safecoin
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 11
|
|
August 15, 2015, 01:16:32 PM |
|
Based on the discussions above I believe bytecoin should be added to this list of the most known anonymous coins.
The only logical alternative I see is removing Dash (very difficult to disqualify bytecoin, without disqualifying Dash on those some qualifiers).
I'm personally more interested in some of the lesser known anonymous coins (but, often, more anonymous).
I hope it's okay if those can be discussed here too.
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
August 16, 2015, 09:04:36 AM |
|
(very difficult to disqualify bytecoin, without disqualifying Dash on those some qualifiers).
It's easy -- just say coins that lied about their launch time by less than a year are still included.
|
|
|
|
safecoin
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 11
|
|
August 28, 2015, 04:19:52 AM |
|
Did this thread Really just ...die out?
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
August 28, 2015, 04:34:43 AM |
|
Did this thread Really just ...die out?
Maybe there really isn't anything left to say. It's been discussed to death. I did find your earlier comment intriguing: I'm personally more interested in some of the lesser known anonymous coins (but, often, more anonymous).
Maybe make a new thread for that?
|
|
|
|
owm123
|
|
August 30, 2015, 07:20:19 AM |
|
How does boolbery compare to dash, xdn, xmr and sdc?BBR also aims at being anonymous coin.
|
|
|
|
40dollaBTC2016
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
August 30, 2015, 07:33:39 AM |
|
What about more progressive coins like moneta verde, or more advanced coins like darknetcoin?
|
|
|
|
safecoin
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 11
|
|
September 15, 2015, 04:50:16 AM |
|
Maybe make a new thread for that?
Maybe someone completely unbiased (or as unbiased as possible) needs to start that thread. Unfortunately, that person isn't me. Safecoin isn't just a username. It's a coin (not yet released). And it will be ...... well, let's just say I'd like to see someone start such a thread that has the most minimal bias. That may actually be the problem with this thread, to be honest.
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
September 15, 2015, 10:59:09 PM Last edit: September 17, 2015, 11:39:52 PM by smooth |
|
Some history about SDC recently posted on their thread. I have not vetted any of this. Isn't it funny how one overlooks the shortcomings of those he loves?
And yet one sees more clearly without that fog.
We all wear many masks Tim and this is the last of mine. CH never posted again and all being well after this neither shall I.
ffmad's remarks were not aimed specifically at CH. Anyway the notion anybody besides ryno and TV could prepare these docs, or more specifically CH, is preposterous,
I had never examined the early days of SDC... until now. The links only serve to document the first 11 days and the dramatic change from 20 to 6 million supply, ostensibly resulting from the presence of scrypt ASIC's, which existed at the time of launch. With 90% of coins mined in the first 11 days, combined with the failure of the official mining pool, it is hard to imagine how this can be described as a "fair launch" . The release of shadow chat to coincide with said 11 day PoS wallet release also suggests the code was ready beforehand and released expediently.
Without peer review the best we got is Todd's cryptographer colleague saying the "math looks like Monero" (which really means Bytecoin I guess).
Anyway people will form their own opinions.
Bye.
I just thought Id take a look at the beginning of SDC before I walk away. Saying it was a "fair launch" is a stretch and it's better to deal with it now than wait till you get further down the rabbit-hole. The collapse of the only mining pool 60 mins after launch, resulting from a DDOS/misconfigured miners spamming the pool (see thread), does not speak to a fair launch. At launch (when ASICs for scrypt did already exist) the Dev explains his use of scrypt by saying: "Scrypt has proven itself time and time again"https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=700087.msg7912522#msg791252211 days later Dev says "We've given it some thought and decided that we will be cutting PoW to 31000 blocks due to ASICS and multipools hitting ShadowCoin hard." and 20 million is slashed to 6 million. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=700087.msg8106937#msg8106937I'm not calling scam or speculating who that solo miner might have been. Neither of those things need to be claimed when asserting that this launch was NOT fair and with the collapse of the official pool 60 mins into launch actually a disaster. Im not sure why a relaunch was not proposed.
|
|
|
|
|
languagehasmeaning
|
|
September 16, 2015, 07:29:30 AM |
|
Definitely add BBR to the OP. It is absolutely worthy
|
|
|
|
newb4now
|
|
September 16, 2015, 04:58:08 PM |
|
Definitely add BBR to the OP. It is absolutely worthy Another vote for adding Boolberry and AEON. I disagree about adding DSH. It is just a BCN clone without the 80% premine right?
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
September 16, 2015, 10:30:27 PM |
|
Another vote for adding Boolberry and AEON. I disagree about adding DSH. It is just a BCN clone without the 80% premine right?
Mostly yes, although they did shift the decimal to the more customary position (with tens of millions of coin units in the supply instead of 100+ billion) to facilitate exchange trading.
|
|
|
|
illodin
|
|
February 11, 2016, 05:09:27 PM |
|
The Chart is a good initiative and should be maintained/updated regularly.
I guess we'll need more updates soon Can we get an updated chart?
|
|
|
|
dEBRUYNE
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1141
|
|
February 11, 2016, 05:55:07 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
LiteBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1133
Merit: 1050
|
|
February 12, 2016, 02:30:14 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
iCEBREAKER
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
|
|
February 12, 2016, 09:34:00 PM |
|
|
██████████ ██████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ██████████████ ██████████████ ████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████████ ██████████ Monero
|
| "The difference between bad and well-developed digital cash will determine whether we have a dictatorship or a real democracy." David Chaum 1996 "Fungibility provides privacy as a side effect." Adam Back 2014
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
impulse709
|
|
February 13, 2016, 03:13:49 AM |
|
XDN devs are releasing an update any day now, should be interesting.
|
|
|
|
illodin
|
|
February 13, 2016, 10:23:52 AM |
|
XDN devs are releasing an update any day now, should be interesting.
Updates are always interesting. Looks like the pump has already started.
|
|
|
|
impulse709
|
|
February 13, 2016, 10:50:21 AM |
|
XDN devs are releasing an update any day now, should be interesting.
Updates are always interesting. Looks like the pump has already started. yep the price has picked up a bit for sure, network hash rate too.. it was crazy under valued before though and still is really. im definitely hoping its more then just a pump XDN deserves some attention.
|
|
|
|
|