how come windows users havent said anything about the sqlite thing ? Do you prefer to see the tables or should i shave down the interface?
Im a bit confused as to what im seeing.
On a non basenode: there is a dropdown of RAWDATA, PEERS, BLOCK, sqlite_sequence. If you click on something you can easily overtype the data (oops anyone want to tell me what unix time for block 2 was?)
RAWDATA is blank for me
PEERS is blank for me
BLOCKS shows the block height, hash, and miner of each block
sqlite_sequence shows current block height
----inputting an address to use the ChainID results in nothing happening.
On a basenode: there are dropdowns for RAWDATA, PEERS, TRUSTRATINGS, TRANSACTIO..., sqlite_sequence, BLOCKS, OUTPUTS, INPUTS
(since my basenode was not synced from scratch for the list only extends for the last ~4000 blocks)
RAWDATA address data tallys of #transactions, total coins in/out, balance
PEERS is blank for me
TRUSTRATINGS is blank for me
TRANSACTIO... shows 3 hashes and their blockheights
sqlite_sequence shows current blockheight, and probably pending transactions + pending total outputs
BLOCKS shows block height, hash, and miner of each of the 4000 blocks this wallet has seen
OUTPUTS likely listing details of the pending total outputs tx included in,, address, ammt, and offset
INPUTS is blank for me
----inputting an address to use the ChainID results in nothing happening.
TL/DR:
sqlite is able to take the blockchain data and parse it nicely, but the trust of an address can not yet be determined inside the wallet.
Recommend:
data should not be editable without an extra step to avoid errors if the data should even be allowed to be edited.
need writeup on what to expect/how to interpret data in the database.
need CHAINID to accept address and return results
