I just wanted to publicly state that this is false. I do not control the NastyFans public address. I do not have access to the key that controls the NastyFans public address, and I am the only one who has the key to my address, making it impossible that anyone could have ever signed a transaction that includes both as inputs.
I just wanted to publicly state OgNasty is lying as usual. Blockworm has proved via blockchain OgNasty controlled all coins for Nasty Mining and NastyFans. Verify it for yourself:
1. Earliest Joint Spend of the Two Specific Vanity Addresses:
(Co-spending NastyFans seed 1NastyFRke... and OgNasty personal wallet 1NastyPXmdu... together as inputs)
Earliest Block: 685,348
Date & Time (UTC): May 29, 2021 at 07:10:30 UTC
Full TXID:
3e5906f309656e6ae9a3ea39349823e3f8d7ea4f6518eb14f43118e1b5e03a49
Details: This occurred nearly a full year before the later consolidated spend in Block 737,322 (bb4861a6...). Both 1NastyFRkeUTmMdbMmzggDVTQA6r3ibUoX (1.02+ BTC) and 1NastyPXmduDcoay5aEZzih7fzqt8UzXRK (0.06 BTC) were co-signed and spent as joint inputs in this transaction.
2. Earliest Spend of the NastyFans Seed with ANY Cluster Address:
(The very first time 1NastyFRke... was ever spent alongside an OgNasty cluster wallet, 19YXTFk9ik...)
Earliest Block: 681,189
Date & Time (UTC): April 30, 2021 at 05:53:11 UTC
Full TXID:
e2e06bc02f8c738ae674e4424498c4f0e501fc50127f7762f0425ed0b7797f33
You can see Og's personal address and the Nasty addresses signing the same transaction:
https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/e2e06bc02f8c738ae674e4424498c4f0e501fc50127f7762f0425ed0b7797f33