JordanL
Donator
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
|
|
June 18, 2013, 05:41:10 AM |
|
wtf, hash rate is purely hardware based, and is not affected by the bitcoin/mining economy at all. Or I've had it all wrong this entire time Hash rate is purely hardware based. ASICMINER (probably) knows their exact hash rate at all times, but the charts we have access to are all estimates of ASICMINER's hash rate, based on the blocks they find and the total bitcoin network difficultly. Since the amount of blocks a solo-miner (like ASICMINER) actually solves is based to some degree on luck, the hashrate we see in the charts is likely to have a great deal more variance than the true ASICMINER hash rate. At least that's my understanding of it.
|
|
|
|
VeeMiner
|
|
June 18, 2013, 07:42:17 AM |
|
wtf, hash rate is purely hardware based, and is not affected by the bitcoin/mining economy at all. Or I've had it all wrong this entire time Hash rate is purely hardware based. ASICMINER (probably) knows their exact hash rate at all times, but the charts we have access to are all estimates of ASICMINER's hash rate, based on the blocks they find and the total bitcoin network difficultly. Since the amount of blocks a solo-miner (like ASICMINER) actually solves is based to some degree on luck, the hashrate we see in the charts is likely to have a great deal more variance than the true ASICMINER hash rate. At least that's my understanding of it. you are right. The approximation for three days or a week week should be pretty exact, but 24 hour aproximation is very dependent on luck...
|
|
|
|
SmiGueL
|
|
June 18, 2013, 07:56:25 AM |
|
100% agree, Blockchain.info still didn't fix their API and can only go back (almost) 2 days.. (Thats why the 48 hours pie is the same as the 4 days pie)
The dotted-line gives a nice visualisation of the last 100 found blocks by Asicminer:)
|
|
|
|
🏰 TradeFortress 🏰
Bitcoin Veteran
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
|
|
June 18, 2013, 08:18:16 AM |
|
Some malicious attacker should send out a 0.07 BTC/share dividend to ASICMINER share addresses, and dump their shares as people panic buy on PTs
|
|
|
|
Nullrisk
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
June 18, 2013, 08:29:03 AM |
|
Well, they are well below the estimated 20%! I'm not sure how to prove it statistically, but it surely looks like variance is not the sole responsible for the deviation...
|
|
|
|
TsuyokuNaritai
|
|
June 18, 2013, 08:35:13 AM |
|
Some malicious attacker should send out a 0.07 BTC/share dividend to ASICMINER share addresses, and dump their shares as people panic buy on PTs That's the crazy way round! I'm going to set up some buy walls tomorrow & send everyone 1 Satoshi.
|
|
|
|
SmiGueL
|
|
June 18, 2013, 08:41:56 AM Last edit: June 18, 2013, 09:51:04 AM by SmiGueL |
|
Some malicious attacker should send out a 0.07 BTC/share dividend to ASICMINER share addresses, and dump their shares as people panic buy on PTs Why not send out 0.007 and wait for panic sells? Will be about 10x cheaper for the attacker and have the same effect..
|
|
|
|
JordanL
Donator
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
|
|
June 18, 2013, 09:37:22 AM |
|
Some malicious attacker should send out a 0.07 BTC/share dividend to ASICMINER share addresses, and dump their shares as people panic buy on PTs tries to do the math Wouldn't that take BTC28,000?
|
|
|
|
SmiGueL
|
|
June 18, 2013, 09:55:25 AM |
|
Wouldn't that take BTC28,000?
Well, at least it's cheaper than candoo's idea of boosting the divs Did anyone hear the rumours about a forced buyback for 3.64 btc per share? So he ill pay uy 3.64 btc per share as a dividend and thats all forever.
Would cost them around $60M to do.... NOT gonna happen
|
|
|
|
tkone
|
|
June 18, 2013, 10:29:13 AM |
|
btc on the rise 104 each, i think it might be a drop or an incline ahead, i dont think 104 is stable
|
|
|
|
freedomno1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1090
Learning the troll avoidance button :)
|
|
June 18, 2013, 10:46:29 AM |
|
btc on the rise 104 each, i think it might be a drop or an incline ahead, i dont think 104 is stable
wrong thread, no one here cares about 4 btc price changes Just repost this every once in a while for people who don't check the old pages ASICMINER Speculation thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=235763.msg2507875#msg2507875Also reminder send investor questions to TAT and others
|
Believing in Bitcoins and it's ability to change the world
|
|
|
🏰 TradeFortress 🏰
Bitcoin Veteran
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
|
|
June 18, 2013, 10:49:52 AM |
|
Well, they are well below the estimated 20%! I'm not sure how to prove it statistically, but it surely looks like variance is not the sole responsible for the deviation...
Yeah, I don't think it's just luck now. Regardless, I'm sure everything will be OK in max of 48 hours.
|
|
|
|
VeeMiner
|
|
June 18, 2013, 10:56:03 AM |
|
Well, they are well below the estimated 20%! I'm not sure how to prove it statistically, but it surely looks like variance is not the sole responsible for the deviation...
Yeah, I don't think it's just luck now. Regardless, I'm sure everything will be OK in max of 48 hours. it's true, there must be some problem because no blocks were found in a long time now. Anyway I'm also sure that the problem will be solved momentarily
|
|
|
|
aahzmundus
|
|
June 18, 2013, 01:08:09 PM |
|
So... this thought came to me.
Previously Friedcat stated we had several 100's of TH on the way. When it came clear that deploying all of that would make ASICMINER control too much of the hash power, they started selling hardware. Current hash rate estimates show us maybe near 40th? So we should have had at least 200th to sell. How many blades do we think we have sold? From my previous ballparks we were never close to selling 100th of power... can anyone come up with a good estimate?
Yet we ran out of blades to sell? I think we should still have a bunch of blades... So a) Asicminer maybe has those blades deployed, yet not on... which would explain how we can easily add more hashing power quickly. b) those blades are in storage for later deployment c) some large player put in an EPIC buy order and bought ASICMINER out of blades, and this weeks div will be the most amazing thing ever.
But really... anyone care to go back and see how many TH of blades should have been produced by now, estimate how many we sold, estimate how many we are using, and then figure out how many are in limbo?
|
|
|
|
SmiGueL
|
|
June 18, 2013, 01:20:51 PM Last edit: June 18, 2013, 02:35:56 PM by SmiGueL |
|
So... this thought came to me.
Previously Friedcat stated we had several 100's of TH on the way. When it came clear that deploying all of that would make ASICMINER control too much of the hash power, they started selling hardware. Current hash rate estimates show us maybe near 40th? So we should have had at least 200th to sell. How many blades do we think we have sold? From my previous ballparks we were never close to selling 100th of power... can anyone come up with a good estimate?
Yet we ran out of blades to sell? I think we should still have a bunch of blades... So a) Asicminer maybe has those blades deployed, yet not on... which would explain how we can easily add more hashing power quickly. b) those blades are in storage for later deployment c) some large player put in an EPIC buy order and bought ASICMINER out of blades, and this weeks div will be the most amazing thing ever.
But really... anyone care to go back and see how many TH of blades should have been produced by now, estimate how many we sold, estimate how many we are using, and then figure out how many are in limbo?
First batch was ~12 TH/s, ~7 TH/s came online Second batch was ~50 TH/s, big part is online, and partly sold. friedcat only mentioned the first 100TH/s of the 200TH/s third batch came from the fab. (unassembled, only the chips)The wafer of the first half (100TH/s) of next batch is to be out of fab.
|
|
|
|
aahzmundus
|
|
June 18, 2013, 01:56:30 PM |
|
Ok so we should have at minimum 100th in blades not sold, with 100 more that should have been part way through production, and honestly done with production by now... right?
I did some math and added up the difference between expected divs and actual divs for the last 5 weeks (the weeks since hardware sales, and also the weeks were SimiGuel's estimates first started being off). I got a total of .085 per share from mining hardware sales over that time. Take that times 400,000 and you get 34,024 bitcoins of profit. Divide that by 50 and you get 680 blades. Take that and multiply by 12gh and you get 8165gh sold.
NOTE this assumes we NEVER sold ANY USB miners, and I think most of us know the USB miners were the MAIN source of HW sales profit. Basically the th sold in blades is a massive over-estimate. So... knowing this... where are the rest of the blades? Are they held for deployment? Or like I keep hope, did some HUGE player just buy out all of ASICMINERS backstock?
Please check my math, tear my argument to pieces, come up with other ideas.. but try and help me answer this question. How the hell are we out of blades with how many we have sold?
|
|
|
|
empoweoqwj
|
|
June 18, 2013, 01:57:40 PM |
|
Ok so we should have at minimum 100th in blades not sold, with 100 more that should have been part way through production, and honestly done with production by now... right?
I did some math and added up the difference between expected divs and actual divs for the last 5 weeks (the weeks since hardware sales, and also the weeks were SimiGuel's estimates first started being off). I got a total of .085 per share from mining hardware sales over that time. Take that times 400,000 and you get 34,024 bitcoins of profit. Divide that by 50 and you get 680 blades. Take that and multiply by 12gh and you get 8165gh sold.
NOTE this assumes we NEVER sold ANY USB miners, and I think most of us know the USB miners were the MAIN source of HW sales profit. Basically the th sold in blades is a massive over-estimate. So... knowing this... where are the rest of the blades? Are they held for deployment? Or like I keep hope, did some HUGE player just buy out all of ASICMINERS backstock?
Please check my math, tear my argument to pieces, come up with other ideas.. but try and help me answer this question. How the hell are we out of blades with how many we have sold?
Why not ask the only person who knows?
|
|
|
|
binaryFate
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003
Still wild and free
|
|
June 18, 2013, 02:00:27 PM |
|
Sorry I miss something, how do we know that we are out of blades?
|
Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
|
|
|
ThickAsThieves
|
|
June 18, 2013, 02:01:49 PM |
|
Ok so we should have at minimum 100th in blades not sold, with 100 more that should have been part way through production, and honestly done with production by now... right?
I did some math and added up the difference between expected divs and actual divs for the last 5 weeks (the weeks since hardware sales, and also the weeks were SimiGuel's estimates first started being off). I got a total of .085 per share from mining hardware sales over that time. Take that times 400,000 and you get 34,024 bitcoins of profit. Divide that by 50 and you get 680 blades. Take that and multiply by 12gh and you get 8165gh sold.
NOTE this assumes we NEVER sold ANY USB miners, and I think most of us know the USB miners were the MAIN source of HW sales profit. Basically the th sold in blades is a massive over-estimate. So... knowing this... where are the rest of the blades? Are they held for deployment? Or like I keep hope, did some HUGE player just buy out all of ASICMINERS backstock?
Please check my math, tear my argument to pieces, come up with other ideas.. but try and help me answer this question. How the hell are we out of blades with how many we have sold?
We already know that some blades were sold to distributors, but we don't know the terms of those deals. Last I checked blades can still be purchased via 3rd party. I recommend just sitting tight a couple days to see how things unfold. Maybe have some relaxing tea
|
|
|
|
Franktank
|
|
June 18, 2013, 02:07:29 PM |
|
I recommend just sitting tight a couple days to see how things unfold. Maybe have some relaxing tea This, no need to get panties in a bunch because friedcat's not updating on a daily basis. You bought in because you trusted friedcat's decision making, unlike those "other ASIC companies"....
|
|
|
|
|