Doom4535
|
|
November 12, 2015, 11:28:33 PM |
|
How well are transactions going through for yall, or are you having to process your own transactions right now? I've got one transaction that has been pending for close to 20 hours despite all the recently processed blocks; are nodes just not relaying transactions to each other well because of the limited network size?
what block is the transaction in? cuz 20 hours doesnt mean much if only 10 blocks has gone by Hasn't hit a block, here's the transaction ID: b534da9eeb6feee6e40751bb7c0a16ab890bb09c241a2fc7519d05730de9195c-000 wallet says it was broadcasted through 5 nodes, but has zero confirms. It could just be slow to propogate through though. I can always stake the transaction myself in two days.
|
FLAP: FDf1mMgvMU5CxT1vR33iZr5sf9u2Mb4gcr EXE: EKtwmweMBLtg5xNXp1anofonJsJiao1DYY free bitcoin lottery
|
|
|
alchebyte
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
November 12, 2015, 11:48:07 PM Last edit: November 13, 2015, 12:10:00 AM by alchebyte |
|
So any idea why my wallet balance went from 55+ MFLAP to 0.00013555709161 MFLAP. All the transactions that add up to the 55+ show up in the ledger
|
|
|
|
menlatin (OP)
|
|
November 12, 2015, 11:48:37 PM |
|
How well are transactions going through for yall, or are you having to process your own transactions right now? I've got one transaction that has been pending for close to 20 hours despite all the recently processed blocks; are nodes just not relaying transactions to each other well because of the limited network size?
what block is the transaction in? cuz 20 hours doesnt mean much if only 10 blocks has gone by Hasn't hit a block, here's the transaction ID: b534da9eeb6feee6e40751bb7c0a16ab890bb09c241a2fc7519d05730de9195c-000 wallet says it was broadcasted through 5 nodes, but has zero confirms. It could just be slow to propogate through though. I can always stake the transaction myself in two days. This one? https://chainz.cryptoid.info/flap/tx.dws?b534da9eeb6feee6e40751bb7c0a16ab890bb09c241a2fc7519d05730de9195c.htm
|
|
|
|
Doom4535
|
|
November 13, 2015, 12:18:38 AM |
|
How well are transactions going through for yall, or are you having to process your own transactions right now? I've got one transaction that has been pending for close to 20 hours despite all the recently processed blocks; are nodes just not relaying transactions to each other well because of the limited network size?
what block is the transaction in? cuz 20 hours doesnt mean much if only 10 blocks has gone by Hasn't hit a block, here's the transaction ID: b534da9eeb6feee6e40751bb7c0a16ab890bb09c241a2fc7519d05730de9195c-000 wallet says it was broadcasted through 5 nodes, but has zero confirms. It could just be slow to propogate through though. I can always stake the transaction myself in two days. This one? https://chainz.cryptoid.info/flap/tx.dws?b534da9eeb6feee6e40751bb7c0a16ab890bb09c241a2fc7519d05730de9195c.htmYup, I take it that it just went through? I guess I should have waited a few extra hours to post... Although I guess it looks like it is taking a few hundred blocks to get a transaction in sometimes or I'm just unlucky? Thanks for the update
|
FLAP: FDf1mMgvMU5CxT1vR33iZr5sf9u2Mb4gcr EXE: EKtwmweMBLtg5xNXp1anofonJsJiao1DYY free bitcoin lottery
|
|
|
Doom4535
|
|
November 13, 2015, 12:21:33 AM |
|
So any idea why my wallet balance went from 55+ MFLAP to 0.00013555709161 MFLAP. All the transactions that add up to the 55+ show up in the ledger Are you looking at this from inside your wallet? I'd say it is because they are currently staking, if you want to prevent this you can encrypt your wallet (however you won't earn any coins unless you unlock it for a while). If your not looking at it from inside your wallet I'd say open it and check the staking balance.
|
FLAP: FDf1mMgvMU5CxT1vR33iZr5sf9u2Mb4gcr EXE: EKtwmweMBLtg5xNXp1anofonJsJiao1DYY free bitcoin lottery
|
|
|
alchebyte
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
November 13, 2015, 12:25:01 AM |
|
So any idea why my wallet balance went from 55+ MFLAP to 0.00013555709161 MFLAP. All the transactions that add up to the 55+ show up in the ledger Actually, my balance is 0, the unconfirmed balance is 0.00013555709161 Also, part of block 700779 appears to be a POS transaction to me for 398,608.56228901 FLAP, which doesn't show up in the ledger or (obviously) my balances... https://chainz.cryptoid.info/flap/block.dws?700779.htm
|
|
|
|
Griffith
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 13, 2015, 12:26:47 AM |
|
So any idea why my wallet balance went from 55+ MFLAP to 0.00013555709161 MFLAP. All the transactions that add up to the 55+ show up in the ledger to get your balance of your wallet open your wallet. dont rely on block explorers to tell you your balance. just open your wallet and see it. also for staking. total balance - staking balance = available balance if the balance is displaying wrong, add rescan=1 to your flappycoin.conf file and restart your wallet be sure to remove rescan=1 after the wallet starts up again though because if you keep it then it will rescan every time the wallet opens
|
|
|
|
alchebyte
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
November 13, 2015, 12:27:40 AM |
|
So any idea why my wallet balance went from 55+ MFLAP to 0.00013555709161 MFLAP. All the transactions that add up to the 55+ show up in the ledger Are you looking at this from inside your wallet? I'd say it is because they are currently staking, if you want to prevent this you can encrypt your wallet (however you won't earn any coins unless you unlock it for a while). If your not looking at it from inside your wallet I'd say open it and check the staking balance. I shut everything down and restarted the wallet, balance and stake at 0, unconfirmed still at 0.00013555709161 MFLAP
|
|
|
|
Griffith
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 13, 2015, 12:29:49 AM |
|
So any idea why my wallet balance went from 55+ MFLAP to 0.00013555709161 MFLAP. All the transactions that add up to the 55+ show up in the ledger Actually, my balance is 0, the unconfirmed balance is 0.00013555709161 Also, part of block 700779 appears to be a POS transaction to me for 398,608.56228901 FLAP, which doesn't show up in the ledger or (obviously) my balances... https://chainz.cryptoid.info/flap/block.dws?700779.htmyou are reading the block explorer wrong. the first transaction is Generation + fees (0 coins), the second transaction is what you staked it looks like you staked 10 flap and made a profit of 0.00549315 FLAP which will be added to your balance one the staking blokc matures. the other two transactions were people just sending coins on the chain to other wallets. they have nothing to do with your wallet and you wont gain coins from them, you just processed their transactions. edit: did you add rescan=1 to your config file?
|
|
|
|
alchebyte
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
November 13, 2015, 12:32:04 AM Last edit: November 13, 2015, 12:44:01 AM by alchebyte |
|
So any idea why my wallet balance went from 55+ MFLAP to 0.00013555709161 MFLAP. All the transactions that add up to the 55+ show up in the ledger Actually, my balance is 0, the unconfirmed balance is 0.00013555709161 Also, part of block 700779 appears to be a POS transaction to me for 398,608.56228901 FLAP, which doesn't show up in the ledger or (obviously) my balances... https://chainz.cryptoid.info/flap/block.dws?700779.htmyou are reading the block explorer wrong. the first transaction is Generation + fees (0 coins), the second transaction is what you staked it looks like you staked 10 flap and made a profit of 0.00549315 FLAP which will be added to your balance one the staking blokc matures. the other two transactions were people just sending coins on the chain to other wallets. they have nothing to do with your wallet and you wont gain coins from them, you just processed their transactions. edit: did you add rescan=1 to your config file? Rescanning now edit: BTW, the first of the other two transactions are all from addresses in my wallet to the POS address in my wallet (and the other 0.88 flap to someone else). I didn't send any of those, I haven't sent anything in months... Rescan finished, no change to balances edit 2: Actually I sent menlatin a test transaction on 9/10 Status: 0/unconfirmed Date: 9/10/2015 18:12 To: menlatin FUQer2xzYLa9k1Ww7B6hmaSvi4huAgEuat Debit: -1.00 FLAP Transaction fee: -0.002 FLAP Net amount: -1.002 FLAP Transaction ID: 59912ee770fcb96beaf6e8a836e028fe41354a5b9139a23bf4a500a388988116
|
|
|
|
Griffith
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 13, 2015, 01:04:01 AM |
|
So any idea why my wallet balance went from 55+ MFLAP to 0.00013555709161 MFLAP. All the transactions that add up to the 55+ show up in the ledger Actually, my balance is 0, the unconfirmed balance is 0.00013555709161 Also, part of block 700779 appears to be a POS transaction to me for 398,608.56228901 FLAP, which doesn't show up in the ledger or (obviously) my balances... https://chainz.cryptoid.info/flap/block.dws?700779.htmyou are reading the block explorer wrong. the first transaction is Generation + fees (0 coins), the second transaction is what you staked it looks like you staked 10 flap and made a profit of 0.00549315 FLAP which will be added to your balance one the staking blokc matures. the other two transactions were people just sending coins on the chain to other wallets. they have nothing to do with your wallet and you wont gain coins from them, you just processed their transactions. edit: did you add rescan=1 to your config file? Rescanning now edit: BTW, the first of the other two transactions are all from addresses in my wallet to the POS address in my wallet (and the other 0.88 flap to someone else). I didn't send any of those, I haven't sent anything in months... Rescan finished, no change to balances edit 2: Actually I sent menlatin a test transaction on 9/10 Status: 0/unconfirmed Date: 9/10/2015 18:12 To: menlatin FUQer2xzYLa9k1Ww7B6hmaSvi4huAgEuat Debit: -1.00 FLAP Transaction fee: -0.002 FLAP Net amount: -1.002 FLAP Transaction ID: 59912ee770fcb96beaf6e8a836e028fe41354a5b9139a23bf4a500a388988116 in your wallet folder where your chain and wallet.dat are stored. there isnt a wallet.bak or anything else in there is there?
|
|
|
|
alchebyte
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
November 13, 2015, 01:10:54 AM |
|
So any idea why my wallet balance went from 55+ MFLAP to 0.00013555709161 MFLAP. All the transactions that add up to the 55+ show up in the ledger Actually, my balance is 0, the unconfirmed balance is 0.00013555709161 Also, part of block 700779 appears to be a POS transaction to me for 398,608.56228901 FLAP, which doesn't show up in the ledger or (obviously) my balances... https://chainz.cryptoid.info/flap/block.dws?700779.htmyou are reading the block explorer wrong. the first transaction is Generation + fees (0 coins), the second transaction is what you staked it looks like you staked 10 flap and made a profit of 0.00549315 FLAP which will be added to your balance one the staking blokc matures. the other two transactions were people just sending coins on the chain to other wallets. they have nothing to do with your wallet and you wont gain coins from them, you just processed their transactions. edit: did you add rescan=1 to your config file? Rescanning now edit: BTW, the first of the other two transactions are all from addresses in my wallet to the POS address in my wallet (and the other 0.88 flap to someone else). I didn't send any of those, I haven't sent anything in months... Rescan finished, no change to balances edit 2: Actually I sent menlatin a test transaction on 9/10 Status: 0/unconfirmed Date: 9/10/2015 18:12 To: menlatin FUQer2xzYLa9k1Ww7B6hmaSvi4huAgEuat Debit: -1.00 FLAP Transaction fee: -0.002 FLAP Net amount: -1.002 FLAP Transaction ID: 59912ee770fcb96beaf6e8a836e028fe41354a5b9139a23bf4a500a388988116 in your wallet folder where your chain and wallet.dat are stored. there isnt a wallet.bak or anything else in there is there? Nope, just the wallet.dat (and the logs and peers.dat). There's a .lock file dated 7/2 though... I do have wallet backups taken before the last 3 updates. Perhaps there's an issue with the most recent one. I had 4.0.2 running often (and staked quite a bit) since roughly 8/14/2015... Perhaps I should try the wallet.dat from 7/2?
|
|
|
|
Griffith
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 13, 2015, 01:42:36 AM |
|
Nope, just the wallet.dat (and the logs and peers.dat). There's a .lock file dated 7/2 though...
I do have wallet backups taken before the last 3 updates. Perhaps there's an issue with the most recent one. I had 4.0.2 running often (and staked quite a bit) since roughly 8/14/2015...
Perhaps I should try the wallet.dat from 7/2?
try the oldest one.
|
|
|
|
alchebyte
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
November 13, 2015, 01:45:24 AM Last edit: November 13, 2015, 02:11:04 AM by alchebyte |
|
Nope, just the wallet.dat (and the logs and peers.dat). There's a .lock file dated 7/2 though...
I do have wallet backups taken before the last 3 updates. Perhaps there's an issue with the most recent one. I had 4.0.2 running often (and staked quite a bit) since roughly 8/14/2015...
Perhaps I should try the wallet.dat from 7/2?
try the oldest one. That seems to have worked, waiting on the 2 hour blockchain catchup. Sent 5 FLAP to menlatin, no confirmations yet... edit: All good now
|
|
|
|
Doom4535
|
|
November 13, 2015, 05:37:43 AM |
|
Looks like the network is getting a bit more active, between having (seemingly) more people involved and the splitting Griffith was talking about, the block time is starting to look a lot better.
|
FLAP: FDf1mMgvMU5CxT1vR33iZr5sf9u2Mb4gcr EXE: EKtwmweMBLtg5xNXp1anofonJsJiao1DYY free bitcoin lottery
|
|
|
Griffith
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 13, 2015, 07:32:19 PM |
|
Looks like the network is getting a bit more active, between having (seemingly) more people involved and the splitting Griffith was talking about, the block time is starting to look a lot better.
splitting is a key factor in all PoS, since there is no proof-of-work mining to ensure a new block comes out every X minutes, the transactions that stake need to split to ensure that there is always a transaction available to stake for a block.
|
|
|
|
CryptoDatabase
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1005
https://cryptodatabase.net
|
|
November 13, 2015, 07:37:45 PM |
|
Looks like the network is getting a bit more active, between having (seemingly) more people involved and the splitting Griffith was talking about, the block time is starting to look a lot better.
splitting is a key factor in all PoS, since there is no proof-of-work mining to ensure a new block comes out every X minutes, the transactions that stake need to split to ensure that there is always a transaction available to stake for a block. If coins have been sitting in a wallet for months do they need to be moved to another address to start staking or will they just start staking how they are?
|
|
|
|
Griffith
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 13, 2015, 09:44:40 PM |
|
Looks like the network is getting a bit more active, between having (seemingly) more people involved and the splitting Griffith was talking about, the block time is starting to look a lot better.
splitting is a key factor in all PoS, since there is no proof-of-work mining to ensure a new block comes out every X minutes, the transactions that stake need to split to ensure that there is always a transaction available to stake for a block. If coins have been sitting in a wallet for months do they need to be moved to another address to start staking or will they just start staking how they are? if you are running the wallet version 4.0.3.0 then they will just stake. you dont need to move them to another address. idk if by wallet you mean application version or wallet.dat file
|
|
|
|
CryptoDatabase
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1005
https://cryptodatabase.net
|
|
November 13, 2015, 10:00:46 PM |
|
Looks like the network is getting a bit more active, between having (seemingly) more people involved and the splitting Griffith was talking about, the block time is starting to look a lot better.
splitting is a key factor in all PoS, since there is no proof-of-work mining to ensure a new block comes out every X minutes, the transactions that stake need to split to ensure that there is always a transaction available to stake for a block. If coins have been sitting in a wallet for months do they need to be moved to another address to start staking or will they just start staking how they are? if you are running the wallet version 4.0.3.0 then they will just stake. you dont need to move them to another address. idk if by wallet you mean application version or wallet.dat file The previous wallet version it was required to move your coins out and move them back in for them to start staking. By wallet I mean the program you open to view and process transactions with. The wallet.dat file itself is just a data file and is what the wallet reads from.
|
|
|
|
Griffith
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 13, 2015, 10:17:32 PM |
|
Looks like the network is getting a bit more active, between having (seemingly) more people involved and the splitting Griffith was talking about, the block time is starting to look a lot better.
splitting is a key factor in all PoS, since there is no proof-of-work mining to ensure a new block comes out every X minutes, the transactions that stake need to split to ensure that there is always a transaction available to stake for a block. If coins have been sitting in a wallet for months do they need to be moved to another address to start staking or will they just start staking how they are? if you are running the wallet version 4.0.3.0 then they will just stake. you dont need to move them to another address. idk if by wallet you mean application version or wallet.dat file The previous wallet version it was required to move your coins out and move them back in for them to start staking. By wallet I mean the program you open to view and process transactions with. The wallet.dat file itself is just a data file and is what the wallet reads from. the previous version didnt require that either. but no you dont have to do it with this version.
|
|
|
|
|