather this system regulating itself. I think its possible, once we figure out who is here to leech and who is here to contribute.

But this situation you are in now (added your private keys to a new wallet) is the perfect one to use rescan. It should add the txn back. If not then, that function i'm referring to from the devs will prolly involve adding zerovert txn back in.

Code:

 -rescan                Rescan the block chain for missing wallet transactions

It doesn't work when I add -rescan (gives the same error as with the oldest bugged-out wallet: "A fatal error...", "Exception: St12out_of_range..."). What is the console version command for this because nothing seems to be accepted there (not even the reindex command)?

Unfortunately, I can't speak for the technology side as much, especially when it comes to the Zerocoin-Zerovert implementation. Even though, I completely agree that some kind of regulation would be nice for new coins, I don't think that a centralized team or any individual on its own should decide what should be here and what shouldn't. The community should decide that as a whole which is actually happening all the time (even right now). It is a slow process but in the end you will see coins that survived and coins that did not make it. That's called freedom or I can put it this way as well: "a chance to play". (Play: not as in a game or gambling but only metaphorically speaking)

I understand your point about the image of CC. Most of the people (who don't know much or anything about CC, actually) only hear from it when the media talks about who stole what in the crypto world (AGAIN). Starting from this point of view, if you wanted to get more people involved with this awesome world we have here, how would you tell them to put their money in a CC that is called ShadowCoin (/ shadow banking) or Darkcoin or even Dogecoin, etc. Just by using common sense, it is a no-go and I'm not even talking about religious people here. Try to explain them that their money is safe if they used shadow banking/coin. I don't want you to feel offended, I really like this conversation with you, we share the same view on this one in general.

Cheers

[silvapaso85]

why the low volume?

Small interest at this moment. This coin need more time to see its potential

[jwinterm]

why the low volume?

Small interest at this moment. This coin need more time to see its potential

Personally I don't think anyone would be wise to put up any significant buy orders when > 50% of the current coin supply is controlled by the dev premine, and this will be the case for six months or longer, with the very slow emission of this coin. Maybe it's a good thing, it will give devs time to work out the bugs, and then they can go open source in a six months or a year, when they only control 30-50% of the current coin supply, but still, I'd have some reservations buying in even in one year's time when dev controls "only" > 25% of current coin supply, and there's no way I'm adding any buy support when the devs control like 80 or 90+% of the current coin supply, which is the case at the moment.

[LongAndShort]

~snip
(...)

Ahh ok so you cannot yet get access to your change from minting zerovert, which seems to be .9 last time i tried or 1 in your case and yes i knew rescan wouldn't work i was being polite. I encourage you to keep your wallet and try the new function they apparently have to help you recover your coins.

Btw shadow banking is worth a look, (google it) its mostly what has helped economies stay afloat over the years, so when you say "unless someone wants to do something dodgy" Well, i argue that remaining anonymous does not always have to mean you are up to no good. Just because its established that way by paranoid governments who really need to know everything that goes on.

The hope is to create economies that take the power back form the governments overreach. Remaining anonymous and supporting that is one of the ways we can ensure that happens. If we don't then we all just become and stay apart of their system where they dictate everything and we don't ever get a say. I encourage you to look deeper, it is not just about money but how we interact with the net and the world through it, that gives this tech power.

I don't believe bushido is fighting for that but mainly he seems to be trying to give vertcoin users an option to use a more anonymous transaction feature to keep them within the vert community. In a lot of ways that makes sense but i chose not to support it because i don't see it as a well put together solution just yet. But only a thing to fill a hole, which i understand is a programmers job but this is much more then programing. This is peoples money and their futures. Just my .2 SDC and good luck.

You have actually made a good point there. I can't argue with that. But that is the reason why many of the CCs were created and that's why I'll stick with Vert. You seem to be good fella so I will definitely check it out. Thank you. But what I can argue with, is the fact that none of is entitled to say who is fighting for what or not fighting at all for something until that is said by that exact same person. You are more than welcome to state your opinion but please do not use speculation on other people's intentions as a foundation when trying to make a point. That doesn't seem to be fair and sound, does it?

Huh? What new function? Please explain. I made a backup, deleted everything and generated a new wallet, imported all private keys just to try if it's there but it's not.
If I go to console and type "listreceivedbyaddress 0 true" it shows the correct amount (using the older wallet). I also exported the "used" TXs. Is there a way to manually "spend" them through the console in the new wallet?

Thank you for all your inputs.

Np, i just think actions most of the time speak volumes. This reckless implementation, to be secure=bloat but this is not as big as most of the "secure" zerocoin studies imply, thus leading most of us to believe there has been a sacrifice in security. Hense the simple deduction made on it and the devs intentions. But i can see where you're coming from and prolly best if we don't continue banging on about it.

I am however concerned for you coins and anyone elses in the future, not only for them but for this industries image in the future. If we fail to regulate this ourselves in a mature and effective manner then there will be strong argument for a third party governed by even fewer people to do it. And we wont really like that, to put it lightly. It may be necessary but i would rather this system regulating itself. I think its possible, once we figure out who is here to leech and who is here to contribute.

But this situation you are in now (added your private keys to a new wallet) is the perfect one to use rescan. It should add the txn back. If not then, that function i'm referring to from the devs will prolly involve adding zerovert txn back in.

Code:

 -rescan                Rescan the block chain for missing wallet transactions

It doesn't work when I add -rescan (gives the same error as with the oldest bugged-out wallet: "A fatal error...", "Exception: St12out_of_range..."). What is the console version command for this because nothing seems to be accepted there (not even the reindex command)?

Unfortunately, I can't speak for the technology side as much, especially when it comes to the Zerocoin-Zerovert implementation. Even though, I completely agree that some kind of regulation would be nice for new coins, I don't think that a centralized team or any individual on its own should decide what should be here and what shouldn't. The community should decide that as a whole which is actually happening all the time (even right now). It is a slow process but in the end you will see coins that survived and coins that did not make it. That's called freedom or I can put it this way as well: "a chance to play". (Play: not as in a game or gambling but only metaphorically speaking)

I understand your point about the image of CC. Most of the people (who don't know much or anything about CC, actually) only hear from it when the media talks about who stole what in the crypto world (AGAIN). Starting from this point of view, if you wanted to get more people involved with this awesome world we have here, how would you tell them to put their money in a CC that is called ShadowCoin (/ shadow banking) or Darkcoin or even Dogecoin, etc. Just by using common sense, it is a no-go and I'm not even talking about religious people here. Try to explain them that their money is safe if they used shadow banking/coin. I don't want you to feel offended, I really like this conversation with you, we share the same view on this one in general.

Cheers

Put this in your conf not -rescan

Code:

rescan=1