Bitcoin Forum

WTF?  This is turning out to be pretty weird.  Why is the world starting to accept this as fact all of the sudden? 
http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-new-satoshi-nakamoto-rumors/ (http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-new-satoshi-nakamoto-rumors/)

All right, bring it on. Until then, nice attempt from Coindesk to have a few more clicks on their website.

Coindesk strikes again with article without sources. Haven't heard anything about Wright lately.

It is plausible that he is Satoshi but actually wanted to throw everyone of the scent by making it look like he was trying to bluff it.....:(  he did say that it wasnt his decision to come forward, no?

knowing barry silbert of coindesk also has ownership stake in blockstream im guessing it will be a story of how adam back(blockstream ceo) is "one of the 4" satoshi's
by talking about his 1997 hashcash.

it could also be looking at craig wrights first appearance in the bitcoin scene via a skype call at a different conference a couple years ago where nick szabo introduced craig wright.

thus saying its a 4 way team of
nick szabo,
craig wright,
adam back
and a mysterious 4th party.

sidenote.
adam back and szabo's concepts from years prior to bitcoin did inspire the single entity of satoshi. but adam back was not involved in bitcoins development, neither adam or nick the user behind the name satoshi,

nick did do something for bitcoin but again did not use the satoshi name.

in short its one mysterious single party who is satoshi..  and the other 3 are non-satoshi's, but just trying to get some notoriety for different reasons
.. well thats my 2 cents

I didn't think Craig Wrght was Satoshi at first.  He sure has a shit personality.  He is a real fucking proper wanker if you ask me.  But, now that the truth is coming out, I guess we have to accept it.

One thing is for sure, HE thinks he is satoshi.  He filed a SHITLOAD of Bitcoin patents and that IP portfolio could only come from someone who thinks they are the true inventor.  I was expecting a much nicer guy to be Satoshi I must admit.

Perhaps you've heard of it already -- there happen to be some strange people in this world who are fond of the idea of "alternative facts" (which in fact are, of course, merely falsehoods/lies). Who cares much about all those Satoshi Nakamoto rumours these days anyway... whether he is Satoshi or not (most likely not), Bitcoin is Bitcoin, a network that operates on a cryptographic protocol.

Arbitrary articles designed for clickbait such as the one you linked seem quite bland to me (just like this topic's title "As it turns out, Craig Wright actually is Satoshi!"). The article's beginning "If the gossip at a recent invite-only bitcoin conference is any indication (...)" is enough to understand what it is all about. So boring!

he is not satoshi.
the article says "relates to craig wright"

which made me look back at the research rabbit hole of who first introduced craig wright at a conference a few years back.. that RELATED person being nick szabo..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdvQTwjVmrE

to re-open the can of worms of Szabo maybe being satoshi.
eg "nick got craig to play along as craig being satoshi, to take some finger pointing away from nick himself"
where the first finger pointing years ago was due to szabo's pre bitcoin 'bitcash' concept that inspired satoshi, years after bitcash was conceived.

but knowing coindesk is writing the article.. im sure the other old inspirations will mention adam back due to coindesks attachment to blockstream.

then a further 2 cents. adam back will proclaim he is satoshi, just so everyone should rush and buy into his LN commrecial hubs concepts...
blockstreams scripts are easy to predict.

---

and this is why craig wright fails the "who is satoshi"
he is into law and forensics and see's bitcoin being used
https://youtu.be/4GuqlQvFYJo?t=1m40s

satoshi hated the idea of identifying people/corporate marketing of data

Don't bother reading it. The article just contains a bunch of speculation and innuendo. It contains no facts.

Here is the article with all the fluff taken out:

Craig Wright has failed to place evidence that he is Satoshi Nakamoto. He even stated this" "I believed that I could do this. I believed that I could put the years of anonymity and hiding behind me. But, as the events of this week unfolded and I prepared to publish the proof of access to the earliest keys, I broke. I do not have the courage. I cannot."  He also offered public apology since he doesnt have enough evidence to back up his claims. I don believe Craig Wright to be Satoshi Nakamoto.

he isnt satoshi, he just didnt think the community would recognise the signature
MEUCIQDBKn1Uly8m0UyzETObUSL4wYdBfd4ejvtoQfVcNCIK4AIgZmMsXNQWHvo6KDd2Tu6euEl13VT C3ihl6XUlhcU+fM4=

as being a publicly available string of text for the last 7 years

he thought people wouldnt pick up on it so quick. so had to play backtrack
i feel sorry for all the investors he has conned

Where in that video do you Szabo introducing Wright or having any relation to Wright?

And in your second video if you pay attention Wright talks about how one will be able to use things like apps to enhance privacy.  That's as good as you're gonna get in the world of blockchains - sorry if you actually drank the Roger Ver happy juice.  

That is a weak argument given the intellectual caliber of the people he "conned".

The probability is quite high that he is Satoshi but the surprise unknown coder may shock people even more.  I hope so.  :)

you need to know his whole back story.

1. in something like 2013 he told a friend to set up a trust. and the collateral was a bunch of PUBLIC KEYS
he did not show proof of signatures of the PUBLIC keys. he relied on his friends naivity to only check the balances of the PUBLIC KEYS to get a total value to use as collateral.

2. emphasis the friend did not understand bitcoin so thought showing public key was like showing a bank statement as proof enough of holding.

3. then using the TRUST which is then falsely insured for multiple millions of dollars of value. (although it held 0 assets and just a list of random early adopter public keys). that TRUST fund was then used as collateral to then get other investments by FALSELY suggesting it was secured by million of assets. due to an insurance policy insuring the trust.

4. the now invested fund was then used to make other investments..

5. australian authorities questioned the trust so he legged it to england.. then craig contacted media and started his own 'i am satoshi' whispers because the australian government were doubting his trusts assets.

6.  later people have seen that the proof is not proof. but publicly available data.. this has made the first trust funds assets factually reduced to zero. meaning the initial investors will want to drop out. which is snowballing right now like ripples in the water. each level of investment has now realised their funds are not secure.

7. now craig wright is trying to get patents and do book deals, etc to try raising capital and creating assets to bulk up the empty trust to try and salvage some value of that empty trust. purely to avoid civil and possible criminal charges if he ever got deported to australia to have to answer for his actions. he thinks if he can replace the PUBLIC key fake asset with patents and book royalty contracts to then give the trust real value, he can avoid civil/criminal actions by showing the trust holds real value.

In this thread, large block maniacs show that their judgement is equally poor in other domains.

yep rational people want dynamic blocks of lean tx's starting at 2mb block buffer limit..

large block maniacs want 4mb weight.

you can spot a maniac when they cant even tell you that 4 is bigger than 2..so will refuse to admit they are the large block maniacs,

if you cant admit that 4 is bigger then 2 and always try to make it sound like 2 is bigger than 4.. then no one should take any notice of other word twisting crap thats said

We will always see once or two per year, a new theory about who is Satoshi.. With all kind of rumors, conspiracies, legend, ect with or without argument. Right now i searched and i am not suprised to see some results in search engine for "Alex Jones bitcoin" LOL I am going to read a bunch of stuff.

I must say you're even better story teller than Craig Wrightoshi himself.

Btw why did you remove the last paragraph from your comment? ;)

because confidential Pedersen commitments is their future plans. and because its not yet official, i presume they will deny it even is in the plan and then meander the topic into more maniacal over dramatics by stating they have not added it yet so i must be wrong... rather than admit i see a few steps ahead of what they are ready to admit.
so i left off their future plan to reduce their maniac mindsets of twisting words.

as for how they are paid. well they will denie they are paid to work on bitcoin and deny their blockstream investors have anything to do with bitcoin... more nonsense meandering away from the topic at hand.

so i tried to stick to the point gmaxwell made.. and just highlighted where he failed.... 2mb block vs 4mb weight.. which is bigger.. even a 6yo knows 4 is bigger

Why do we even discuss this topic once again? Because Coindesk decided to strike again with this drama series - "We know who Satoshi is, maybe"?
Until we have real, valid and irrefutable proof that Craig can present to everyone, publicly, confirming his identity as Satoshi, until then I refuse to believe in this rumor.

I'm pretty sorry rawdog  :-\, but everybody who thinks Craig is Satoshi is retard.

And im not believing this shit anymore. Wheres the evidence that Craig Wright is the real Satoshi Nakamoto? Anyone can claim he is Satoshi Nakamoto. Satoshi Nakamoto will not reveal himself. I've read many of this kind of news. And all of it is just rumors. Also i never agree bitcoin is just created by a single person only. They should be a group.

Stop that whining. Gmaxwell hit the point

I doubt it was group, how could group maintain long term conspiracy and refrain from spending  bitcoins

May be craig have paid some bucks to coindesk for this rumor. No any source is mentioned on the article, so i will consider this as another attempt to create fud and panic in the market. Nobody gonna believe him as satoshi

He cannot because he don't have access to those earliest key.  ;D

not whining. he did hit the point. he just didnt realise he was slapping his own face.
2 vs 4
gmaxwll is 4 lover and a 2 hater

Due to several issues coindesk lost its hard gained reputation. Now it could have made plans to regain the same traffic to the website through such statements. This might grab the attention of most users as it is a sensitive information.

franky1 is now also an enemy of fungiblity and not just decentralization? color me surprised.

FWIW, rumor I'm hearing is that Wright is going to be the marketing face for some a new altcoin.   If anyone is selling futures on it, I'm interested in shorting it. :P

How are your attempts at destroying BTC using LN going?     ;)

LOL, you do know that BTC is Centralized to the Chinese Mining Pools, they are the ones blocking segwit.  :D
So the battle to be Decentralized has been lost for over a year.


 8)

FYI:
By the Way , Franky1 is Correct and Gmaxwell is incorrect.
4 is more than 2.   :D

I don't care who the Sathoshi actually is. I only care about his amazing work. We should really thankful to him about the work. If he needs to be anonymous, let him be. It is his right.

Craig Wright makes me real mad. he is a filthy liar. and the worst part of it is that proving your identity in bitcoin is very easy. it is in fact too easy it makes me laugh when he is refusing to provide any proof, and the only reason for that is because he can not provide any proof.

he tried different manipulation techniques, asked many bitcoin developers to confirm him and they all denied except one!

and this is celebration day for all this shitty news sites to use this click bait to generate more traffic they could imagine.

The challenge from the community to Craig Wright is still out there. Move 1 bitcoin from the known Satoshi stash and we will accept you with open arms. He has not done this, so in my opinion he is still a fraudster. ^smile^
I should have thought people would have left this alone now, but it seems as though this fight is far from being over.

Gavin really whacked his reputation with a fish with this guy. ^LoL^

G to the Max, are you serious about this?  I don't care what anyone says about Wright, I'd take a risk on any coin he backs.  Seeing how Ver is about to split BTC wouldn't surprise me if Wright and Gavin move to the new alt called Bitcoin Unlimted.  The sky should be falling that fine day in Cryptoworld.

well you are either an enemy of scaling or decentralization, if no solution will ever come bitcoin will lose one of those aspect

while decentralization is the point of bitcoin, without scaling bitcoin will remain a niche market and thus centralized...oh the irony...

A settlement layer - slash - a store of value with an ETF license for tens of trillions of dollars is quite the niche market.

So did rawdog and everyone who supports that bunch of swindlers with BU

Craig is NOT Satoshi, because he failed to present even the easiest kind of proof, that he controls any of Satoshis known Bitcoins PLUS he wasn't able to sign with Satoshis GPG key either.

Edit: I don't believe this "Gavin has been bamboozled" story AT ALL.

Yeah, Gavin and Matonis, and other incredibly smart people all got fooled by Wright.

And that's why Wright repeatedly keeps coming back into mainstrea media after so long.

Forget logic and deductive reasoning, instinct alone should tell you there's something more to this than meets the eye.

Care to elaborate? Or just confused about what decentralization is about?

I would say he was close enough to Satoshi to be able to say certain stories. But he doesn't have the private key of the wallets.
Last time I've read that he was in quite a debt, so becoming Satoshi will bring him media coverage, attention, money...

I am satoshi, and I have proof, i promise to move my coins soon in the future.

if you believed "Craig Wright" you must believe me too. because me and him are providing the same amount of proof to you that are currently reading this comment.

But that doesn't explain how he fooled Matonis and Gavin.  Do you really think it would be so simple to do given their reputations and the gravity of the matter?  Again, it's highly improbable.

And there were other very reputable individuals who came out and said they met Wright as Satoshi years earlier.

Simply too much to dismiss. 

He just wish some publicity, I don`t see any other reason why he forcing this topic again. 'as the events of this week unfolded and I prepared to publish the proof of access to the earliest keys, I broke. I do not have the courage. I cannot.' Poor him, he cannot force him self to move the coins, like he need to dig it and carry them for real.
He is first one, in future I expect more people like him to try to take the name Satoshi. This will mysticism are contribute to bitcoin I think. One of the comments that made me laugh on this news site is this one
'Matt J Delorey • 12 hours ago
The real Satoshi Nakamoto will never be known to the public, it's all done by design. You will hear many more stories like this, but the truth is Satoshi Nakamoto died.... I know because I worked with him. So all the stories you hear from now on are just hype.`

Going through the articles I can but not say that its total gibberish and nothing else without any basis. Just a situation of picking dots from a situation and turning that into an article in other to generate quite a number of clicks on their site. I really want to know what changes for Satoshi to now come out at this time, its not even sure if he will be present in the conference either way, we will be waiting for another article that will give us the outcome.

Hmm,

Maybe Matonis and Gavin are not as smart as you think they are or maybe they just really wanted to believe it was him, so he could help end the rift that is splitting BTC between the Chinese miners and the BTC Core LN scammers.

If Wright can't move 1 BTC from Satoshi BTC Address, then he is not Satoshi.
The Fact the guy is in so much debt and Satoshi BTC would have him sitting pretty , tells you he is not Satoshi.
That is too much to dismiss.  ;) 

 8)

You guys are all going around in circles refusing to think for yourselves.  

Look at the big picture of what's happening with Bitcoin and Wright.  Assume Wright will get his 400 patents.  With that in mind the intelligent move is to assume he is Satoshi which will only add to his influence over Bitcoin and the blockchain.

Once you use that premise then you can try to figure out which side of the big block civil war Wright is gonna fall on.

Cause if he is Satoshi and he holds 1+ million BTC and he decides to move to an alt then all you guys will wake up to a 90%+ drop in Bitcoin's price and then you're gonna act all surprised and broken hearted.

Aren't you all tired of being behind the curve?  Then stop following each other and try to think about what's coming next instead of gossiping about the past and letting your personal feelings get in the way.

Proving Wright is Satoshi wouldn't end by rift as both sides of the civil war are entrenched, well backed and determined.  What it would give them is leverage and a justifiable reason to successfully split Bitcoin which will only lead to a bigger war.

You have to ask if committing career suicide is worth that cause without a doubt if they knew Wright didn't have proof they would be found out.

As for how smart Gavin and Matonis are - all the real world evidence, before this ordeal, supports high intelligence and a well developed sense of discernment. 

Everyone here is assuming the improbable to be true which is senseless and financially dangerous if you hold Bitcoin.

I don't hold BTC, technically it is a dead end. Writings been on the wall for over 6 months now.
The masses are a little slow to catch on, but they should figure it out in the next 12 to 18 months.  ;)


 8)

So you say that the guy has the private keys for a ton of money and he stays in debt instead of living a luxury life?
I don't understand this logic. Are you sure you didn't miss anything?

In my logic any sane man would have touched that money already. Unless he has lost - for whatever reason - the private keys or he's dead.

Oh, if Wright is Satoshi and he moves to an alt then the sleeping masses are gonna catch on in the next few weeks. 

Not a chance. How did you say so that this will be the end while it is very hot to people in contratry. I think it will just pump for the next 12months as you predicted considering that bitcoin community will be grow more this year. 8)

According to Wright, all those Bitcoins were put in a trust and he couldn't get to them for some time - which was part of some agreement.  It's been a while but I believe he was trying to find a way to get them back early.  My gut feeling is that he's gonna need them if he has any big plans for an alt-coin which means he probably found a way.  With enough money and connections any contract can be broken.  

It's best to be prepared by assuming a worst case scenario.

Just watched Banking on Bitcoin, a great bitcoin documentary that talks a lot about this issue and point to this man I think. Recommend you all see it, available freely you know at many torrent sites and so on...

seriously?
im not an enemy of fungibility..

im an enemy of bloated transactions using failed Pedersen commitment idea that permanently bloats up a transaction but ends up only giving about a couple weeks of secrecy.

here is the issue with your commitments. if people are to mix funds and move funds for your confidential transactions to work where funds A and funds B, when being spent must equal the same as funds C.. then many people need to use the same commitment for the math to work.

as soon as someone knows the commitment. it can all be decoded.

same as the concern of the other separate problem of "address re-use". i see rusty russel is very quiet about the "address reuse" issue which will cause an issue for LN.

try to think beyond the positivies of your short term use strategies to offer a feature and instead think about scenario's of length of utility before the utility itself becomes a weakness.. try to be critical of your own code, not plaster it with utopian dream advertising, while sweeping the risks under the carpet.

you love giving people hope and empty promises or features offering empty short term gestures, but you dont give the community what they really need.
and thats why i lost all respect for you.

what if i told you that coindesk ceo barry silbert, pays matonis a wage via coindesk
what if i told you barry silbert pays gavin via barry's investment/ownership stake in Bloq
what if i told you barry silbert pays gmaxwell via barry's investment/ownership stake in Blockstream

and its just a big finger pointing distraction for clickbait and drama for the last 2 years to get people to take their eye off the ball

EG when politics get serious and real lives can be affected and wars begin.. bring in some kardashian drama to settle the sheep back to sleep so they dont notice the real concerns happening in the opposite direction

This is what really happened at the Satoshi Roundtable:

Attendee 1: This is boring. Let's play the drinking game.

<45 minutes later>

Attendee 2: Dudes, this is fun. What next?

Attendee 3: Let's start a rumor.

Attendee 2: Like Bruno fucks goats? hehehe.

Attendee 3: I said a rumor, drunkface.

Attendee 1: I know. We can ... we can ... Shit, I lost my thought.

Attendee 5: Let's start a rumor that Satoshi Nakamoto is really ...

Attendee 15: Excuse me for speaking outta of turn, but I have to go and throw-up, but before I do I wanna say Craig Steven Wright. Byeeeeeeee.

<all attendees: Applause>

<the next day>

Random Attendee: What the fuck did we do last night?
Another Random Attendee: No fuckin clue. Must have been the Romulan Ale we all drink. And who hid all our pants? And is your butt sore, too?

<humor at Bruce's expense for not inviting me  :P>

What I see is an overpaid coindesk writer trying to conjure up a story and failing. Miserably. There's no proof, no new evidence that anything whatsoever has come up questioning the common knowledge they Craig Wright is a fraud.

Speaking of clickbait, read the following article three times through, then see if it makes any sense to you: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/man-accidentally-makes-13-million-buying-house-bitcoin/ My opinion is that the worse YouTube testimony of EThtrade is more convincing to me than what I read there.

This is all boiled dog's fault I only blame him, what the fack do we care about Satoshi? I think people have seen all these shitcoins with their devs stick around with a mouse and keyboard now they think bitcoin was developed for the same reason which is polo bitrex pump it we promise never dump it story.
I bet Craig Wright strangled the real Satoshi in his home now wants to claim his identity as well or maybe Gavin had  a hand in this and buried the founder but they were unable to open the wallet containing all the private keys but just recently had a success to breaking the encryption and will provide us with the undeniable evidence right?

---

I'm dedicating this to rawww yo Dog!

There are way bigger chances thtat Adam Back or Nick Szabo are satoshi than Craig Wright, he just lacks the talent.

You don't want to fathom the possibility of Adam Back being either satoshi or part of the satoshi team because you are an anti blockstream troll, that's all. But at the end of the day, Adam Back is forever part of Bitcoin history as he is credited by satoshi in the whitepaper, and will always be a potential satoshi/part of satoshi team like it or not.

In any case, we can't know if satoshi was a single entity of a team of people. He used Tor, so it could have been 1 person or a couple. Any intelligent group of people wanting to pose as 1 person could have had the same person to talk in forums so there are no big differences in writing style to start the team rumors, so we can't know.

I heard about Craig Wright before but I doubt he is the real creator of Bitcoin. If he really was the one, he should come with real, actual proofs that he owns it, or that he created it. We also have to remember that we are living pretty tough times to make this claim and really be the creator of such an idea that "is used by criminals".

Rumor has it that President Trump is Satoshi Nakamoto, hence hanging a painting of Andrew Jackson in the Oval Office. In the next couple days he's gonna announce that his bitcoin hoard will finance the building of The Wall.

so i emboldened the part where even you say one person used the satoshi pseudonym.
what is known.. only one person used the satoshi username
what is known.. other people did help satoshi.. eg hal finney, plus others.
but again for emphasis
what is known.. only one person used the satoshi username

oh and call me a troll all you like. simply because i am not hailing PEOPLE and BUSINESSES up as kings..
i think your missing the point of this topic.

no one should care about the people or businesses, and only care about the code.
if you would rather protect people and not care/protect the code and bitcoins ethos.. then this whole topic is lost on you

 stupidity of BU and Roger Ver's puppets is incredible, their dullness is really unlimited. What do you hope to obtain from these filthy insinuations?

see how simple this drama can escalate to meander with simple name calling..

funny part is when someone pokes the bear by making an insinuation. the other side reacts. then the bear poker can play the victim card.
endless kardashian drama.

in short no one should care about the name drama. and instead be looking at what CODE decisions were made at the roundtable.
if you cant see that coindesk is causing fake social drama to distract sheep from asking about the code.. with distractions about 'who is satoshi'..
then you wont see what changes to the CODE will be until its too late

From that article:

So....   we just wait for the next month then?

I don't see any CREDIBLE statement in the article. Just a click-bait headline.

I wouldn't be surprised if Dave Kleiman's name comes up again. He's the (dead) guy in Florida who was (supposedly) friendly with Craig Wright.

I was involved in the Bitcoin community from late 2010, and I remember interacting with Kleiman; he definitely had the right sort of skill set and personality.

I don't recall Wright, but it's possible he used a different handle.

It's still rumors and I give no ears to to rumors. Coindesk is trying to continue the Bitcoin/Satoshi Controversy. For me, There's no need finding out who Satoshi actually is. If Satoshi wanted recognition, He would have done that a long time again. 

If he is Satoshi then why can he not sign a Tx? It would take 1 minute and prove his claim with mathematics.  ::)  I mean really, I'm supposed to believe that the guy who gave us trust-less cash wants us to just trust his word without proof? 

Here we go again with this guy :(

Ironic:  Your signature line says:  "the gospel according to Satoshi," but then you show your faithlessness by demanding extraordinary proof.  I think you guys are gonna get more proof than you can bear soon.  Don't forget how badly you begged for it.  

you may have forgotten about this or selectively not mentioning it. I don't know about Motonix! but about Gavin i have to say but Craig Wright offered many others to come forth and confirm his identity lie and they all refused. Gavin was like his last choice! possibly paid.

anyways, there is a very simple solution to all this and all arguments about it until then is pointless:

You are correct that I have no faith in what some random guy says. Cryptographic proof is not extraordinary. It is proof period. Satoshi would know that.

But cryptographic proof itself only proves that someone has keys from Satoshi's outputs. Not that Satoshi has them or that he is alive.

You may wanna change your avatar to:  The revolution will be patentized.  :)

Good luck!  

If he dumps a million Bitcoins on your heads will that FINALLY be enough proof? 

I'll give Satoshi a call, we're tight.  ;D

more trolls trying to keep this 'event' active for a month or two. to distract us from talking about the code changes.
so that we dont ask what esle was talked about at the round table.

so lets just divert this topic.

what else was talked about at the roundtable. what have the devs proposed to do for the corporations that turned up at the all-inclusive weekend.

let the social drama sit to the side and ask the real questions about the roundtable

Well guys its now become general news as Craig Wright names is comes out one more time.

Anyway what these guys want to prove it that they are satoshi or developer of bitcoin or invented awesome technology. Its now become public some none can claim bitcoin as a owner or anythings else as many organization have already participated to make bitcoin more and more valuable. We must have to consider about them also.

Concurred.  No signed message = no Satoshi. 

From what I understood from previous dramas, Wright tried to fake a signed message and the community caught him out.  He simply copied a signature from an old 2009 transaction belonging to Satoshi.  The only thing Wright's message proved is that he's a scammer and shouldn't be trusted.  Consign him to the history books as a charlatan and then allow him to fade into obscurity where he belongs.

Apparently this man if he is not a con man he has some persistence with the personality of Satoshi Nakamoto. Not knowing whether a medical opinion from a psychiatrist is required but is really sad the crypto currencies news sites and also some journalists who are trying to gain a few minutes of publicity to replay the claims of a rather sick man writing about gossips, because they have not any evidence but only rumors. If people believe that Craig Wright is Satoshi why not ask him to spend his bitcoins;

These kind of rumors will come and go and nothing will be reveled actually. No one has the proof that Mr. Craig Wright is the creator of bitcoin. It's fake as it sounds.

I have a strong feeling, that Satoshi Nakamoto is not a single person, instead it is a group of people those who have created bitcoin. Even though a single human is enough to create revolution, but in this case, a group of people is involved.

Wow like wow coin desk has done a really good job for all of us to visit their website and had its traffic increase. I don't understand why would they even claim to proclaim this. It is understood by all that satoshi will never reveal himself. I think we all should not even bother posting such links as I feel this is a insult to our feelings about the founder, it's mocking us in our face.

Hahaha I read through and where's the proof? No signed message no coins no "here's proof I made this part because here are my notes" nothing. What the hell is going on with these crappy attempts to pull people into their website!?

by advertising some kardashian-esq social drama, they can bring the crappy drama to the front page whilst pushing the more important questions about what happened at the round table to the bottom of the list. hoping no one reads, asks or see's the actual important information. (about code/feature proposals)

Nope he's not Satoshi. Now everyone will clam as Satoshi and will publish fake articles by black marketing. That is the person gives money to write and upload such articles. May be he had unearthed many mysteries nad might know many this about bitcoin but that doesn't make him satoshi

Again, having access to his private keys means nothing. It may be Satoshi or anyone that was given/has stolen his keys.

There is nothing, that has more "proof value" for this anonymous character, than moving some of his original coins or sign a message with his publicily known GPG key. If you find something better, you might be able to name it.

Give it a few more days, the news is still breaking.  The insiders know something and they are not telling why they now know Craig Wright is Satoshi.  It is all in the article.  Did you read it?

After a while, you forget to eat and start resembling Lindsay Lohan scouring Bitcointalk for tiny nugget crumbs for a fix to support your crack [up] habit. That said, anybody here a doctor? Note to self: check Wright's countless unverified degrees to see if he practices, else order another pizza so to again play frisbee with the neighbor's dog. Rumor has it that it's gonna teach me how to lick my own balls.

These guys are idiots going along with th the year-long mainstream bashing of Wright.  They can't look past that no matter how much you try to make them understand.

love the comedy you bring gleb,
as for resembling lindsay lohan mixed with a dog wanting to be fed crumbs

http://letstalkbitcoin.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/ep67.jpg

this post is meant as respect to your comedic personality. not an attack
:D

Look, any faggot who puts on a pink tutu and knee pads is only getting down there for one thing: to suck dick.  This Gleb guy is a poof of the highest order.  I can tell you that.  

like the poster said, all that proves is control over those keys. it would be very compelling but anything could've happened in the intervening years between now and their creation.

maybe it's too late for a big reveal now, not that I believe any real Satoshi would have the slightest interest in doing so.

or he has the skill to get stephanie to laugh and tie him up... which would make him straight :D
all depends on what he done next, after getting chained up by stephanie :D

Amen. anyone who does not get this does not get bitcoin.

agree with what you said.
but then again

we are all satoshi
MEUCIQDBKn1Uly8m0UyzETObUSL4wYdBfd4ejvtoQfVcNCIK4AIgZmMsXNQWHvo6KDd2Tu6euEl13VT C3ihl6XUlhcU+fM4=

Dude, you should know that anytime somebody alludes to dripping jeez, my cock gets harder than the doorknob that's permanently stuck up my ass. Speaking of getting hard, take [more than] a gander at this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1766876.0

Tell me if I m wrong, but to me Satoshi and Bitcoin is all about facts, consensus and united community - nothing to do with individuals and far off people bashing and ranting.

I cannot believe that this sprit has changed after he left, even to some legends here...

Might be the funniest post ever.  Satoshi and Bitcoin are all about scams, lies, and cheating.  The community is filthy with dirty fags wearing pink tutus among many other things.  This place is a filth-pit.

actually satoshi wanted people to be sceptical. a good dev is someone that wants people to try hacking systems so they can see the problems that need to be fixed.
the old saying "hack it until it doesnt break"

but sitting back and kissing ass because you fear hurting a dev, will just make the dev hand out weak/flawed code because they are not being told that things are wrong.

Proclaims our fearless leader shedding light on the subject:

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lhcupgq0Q01qd5n55o1_500.gif

kinda regret posting the old pic of gleb.. kinda sidetracked the topic a bit too much.
thought it would have put a few smiles on faces.. not the opposite

I think this guy might be officially crazier than me.

Maybe it takes crazy to see that Wright is Satoshi. 

It's cool, bud. Don't fret it.

Bruno


Forgive me for asking, if such is the case, then what title am I after by posting the following?: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1766876.msg17645132#new

I am sure.  It is because you are a flaming fag with shit dick which you boldly admit on public interwebs.  Now go flit around the neighborhood in your pink to try to attract another of your type.

Dude needs to get up to speed as to why I donned the pink tutu at a Bitcoin conference in Las Vegas:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zml5OMTPak

https://i.imgur.com/84PI4Bw.png

Dude also seems to have issues with flaming fags which I am not, but would gladly declare such if were the case. Dude plays the racist card in 5 ..... 4 .... 3 ...

Pink tutu, knee pads, your own admission:

denials aren't going to help against this backdrop.  Facts are facts.  There are no 'alternative facts'.

I'll give you a medium-sized blowjob if you can point to the knee pads that I'm supposedly wearing OR have stated donning such by my own admission (speaking of There are no 'alternative facts'.):

https://i.imgur.com/hlCCQo9.jpg

'your own admission' was with specific regard to 'dripping jeez' - not kneepads.  I prepared the quote accurately.  The kneepads were in the original photo - not in the one you posted.  

But I must say, your alleging the knee pads aren't present is a pretty thin denial.  

As for the blowjob, no thanks I have a girlfriend for such things.  Blowjobs from fags don't appeal to me.

What a retard! The two images in question were taken within in a minute apart and there were no knee pads worn by myself prior to or during either snaps, including during the entire conference. But I must say, your alleging the knee pads were present is a pretty thin accusation. Your case of me being a flaming fag is a much stronger accusation, albeit false, although I do smoke [fags].

OK, pink tutu boy, if you say you are not a fag, you are not a fag.  What's it to me?  Nothing.  But you also say your dick gets hard when you think of dripping jeez, so that must also be true, taking you at your word.  You say you have a doorknob up your ass too.  None of this shit matters to me.  If you are not a fag, then your fag proclivities are your own nightmare.  I just wanted to bring up the craig wright thing.  You hijacked the topic with your faggy pink tutu. 

Filthy.  Disturbing.  But funny.  lol

Gleb, is that really you in that tutu?  I thought you were some 25 yr old college kid.  Hahaha, you're really out there. 

This is fun, a mad throws a stone in a well and 100 wise men are unable to take it out, I bet while we all here fighting and name calling Satoshi is watching and laughing at us right now, any one claiming to be him should post a txid with the locked satoshi account here using bitcoins mined from the second block and I think it's about time that he do this for everyone to make sure he is not abandoned this community.

Yep! I'll be 57 come March 4th. For my birthday I desire MFC tokens.  :o

Satoshi Nakamoto was not a weak character like Craig Wright

Wright might be difficult to deal with but I honestly don't see what's weak about him.  You don't have to like someone to be honest about Their good qualities.   It's actually necessary if you want to compete effectively.

You know what the irony is, I was actually in that room when that photograph was taken.  Go ahead, ask me which corner Armory was in.  Or, ask me where DiIorio was sitting in relation to where you were kneeling.  I have first-hand eye witness knowledge of the matter. 

John Nash created bitcoin and this article is shit lie fake news.

https://soundcloud.com/stew-pendousman4444/on-nash-ideal-money

https://medium.com/@rextar4444/20-years-ago-john-nash-re-defined-our-understanding-of-economics-again-and-we-still-havent-4f3b7f09fd0e#.6hpwhrbfo

John Nash is overrated, especially when it comes to Bitcoin.  Guys like Adam Back or Gmax are way more qualified but you big blockers hate him so then they're no good.

'bigblockers'

lol
2 vs 4 which is bigger

Great, so if you were in that room, you would've noticed that I WASN'T wearing knee pads. Further, that pic wasn't taken inside any room but in the corridor between where the keynote speakers spoke and the refreshment room, the ONLY two rooms allocated by the MGM Grand for that Bitcoin conference, adjacent rooms utilized by a firemen convention with a ballerina conference taking place down another corridor, where most of the its attendees where donning ... wait for it ... tutus.

They looked like kneepads to me, ya fucking dirty fag.  

I'll tell you this much is certain, you weren't hitting that hot piece of meat you were standing next to.  Not in a million years would she consider letting you put your filthy dick in her.  

You caught me there. Give me a couple hours so that I can delete ALL them posts I penned about fuckin that hot piece of meat, replacing the content with how you and I have sucked each other's cocks till morn over the course of the past few years, I McLovin your clean cock more than you McLovin my filthy dick. Note to self: clean filthy dick.

How about if you keep your disgusting filthy fantasies to yourself?  It won't help if you clean your dick since you keep shoving it up little alter boy asses all day.

i have not heard anything about this .this is just a news.different media are saying different things about bitcoins found .but first most wright .i have not heard about it anywhere.

I love how this thread became a battleground of people supporting different scaling solutions instead of discussing Satoshi=Wright news.
Coindesk totally hit the spot there, bitcoin biggest secret - news about uncovering Satoshi's identity will always bring the biggest crowd to the table.

Lol, great post, he really does act like the biggest wanker doesn't he, He might be a nice guy if you got to know him but he just comes off as so arrogant.
If there is one reason why i believe that Mr Wright is not Satoshi it is the fact that Craig has applied for all those bitcoin patents, it just doesn't fit into Satoshi's style to me, he made bitcoin for the people, not for him to make a monopoly of it, although i could be wrong.

One place where you don't get any argument whatever, that Craig Wright is a wanker.  Everyone agrees with that.

Dude, wait till you read a tad further to see RawDog and I playing swords with one clean and one filthy epee.

I said keep your twisted fantasies to your demented self you pig. 

I'm the type of person who gets off sharing his twisted fantasies with like-minded demento others. Oink! Oink!

Oh no don't get Gleb started on his twisted fantasies, he will post something next that once read none of us will be able to sleep tonight, he has one weird imagination, and/or life. I seen him in that pink tutu and I'm still scared  :P

You bastard! Now I can't get this song that I just made up outta my head.  :'(

 :-X haha, ah that was my own stupid fault i guess, should have known you would post a pic, i won't be sleeping tonight.
That's not you though, you just wish you had a body like that  :D

Anyway I'm not getting in the middle of what seems like some history between you two so see ya.

Nice lyrics, Bruno. If you want to start a band project, consider me as the guitarist.

Actually, the history you speaketh of basically started today, therefore you didn't miss much. I tried extending an olive branch to RawDog, but the couple times I did he ate them, with now I'm all out of olive branches, but I do have some extra olive oil if he's game.


Where I play second fiddle and RawDog plays the skin flute?

FWIW, the last part of my song was inspired by: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procession_(The_Moody_Blues_song)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHfIftAK5Hs&feature=youtu.be&t=79

RawDog could play us some tunes on his dick, which seems to be his favorite instrument, besides his anal orientated sound design.
No Bruno. You should definitely be the vocalist.

And how about those who vouched for this scammer to wit Andressen and some trolls here? They must  as well be dishonored and branded as scammers and forgotten with their foolish hardfork BU forever

Is it just me or you bored averyone with your dull BU code? this thread is about scammers personality not about their code. Their code is discussed in other thread. But you persistently trying to distract our attention from scammers with some 'code' fairytales. It makes think you're one of them

lol this whole forum is about bitcoin.
craig wright is scamming the FIAT economy.

and if you actually read some code, you will realise that you are the one that is in a lucid dream and have been conned into thinking that cores centralist ideals are decentralised. so if you want to talk about scammers. im afraid to inform you, you have been scammed.

what you should be desiring is diversity, not centralist control.
what you should be desiring is where users get the choice, not devs.
what you should be desiring is where you can do your own independant thinking, not reading some script of fake doomsdays.

i suggest you stop acting like the core kings will look after you, and instead realise you have been conned. and dont let this social drama distract you from that awakening. and then do your own research

learn consensus
learn diversity
learn independant free choice
learn bitcoins ethos

and have a nice day.
or
dont learn everything, keep hugging onto core like a teddybear that will protect you while you sleep, and have a goodnight

You appears to contradict each other. You said this forum is about bitcoin, your associate rawdog said Bitcoin is dead, then why are you swarming here?
You said learn bitcoins ethos, your hosts andressen, hearn and ver said Bitcoin failed, then why would I learn it?
You can fool some of the people all the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all the time.

lol research better, you are just pointing fingers but not researching.. typical
you have spent too much time in r/bitcoin and got cabin fever.

open your mind and look at who is holding the door shut on you from seeing the real world.
look at who is whispering stories into your ear where they will protect you
look at who is offering you the teddy bear to help you sleep

research research research, if you decline to research and prefer to just point fingers. you are only letting yourself down.
avoid replying until you include some research and something of substance.

such as knowing who is paid/linked to who

that author mentions Calvin Ayre

Ayre is a gambling and casino BILLIONAIRE

Casinos have a porblem
that is US players coming in and out and being paid.

Bitcoin is the PERFECT solution

wright has made himseklf look a joke publically.
What nobdy knows is that wright LIKES privacy

Wght designs online games
Poker.
Casinos.

Wright was doing this in the 90s

Wright was the one that managed the systems and security for Lasseters - the FIRST online casino

the trick with magic is to have people look away from where you want them to

The US puts people into jail for gambling operations

wright can still develop underground poker systems
payment systems in bitcoin
casinos
gambling

EVEN if the world thinks he is a fraud

because the ONLY part of the world HE cares about know what he does.

If you move money for casinos
if you code casinos that have US citizens using bitcoin

WOULD YOU LIKE TO BE IN THE MEDIA
or would you make yourself a public fool to be rich and powerful BEHIND the curtain....,

At least as nice as you egghead - I guess.
Thanks for the pointer to your video. Now every time I need an adrenaline rush I know where to go.

Even if I assume Wright is a wanker far worse than I could imagine ... I'd still prefer listening to him for hours than to have listen to you moron for 5 minutes.

Pro advice: get a new head with more space in it.


Rico

Coindesk racking up some traffic again with this sheer nonsense of who the real satoshi nakomoto is....am guessing Satoshi is somewhere quiet doing some solo mining or something

He is not satoshi, he's not smart enough

https://github.com/trottier/original-bitcoin/blob/master/src/uibase.cpp

Search the old code for POKER

WRIGHT IS A CAsino billionaire - the last that the world does not know.

His partener and buddy Calvin Ayre is the front man.

Wright is the coder

THIS IS WHY HE WANTS YOU NOT TO BELIEVE

CHECK THE CODE! It includes Poker stubs - he removed it later ion the main core client but it is there!!!!!

Bitcoin was NOT for the people - it was so the people could GAMBLE!

wright is smart enough to have a Masters in Statistics from the University of Newcastle
A Masters in Law from Northumbria (UK)
Several from CSU and others we have not tracked.

He also has stared and ran at LEAST 10 Casinos and Poker operations

He and Calvin Ayre are BEST FRIENDS

And NOBODY has figured that Bitcoin was all about poker - and included it in the early code before he and Hal removed it!
https://github.com/trottier/original-bitcoin/blob/master/src/uibase.cpp

Sun Zu
http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/202800-appear-weak-when-you-are-strong-and-strong-when-you

Right now - Wright is strong and is preparing for a war!

And you are all too dumb to see it

To even check the fkin code!

Uh, this is some crazy stuff right there. 

Search the old code - the poker lobby is INSIDE Bitcoin

Wright separated it out before anyone saw - but it is there  - for all to check!

This is his big secret.

He is a part of Bodog with Ayre and worth billions WITHOUT Bitcoin - with - who knows.

He likes to not be seen as a billionare - that makes toop many questions in the gaming world - wright is the ULTIMATE casino boss - he fools us to think he is nothing!

yes and you can check that it is real

Wright missed all the old copies
he tried as satoshi to delete them all
but others have them

Wright is hiding his ties to online gambling!

He does not hneed to defraud anyone, he is already rich

That is the bait and switch!

Wired would have exposed him in Oz.
He is a billionarie with no local taxes on the casinos - he lives under the radar for his companies 0- making money

This is what the tax ppl are trying to do - to show that it is him
Not for him to hide - he does not want to be sn in public

So then Bitcoin is cacacoin?  💩

Sad. 

We shouldn't believe on anyone other than the person who is in a position to move bitcoins from the satoshi's bitcoin wallet. No one knows who is real satoshi but fortunately, we have this way to find out real ownership of satoshi by verifying candidate's identity with the satoshi's bitcoin wallet. There will be thousands of articles claiming XYZ a real satoshi Nakamoto but we shouldn't trust any of them unless valid concrete proof.

Just wright did bitcoin in order to allow payments from anywhere in the world

Liberty exchange and all thoise are closed

Bitcoin and all that followed are going stroing

And for gambling - better day by day

wright is laughing all the way to the bank

Who to know a probabilitic security system better - a gambler!

crypto currency is all about getting money in and out of a system without being controlled - just what casinos needed

Blockchain is not freedom, it is about gambling!

He probably isn't satoshi, but its not right to say that he is not smart enough. He is pretty and I;m sure he is smarter than you for one.

Think!


If he signs on Camera - then he is proven to a level the US can use in court. Now, he has thrown everyone. Even the gov have stepped down the investigation.

wright will NEVER come forth
the old code contains POKER stubs

just get off your ass and read it - do a search it is there

Sign a message PUBLICCALY and go to jail....

Sign in a private room with Gavin and others... Plausible denaibility - Wright is a Poker player and he played you all to  NOT Believe.

But even wright could not remove all the evidence and it will come out soon - without wrights help!

This is the story that never dies! How many Satoshi are there? Am I Satoshi, are you Satoshi, who knows these days.

Hmm, probably this would not happen if we ask him to sign a bitcoin address (the one which was used to claim early block mining rewards). Signed message would confirm the fact that if he alive or not. Of course this is Satoshi's decision to prove it or not.


Lolz.. I bet that in next 10 years, we will have at least 10 new candidates claiming to be real satoshi.

wright and Ayre are playing where's wally

http://calvinayre.com/2015/12/09/business/has-bitcoin-inventor-satoshi-nakamoto-been-outed/

this is all a setup to discretit wired and make wright able to work in the shadows!

http://forum.bitcoingambling.io/threads/bitcoin-maximalist-calvin-ayre-says-btc-is-the-most-positive-development-in-online-gambling.119/

https://github.com/trottier/original-bitcoin/blob/master/src/uibase.cpp

Search the old code for POKER

WRIGHT IS A CAsino billionaire - the last that the world does not know.
His partener and buddy Calvin Ayre is the front man.
Wright is the coder

THIS IS WHY HE WANTS YOU NOT TO BELIEVE

CHECK THE CODE! It includes Poker stubs - he removed it later ion the main core client but it is there!!!!!

Bitcoin was NOT for the people - it was so the people could GAMBLE!

IT IS IN THE EARLY CODE

Wright is a POKER player he bluffed everyone to think his hand is empty What it really is is a Billionare coder who does not need BITCOIN itself but has shitloads and also has casinos

Wright is tied to Bodog Mathews, his right hand man is the former CTO of centerbet Calvin Ayre is a Billionare casino marketer and wrights friend and partner
Wright wants to be the wizard behind the curtain. Everyone missed his deception - that he IS SATOSHI and runs a casino!

That explains Wright's crazy behavior and all his games.  Wow!!!

And the POKER lobby was IN Bitcoin Core

Hal was the one how removed it

Wright seems to have split it off into a separate (secret) version. But it is there in plain sight

not crazy - perefectly rational - just we are led to look away and not see the satoshi behind the curtain
the one with a mega company
the one with servers in iceland

the one with more degrees than most ppl have years in uni who has managed to make us all think he has no interest and is just another run.

Mostly
He has made us all look away from the origin or bitcoin and what he is doing with a team of 50+ people that do not talk to the media and have money to burn!

This is the craziest stuff I've heard in the 4 years I've been here.  Time to set fire to these guys. 

try telling me this part of the old bitcoin code is NOT poker!
https://github.com/trottier/original-bitcoin/blob/master/src/uibase.cpp

And this cut from the old code is JUST a part of it

CPokerLobbyDialogBase::CPokerLobbyDialogBase(wxWindow* parent, wxWindowID id, const wxString& title, const wxPoint& pos, const wxSize& size, long style) : wxFrame(parent, id, title, pos, size, style)
{
    this->SetSizeHints(wxDefaultSize, wxDefaultSize);
    this->SetBackgroundColour(wxSystemSettings::GetColour(wxSYS_COLOUR_BTNFACE));

    wxBoxSizer* bSizer156;
    bSizer156 = new wxBoxSizer(wxHORIZONTAL);

    m_treeCtrl = new wxTreeCtrl(this, wxID_ANY, wxDefaultPosition, wxDefaultSize, wxTR_HAS_BUTTONS|wxTR_HIDE_ROOT|wxTR_LINES_AT_ROOT);
    m_treeCtrl->SetMinSize(wxSize(130,-1));

    bSizer156->Add(m_treeCtrl, 0, wxEXPAND|wxTOP|wxBOTTOM|wxLEFT, 5);

    wxBoxSizer* bSizer172;
    bSizer172 = new wxBoxSizer(wxVERTICAL);

    m_listCtrl = new wxListCtrl(this, wxID_ANY, wxDefaultPosition, wxDefaultSize, wxLC_NO_SORT_HEADER|wxLC_REPORT);
    bSizer172->Add(m_listCtrl, 1, wxEXPAND|wxALL, 5);

    m_buttonNewTable = new wxButton(this, wxID_OPENNEWTABLE, wxT("&Open New Table"), wxDefaultPosition, wxDefaultSize, 0);
    bSizer172->Add(m_buttonNewTable, 0, wxALL, 5);

    bSizer156->Add(bSizer172, 1, wxEXPAND, 5);

    this->SetSizer(bSizer156);
    this->Layout();

    // Connect Events
    m_treeCtrl->Connect(wxEVT_COMMAND_TREE_SEL_CHANGED, wxTreeEventHandler(CPokerLobbyDialogBase::OnTreeSelChanged), NULL, this);
    m_listCtrl->Connect(wxEVT_COMMAND_LIST_ITEM_ACTIVATED, wxListEventHandler(CPokerLobbyDialogBase::OnListItemActivated), NULL, this);
    m_listCtrl->Connect(wxEVT_COMMAND_LIST_ITEM_SELECTED, wxListEventHandler(CPokerLobbyDialogBase::OnListItemSelected), NULL, this);
    m_buttonNewTable->Connect(wxEVT_COMMAND_BUTTON_CLICKED, wxCommandEventHandler(CPokerLobbyDialogBase::OnButtonNewTable), NULL, this);
}

CPokerLobbyDialogBase::~CPokerLobbyDialogBase()
{
    // Disconnect Events
    m_treeCtrl->Disconnect(wxEVT_COMMAND_TREE_SEL_CHANGED, wxTreeEventHandler(CPokerLobbyDialogBase::OnTreeSelChanged), NULL, this);
    m_listCtrl->Disconnect(wxEVT_COMMAND_LIST_ITEM_ACTIVATED, wxListEventHandler(CPokerLobbyDialogBase::OnListItemActivated), NULL, this);
    m_listCtrl->Disconnect(wxEVT_COMMAND_LIST_ITEM_SELECTED, wxListEventHandler(CPokerLobbyDialogBase::OnListItemSelected), NULL, this);
    m_buttonNewTable->Disconnect(wxEVT_COMMAND_BUTTON_CLICKED, wxCommandEventHandler(CPokerLobbyDialogBase::OnButtonNewTable), NULL, this);
}

CPokerDialogBase::CPokerDialogBase(wxWindow* parent, wxWindowID id, const wxString& title, const wxPoint& pos, const wxSize& size, long style) : wxFrame(parent, id, title, pos, size, style)
{
    this->SetSizeHints(wxDefaultSize, wxDefaultSize);

    wxBoxSizer* bSizer174;
    bSizer174 = new wxBoxSizer(wxVERTICAL);

    m_checkSitOut = new wxCheckBox(this, wxID_ANY, wxT("Deal Me Out"), wxDefaultPosition, wxDefaultSize, 0);

    bSizer174->Add(m_checkSitOut, 0, wxALL, 5);

    m_buttonDealHand = new wxButton(this, wxID_DEALHAND, wxT("&Deal Hand"), wxDefaultPosition, wxSize(150,25), 0);
    bSizer174->Add(m_buttonDealHand, 0, wxALL, 5);

    m_buttonFold = new wxButton(this, wxID_FOLD, wxT("&Fold"), wxDefaultPosition, wxSize(80,25), 0);
    bSizer174->Add(m_buttonFold, 0, wxALL, 5);

    m_buttonCall = new wxButton(this, wxID_CALL, wxT("&Call"), wxDefaultPosition, wxSize(80,25), 0);
    bSizer174->Add(m_buttonCall, 0, wxALL, 5);

    m_buttonRaise = new wxButton(this, wxID_RAISE, wxT("&Raise"), wxDefaultPosition, wxSize(80,25), 0);
    bSizer174->Add(m_buttonRaise, 0, wxALL, 5);

    m_buttonLeaveTable = new wxButton(this, wxID_LEAVETABLE, wxT("&Leave Table"), wxDefaultPosition, wxSize(90,25), 0);
    bSizer174->Add(m_buttonLeaveTable, 0, wxALL, 5);

    m_textDitchPlayer = new wxTextCtrl(this, wxID_DITCHPLAYER, wxEmptyString, wxDefaultPosition, wxSize(45,-1), wxTE_PROCESS_ENTER);
    bSizer174->Add(m_textDitchPlayer, 0, wxALL, 5);

    m_checkPreFold = new wxCheckBox(this, wxID_ANY, wxT("FOLD"), wxDefaultPosition, wxSize(100,-1), 0);

    bSizer174->Add(m_checkPreFold, 0, wxALL, 5);

    m_checkPreCall = new wxCheckBox(this, wxID_ANY, wxT("CALL"), wxDefaultPosition, wxSize(100,-1), 0);

    bSizer174->Add(m_checkPreCall, 0, wxALL, 5);

    m_checkPreCallAny = new wxCheckBox(this, wxID_ANY, wxT("CALL ANY"), wxDefaultPosition, wxSize(100,-1), 0);

    bSizer174->Add(m_checkPreCallAny, 0, wxALL, 5);

    m_checkPreRaise = new wxCheckBox(this, wxID_ANY, wxT("RAISE"), wxDefaultPosition, wxSize(100,-1), 0);

    bSizer174->Add(m_checkPreRaise, 0, wxALL, 5);

    m_checkPreRaiseAny = new wxCheckBox(this, wxID_ANY, wxT("RAISE ANY"), wxDefaultPosition, wxSize(100,-1), 0);

    bSizer174->Add(m_checkPreRaiseAny, 0, wxALL, 5);

    this->SetSizer(bSizer174);
    this->Layout();
    m_statusBar = this->CreateStatusBar(1, wxST_SIZEGRIP, wxID_ANY);

    // Connect Events

Is this true? 

Now it is all starting to make sense.  Now I believe wright actually is Satoshi.

Appealing narrative you're coming out with here...
In this looong extract on the subject (https://www.lrb.co.uk/v38/n13/andrew-ohagan/the-satoshi-affair), Ayre's name and "regular visits to Antigua" come up, as well as Mathews' assertion that Ayers was

Worth a read.

It is in the code

https://github.com/trottier/original-bitcoin/blob/master/src/uibase.cpp

Search Poker on the site

Wright pulled EVERYTHING about Lassetesr and the casinos FIRST

He looks mad/mental so we do not look!

A guy with 10 plus degrees who can operate in the online gambling world without being found is not dumb. This is Mission impossible level villan stuff.

Liberty, where he lost money was a gambling laundering site

That author talked of ayre
but they made it like it was something new

they played us all and he has done another runner

Masthews also vanished from social.

but we all ignored the disapear

it was just a fail and not satoshi.
after all, who wants a mad guy

is it worse that he is a gambling king?

A Gambling and casino mogil who sits on a fortune has a reason to do so... he wants the power and secrets are the key

that image on the blog is not a bond thing
it is him the casino guy
https://web.archive.org/web/20120316093712/http://gse-compliance.blogspot.com/

I had a feeling Wright was Satoshi and he was planning to kill Core and back an alt, Bitcoin Unlimited.  By killing Core they're gonna kill the real Bitcoin.  That's why he took out 400+ patents.  To go to war and own it all. 

And
https://web.archive.org/web/20120718031948/http://gse-compliance.blogspot.com/2012/03/what-forms-loop.html

Using the post lets you do simple loops if the op codes are not limited in bitcoin

wrights comments re loops work for a limited numebr of iterations in btc script now with the Alt Stack as the marker

the way he posted and then deleted

The Poker code is there.
Not just one site. Losts of the early 09 code

it is real and easy to check

Fuck me.  Listen, Wright said he was Satoshi and was going to prove it with a private key.  That's fucking proof, and anyone with half a brain knows this.  So tell me why Satoshi doesn't understand the basic purpose of and use of public/private key cryptography?

And how are you so smart to dig all this up but you also don't understand this basic concept?  It's really basic.  You know, rather than continuing to concoct a story that fits an irrational conclusion, why can't you understand basic cryptography? You are in a bitcoin forum.

IKf wright signs - poker = jail

wright knows how to sign

YOU want him to sign. He does not want to.

Are yoiu all that thick!

There is another problem here.  Clearly you don't understand gambling and probabilities, and I do.  You don't make money as a gambler, you lose money. And Wright seems FAR more likely to be the kind of person that would gamble his life and fortune away than whatever implication you are trying to make about him being the james bond of gambling.  There is no such thing.  

One has to ask, does the story you are creating make sense, and when one thinks about it the answer is, "why the fuck are we still talking about this".

Also Satoshi said that the price of any commodity will gravitate towards the production cost, and there are only 3 men in the world at that time that could say that, and I already heard write say something that shows he does not understand that statement.

And how is it, someone tell me, that there is a claim that multiple people worked on the project but only craig is satoshi?  It doesn't make sense.

How is it that nothing make sense, Craig is a polar opposite to Satoshi, and we have far more reasons to believe Szabo Finney and Nash did this (knowing szabo worked on an e-cash with chaum), yet we are still for whatever reason trying to build a story about Wright.

We are taking THE most farfetched possibility and bending and bending truth.

how do you know how to find poker code in the base code but you don't understand what public/private key encryption is?

Wright went on mainstream media to announce that is Satoshi and just wants to be left alone.  There is no twisted story in which that is a rational move.  Its wholly irrational. It doesn't make sense from even the perspective he is Satoshi and wanted to trick us so he would be left alone.  Only a child would perpetuate that myth.  If he wanted to be left alone he wouldn't be on the news.  He was seeking attention.  And what kind of person seeks attention by saying they don't want attention?

HOw are ytou all so thick that you have to have Satoshi as some fuking benevolent god and not a fuking poker barron who has played you all to stay hidden!

look at the fukin code



AND what attention - he is being left alone.

yes and bigblockers want me to loot at the whitepaper.  And while that sounds like a logical and grounded argument its actually completely empty of content.  I want to ask you again, so the community can understand what is happening here:  How is it you can find poker in the source code, but you can't understand the basic purpose of pgp cryptography?

No see, now you are being irrational, here we are all revisiting this retarded story and claim, and its apparently going to be all over the news again, and you are in here giving details and facts and stories, while simultaneously claiming we are leaving him alone.

How far do you think you will get now that I pointed this out to the community?

I really dont understand the reason behind this sudden interest in who Satoshi is or was? The crypto world is moving forward, bitcoin is leaving to expectation despite challenges here and there and people have looked for him and tired of looking for him. For crying out loud let the man or woman enjoys his labour or effort. In the near future someone else will do another 'investigative journalism' and claim someone else is the real Satoshi and others are fakes...

And ppl like you are why wright gets to move in the shadows and do as he wants.

Crypto means perfection. What BS.

You think you can make a person sign. You are all losing to him as you cannot look past your own huborous

Wait and see

I can code is how I can see that the code is there. You should learn this and to read!

I understand crypto, better than most here. I know the limits that seem to escape so many

Exactly, its fake news.  Think about and the timing.  If the world was really interested they would be talking about Nash's essays about how an international e-currency with a stable supply would asymptotically take power from central banks to arbitrarily print money.

The Wright news was clearly a coordinated stunt pulled probably by a group that Wright got to believe it is "likely" Satoshi. They think they are being benevolent but its simply because they are "in the know" and are corrupted by the power of it.

If wright wanted to be in the shadows he wouldn't be on fucking major international news sites claiming to be Satoshi.

You can't code, you don't even understand basic pgp encryption.

I understand PGP well.


I also know that the idea you have is BS... you cannot make another prove nor disprove as a result of your bs.

You have already demonstrated i this thread that you do not.

We all need to ask, why you, Gavin, and (alledged) Satoshi don't understand how pgp encryption works and what it is for.

The problem we are having is that much of the community seems to be wholly ignorant to this.  And so myths can easily be perpetuated (such as Satoshi wanted bitcoin to be scaled as a coffee money, which is bullshit).

No one that understands pgp encryption believes Wright could possibly be Satoshi.

Blah blaH - IE KNOWS WHAT sn WANTS....


Yet Satoshi said:
"While I don't think Bitcoin is practical for smaller micropayments right now, it will eventually be as storage and bandwidth costs continue to fall. If Bitcoin catches on on a big scale, it may already be the case by that time. Another way they can become more practical is if I implement client-only mode and the number of network nodes consolidates into a smaller number of professional server farms. Whatever size micropayments you need will eventually be practical. I think in 5 or 10 years, the bandwidth and storage will seem trivial."

Coffee is WAY larger than a micropayment

Do you understand why no credible scientist will accept your conclusion based on "satoshi said"?

Do you understand...

And I quote...
"such as Satoshi wanted bitcoin to be scaled as a coffee money, which is bullshit"

That a quote from Satoshi is a Quote from Satoshi and is evidence of what he said and that you are a lying shit who twists that.... :)

It's "hubris", fyi.

Also, irony meter is about to break.

pedant

englist is not everyones frst language

"Xoтя я нe дyмaю, чтo пpямo ceйчac Bitcoin пpaктичнo для мaлeнькиx микpoплaтeжeй, тo в кoнeчнoм итoгe бyдeт в кaчecтвe xpaнeния и пpoпycкнoй cпocoбнocти зaтpaты пpoдoлжaют пaдaть.

Ecли Bitcoin yлaвливaeт в бoльшиx мacштaбax, этo мoжeт быть бoлee тaк в этo вpeмя.

Дpyгoй cпocoб Биткoйн мoжeт cтaть бoлee пpaктичным бyдeт, ecли я peaлизoвaть peжим клиeнтa тoлькo и чиcлo yзлoв в ceти включaeт в ceбя мeньшee кoличecтвo пpoфeccиoнaльныx фepмax cepвepoв.

Heзaвиcимo oт paзмepa вaм нyжнo микpoплaтeжeй в кoнeчнoм итoгe бyдeт пpaктичным.

Я дyмaю, чтo чepeз 5 или 10 лeт, пpoпycкнaя cпocoбнocть и xpaнeниe бyдeт кaзaтьcя тpивиaльным ".

:P

Why don't we find holes or explanations for the evidence of are yiu all still busy worshipping a mortal?

If wright felt that the feds were close to finding him then what better way to hide Satoshi than to fail mserably at proving he's satoshi?  It makes sense then how he was able to fool Garvin and Matonis but then fail the most simple of tests.  That never made sense so either Wright is crazy or he is Satoshi and is devilishly shrewd to have fooled everyone that he is not Satoshi when in fact he is.

Muhahaha ... YMMD! :D

Wait until I find his keys, then I will prove that I am Satoshi. But not before. Before that event I am not Satoshi.
This is where quantum theory meets Bitcoin.


Rico

You can throw that premise out the window with Craig Wright Jr.'s bath water given that if I've done the math correctly, currently, bitcoins can be subdivided to eight decimal places, viz. 0.00000001, but in the future could be coded to nine decimal places - 0.000000001 - thus ten times more units negating "a stable supply". Similarly, ten decimal places, eleven, twelve, etc., depending on worldwide demand.

That said, this latest revelation is fucking with me and Vlad. Somebody get me an apple.

I don't think that would change anything.  You know why its fucking you up.  Because you need to introduce into your core beliefs the concept of a stable metric of value.  If there are 21 million bitcoin's and you make them more divisible, this doesn't necessarily effect the value of a bitcoin in the way you are implying.

extra zero is stable supply. just liitler bits

but the code is not so easy to add zero to.
not floating point and this need hard fork to make large number zeros

Sorry, Gleb.   The supply is only increased when a block subsidy is generated in a coinbase transaction, currently 12.5 BTC every 10 minutes (on average).  Whether that 12.5 BTC comes in the form of 1.25 billion sats or in the form of 12.5 billion Gleb-sats (tenths of a sat) is irrelevant to the amount of supply increase.  Both represent 12.5 BTC.  

After the year 2120 or so (when the last BTC has been generated), the supply will never increase.  Cutting a sat into ten little pieces (which is equivalent to selling something like "ten Gleb autographs for 1 sat") is not an increase in supply.

And FYI there are already talks by major bitcoin elites about how the 21 million cap is not so much written in stone.

https://web.archive.org/web/20120718031948/http://gse-compliance.blogspot.com/2012/03/what-forms-loop.html

https://i.imgur.com/OqHEcj4.png

https://i.imgur.com/NKl6gxf.jpg


I was alluding to the Satoshi-poker connection that was fucking me and Vlad up, the latest revelation. Apologies for the mix-up. Thanks for clarification on the other, for sometimes I go beyond just pretending to be a Dumb-ass.  :P

I now see others have tried to correct me. Thanks, all.

Now back to this poker connection that has Vlad and I terribly upset.  :'(

Those people are irrational and have never read a book on economics, and they can't hold a candle to me in a debate on this subject.

I agree about that being that the main guy is Ver.  But you can't ignore his influence. 

Well no, you can't when every bitcoin media outlet is perpetuating his narrative (hmm wonder why that is?), but in another sense, from a rational perspective, its not possible for him or his or another faction to change bitcoin in these ways.  Ignorance is a limited phenomenon, so entropy builds up which is effectively a resistance to change. It's getting harder not easier, and soon as our money systems begin to stabilize (because bitcoin will be a digital gold not a coffee money) and then Nash's insight from ideal money will start to make sense and become relevant.

There is really only one way for it to play out, which is quite based on reason, as to why it would do so in this way.

The other important thing to note is that its basically the same crowd implicating Wright that says things like they might remove the cap in the future and that bitcoin needs to scale and core has hijacked it.  The same crowd that refuses to use standard definitions for words and often conflates polar opposite meanings for key words in the same sentence.

I get an overwhelming feeling there are a lot of people that think they created bitcoin and have yet to realize they were only lead to believe that they did.

There is an implication that "Satoshi" needn't understand economics or the macro-economic implications of bitcoin, and this is only perpetuated because the general bitcoin community has little to zero understanding of these subjects.

http://nakamotoinstitute.org/mempool/hyperbitcoinization/

This paper doesn't belong on a satoshi school dot org.  It's ridiculous.

https://web.archive.org/web/20151119111410/http://lynn-downunder.blogspot.com

https://i.imgur.com/faLqByC.png

https://i.imgur.com/GqZr3N5.jpg
"Hey, Reeses, Tibanne here. What's happening there down under with you and Peanut? Craig been treatin' you guys okay like Mark treats me here in Japan?"

https://i.imgur.com/mIaBPQc.jpg
"Dear, Tibanne. Goofers here. I regret to inform that Reeses' not pinin'! 'E's passed on! This cat is no more! He has ceased to be! 'E's expired and gone to meet 'is maker! 'E's a stiff! Bereft of life, 'e rests in peace! 'E's pushing up the daisies! 'Is metabolic processes are now 'istory! 'E's off the twig! 'E's kicked the bucket, 'e's shuffled off 'is mortal coil, run down the curtain and joined the bleedin' choir invisibile!!He's f*ckin' snuffed it!..... REESES IS AN EX-CAT!!"

https://i.imgur.com/m7Is67e.jpg
"Tibanne, this is Flame, to let you know that Goofers speaketh the truth. Reeses and I were fairly close."

Speaking of a dead parrot cat and some other cat owner renown for baking cookies apple pies (above) ...

http://seclists.org/basics/2008/Mar/147

Is that post for real?  Haha.

that guy is rusty russel
introducing 4 more decimals in his LN (millisatoshi)
https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=millisatoshi

its starting to become very funny that every action blockstream employee's propose is being pointed in every direction away from blockstream.

EG gmaxwell loving bilateral splits..
every blockstream centralists says other implementations want bilateral splits.
yet other implementations refuse to split.

even funnier
blockstream centralists fear other implementations splitting the network.. yet every argument they have is demanding other implementations to Fork Off and make their altcoin....

im guessing they are trying self fulfilling prophecy that if they nag for it enough they can make other implementations do it.. then blame the other implementations for doing it.. (facepalm)

and it seems they dont even realise the words they are speaking. like empty drones repeating scripts without understanding what they are saying or researching the truth.

These are no more than just idle talks

I created a thread about a year ago telling basically the same, that "21 million cap is not so much written in stone". My main point was that what is done by one human being can be undone by another human being. But that thread was quickly filled with angry comments and I myself was just as quickly labelled as a heretic and traitor. I'm still keeping to the same view but seeing how miners are loath to accept changes that could even slightly undermine their profits (e.g. changing the notorious blocksize), this is utterly irrelevant what the so-called bitcoin elites are discussing now

You know what Satoshi would say?  He would say "ya we can change it easy, just set it at x block" then he would leave and never address such irrational debate again.

From the desk of Real Satoshi, The Security Guru:

http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Jan/561


Something else I just saw since I'm a professional anagramer  ::): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stochastic#Finance


The anagram for Stochastic - ctc = Satoshi.  :o :o :o

anagrams hmm..

and abit of cryptographic math lol
gives you my brain fart ages ago

Your post gave me the CBz.

Now, onto some real math: http://www.blacksheepnetworks.com/security/resources/pentest/14456.html


2007 - 23 = 1984 (not the infamous book title).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_Steven_Wright


Ergo, Craig Steven Wright has been in Info Sec since he was 14 years old, a freshman in high school still checking his balls down under (De (https://www.allacronyms.com/De/Double-entendre) intended) every day to see if any peach fuzz was about to bloom.

Wait, Nick Szabo's middle name was Thomas?

Oy, I'm seeing unicorns!!!

http://scontent.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-15/s480x480/e35/12357765_979912135434790_1642662608_n.jpg?ig_cache_key=MTE0OTIwMDUwMTc1MDEzNzc0OQ%3D%3D.2
"Wanna play on my tom-tom?"

Holy fuck!  You are one weird queer.  I like that about you.   Are you jewish?

There are way too many crazies on this thread, not sure I have room.  lol

But I like the twins idea.  But really, I thought I researched all these top Bitcoin coders and somehow I missed Szabo's middle name. 

On dad's side, grandfather was German and grandmother was Lithuanian. On mother's side, grandfather was Pennsylvania Dutch and grandmother's maiden name was Hershberg. Does the latter count?

RawDog, the only qualms that I have with you is that you for some reason have qualms with me. That said, I'm extending an olive branch for you to stick up your ass (humor, bud).

See, you just make it such a challenge for me to shine.  😂

I think the Hershberg does it.  Not only are you a fucking queer, but you are also a fucking jew.  Hey, I said I like you.  Even if you want to push things up my ass, an offer I fully decline and reject as vulgar, I still like you.  Indeed, we are probably related via that Lithuanian connection.  How do you like that!  Sorry to learn your otherwise respectable Dutch granddad had to go marry some dirty yenta and screw up your genetics.  But, that's the way things go.  

Yiddish East Blockers.

Now it all makes sense.   :)

Left (or first) image: https://web.archive.org/web/20151119111410/http://lynn-downunder.blogspot.com

https://i.imgur.com/OBg5nHF.png http://media.coindesk.com/uploads/2014/04/Gavin-with-cockie.jpg

Any questions?

For those wonder what happened to Reeses:

https://web.archive.org/web/20151119111410/http://lynn-downunder.blogspot.com

https://i.imgur.com/faLqByC.png

ref. https://web.archive.org/web/20151119111410/http://lynn-downunder.blogspot.com


https://web.archive.org/web/20151118155803im_/http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_lPXDlv0_iG8/SxrnExjpL8I/AAAAAAAAC7o/BoqywfAjwXE/s400/ReesesandPeanuta.jpg

Well of course, I instantly developed a huge craving for Reese's [sic] ... (http://web.archive.org/) (follow the link is possible: http://web.archive.org/#!http://cassowarytales.blogspot.com/2013/11/reeces-peanut-butter-cups-ah.html (http://web.archive.org/#!http://cassowarytales.blogspot.com/2013/11/reeces-peanut-butter-cups-ah.html))

What are the odds?

Speaking of who ^^^, here's an interesting tidbit - one dude who vouched for Craig Steven Wright being Satoshi Nakamoto was on record prior in stating that his job is NOT figuring out who is trustworthy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mIcfxes8OI&feature=youtu.be&t=3360. Yet, that is exactly what he did.

No, I don't know

On the other hand, you don't know that either. Most likely, he left the scene specifically not to get involved in debates like this one. And that was a wise decision, after all. I don't think he would be quite happy to have his say ultimately ignored which would certainly be the case. If you have a half functioning brain, you can easily imagine how it might have happened, with miners not giving a fuck about anyone (Satoshi included) and anything but their profits

It only takes a basic understanding of economics and game theory to understand that this would be (and was) the premise of satoshi's design. That you don't understand that, is exactly why "he" left.

That's what I'm talking about

And it's good that you finally come to understand my point. The next step would be to accept the truth that if he didn't leave, his voice wouldn't be heard by the miners turning a deaf ear to anything but the tinkling of coins. Therefore, he couldn't possibly say what you meant him to say if he were to stay. Basically, this is no more than your wet dreams

Craig wright is a flake just like John Nash and the others, until someone comes out to spend a single coin of Satoshi I wouldn't believe. Why is this craze for unnecessary fame ? I'm sick and tired of it!!

Its probably a frontend for this: http://www.correspondencepoker.com/  a peer2peer pokergame copyrighted in 2009.
Also mentioned here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=289261.5;imode

CPoker is the shortform for correspondencepoker

Why do you all care who's Satoshi?! Use bitcoin and that's it!

its all fake drama
instead of asking the real questions about what concepts and code changes have been discussed at the roundtable.
those close to the corporate elite want to distract you with this kardashian-esq social entertainment drama of 'the round table will reveal the real satoshi'

making sheep think the only thing to discuss concerning the round table is this social 'who is satoshi' crap.

So if Satoshi is the CIA or KGB then it don't matter? 

The world needs more people like you, only 7.2 billion out there right now. 

No its not my wet dream.  I, too, think its a silly thought, just like sastoshi was being silly the first time he said we could scale the block size. It's a pipe dream.  It's a pacifier for ver for satoshi to have said "oh ya, we can change it, just all have to agree." I think we agree and you missed my sarcasm as you missed mine.

All you Nash fans and Wright fans GTFO, if Satoshi wanted to come out he would've done the requested transaction from one of the first 50BTC mined by him.

LOL :D ;D ;D If it was the truth don't you think a LOT of people would had been arrested until now or something like this?

Drugs & Other stuff(i dont want to mention) that are sold on blackmarkets?

It was a hypothetical question to prove a point.  It's smart to try and understand the nature of things.  Especially things which have the potential to engulf the world. 

How do people fit so much so much stupidity into one sentence?

Sig campaigns are making this possible

One person, can't remember who, perhaps Jon Matonis, claim they met satoshi many years ago, and it was craig wright, and he asked him to work on the project,  maybe it was jvp (I'm not spending the time to google these idiots).  Then the mysterious person asked them to work on the project, and the guy said "how will i know its you" and wright said "satoshi nakamoto".

So the fucking claim is, the most hidden anonymous person ever, that alludes everyone, all media, all intelligence agencies, and released the atomic bomb of central banking, was going around giving out their secret code name arbitrarily.

So wright COULD be satoshi, if you ascribe irrationality to reason and vice versa, and I think that do that, and bring that bullshit to the dialogue, should tortured and killed (metaphorically but for real, just kidding).

No one would dare make these claims, on a stage, with me on it, in front of an audience. And thats why no one will discuss Nash's Ideal Money a lecture over 20 years about how an international e-currency with a stable supply will usurp central banking practices. 

no one likes feeling like an idiot, do you everyone?

Maybe thomas edison was satoshi.

Do you think they know how stupid they are or its just an honest idiot mistake?

https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_Steven_Wright

Wright, Craig; Kleiman, Dave; Sundhar R.S., Shayaam (2008). "Overwriting Hard Drive Data: The Great Wiping Controversy". In Sekar, R. Information Systems Security: 4th International Conference, ICISS 2008, Hyderabad, India, December 16–20, 2008, Proceedings. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 243.

SHYAAM SUNDHAR RAJAMADAM SRINIVASAN

- http://www.vidarholen.net/~vidar/overwriting_hard_drive_data.pdf (white paper looks somewhat familiar!)
- http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-dev/200506/att-0004/Resume.pdf
- https://sourceforge.net/u/snaos/profile/ (Username: snaos Joined: 2004-05-29 03:28:35)
- https://www.sans.org/instructors/shyaam-sundhar-rajamadam-srinivasan/type/asc/

"Shyaam Sundhar has had over 5 years of Information Security experience with over a year of management experience at BAE Systems Inc. He currently works for Department of Interior as their Information Assurance Engineer. He was a security analyst at Symantec MSS for over 3 years with over five years of intrusion defense, threat analysis and signature writing experience through his previous jobs. He holds Master of Science in Information Security and Master's Certificate in Computer Security and Information Assurance from the George Washington University, Graduate Certificate in Computer Security from Stanford University and is currently pursuing Master's in Intelligence Studies from the American Military University (AMU). With active professional membership at InfraGard, ACM, ACFE, ISACA, IACSP, HTCN, ATAB and various other associations, he has been actively participating in the security community. He has held professional certs such as, GREM, GCFA, GCIA, GCIH, GPCI, GCDS, GLDR, SSP-CNSA, SSP-MPA, SSP-GHD, GHTQ, GWAS, and GIPS. He was a board member at IARIA research group where he has participated as TPC, Chair and Co-Chair of several IEEE conferences related to Security. For more information on Shyaam, his profile can be found at http:// www. linkedin.com/in/intrusion."

His now obfuscated linkedin profile photo was recently updated presenting him standing in front of a wall of blocks with two "Horses of the Apocalypse" either side.

 
  
As Sundhar R.S., Shayaam clearly worked with both Craig Wright and Dave Kleiman before the date of public Bitcoin inception, it would certainly be interesting to learn his opinions (if any) on the subject of Bitcoin creation.
  

I can't make coindesk as a official news caterer for Altcoins as it can create news without sources or anything in other words they just make stories up or make news that is what already on the internet. They put some attractive headlines just to click the link to their website which is like a click bait in which they can monetize.

Uhhh, that's SSS.  One or the 5 Satoshi team members.  I got it wrong thinking it was SSS the law firm. 

Isn't this exactly the way media works nowadays? Do you know reliable source of bitcoin related information, not biased by their agenda or connections?

Building up a drama is primary aim of every news network, bitcoin related or not, the worst or more scandalous the news is, the better.
 
Wright's case shouldn't be appearing on news sites anymore, since there is only presumptive evidence available of him being linked to Satoshi anyway.

Vitalik Mic Drop on Gavin about Craig!  fucking Craig.


https://soundcloud.com/proofofbeats/signal-to-noise-ratio-vitalik-mic-drop

Vitalik the fetus shouldn't be stepping up to Gavin like that.  He's an overrated assclown. 

Meaning of SNAOS by its letters: (http://meaningsfor.com/meaning-of/snaos/snaos-stands-for-snaos-means)

S: S is a single strand that goes forward and backwards. It shows a willingness to explore. Friendliness, perceptiveness and accommodating are all S qualities. The ends pointing forward and backwards shows a conflicting nature with itself and a degree of puzzlement.

N: N has two stable ends on the ground and two upwards displaying confidence. It is willing to explore upwards as well as downwards indicating intellectual curiosity. It becomes sluggish if its spaces get filled with water thereby wasting talent from less agility. This makes it easily affected, but good fortunes always come to it.

A: The letter A has two bars connected at a pointed edge and a cross bar holding them together. From an open end to a pointed edge signifies that all energies are trained to a point to achieve the most singularly important goal. The cross bar shows caution. Failure is avoided by stringing all required resources together. A also looks like a Pyramid with the peak as the apex of the Pyramid. Pyramids are iconic. A therefore symbolizes prominence and a desire to be recognized for ones achievements. The cross bar also represents a rung in ladder. To get to the top, one has to first step on the rung. It also means originality, a strong will power and an enterprising ability. The upper-case version consists of the two slanting sides of a triangle, crossed in the middle by a horizontal bar. It shows aspiration, the dominance to be successful, positive attitude, an optimistic world view and egotism.

O: O is well carved with no pointed edges. It is smooth and closed. It shows deep in thought, well disciplined, down in the dumps and caring. The roundedness of the O with lookout in the middle indicates a peering nature into the outside. This means, lookout for the mysterious and be home-loving and enjoy the things that are close by. It is a traditionalist letter.

This is the standard format of academic papers, especially those in computer science.

Lol I can't believe that

He is a TUTU wearing  grandpa!

Hey Gleb!

Those horses aren't from the apocalypse and robots don't come from wombs.

maku!

http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2009-January/015014.html


So, Satoshi Nakamoto left the scene when Wikileaks started accepting bitcoin donations as he predicted would happen, and when Gavin told him that he's going to hold an audience with the CIA to discuss how bitcoins will be used for porn (among other things), again, just like Satoshi predicted would happen.  ::)

Satoshi: Hey, Candy, now that we're in private chat, will you show me the upper left-hand quadrant of your right nipple for eight satoshis?
Candy: Give me thirty satoshis and I'll show you the whole nipple.
Satoshi: Can't do, girlfriend. I'm still waiting for confirmations on a deposit I made going on 24 hours now, so I'm low on satoshis. How 'bout ten satoshis for you to put your index finger in your mouth and get it nice and wet? Hey, before you do that, about how many micropayments do you make on average per day?

Found Satoshi's post via http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2009-January/015019.html while Googling "Shyaam Sundhar".

https://i.imgur.com/zruI6dA.png

Says the guy who sat next to me while donning said garb at the entrance of the MGM. Hey smoothie! Hey, can I have my knee pads back that you borrowed so to exercise while wearing them, you once fat pig? I need to them to validate RawDog's assertions.

Cake white, the flat earth of crypto ;)

Is there anyone that has read the vast majority of szabo's works and claim's he had nothing to do with satoshi?

Satoshi also didn't like the first Bitcoin article published by Gawker "http://gawker.com/5805928/the-underground-website-where-you-can-buy-any-drug-imaginable" (link doesn't work), which brought a lot of attention to the public, incl. Assange and the CIA/DEA and all the others.
My bet is: Gavin was flipped at the CIA session and he has NOT been bamboozled by Craig at the fake signing key session.

Also, Craig is not Satoshi. The real Satoshi knows how to bring a 100% proof. Craig doesn't.

Many people are claimimg to be Satoshi Nakamoto, but I bet none of them is the real one. If Satoshi wanted to reveal himself, he would know 100000% how to do it because.. he was the creator of BTC. When he launched it, he knew he will never reveal himself because of security issues. Unless the real Satoshi is revealed, nothing can happen to all these people claiming to be the real ones.

I think they don't care about the content of their posts. If you want to make mony by sig spamming, you need to post anything to raise your rank, even when you don't have a clue about what you are talking.

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ZhfDpylWQPw/maxresdefault.jpg
"Misdirections, long confirmation times, sensationalized news, porn, ... oh my! Captain, should I fire proton torpedoes? My bad! I forgot we're not talkin' to one another."


Start sentence with first word being capitalized.
Put full stop/period at end of said word.
Insert random words in between first word and period.
Make sure random words count meets or exceeds sig campaign's requirements.
Move on to next thread and repeat process.

There is literally only one person making this claim. And there is a person in the community saying craig wright came up to him before bitcoin was released and revealed that his is satoshi nakamoto.

Are my words working?

This topic has gone to 14 pages yet we all know that it is a clickbait topic without any facts whatsoever. RawDog please stop creating topics of these kind, they lead to nowhere. The fact is that there is no proof that Craig Wright is actually Satoshi Nakamoto. For this reason topics such as these are not necessary.

You don't have an argument about not creating this threads, when it starts with "14 pages" of discussion.  Is there ANYONE who is rational in this place.

You don't understand.  I have READ nash's works.  The ENTIRE argument spanning 20 years is about how HE created bitcoin.  NO ONE who is disagreeing has ACTUALLY read the material.

That is why I am telling, to stfu instacalm.

https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/500/1*IyQSYgKfyO6DcYMAOzgWXA.pngNash tricked us, on purpose.  And then he SAID he tricked us. Who is satoshi, the answer is "no one, idiots".  But nonetheless NASH CREATED BITCOIN.

With all due respect, this thread, created by thou whose name has been restricted from the records  :P, has provided a many new insights, along with affording some grandma in Romania to sell more apples.

What a fuckwad you are instacalm.  

This is what people want to talk about around here.  14 pages indicate this is a topic worth reading and responding to.  

Do you know about the topic that got no replies?  No.  That is because it is now on page 78.  Why should we stop posting topic that people want to talk about?  Why don't we talk about your stupid topic then?  Oh wait, your fucking topic is the one on page 78.  No one likes that shit.  

I can't help it if everyone here is a moron and likes to talk about really dumb shit.  Go find a more interesting forum if you don't like it.  Are you also a fucking jew?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9OsZYIcEeBc

https://i.imgur.com/rvOhnkg.png

If anything, he bought satoshi credentials from the real satoshi or from someone else that bought them.

You think Satoshi would sell his soul like that when he was already rich?  Let's be logical. 

I think it's 100% possible that he sold his soul before he knew he was rich. People do strange things when they can't see the future.

All I know is that craig isn't the original Satoshi...regardless of any proof he thinks he has.  He may have worked with Satoshi, but that is all folks.

Its obviously nonesense. Anyone can see. They only doing that to create some traffic and that guy is just talking crap so he can get some fame or whatever motive he has. Satoshi wouldn't tell anyone who he was nor would he need to. Thinking othereose is plain silly.

These are all rumors and they will continue forever as everyone wants to be claiming the owner of bitcoins. The old thing which can stop all these false news is that Satoshi Nakamoto reveals himself in real and tell the media by coming live on media with solid facts.
I just wonder if he is still alive ?

If Craig Wright actually is Satoshi!

Then

Larry the Cable Guy actually is the Real Tooth Fairy.  :P

http://cdn.movieweb.com/img.news/NEOq5fSqNuMNSS_1_8.jpg


 8)

FYI:
Shock anyone back to sanity.  ;)

https://i.imgur.com/IgxgxGp.jpg

How do I earn wings?

Last I heard you have to sign a contract with Victoria Secrets.  ;)
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/64/3a/dd/643add0bf05d99b6a7dd66f601bbc289.jpg


 8)


FYI:
Or put 25 cents under Vlad's pillow for the tooth fairy wings.   :D

If Satoshi Nakamoto is an individual it would be the most wise for her/him not to reveal her/himself. Craig Wright appears to be an individual with narcissistic issues, it would more than surprise me if he'd be Satoshi after not being able to supply proof. In fact we pretty much know it isn't him indeed. May the real creator(s) remain a mystery, that's a good thing.

Its not proof for him someone to move the coins, and I reject the notion you should be allowed on this site or anywhere near cryptography or programing.

Red Bull will give you wings  ::)

Satoshi: http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2009-January/015014.html


<follow link to source (https://books.google.com/books?id=LchFDAAAQBAJ&pg=PR23&lpg=PR23&dq=May+2007+satoshi&source=bl&ots=AqsKfX6HlE&sig=xfJ4YXOHY7NGD7kFVl2oZOlIhi0&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiy_dLS04jSAhVB-WMKHXuPDV0Q6AEIUDAM#v=onepage&q=May%202007%20satoshi&f=false), or>


https://i.imgur.com/fAUdNeq.png

So, Satoshi Nakamoto envisioned a real-world currency that wouldn't be used in the real world, e.g. Starbucks (no pun intended)? Shame on you, CSW!

Robsa comments at coindesk: "Someone or the group that invented bitcoin solved the double spending problem for digital currencies, implemented the first blockchain, deployed the first decentralized digital currency and did so while remaining unknown. They are unlikely to then act as clumsily as Wright."

Craig may have known who the real Satoshi was, and acts as if he knows that if he makes outrageous claims, he wouldnt be refuted by the real Satoshi...so he knows Satoshi died in 2013.

You monkeys ready for the next Wright act?  You about to get REKT!

I guess you are mostly nitpicking

Nowhere in the quote which you cited Satoshi says about Bitcoin as a "real-world currency". In fact, you are outright distorting his words since he just says about using Bitcoin across "Internets". Nevertheless, if you consider a currency used in such a way as a real-world currency (which I basically agree with, given the role Internet now plays and the place it now takes), you shouldn't then claim that it can't be used in the real world since it directly follows from your own assumption that Internet is (a significant part of) the real world

Though some of the information had or may resembles the person who died last 2013 due to a car accident, it has not been founded that he is really satoshi.  So all we have right now are just speculation and wild guesses.  Only one thing to prove who the real satoshi is and that is to move the Bitcoin address that is under Satoshi's or sign a message from it.

What is Dr Craig Wrights stand on the blocksize debate, does anyone know what side he stands on? I haven't seen any comments from him on it although I don't take the guy too seriously.

But if he is Satoshi as he says then he should have some input on it that reflect the original proposal to scale as needed.

Dr. Wright says unlimited blocks.   :)

Though it is hard to believe but among all the individuals who claims to be satoshi only the person they considered dead last 2013 have a solid concrete evidence showing that he is satoshi. But I don not buy the idea and probably satoshi is still alive and watching how bitcoin evolves and was busy selling his millions of bitcoin at his disposal.

Well anything goes to be quite frank. We will never know who the real SATOSHI is without concrete evidence and proof. This maybe just another good write up job from Coindesk to attract more readers to its fold.

Where did he talk about the scaling issue and i could not find any documents or videos that Craig wright talks about scaling and i have not seen him supporting unlimited blocks,Craig being a developer he could very well understand the weakness in their line of codes and for that sole reason he wont support them :P i do accept that they do have a good theory but they should have backed that up with a bug free code.

Long back itself Graig Maxwell have been claiming him as Satoshi describing various reasons. But importantly revealing his identity doesn't gonna make any impact but as mentioned it might gain some reputation to coindesk. The innovation made by Satoshi is really good.

Don't think that Satoshi would reveal himself. It would just be a bad move and best avoided.
Some people love him some not so much so rather be safe.