Bitcoin Forum
May 21, 2024, 11:28:44 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 [378] 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 ... 1348 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It  (Read 3916378 times)
JordanL
Donator
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 18, 2013, 05:41:10 AM
 #7541

wtf, hash rate is purely hardware based, and is not affected by the bitcoin/mining economy at all.  Or I've had it all wrong this entire time  Shocked


Hash rate is purely hardware based. ASICMINER (probably) knows their exact hash rate at all times, but the charts we have access to are all estimates of ASICMINER's hash rate, based on the blocks they find and the total bitcoin network difficultly. Since the amount of blocks a solo-miner (like ASICMINER) actually solves is based to some degree on luck, the hashrate we see in the charts is likely to have a great deal more variance than the true ASICMINER hash rate.

At least that's my understanding of it.
VeeMiner
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 752
Merit: 500


bitcoin hodler


View Profile
June 18, 2013, 07:42:17 AM
 #7542

wtf, hash rate is purely hardware based, and is not affected by the bitcoin/mining economy at all.  Or I've had it all wrong this entire time  Shocked


Hash rate is purely hardware based. ASICMINER (probably) knows their exact hash rate at all times, but the charts we have access to are all estimates of ASICMINER's hash rate, based on the blocks they find and the total bitcoin network difficultly. Since the amount of blocks a solo-miner (like ASICMINER) actually solves is based to some degree on luck, the hashrate we see in the charts is likely to have a great deal more variance than the true ASICMINER hash rate.

At least that's my understanding of it.

you are right. The approximation for three days or a week week should be pretty exact, but 24 hour aproximation is very dependent on luck...
SmiGueL
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 251



View Profile
June 18, 2013, 07:56:25 AM
 #7543

100% agree, Blockchain.info still didn't fix their API and can only go back (almost) 2 days..
(Thats why the 48 hours pie is the same as the 4 days pie)  Huh





The dotted-line gives a nice visualisation of the last 100 found blocks by Asicminer:)



Asicminer Hashrate Charts @ www.asicminercharts.com

Donations BTC: 1SmiGSGWXzD5aZhmw3jyfpBFCgiki45MT
🏰 TradeFortress 🏰
Bitcoin Veteran
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043

👻


View Profile
June 18, 2013, 08:18:16 AM
 #7544

Some malicious attacker should send out a 0.07 BTC/share dividend to ASICMINER share addresses, and dump their shares as people panic buy on PTs Grin
Nullrisk
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 18, 2013, 08:29:03 AM
 #7545

Well, they are well below the estimated 20%!
I'm not sure how to prove it statistically, but it surely looks like variance is not the sole responsible for the deviation...
TsuyokuNaritai
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 18, 2013, 08:35:13 AM
 #7546

Some malicious attacker should send out a 0.07 BTC/share dividend to ASICMINER share addresses, and dump their shares as people panic buy on PTs Grin

That's the crazy way round! I'm going to set up some buy walls tomorrow & send everyone 1 Satoshi. Tongue

SmiGueL
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 251



View Profile
June 18, 2013, 08:41:56 AM
Last edit: June 18, 2013, 09:51:04 AM by SmiGueL
 #7547

Some malicious attacker should send out a 0.07 BTC/share dividend to ASICMINER share addresses, and dump their shares as people panic buy on PTs Grin

Why not send out 0.007 and wait for panic sells?  Wink
Will be about 10x cheaper for the attacker and have the same effect..

Asicminer Hashrate Charts @ www.asicminercharts.com

Donations BTC: 1SmiGSGWXzD5aZhmw3jyfpBFCgiki45MT
JordanL
Donator
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 18, 2013, 09:37:22 AM
 #7548

Some malicious attacker should send out a 0.07 BTC/share dividend to ASICMINER share addresses, and dump their shares as people panic buy on PTs Grin

 Roll Eyes tries to do the math  Cry

Wouldn't that take BTC28,000?
SmiGueL
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 251



View Profile
June 18, 2013, 09:55:25 AM
 #7549

Wouldn't that take BTC28,000?

Well, at least it's cheaper than candoo's idea of boosting the divs

Did anyone hear the rumours about a forced buyback for 3.64 btc per share? So he ill pay uy 3.64 btc per share as a dividend and thats all forever.

Would cost them around $60M to do....

NOT gonna happen Tongue

Asicminer Hashrate Charts @ www.asicminercharts.com

Donations BTC: 1SmiGSGWXzD5aZhmw3jyfpBFCgiki45MT
tkone
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 18, 2013, 10:29:13 AM
 #7550

btc on the rise 104 each, i think it might be a drop or an incline ahead, i dont think 104 is stable

freedomno1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1090


Learning the troll avoidance button :)


View Profile
June 18, 2013, 10:46:29 AM
 #7551

btc on the rise 104 each, i think it might be a drop or an incline ahead, i dont think 104 is stable

wrong thread, no one here cares about 4 btc price changes

Just repost this every once in a while for people who don't check the old pages

ASICMINER Speculation thread
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=235763.msg2507875#msg2507875

Also reminder send investor questions to TAT and others

Believing in Bitcoins and it's ability to change the world
🏰 TradeFortress 🏰
Bitcoin Veteran
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043

👻


View Profile
June 18, 2013, 10:49:52 AM
 #7552

Well, they are well below the estimated 20%!
I'm not sure how to prove it statistically, but it surely looks like variance is not the sole responsible for the deviation...
Yeah, I don't think it's just luck now. Regardless, I'm sure everything will be OK in max of 48 hours.
VeeMiner
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 752
Merit: 500


bitcoin hodler


View Profile
June 18, 2013, 10:56:03 AM
 #7553

Well, they are well below the estimated 20%!
I'm not sure how to prove it statistically, but it surely looks like variance is not the sole responsible for the deviation...
Yeah, I don't think it's just luck now. Regardless, I'm sure everything will be OK in max of 48 hours.

it's true, there must be some problem because no blocks were found in a long time now. Anyway I'm also sure that the problem will be solved momentarily
aahzmundus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500


Invest & Earn: https://cloudthink.io


View Profile
June 18, 2013, 01:08:09 PM
 #7554

So... this thought came to me.

Previously Friedcat stated we had several 100's of TH on the way.  When it came clear that deploying all of that would make ASICMINER control too much of the hash power, they started selling hardware.  Current hash rate estimates show us maybe near 40th?  So we should have had at least 200th to sell.  How many blades do we think we have sold?  From my previous ballparks we were never close to selling 100th of power... can anyone come up with a good estimate?

Yet we ran out of blades to sell?  I think we should still have a bunch of blades... So a) Asicminer maybe has those blades deployed, yet not on... which would explain how we can easily add more hashing power quickly. b) those blades are in storage for later deployment c) some large player put in an EPIC buy order and bought ASICMINER out of blades, and this weeks div will be the most amazing thing ever.

But really... anyone care to go back and see how many TH of blades should have been produced by now, estimate how many we sold, estimate how many we are using, and then figure out how many are in limbo?

SmiGueL
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 251



View Profile
June 18, 2013, 01:20:51 PM
Last edit: June 18, 2013, 02:35:56 PM by SmiGueL
 #7555

So... this thought came to me.

Previously Friedcat stated we had several 100's of TH on the way.  When it came clear that deploying all of that would make ASICMINER control too much of the hash power, they started selling hardware.  Current hash rate estimates show us maybe near 40th?  So we should have had at least 200th to sell.  How many blades do we think we have sold?  From my previous ballparks we were never close to selling 100th of power... can anyone come up with a good estimate?

Yet we ran out of blades to sell?  I think we should still have a bunch of blades... So a) Asicminer maybe has those blades deployed, yet not on... which would explain how we can easily add more hashing power quickly. b) those blades are in storage for later deployment c) some large player put in an EPIC buy order and bought ASICMINER out of blades, and this weeks div will be the most amazing thing ever.

But really... anyone care to go back and see how many TH of blades should have been produced by now, estimate how many we sold, estimate how many we are using, and then figure out how many are in limbo?

First batch was ~12 TH/s, ~7 TH/s came online
Second batch was ~50 TH/s, big part is online, and partly sold.


friedcat only mentioned the first 100TH/s of the 200TH/s third batch came from the fab. (unassembled, only the chips)


The wafer of the first half (100TH/s) of next batch is to be out of fab.

Asicminer Hashrate Charts @ www.asicminercharts.com

Donations BTC: 1SmiGSGWXzD5aZhmw3jyfpBFCgiki45MT
aahzmundus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500


Invest & Earn: https://cloudthink.io


View Profile
June 18, 2013, 01:56:30 PM
 #7556

Ok so we should have at minimum 100th in blades not sold, with 100 more that should have been part way through production, and honestly done with production by now... right?

I did some math and added up the difference between expected divs and actual divs for the last 5 weeks (the weeks since hardware sales, and also the weeks were SimiGuel's estimates first started being off).  I got a total of .085 per share from mining hardware sales over that time.  Take that times 400,000 and you get 34,024 bitcoins of profit.  Divide that by 50 and you get 680 blades.  Take that and multiply by 12gh and you get 8165gh sold.

NOTE this assumes we NEVER sold ANY USB miners, and I think most of us know the USB miners were the MAIN source of HW sales profit.  Basically the th sold in blades is a massive over-estimate.  So... knowing this... where are the rest of the blades?  Are they held for deployment?  Or like I keep hope, did some HUGE player just buy out all of ASICMINERS backstock?

Please check my math, tear my argument to pieces, come up with other ideas.. but try and help me answer this question.  How the hell are we out of blades with how many we have sold?

empoweoqwj
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 18, 2013, 01:57:40 PM
 #7557

Ok so we should have at minimum 100th in blades not sold, with 100 more that should have been part way through production, and honestly done with production by now... right?

I did some math and added up the difference between expected divs and actual divs for the last 5 weeks (the weeks since hardware sales, and also the weeks were SimiGuel's estimates first started being off).  I got a total of .085 per share from mining hardware sales over that time.  Take that times 400,000 and you get 34,024 bitcoins of profit.  Divide that by 50 and you get 680 blades.  Take that and multiply by 12gh and you get 8165gh sold.

NOTE this assumes we NEVER sold ANY USB miners, and I think most of us know the USB miners were the MAIN source of HW sales profit.  Basically the th sold in blades is a massive over-estimate.  So... knowing this... where are the rest of the blades?  Are they held for deployment?  Or like I keep hope, did some HUGE player just buy out all of ASICMINERS backstock?

Please check my math, tear my argument to pieces, come up with other ideas.. but try and help me answer this question.  How the hell are we out of blades with how many we have sold?

Why not ask the only person who knows?
binaryFate
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003


Still wild and free


View Profile
June 18, 2013, 02:00:27 PM
 #7558

Sorry I miss something, how do we know that we are out of blades?

Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. 
This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
ThickAsThieves
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 18, 2013, 02:01:49 PM
 #7559

Ok so we should have at minimum 100th in blades not sold, with 100 more that should have been part way through production, and honestly done with production by now... right?

I did some math and added up the difference between expected divs and actual divs for the last 5 weeks (the weeks since hardware sales, and also the weeks were SimiGuel's estimates first started being off).  I got a total of .085 per share from mining hardware sales over that time.  Take that times 400,000 and you get 34,024 bitcoins of profit.  Divide that by 50 and you get 680 blades.  Take that and multiply by 12gh and you get 8165gh sold.

NOTE this assumes we NEVER sold ANY USB miners, and I think most of us know the USB miners were the MAIN source of HW sales profit.  Basically the th sold in blades is a massive over-estimate.  So... knowing this... where are the rest of the blades?  Are they held for deployment?  Or like I keep hope, did some HUGE player just buy out all of ASICMINERS backstock?

Please check my math, tear my argument to pieces, come up with other ideas.. but try and help me answer this question.  How the hell are we out of blades with how many we have sold?

We already know that some blades were sold to distributors, but we don't know the terms of those deals. Last I checked blades can still be purchased via 3rd party.

I recommend just sitting tight a couple days to see how things unfold. Maybe have some relaxing tea Wink
Franktank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 18, 2013, 02:07:29 PM
 #7560

I recommend just sitting tight a couple days to see how things unfold. Maybe have some relaxing tea Wink

This, no need to get panties in a bunch because friedcat's not updating on a daily basis. You bought in because you trusted friedcat's decision making, unlike those "other ASIC companies"....
Pages: « 1 ... 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 [378] 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 ... 1348 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!