🎲 DiceSites.com - List of dice sites w/ statistics, graphs & verifiers

[TOPBTCCASINOS]

One of the best sites around - I use this most days.

I hope your are doing ok in terms of affiliate income as you deserve it

[1714959556]

1714959556

[1714959556]

1714959556

[gamblingbad]

And it is possible crypto-games is not open with their stats so it cannot be added.

Wrong, and easily to check for you. Crypto-Games offers public investments and hence provides all necessary stats, more than some casinos listed.
Further, all stats are available via API (https://api.crypto-games.net/v1/coinstats/BTC and https://api.crypto-games.net/v1/settings/BTC for BTC).

crypto-games is a casino not just a traditional dice site either so it isn't as easily comparable.

Yes and no. It's possible to just list the dice part of the casino, the stats for the dice game are available seperately and can be compared to the dice stats on all other sites.
Bitdice offers more games than just dice aswell, so does nitrogen (sports). Those sites are listed.

Yeah I checked out crypto-games and you could make a case that it should be added. But I am not sure what other sites gamblingbad is talking about.

If you only look dicesites.com you will believe its only a few sites. Dosent matter for me what you believe. I just like stats nlnico makes, thats why i post here and hope he adds more sites. Not to disqus with people who not follow btc gambling.

The thing is that NLNico always wanted to only list sites that he felt were trustworthy.

Takes a very long time for a site to prove they are, if they ever can since even some long opened sites can turn into scams.

I am invested in 4 sites not on NLNicos list but as much as I like them and have spoken with the owners I couldn't personally vouch or recommend them to investors due to them being new and also because I'm willing to take the risk personally.

It's one thing to invest in something but it's much worse if you then start recommending others do and it turns out bad. Then your own reputation is tarnished. NLNico has one of the best reputations in this community so I doubt he wants to mess that up.

Excited to see the new version. Long awaited but who am I to talk?

I admit I would love to see Bustabit on there though.

If u fear to talk about site u invest maybe u should quiet. What the point to disqus here if not going to give our opinion?

[KingDice]

And it is possible crypto-games is not open with their stats so it cannot be added.

Wrong, and easily to check for you. Crypto-Games offers public investments and hence provides all necessary stats, more than some casinos listed.
Further, all stats are available via API (https://api.crypto-games.net/v1/coinstats/BTC and https://api.crypto-games.net/v1/settings/BTC for BTC).

crypto-games is a casino not just a traditional dice site either so it isn't as easily comparable.

Yes and no. It's possible to just list the dice part of the casino, the stats for the dice game are available seperately and can be compared to the dice stats on all other sites.
Bitdice offers more games than just dice aswell, so does nitrogen (sports). Those sites are listed.

Yeah I checked out crypto-games and you could make a case that it should be added. But I am not sure what other sites gamblingbad is talking about.

If you only look dicesites.com you will believe its only a few sites. Dosent matter for me what you believe. I just like stats nlnico makes, thats why i post here and hope he adds more sites. Not to disqus with people who not follow btc gambling.

The thing is that NLNico always wanted to only list sites that he felt were trustworthy.

Takes a very long time for a site to prove they are, if they ever can since even some long opened sites can turn into scams.

I am invested in 4 sites not on NLNicos list but as much as I like them and have spoken with the owners I couldn't personally vouch or recommend them to investors due to them being new and also because I'm willing to take the risk personally.

It's one thing to invest in something but it's much worse if you then start recommending others do and it turns out bad. Then your own reputation is tarnished. NLNico has one of the best reputations in this community so I doubt he wants to mess that up.

Excited to see the new version. Long awaited but who am I to talk?

I admit I would love to see Bustabit on there though.

If u fear to talk about site u invest maybe u should quiet. What the point to disqus here if not going to give our opinion?

Its very rational what dean is saying. His opinion is that he likes the sites he invested, and he took the risk by himself. But of course no-one respectable would easily "vouch" for a new site ( yes, even for KingDice  hehe )

[NLNico]

I think my site is still fine if you are just looking for a decent dice site to play on. I do agree it's incomplete and there are some sites that should be on there though. Most notably crypto-games and bitvest (especially since they added dice.) My new version has filters too, so it allows non-dice (which would be hidden by default), so for example bustabit and luckybit are already added on my local test site too. And potentially some MP sites could be added like Bit-Exo (in terms of wagered.)

There are some newer sites that look promising too, like yolodice.com, kingdice.com and duckdice.io. Normally I would at least like a site to be around like 6 months and AFAIK they are newer than that. I am considering to add newer sites though and just make them hidden by default too with simple filter (checkbox), so it allows people to still see them if you want.

Other than that: SatoshiDice and CoinRoll are removed just recently for having too many issues with too slow support. PocketDice I am not sure how their latest issues were resolved (with the huge delay on like 80 coin withdrawal), so I would have to look into that. BitSler I don't have stats from. Sites like 999dice still seems sketchy to me. Maybe some MP sites could be added (besides BB and Bit-Exo), but I am not sure how much wagered they have lately.




Overall the problem is that my new version is technically not compatible with my old version, so I decided to only add sites to new version. Then obviously the new version is taking waaaaaaaaaaaaaay too long I am really sorry about that, it's pretty much just that other work comes along that I have to give higher priority than my own site. I definitely still care very much about my site though and plan to finish the new version soon-ish.

[wrxbuzz]

Except primedice, and betking, which dice sites do you recommend to us? Is fortunejack dice OK? I saw many people complaint their bugs, win result will get balance minus, I dare not play there.

[iram3130]

Nice information and design. I would suggest a ranking or star rating system which would make users more easily understandable about the dice sites.
I dont see any social media handles. Please make pages in there and give share option so that you get some good advertisements.

[Lutpin]

Nice information and design. I would suggest a ranking or star rating system which would make users more easily understandable about the dice sites.

They are ranked/rated by their stats, rather than subjective opinions about which site is better than which other.

[Dmtripp27]

I love your site. I think I'm on there more then i am on here. And I almost always have this up.

[gamblingbad]

I think my site is still fine if you are just looking for a decent dice site to play on. I do agree it's incomplete and there are some sites that should be on there though. Most notably crypto-games and bitvest (especially since they added dice.) My new version has filters too, so it allows non-dice (which would be hidden by default), so for example bustabit and luckybit are already added on my local test site too. And potentially some MP sites could be added like Bit-Exo (in terms of wagered.)

There are some newer sites that look promising too, like yolodice.com, kingdice.com and duckdice.io. Normally I would at least like a site to be around like 6 months and AFAIK they are newer than that. I am considering to add newer sites though and just make them hidden by default too with simple filter (checkbox), so it allows people to still see them if you want.

Other than that: SatoshiDice and CoinRoll are removed just recently for having too many issues with too slow support. PocketDice I am not sure how their latest issues were resolved (with the huge delay on like 80 coin withdrawal), so I would have to look into that. BitSler I don't have stats from. Sites like 999dice still seems sketchy to me. Maybe some MP sites could be added (besides BB and Bit-Exo), but I am not sure how much wagered they have lately.




Overall the problem is that my new version is technically not compatible with my old version, so I decided to only add sites to new version. Then obviously the new version is taking waaaaaaaaaaaaaay too long I am really sorry about that, it's pretty much just that other work comes along that I have to give higher priority than my own site. I definitely still care very much about my site though and plan to finish the new version soon-ish.

Sounds great=) Sorry if i was to negative in my earlier post.

[torry28]

Except primedice, and betking, which dice sites do you recommend to us? Is fortunejack dice OK? I saw many people complaint their bugs, win result will get balance minus, I dare not play there.

About fortunejack, you can read what NLNico ever said in their thread here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=774929.msg12510016#msg12510016
 (Read on the next page too)
FYI: Betking.io already closed.

[zinobiq]

I think my site is still fine if you are just looking for a decent dice site to play on. I do agree it's incomplete and there are some sites that should be on there though. Most notably crypto-games and bitvest (especially since they added dice.) My new version has filters too, so it allows non-dice (which would be hidden by default), so for example bustabit and luckybit are already added on my local test site too. And potentially some MP sites could be added like Bit-Exo (in terms of wagered.)

There are some newer sites that look promising too, like yolodice.com, kingdice.com and duckdice.io. Normally I would at least like a site to be around like 6 months and AFAIK they are newer than that. I am considering to add newer sites though and just make them hidden by default too with simple filter (checkbox), so it allows people to still see them if you want.

Other than that: SatoshiDice and CoinRoll are removed just recently for having too many issues with too slow support. PocketDice I am not sure how their latest issues were resolved (with the huge delay on like 80 coin withdrawal), so I would have to look into that. BitSler I don't have stats from. Sites like 999dice still seems sketchy to me. Maybe some MP sites could be added (besides BB and Bit-Exo), but I am not sure how much wagered they have lately.




Overall the problem is that my new version is technically not compatible with my old version, so I decided to only add sites to new version. Then obviously the new version is taking waaaaaaaaaaaaaay too long I am really sorry about that, it's pretty much just that other work comes along that I have to give higher priority than my own site. I definitely still care very much about my site though and plan to finish the new version soon-ish.

coinroll was hacked, right ?

[dustboy]

coinroll was hacked, right ?

Where and when you heard/read about it? I do not find any news or posts on this forum that they were hacked lately. Are you going to say that their recent issue of slow supports because they were hacked? Would be nice if you can give more info about it.

[mohir]

 i don;t get it as prime dice u can check roll HMAC N Than to hexadecimal  how bitsler.com do that  do u know how u verify that roll.

what is this all abt ..... its not as primedice

$seed = $serverSeed.'-'.$clientSeed.'-'.$nonce;
do {
     $seed = sha1($seed);
     $lucky = hexdec(substr($seed,0,8));
} while ($lucky > 4294960000);

$luckyNumber = ($lucky % 10000) / 100;

if ($luckyNumber < 0)
     $luckyNumber = -$luckyNumber;


echo $luckyNumber;

who can tell me how to verify n take out bitsler roll

like prime dice its simple client seed -nonce with secret key =hmac   n hmac gives us decimal with sha512 whts behind bitsler??

[dannon]

I think my site is still fine if you are just looking for a decent dice site to play on. I do agree it's incomplete and there are some sites that should be on there though. Most notably crypto-games and bitvest (especially since they added dice.) My new version has filters too, so it allows non-dice (which would be hidden by default), so for example bustabit and luckybit are already added on my local test site too. And potentially some MP sites could be added like Bit-Exo (in terms of wagered.)

There are some newer sites that look promising too, like yolodice.com, kingdice.com and duckdice.io. Normally I would at least like a site to be around like 6 months and AFAIK they are newer than that. I am considering to add newer sites though and just make them hidden by default too with simple filter (checkbox), so it allows people to still see them if you want.

Other than that: SatoshiDice and CoinRoll are removed just recently for having too many issues with too slow support. PocketDice I am not sure how their latest issues were resolved (with the huge delay on like 80 coin withdrawal), so I would have to look into that. BitSler I don't have stats from. Sites like 999dice still seems sketchy to me. Maybe some MP sites could be added (besides BB and Bit-Exo), but I am not sure how much wagered they have lately.




Overall the problem is that my new version is technically not compatible with my old version, so I decided to only add sites to new version. Then obviously the new version is taking waaaaaaaaaaaaaay too long I am really sorry about that, it's pretty much just that other work comes along that I have to give higher priority than my own site. I definitely still care very much about my site though and plan to finish the new version soon-ish.

coinroll was hacked, right ?

Are you sure? Did they announce that?

[NLNico]

i don;t get it as prime dice u can check roll HMAC N Than to hexadecimal  how bitsler.com do that  do u know how u verify that roll.

what is this all abt ..... its not as primedice

$seed = $serverSeed.'-'.$clientSeed.'-'.$nonce;
do {
     $seed = sha1($seed);
     $lucky = hexdec(substr($seed,0,8));
} while ($lucky > 4294960000);

$luckyNumber = ($lucky % 10000) / 100;

if ($luckyNumber < 0)
     $luckyNumber = -$luckyNumber;


echo $luckyNumber;

who can tell me how to verify n take out bitsler roll

like prime dice its simple client seed -nonce with secret key =hmac   n hmac gives us decimal with sha512 whts behind bitsler??

Note that I already have a simple verifier for Bitsler too: https://dicesites.com/bitsler/verifier

At Bitsler you have to use SHA1 instead of HMAC-SHA512 with:

Code:

server_seed-client_seed-end_nonce

Then instead of the first 5 characters, get the first 8 characters and convert from hexadecimal to decimal. Last part is the same as PD... outcome%10000/100.



Let me know if it works If not, you could give an example and I can show the "calculation" of the first result.

[KingDice]

Im so happy that KingDice is soon becoming 6month old, and will be added to Dicesites! (#not)  

[emsjvh]

can you verify duckdice?

[mohir]

 can you please check again it works last time but i think i forgot again
Seed server (Hashed)
0dfae9fef68c1638bde02cb59983ddf79907783d8c345f217118ca814a75b5a74bca41bc43cbc4f 80fef87f66b962e4157682e3bf0c11dad677ed7c5076f7dba
Seed server (Revealed)
bb991459f04a09c7198fc1c56e47d5d6085d78b87965cd41e1770789d5216b4e4ad7ea1a21bc237 2eb13fa552d7ca44ff2e529c06ab624e46d200a362a932adc
Seed client
84d58ad81c56dfbcfee016c4ad477530e7c85756

u mean this right

Code:

server_seed-client_seed-end_nonce

for the first roll  on this sitehttp://www.freeformatter.com/hmac-generator.html#ad-output
Copy-paste the string here

bb991459f04a09c7198fc1c56e47d5d6085d78b87965cd41e1770789d5216b4e4ad7ea1a21bc237 2eb13fa552d7ca44ff2e529c06ab624e46d200a362a932adc-84d58ad81c56dfbcfee016c4ad477530e7c85756-1

Secret Key
bb991459f04a09c7198fc1c56e47d5d6085d78b87965cd41e1770789d5216b4e4ad7ea1a21bc237 2eb13fa552d7ca44ff2e529c06ab624e46d200a362a932adc
Select a message digest algorithm
SHA1

than outcome 8 digits to  hexa and than last part same right ?

becoz its not coming correct or i forgot something.............. it works that day

 thanx and regards




...

i don;t get it as prime dice u can check roll HMAC N Than to hexadecimal  how bitsler.com do that  do u know how u verify that roll.

what is this all abt ..... its not as primedice

$seed = $serverSeed.'-'.$clientSeed.'-'.$nonce;
do {
     $seed = sha1($seed);
     $lucky = hexdec(substr($seed,0,8));
} while ($lucky > 4294960000);

$luckyNumber = ($lucky % 10000) / 100;

if ($luckyNumber < 0)
     $luckyNumber = -$luckyNumber;


echo $luckyNumber;

who can tell me how to verify n take out bitsler roll

like prime dice its simple client seed -nonce with secret key =hmac   n hmac gives us decimal with sha512 whts behind bitsler??

Note that I already have a simple verifier for Bitsler too: https://dicesites.com/bitsler/verifier

At Bitsler you have to use SHA1 instead of HMAC-SHA512 with:

Code:

server_seed-client_seed-end_nonce

Then instead of the first 5 characters, get the first 8 characters and convert from hexadecimal to decimal. Last part is the same as PD... outcome%10000/100.



Let me know if it works If not, you could give an example and I can show the "calculation" of the first result.

[jamyr]

I guess the site is not working properly?

Tried to verify my rolls on Primedice.

Server seed Hash

Code:

4de2ed397d67101ae30e08db85b009377520ae4b21bb2edf5c4bba9a2e01d173

Server Seed

Code:

9695a036e658edc3a065d0a4f852f1d5deab7c567cdbae0c3cfaa8c3729bfae3

Client Seed

Code:

1646361111284a

Starting Nonce, I left it to 0 so it will produce all my bets, I get this:

Result
We generated the same server seed hash. Check if your rolls are correct.

Your rolls:

http://prntscr.com/fxjyq9

[svirby]

Can you maybe add luckygames.io ?