Bitcoin Forum

Bitcoin => Hardware => Topic started by: Bicknellski on August 11, 2014, 08:55:05 AM



Title: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on August 11, 2014, 08:55:05 AM
https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/thumbup.gif

[Thumbs Up]

Reputable companies that you can expect delivery on time and to spec and will when they are in error provide reasonable and equitable relief to the customers satisfaction. In no particular order of importance.

 AAUER1's Twinfury USB Miner (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=345294.msg3700722#msg3700722)
 The ASICMINER Project (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99497.0)
IASCICMINER (Asicminer Tube Miner Promoted by FriedCat) (http://www.iasicminer.com/index.php/action-channel-name-home)
 Ben Turas One String Miner (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=495536.msg5457850#msg5457850)
Bitfury (http://www.bitfury.org/)
 Bitmaintech (https://bitmaintech.com/productDetail.htm?pid=00020140630025130637RV8OhOwt06BC)
BTCGarden (http://www.btcgarden.com/product)
 CanaryInTheMine Group Buy AsicMiner Tube's (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=735982.msg8313995#msg8313995)
CrazyGuy's ASICpuppy Miner Reseller (https://asicpuppy.com/magentoPuppy/)
 Easy 2 Mine owned by 李培才 (http://www.easy2mine.com)
Rockminer (http://shop.rockminer.com/goods.php?id=45)
Spondoolies Tech (http://www.spondoolies-tech.com/products/sp30-yukon-september-batch-2)
 VS3's Nanofury USB Miner (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=321287.msg3441097#msg3441097)
Yiazo (http://www.yiazo.com/product/ybf-300ghs-miner-set/)

-------------------------------------------

https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/thumbdown.gif

[Thumbs Down]

Unreputable companies that have provided late delivery or not to spec and will not or have yet to provided adequate relief to customers when the company is in error. In no particular order of importance.

KNC  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=170332.msg8341946#msg8341946)
CoinTerra (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=619784.msg6862490#msg6862490)   
Butterfly Labs (http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/09/feds-label-bitcoin-miner-maker-butterfly-labs-as-systematic-deception/)
HashFast (http://www.extremetech.com/uncategorized/173772-bitcoin-asic-manufacturer-hashfast-facing-lawsuits-over-alleged-false-advertising-fluctuating-bitcoin-prices)
Bitmine (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=291141.0)
Technobit (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=358439.msg5089474#msg5089474)
Avalon (http://www.asicbitcoinmining.info/2013/06/concern-grows-over-possible-avalon_8.html)
Black Arrow (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=681965.msg7734528#msg7734528)
AMT (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=752116.msg8507772#msg8507772)
VMC (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=206488.msg8221340#msg8221340)
nTek (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=579457.0)
Minersource (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=705442.msg7972380#msg7972380)

-------------------------------------------

[REASONING]

Here is my biased and opinionated guide on purchasing hardware. I am only taking into account which companies have, in my personal assessment, a reputation for delivering on time and to spec without any significant or outstanding customer service issues. This is not a comparative chart it is merely a suggestion for consumers looking for a starting point rather than having to read through all the forums and other media.

As the OP I am willing to move companies in or out of either area given sufficient complaints from customers or sufficient rectification of past indiscretions based sufficient CUSTOMER feedback from those who were injured initially. Feel free to discuss my biased and opinionated ratings in this an unmoderated thread. I value the opinions of actual customers over the fabricator in every case. If you are here to troll me I will simply ignore you and move on to the topic at hand.

Please note there are only two categories so you will need to weigh the merits on your own and determine whether or not you would recommend someone trust a company to deliver on time and to specification and will if in error resolve any and all disputes with their customer base. Let me know if I am missing any fabricators far or wide inside or outside bitcointalk remember NO SCRYPT or ALTCOIN. ONLY SHA256 box makers please. Obviously we will just avoid the outright scams that never shipped a unit right? And please make sure to debate vigorously if you feel I am wrong in my opinion. I will change it based on evidence of customer support for the company is fairly universal.

Remember this guide is just the starting point. You can scan the list and agree or disagree and do your own research. I am giving you my best appraisal based on the reading of the bitcointalk forums and other sources. It is not a comparison of companies. It is just meant to give you a starting point especially for new members to source miners. And as always... read the  Caveat Emptor (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=504530.msg5557195#msg5557195) by Gmaxwell and learn any purchase of mining equipment is a crapshoot at best. Good Luck hope it helps you avoid the pitfalls when buying miners.

Oh here is a great rant about ROI.  Some rants about Financial ROI by TheRealSteve (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=464496.msg6540642#msg6540642)


-------------------------------------------


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on August 11, 2014, 08:55:19 AM
[UPDATES]

25.SEP.2014

Loshia / Marto74 concerted effort to spam this thread goes on. Thanks for keep the thread at the top for me fellas more people get to see the message never buy Technobit. Keep spamming please.

23.SEP.2014

FTC shutsdown BFL (http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/09/feds-label-bitcoin-miner-maker-butterfly-labs-as-systematic-deception/)

Quote
The Federal Trade Commission has filed a civil lawsuit against Butterfly Labs (BFL), an embattled Kansas-based Bitcoin miner manufacturer. The FTC alleges that the company engaged in fraudulent and deceptive practices.

Federal authorities believe that the three named members of the company’s board of directors—Jody Drake (aka Darla Drake), Nasser Ghoseiri, and Sonny Vleisides—spent millions of corporate revenue on all kinds of things, including saunas and guns, while ignoring many customer orders that went unfulfilled or were significantly delayed.

31.AUG.2014

Minersource added to Thumbs Down list. Regardless of the causes no one at this point no one can claim that Minersource has delivered everything promptly, and compensated everyone appropriately. There are a significant number of outstanding issues with this supplier on several fronts. Best to avoid them entirely.

21.AUG.2014

Revised Thumbs Up section with appropriate company name as IASICMINER which is clearly separate from The ASICMINER Project although promoted by FriedCat the people you are dealing with are different than FriedCat. I will continue to review the information if there is more concrete information that The ASICMINER Project and IASICMINER should be considered the same company / people then I will update. As it stands now they are different people given the posts. The suggested edit came from aerobatic which led me to revise in this manner. Thanks for the heads up aerobatic.

19.AUG.2014

Bitmaintech resolves issue. I feel that this was an oversight and they are now compliant I hope.

Dear Community,

Our truly apologies for the mis-understanding reported in this Support Thread. We are very willing to share the cgminer code to the Community.
Just reviewed our internal resource again, there is a little mis-communicaton between Customer Service Team and R&D Department. We thought this task was done 3 weeks ago..  
However, R&D Department is repacking the cgminer code and will upload it to GitHub.com in 3 hours.

Any advice from the Community and Global Customers is appreciated, feel free to contact us via PM or info@bitmaintech.com.

Thank you!


Cgminer 3.12.0 has been uploaded, https://github.com/bitmaintech/cgminer. The latest version will be updated in 2 weeks.


17.AUG.2014

Have added the AsicMiner Tube page here to the list. http://www.iasicminer.com/index.php/action-channel-name-home  
Have added CanaryInTheMine's Group Buy for AsicMiner Tubes here. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=735982.msg8313995#msg8313995

Notice... watching carefully how Bitmaintech handles the calls from CKolivas to provide the code. This could push the rating to Thumbs Down if Bitmaintech doesn't make good on providing the code as per the license. Requested here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671189.msg8302469#msg8302469

Hi BITMAIN.

As you're an official representative of bitmain, may I ask you to please provide the source code for your modifications to cgminer in the form of the driver for the S3. cgminer is provided under the GPL version 3 license which means you are obliged by law to provide the source code to any modifications you do if you distribute binaries and you are distributing modified cgminer binaries with every S3.

Provision of the source code would allow us to aid the development of your driver and help bring your version to sync up with the latest cgminer to derive the benefits of newer versions along with its many fixes.

16.AUG.2014

Have added a 2 resellers of miners that currently have excellent shipping records.

CrazyGuy's ASICpuppy Miner Reseller (https://asicpuppy.com/magentoPuppy/)
PCFLI Miner Reseller (http://www.easy2mine.com)


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bickellski's Bias and Opinionated Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Norcoin_ on August 11, 2014, 08:59:15 AM
KNC togheter with BFL? that's harsh  :P


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on August 11, 2014, 08:59:53 AM
KNC togheter with BFL? that's harsh  :P

Late delivery?

No?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=170332.msg8244455#msg8244455

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=170332.msg8234449#msg8234449

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=170332.msg8194146#msg8194146

Seems to me customers are NOT happy. So my opinion is don't buy KnC.

Same with BFL for obvious reasons.

There are only 2 categories here. Thumbs Up or Thumbs Down. Not doing any "comprehensive" assessment here just basing off a simple set of criteria. Has the company in question delivered on time, to spec and if not have they compensated everyone properly or done everything in their power to provide a fair and equitable solution to the consumers who have legitimate complaints.



Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bickellski's Bias and Opinionated Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Norcoin_ on August 11, 2014, 09:13:06 AM
KNC togheter with BFL? that's harsh  :P

Late delivery?

No?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=170332.msg8244455#msg8244455

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=170332.msg8234449#msg8234449

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=170332.msg8194146#msg8194146

Seems to me customers are NOT happy. So my opinion is don't buy KnC.

Same with BFL for obvious reasons.

There are only 2 categories here. Thumbs Up or Thumbs Down. Not doing any "comprehensive" assessment here just basing off a simple set of criteria. Has the company in question delivered on time, to spec and if not have they compensated everyone properly or done everything in their power to provide a fair and equitable solution to the consumers who have legitimate complaints.

Remember this is guide is just the starting point. You can scan the list and agree or disagree and do your own research. I am giving you my best appraisal based on the reading of the bitcointalk forums and other sources. It is not a comparison of companies. It is just meant to give you a starting point for new members to source miners. As always... read the https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=170332.msg8194146#msg8194146 Caveat Emptor from Gmaxwell and learn any purchase of mining equipment is a crapshoot at best. Good Luck.

I got my jupiter that was over spec in time, well almost. I asked for a refund on the neptunes which I got fast. So my experience is that they at least are people with some integrity, more then you can say about anybody at BFL.

Now I remember why I got my refund, they used my money on a datorhall. I changed my mind, thumbs down.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on August 11, 2014, 09:16:21 AM
KNC togheter with BFL? that's harsh  :P

Late delivery?

No?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=170332.msg8244455#msg8244455

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=170332.msg8234449#msg8234449

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=170332.msg8194146#msg8194146

Seems to me customers are NOT happy. So my opinion is don't buy KnC.

Same with BFL for obvious reasons.

There are only 2 categories here. Thumbs Up or Thumbs Down. Not doing any "comprehensive" assessment here just basing off a simple set of criteria. Has the company in question delivered on time, to spec and if not have they compensated everyone properly or done everything in their power to provide a fair and equitable solution to the consumers who have legitimate complaints.

Remember this is guide is just the starting point. You can scan the list and agree or disagree and do your own research. I am giving you my best appraisal based on the reading of the bitcointalk forums and other sources. It is not a comparison of companies. It is just meant to give you a starting point for new members to source miners. As always... read the https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=170332.msg8194146#msg8194146 Caveat Emptor from Gmaxwell and learn any purchase of mining equipment is a crapshoot at best. Good Luck.

I got my jupiter that was over spec in time, well almost. I asked for a refund on the neptunes which I got fast. So my experience is that they at least are people with some integrity, more then you can say about anybody at BFL.

Now I remember why I got my refund, they used my money on a datorhall. I changed my mind, thumbs down.

Thanks for the feedback. Yes there are many stories like those about KnC unfortunately. Can't recommend a company that uses it's customers in that fashion.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bickellski's Bias and Opinionated Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Norcoin_ on August 11, 2014, 09:20:32 AM
I have not used technobit myself, but I have seen that he is very fast on designing new miners. Why thumbs down?


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on August 11, 2014, 09:22:29 AM
I have not used technobit myself, but I have seen that he is very fast on designing new miners. Why thumbs down?

There are a number of unresolved issues with some customers as well as scores of customers that were poorly treated and lied to directly and this is well documented in the threads. I can not recommend a company that is unwilling to resolve customer complaints. If those who were burned are made whole then I am more than willing to change my opinion. At this point I don't see how that is going to happen given the stance of the company towards some of their customers. Given what passes as customer service it is not a company I would recommend based on even present threads in the last few weeks with regards to RMA's.

This is not a guide on how fast you come to market. It is a guide on how well you deal with the consumer bottomline and there are clearly persistent issues with this company and their treatment of consumers. I would never personally recommend a company that has outstanding issues with the community especially when you might even have suspicions they use multiple accounts to misrepresent their customer service. There is clearly an inordinate amount of NEW members posting on how great the Technobit service is. It is an anomaly that doesn't go unnoticed by senior members and should give you pause about the reality with that company especially given how many complaints there are right up to today.

As an example Avalon would be thumbs down until we are given the whole story of what went down during the chip fiasco last year. You can't rely on a company that has willfully ignored the community asking for accountability. As such you are much better off dealing only with companies that have proven trustworthy. Again my opinion but there is certainly less risk involved dealing with companies on the THUMBS UP side vs. the THUMBS DOWN side.

Bitmain or Rockminer does very well shipping almost real time with minimal delays / pre-order and at a reasonable price. Why not use them over a company that could be suspect? That to me is why you use this guide. You cut through the crap and get to the point. Who is reliable all the time. The pattern continues... be warned.


Update.
The boards are populated and tested @ this stage.
@ the moment each board is tested with heatsink and cooler.
This is a slow process. Then the boards pass 2 hour test each.
Hopefuly will manage to start shipping in Saturday.
Our shipping girl will start contacting you all tommorow for transport details
Anything happening in the shipping department Marto?

Has anyone been contacted by Technobit yet?


Nor I, the bankwire thing that he instructed us to do if we were apart of the group buy hasn't even gone through yet.

My BA order got into Bulgaria on the 8th of August and since then the delivery looks like it has not been picked up yet.

-No update from Marto on this (multiple messages sent in the past week)
-No processing of my order since I made it on the 5th of August and because of that:
-No reference number to send to Marto for him to look into


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Norcoin_ on August 11, 2014, 10:01:20 AM
I have not used technobit myself, but I have seen that he is very fast on designing new miners. Why thumbs down?

There are a number of unresolved issues with some customers as well as scores of customers that were poorly treated and lied to directly and this is well documented in the threads. I can not recommend a company that is unwilling to resolve customer complaints. If those who were burned are made whole then I am more than willing to change my opinion. At this point I don't see how that is going to happen given the stance of the company towards some of their customers. Given what passes as customer service it is not a company I would recommend based on even present threads in the last few weeks with regards to RMA's.

This is not a guide on how fast you come to market. It is a guide on how well you deal with the consumer bottomline and there are clearly persistent issues with this company and their treatment of consumers. I would never personally recommend a company that has outstanding issues with the community.

As an example Avalon would be thumbs down until we are given the whole story of what went down during the chip fiasco last year. You can't rely on a company that has willfully ignored the community asking for accountability. As such you are much better off dealing only with companies that have proven trustworthy. Again my opinion but there is certainly less risk involved dealing with companies on the THUMBS UP side vs. the THUMBS DOWN side.

Bitmain or Rockerbox does very well shipping almost real time with minimal delays / pre-order and at a reasonable price. Why not use them over a company that could be suspect?

My personal choice is Spondoolies and Bitmain. They have both delivered on time, Spondoolies disappointed me a bit with underperforming sp30, but I am sure the compensation will be fair.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on August 11, 2014, 10:05:40 AM
I have not used technobit myself, but I have seen that he is very fast on designing new miners. Why thumbs down?

There are a number of unresolved issues with some customers as well as scores of customers that were poorly treated and lied to directly and this is well documented in the threads. I can not recommend a company that is unwilling to resolve customer complaints. If those who were burned are made whole then I am more than willing to change my opinion. At this point I don't see how that is going to happen given the stance of the company towards some of their customers. Given what passes as customer service it is not a company I would recommend based on even present threads in the last few weeks with regards to RMA's.

This is not a guide on how fast you come to market. It is a guide on how well you deal with the consumer bottomline and there are clearly persistent issues with this company and their treatment of consumers. I would never personally recommend a company that has outstanding issues with the community.

As an example Avalon would be thumbs down until we are given the whole story of what went down during the chip fiasco last year. You can't rely on a company that has willfully ignored the community asking for accountability. As such you are much better off dealing only with companies that have proven trustworthy. Again my opinion but there is certainly less risk involved dealing with companies on the THUMBS UP side vs. the THUMBS DOWN side.

Bitmain or Rockminer does very well shipping almost real time with minimal delays / pre-order and at a reasonable price. Why not use them over a company that could be suspect?

My personal choice is Spondoolies and Bitmain. They have both delivered on time, Spondoolies disappointed me a bit with underperforming sp30, but I am sure the compensation will be fair.

Yes I am a customer of both of these companies. I am hopeful that SPTech will compensate in a reasonable fashion. They have in the past. Minor issues with S2 Antminer Bitmaintech boards bouncing out during transport and dead PSU's but compensation was offered but shipping back a PSU makes little sense when you need to get these things up and running asap and the cost of boxing it up and VAT coming back etc just not worth it. Happy with both of these companies so far... and it is clear consumers are very happy with them as well. I am also keen on becoming a ROCKMINER customer soon.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: jimmothy on August 11, 2014, 10:20:06 AM
Why is btcgarden unreputable?

They have almost no complaints, communication is great, hardware ships immediately, and performs exactly as advertised.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on August 11, 2014, 10:20:38 AM
Why is btcgarden unreputable?

They have no complaints, hardware ships immediately and performs exactly as advertised.

Checking the threads... adding links soon.

IPO?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=264696.msg2922342#msg2922342

Does that not merit concerns for people?
Can you trust them given this sort of past behaviour?

Scanning threads for more.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=622439.msg8147577#msg8147577 <-- Delivery 3 - 7 days... on spec only minor issues and they are very responsive and helpful in thread.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=622439.msg8288576#msg8288576 <-- Responsive to customer calls for discounting of pricing.

I am moving them to Thumbs Up and will continue scanning. Thanks for the heads up Jimmothy.

But still let us have a serious discussion about the aborted IPO... doesn't that give you pause even with the good shipping etc I wonder how many people were hurt in the IPO. Smells bad can you give any insight into that? I will start reading through the IPO stuff now and comment later.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: jimmothy on August 11, 2014, 10:54:15 AM
Why is btcgarden unreputable?

They have no complaints, hardware ships immediately and performs exactly as advertised.

Checking the threads... adding links soon.

IPO?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=264696.msg2922342#msg2922342

Does that not merit concerns for people?
Can you trust them given this sort of past behaviour?

Scanning threads for more.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=622439.msg8147577#msg8147577 <-- Delivery 3 - 7 days... on spec only minor issues and they are very responsive and helpful in thread.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=622439.msg8288576#msg8288576 <-- Responsive to customer calls for discounting of pricing.

I am moving them to Thumbs Up and will continue scanning. Thanks for the heads up Jimmothy.

But still let us have a serious discussion about the aborted IPO... doesn't that give you pause?

I'm not sure what concerns the IPO raises. An IPO is much better than crowdfunding via preorders like avalon/bitfury/knc. I invested in the IPO and what happened was someone made phony complaints to the local police after the IPO was successful. IPO was cancelled because of the legal risks and every bitcoin was returned. Nobody was unhappy with how it turned out as far as I could tell.

They funded a generation of asics with their own money (designed/produced their own chips and all) and if they were scammers they would have ran with the few thousand BTC they raised during that IPO instead of returning it all.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on August 11, 2014, 10:59:57 AM
Why is btcgarden unreputable?

They have no complaints, hardware ships immediately and performs exactly as advertised.

Checking the threads... adding links soon.

IPO?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=264696.msg2922342#msg2922342

Does that not merit concerns for people?
Can you trust them given this sort of past behaviour?

Scanning threads for more.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=622439.msg8147577#msg8147577 <-- Delivery 3 - 7 days... on spec only minor issues and they are very responsive and helpful in thread.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=622439.msg8288576#msg8288576 <-- Responsive to customer calls for discounting of pricing.

I am moving them to Thumbs Up and will continue scanning. Thanks for the heads up Jimmothy.

But still let us have a serious discussion about the aborted IPO... doesn't that give you pause?

I'm not sure what concerns the IPO raises. An IPO is much better than crowdfunding via preorders like avalon/bitfury/knc. I invested in the IPO and what happened was someone made phony complaints to the local police after the IPO was successful. IPO was cancelled because of the legal risks and every bitcoin was returned. Nobody was unhappy with how it turned out as far as I could tell.

They funded a generation of asics with their own money (designed/produced their own chips and all) and if they were scammers they would have ran with the few thousand BTC they raised during that IPO instead of returning it all.

Raises many concerns if investors were hurt.

Are there instances of people being hurt in that IPO?

Or did everyone get money back and are or were not overly concerned with being dumped as investors?

Given what little I have read seems to be that they reimbursed everyone although there are some people who were at the time very pissed off. Not sure how that translates into loses at the time. But again that is something people need to consider when making a choice to buy. Ethics could be questioned here should there be some in the community that still feel this company can't be trusted. Anyhow doesn't look like you want to discuss what went on so I will have to review the thread on my own and ask people who were pissed at the time as IPO investors are still pissed now or feel injured as a result. Given their openness and delivery and zero issues with current shipping etc I feel comfortable putting them in the Thumbs Up on your advice. Thanks again.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=264696.msg2915126#msg2915126 <-- Example of pissed investor suggesting impropriety in the IPO compensation.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=264696.msg2914929#msg2914929 <-- Reason for cancelling the IPO.

Unlike Avalon who never came forward and explained what happened to our CHIPS and blaming the whole thing on Yifu without any clarification... I am much more comfortable with BTC Garden given how they rectified the IPO even with some complaints and how they deal in real time with customers in the thread as you pointed out. It is often more about how companies handle the problems than a seamless delivery on spec in my estimation.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: bbxx on August 11, 2014, 12:19:29 PM
Why is btcgarden unreputable?

They have almost no complaints, communication is great, hardware ships immediately, and performs exactly as advertised.

i can confirm this, their miners are very stable and working as advertised.
communication is perfect.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: dogie on August 11, 2014, 12:55:04 PM
Maybe you should concentrate on wasp rather than proving than no one will ever be happy with any answer anyone comes up with, even one as basic as good or bad.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Xian01 on August 11, 2014, 01:11:29 PM
Maybe you should concentrate on wasp rather than proving than no one will ever be happy with any answer anyone comes up with, even one as basic as good or bad.
Amen.

The Wasp project has become a big joke to me as a result of Bicks' social-justice-warrior efforts here.

*mumbles something about glass-houses*


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: wpgdeez on August 11, 2014, 01:17:16 PM
Maybe you should concentrate on wasp rather than proving than no one will ever be happy with any answer anyone comes up with, even one as basic as good or bad.
A little competition never hurt anyone.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on August 11, 2014, 01:53:46 PM
Interesting.

Attack the man.

Goes without saying you seem to ignore the point of others offering you advice.

How about you work on your thread and how transparent it is and I will work on mine and as for working on the Wasp there are 54 other people you included that are members of that group. Feel free to step up and do more if you like. As for Xian01... he should go worry about BCP19 and the BFL thread seems he can't leave that mole alone.

Interesting that no one commented on the ratings. Laughable.

Maybe you should concentrate on wasp rather than proving than no one will ever be happy with any answer anyone comes up with, even one as basic as good or bad.
Amen.

The Wasp project has become a big joke to me as a result of Bicks' social-justice-warrior efforts here.

*mumbles something about glass-houses*

EDIT: More to the point and the main reason a simple thumbs up thumbs down like this is more in keeping with the consumer focus that is required here in these forums. It really seems to me that the OTHER COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE is more about being fair to the manufacturer than being responsible to the consumer. So much for listening to the community.

Refunds are significantly delayed and they have used stall tactics.  You act insulted when people question your ratings, but you choose to ignore these serious problems.  I was supposed to be refunded 3 months ago.  It's really significant actually.  And they use stall tactics.

You are not helping the little guys when you ignore this stuff.  Some of us can't afford to lose that money, and if you rate them as 'fine' they have no real reason to pay us back.  

"1 - refunds significantly delayed or not being processed at all. Includes stall tactics."  is the truth


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on August 11, 2014, 01:57:31 PM
Maybe you should concentrate on wasp rather than proving than no one will ever be happy with any answer anyone comes up with, even one as basic as good or bad.
A little competition never hurt anyone.

I am not in competition with his version.

I am posting this as a guide to people who may not want to spend an inordinate time reading all the reasons why he arrived at a score and then ignore the consumers who have complained about company X or Y. Let me make it brutally clear that this is a biased guide that is CONSUMER CENTRIC not MANUFACTURER CENTRIC unlike his guide.  

Again it is always on the consumer to make the choice. I hope what I provide is the starting point for people to make a better informed decision. I don't know anyone with any time spent in these forums that is going to complain much about this "system" because I am willing to actually listen to people if they have concerns about my ratings and change them. Unlike those that think they have a system without bias or a personal skew. Don't take my word for it. Just go read his thread... plenty of justifiable complaints there.



Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bickellski's Bias and Opinionated Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: HarmonLi on August 11, 2014, 01:58:57 PM
KNC togheter with BFL? that's harsh  :P

At first I also thought that this is a tad extreme, but you really have to look how they continued to get worse and worse. They didn't meet their delivery promises, the miners seemed to be used. They tricked customers into new terms and also refused refunds. They used to be a very good manufacturer and a ray of light in this dark area, but it seems they've gone a long way since then!


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bickellski's Bias & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on August 11, 2014, 02:01:41 PM
KNC togheter with BFL? that's harsh  :P

At first I also thought that this is a tad extreme, but you really have to look how they continued to get worse and worse. They didn't meet their delivery promises, the miners seemed to be used. They tricked customers into new terms and also refused refunds. They used to be a very good manufacturer and a ray of light in this dark area, but it seems they've gone a long way since then!

The bottomline would you recommend anyone purchasing their units? I think you agree with me no you wouldn't.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: deeneendo on August 11, 2014, 02:02:23 PM
Hi Bicknellski,

you can add fibonnac.io to the list of unreputable manufacturers... It doesn't look like they will ever deliver, fortunately, I got a refund

Greetings,

deeneendo


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on August 11, 2014, 02:05:17 PM
Hi Bicknellski,

you can add fibonnac.io to the list of unreputable manufacturers... It doesn't look like they will ever deliver, fortunately, I got a refund

Greetings,

deeneendo

Can I get the link so I can read up on it?

Is it a straight up scam or have they delivered anything before?

Those are scrypt miners... I am not well enough informed about those and this is a BTC guide. Sorry won't be adding them or Alpha etc.



Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bickellski's Bias and Opinionated Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: HarmonLi on August 11, 2014, 02:06:05 PM
KNC togheter with BFL? that's harsh  :P

At first I also thought that this is a tad extreme, but you really have to look how they continued to get worse and worse. They didn't meet their delivery promises, the miners seemed to be used. They tricked customers into new terms and also refused refunds. They used to be a very good manufacturer and a ray of light in this dark area, but it seems they've gone a long way since then!

The bottomline would you recommend anyone purchasing their units? I think you agree with me no you wouldn't.

You're right not recommending them (at least currently). I wouldn't say they're BFL, but definitely not recommend them to anyone interested in buying a new miner at the moment!!!


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on August 11, 2014, 02:12:30 PM
What do home miners have to compete with?

http://bitcoinagile.com/81AF6/inside-a-chinese-bitcoin-mine-the-coinsman_stream


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: HarmonLi on August 11, 2014, 02:31:32 PM
What do home miners have to compete with?

http://bitcoinagile.com/81AF6/inside-a-chinese-bitcoin-mine-the-coinsman_stream

Chinese mining farms are crazy! It's so incredible... Why is it always that "The Chinese" are doing these things that seem to get totally out of proportion? If it comes to Bitcoin mining it is clear that you need to keep your costs down and it's purely margin hunting. But, wow still...


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: dogie on August 11, 2014, 02:38:56 PM
You mean like how you accused me of being biased, even though my rating scheme is laid out in full, is numerical and is automatic according to the automatic criteria?

And no, I am not a member of Wasp, I didn't join that for a reason. You left me positive trust for being 'such an asset to the community' to get me to join, then removed it when my views didn't align exactly with yours (or the other 50,000 chefs who all think their opinions can equally be integrated into ONE rating).

I suggested you go deal with WASP that seeing as you are the only person working on it and everyone wants to sell their shares. And yes, I am still on that mailing list, and yes, I have asked several times to be removed from it.

Interesting.

Attack the man.

Goes without saying you seem to ignore the point of others offering you advice.

How about you work on your thread and how transparent it is and I will work on mine and as for working on the Wasp there are 54 other people you included that are members of that group. Feel free to step up and do more if you like. As for Xian01... he should go worry about BCP19 and the BFL thread seems he can't leave that mole alone.

Interesting that no one commented on the ratings. Laughable.

Maybe you should concentrate on wasp rather than proving than no one will ever be happy with any answer anyone comes up with, even one as basic as good or bad.
Amen.

The Wasp project has become a big joke to me as a result of Bicks' social-justice-warrior efforts here.

*mumbles something about glass-houses*


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on August 11, 2014, 02:41:22 PM
Do what you like if you have problem with my ratings feel free to comment. All I see here is someone that can't accept constructive criticisms as evidenced in your thread by a significant number of people.

I am not concerned with your guide as much you seem to be concerned with mine. Feel free to ignore my biased one and work on your far superior less bias one. I won't be back commenting in yours trust me nothing seems to change even when people present you with evidence to the contrary.

We already heard your PLEA for me to go work on the WASP and again there are 54 others than can do more than they have already bar Dick I suppose so I am pretty comfortable posting my own guide and that has little or nothing to do with what is or isn't happening in the WPC. Just you go back to working on your threads you have more than enough to worry about than what I have as a hobby and it really is telling that you seem to want to make this about everything other than a simple guide for new miners. Sad. :( . Haters gonna hate and it is clear you have a problem with being a hater right now.

snip

Quote
Bicknellski 37: -0 / +27(27)   2014-03-28   0.00000000   Reference   Dogie has consistently provided worthwhile and necessary reviews and his current review of ASIC manufacturing companies is definitely one of the most informative posts currently in custom hardware. This alone should save people MILLIONS in losses if they apply all the information he has posted. (Delete)

I don't think so buddy. You got all that backwards. As for being or not being a member... if you paid your $100 you are a member. If you didn't sorry you are receiving emails. I am sure we can rectify that easily.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Xian01 on August 11, 2014, 02:51:18 PM
As for Xian01... he should go worry about BCP19 and the BFL thread seems he can't leave that mole alone.

Seriously Darin ?!

Are you fucking serious right now ?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg7649232#msg7649232

Is your memory that short ?!

Fuck you and the horse you rode in on.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on August 11, 2014, 02:53:15 PM
You seem to be the one with problem not me.

Ignore.

No point to listening to someone that lost the plot.


Snip


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: dogie on August 11, 2014, 02:57:22 PM
All I see here is someone that can't accept constructive criticisms as evidenced in your thread by a significant number of people.

What you still don't seem to understand is that when 20 people have different opinions, you can't make 20 people happy. 5-10 of those will not 'get their way' and will stomp and cry that you're not listening because you simply can't please everyone when you can only provide one solution. I don't think this thread will teach you that as a 'good/bad' system is as basic as it gets.


Title: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on August 11, 2014, 02:59:38 PM
snip

Welcome to the ignore list. What you don't get is I don't really have time to CARE about your guide. Go fix it or don't, again not my problem. Doesn't seem to be about whether or not this guide ratings are up to snuff it is about you arguing about your thread and the WPC. Not really on topic. Ignored. Feel free to talk to the wall I will be focused on people who want to engage in debate on the topics offered here it is not about your threads so you can go back there and deal with your hurt feelings there. Note I haven't and won't change your trust rating it was never a ploy given it wasn't me that suggested your name to come to the WPC. Your rating is still valid after what BFL did as it was before what BFL did and that is the actual reason it was changed to the current rating nothing to do with the WPC sorry buddy way off the mark again.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Gleb Gamow on August 11, 2014, 03:01:53 PM
Consider putting both lists in the OP in alphabetical order, bud.

I'm fully aware that you may still have your differences with me, for whatever reasons, but still I offer up this kind suggestion. Even if you implement my suggestion, feel free to maintain the sentiment you may still have toward me. I am glad we haven't locked horns lately, hoping this post doesn't rekindle said locking.

Somebody quote me in case I'm on ignore, echoing the suggestion if you believe it has merit.

~Bruno Kucinskas


Title: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on August 11, 2014, 03:03:24 PM
Consider putting both lists in the OP in alphabetical order, bud.

I'm fully aware that you may still have your differences with me, for whatever reasons, but still I offer up this kind suggestion. Even if you implement my suggestion, feel free to maintain the sentiment you may still have toward me. I am glad we haven't locked horns lately, hoping this post doesn't rekindle said locking.

Somebody quote me in case I'm on ignore, echoing the suggestion if you believe it has merit.

~Bruno Kucinskas

A - Z for the Thumbs Up sounds doable... for the Thumbs Down don't really care.

My issue with you Bruno were simple ones. You know what they are / were no need to go into those I suppose that is for another thread.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Xian01 on August 11, 2014, 03:04:41 PM
No point to listening to someone that lost the plot.

Dare I ask what plot you are referring to ?

Is it the plot where you pontificate from your holier-than-thou glass house-on-high; slamming other vendors while you suffer with your own production setbacks and delays ?

Nope. No hypocrisy or double standard here.

Dogie and I aren't the problem here buddy. I appreciate what the dude has done for the community.

He's certainly contributed WAY more than you have at the end of the day.




Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Xian01 on August 11, 2014, 03:06:14 PM
Welcome to the ignore list.
Oooh ! Can I play too ?!

Christ Darin... such a fucking man-child.

I would like to say it's been nice knowing you... but...


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: dogie on August 11, 2014, 03:25:20 PM

You've been on mine since May April ^_^


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: dropt on August 11, 2014, 03:31:05 PM

You've been on mine since May April ^_^

Yet, you're well aware of his threads and posts.  That's interesting, really.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: dogie on August 11, 2014, 03:38:00 PM
Yet, you're well aware of his threads and posts.  That's interesting, really.
[/quote]

You've been on mine since May April ^_^

Yet, you're well aware of his threads and posts.  That's interesting, really.

Ignore function doesn't delete people, especially when they accuse you in your own thread of being biased (and then get quoted by someone who isn't ignored)... Anyway, I'll let him do his thing.


Title: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on August 11, 2014, 03:40:00 PM
What do home miners have to compete with?

http://bitcoinagile.com/81AF6/inside-a-chinese-bitcoin-mine-the-coinsman_stream

Chinese mining farms are crazy! It's so incredible... Why is it always that "The Chinese" are doing these things that seem to get totally out of proportion? If it comes to Bitcoin mining it is clear that you need to keep your costs down and it's purely margin hunting. But, wow still...

Hey what about the BitFury one in Iceland... 20 Ph? Was it?

Those pictures of the Avalons just cast aside is really mind blowing. If only you had "free" electricity something green based... biodigestor or something right?

There are basically two scenarios I can think of why they would set them up in stages, test them on a couple of pools, take them down to test the next bulk and the switch them on bulk by bulk. However, none of these scenarios looks good for BitFury in the long term....

June 18 - June 29 was BitFury Georgian DC. 20MW deployment in 1.5 months. They've started in mid May.
What we see now is what George Kikvadze calls "Summer Surprise". It's their Icelandic DC.
I believe we can expect a continues cadence of 20 PH/s from BitFury every 2 months.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bickellski's Bias and Opinionated Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: xingqiaoyin on August 11, 2014, 03:52:53 PM
KNC togheter with BFL? that's harsh  :P

At first I also thought that this is a tad extreme, but you really have to look how they continued to get worse and worse. They didn't meet their delivery promises, the miners seemed to be used. They tricked customers into new terms and also refused refunds. They used to be a very good manufacturer and a ray of light in this dark area, but it seems they've gone a long way since then!

It is amazing how fast you could become a hero to zero in bitcoin world.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bickellski's Bias and Opinionated Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: marto74 on August 11, 2014, 04:48:56 PM
I have not used technobit myself, but I have seen that he is very fast on designing new miners. Why thumbs down?
Yes , but do not forget this is Bick and this is his personal opinion.
And it is what it is
We had a big forum war with him about a month ago , so ....;)


Title: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on August 12, 2014, 02:12:20 AM
KNC togheter with BFL? that's harsh  :P

At first I also thought that this is a tad extreme, but you really have to look how they continued to get worse and worse. They didn't meet their delivery promises, the miners seemed to be used. They tricked customers into new terms and also refused refunds. They used to be a very good manufacturer and a ray of light in this dark area, but it seems they've gone a long way since then!

It is amazing how fast you could become a hero to zero in bitcoin world.

All the way to the bank right? There have been millions "misappropriated" by many a hero now zero. And that is why you want to set the bar a bit higher to save people a buck in the long run. Just follow threads and read what is going on for those in the THUMBS DOWN section. Most of them continue to disappoint right up to today. You can see why people should avoid the thumbs down list when you continually see this lack of information. When people have more time to respond to this thread and ignore customers you have to consider why even bother ordering from companies like this when you have so many good options available.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=682105.msg8340699#msg8340699
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=682105.msg8327832#msg8327832
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=682105.msg8345100#msg8345100
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=682105.msg8318257#msg8318257
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=564612.msg8462935#msg8462935
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=682105.msg8484540#msg8484540

Only 2 boards shipped till now? 4 Weeks after chip arrival now, at least?
Is there anyone that actually got his X1/X3 shipping fee and extra psu they paid for back from Minersource since you converted to chips?

I know your busy Marto.. But a daily update would not hurt. In fact it would help you. I for one could care less if you say we had a step back as we ran into... blah blah blah. Fact is I am of the few who paid in full no conversion chips, and would like to know the status.

 My 12k venture hit 26k+ and I rely on you. The money I sent alone would pay 3 qualified workers for the next 3 weeks. That is just me...

Hy marto74,

i send you on 05.08. 2 broken mimers back. i send you a message to for my return delivery to you, for 2 broken miners.

The Tracking Code, Shows, that the miners wait till 12.08 in your local post office, why do you not pick them up?????

I LOST MANY TIME OF MINING!

AND when it comes back, i lost the delivery costs to, and have only broken miners from you!

Check your messages!



Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Niggle on August 12, 2014, 06:19:29 AM
Why the thumbs down for Avalon? I know they had their past problems but they are currently shipping in hand stock and fast. I got my 290gh module in Sydney, Australia in 6 days. Not bad I reckon.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: bbxx on August 14, 2014, 11:59:32 AM
NOTE: bbxx falsely accuses Beastlymac of a scam and goes on to lie. Trust ratings are there for legitimate claims of fraud or untrustworthy behavior. As such I gave him a negative trust rating for lying about Beastlymac. Check his negative rating  here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=39971), and the scam accusation lies  here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=712480.msg8347058#msg8347058). I will remove this note as soon as the Moderators move the post bbxx made that is off topic to scam accusations or elsewhere as it is way off topic.

i have deleted my post, but i am forced to defend

beastlymac within 4 months was denying any order, payment. finally he found secret list with order and put goods at auction. it is scam. pure fraud. my "lies" has been proven false.

thanks


Title: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on August 15, 2014, 06:47:11 AM
Arbitrage / Mining Alternatives to Revenue? (http://www.coindesk.com/bank-canada-research-cryptocurrency-arbitrage-doesnt-exist/)


Quote
Another trader, Joseph Lee, created arbitrage bots that managed his trading for a year, netting him hundreds of thousands of dollars. He has since retired the bots to focus on derivatives exchange BTC.sx. Lee also disagrees with the conclusions of Halaburda and Gandal’s working paper.

“Without a doubt, arbitrage opportunities have existed in [the period of study] and will always exist in the market. They even exist in the current financial market which has trillions of dollars of liquidity,” he said.

So you do not want to buy as there is no ROI? But are there opportunities in Arbitrage between exchanges for BTC or even between altcoins and BTC?

Don't chuck out the miners yet always a new way to skin a cat.

----

NOTE REINSTATED:

Again let us be clear bbxx falsely accuses Beastlymac of a scam and goes on to lie about the nature of the dispute. Trust ratings are there for legitimate claims of fraud or untrustworthy behavior. As such I gave him a negative trust rating for lying about Beastlymac. Check his negative rating  here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=39971), and the scam accusation lies here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=712480.msg8357710#msg8357710). I will only remove this note as soon as the Moderators move the post bbxx made that is off topic to scam accusations or elsewhere. Or bbxx deletes his post entirely from this thread and stops harassing people.


Quote
SAMPLE: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=712480.msg8357710#msg8357710

He was not ignored for 5 months I did respond to some of the messages sent although I do admit that my communication skills during that period was sub par.

He has withheld his shipping details from day one. Even though he stated. His package would have been delivered months ago had he provided his shipping details "in next days i will provide you shipping address plus i will send you cash for package to poland." As KWH has hinted at it is possible that curiousminer withheld his shipping details in an attempt to bet on the difficulty at the time they would have been delivered if the difficulty was good he would have kept his order if not he would have tried to get a refund. Maybe he was under the impression that getting a refund at a later date was a possibility because he did not read the rules that where stated in the thread that say that no refund could be given after the order had been submitted to the manufacturer.


Title: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on August 15, 2014, 06:49:50 AM
 Federal regulators are warning consumers about the risks of using virtual currencies such as Bitcoin. (http://www.foxbusiness.com/economy-policy/2014/08/11/us-regulator-calls-bitcoin-wild-west/)


Prudent?

This guide is hopefully making it less the standard for cowboys walking off with your bitcoins.


Title: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on August 15, 2014, 06:57:53 AM
Why the thumbs down for Avalon? I know they had their past problems but they are currently shipping in hand stock and fast. I got my 290gh module in Sydney, Australia in 6 days. Not bad I reckon.

Still outstanding issues with regards to the lost revenue on batches and chips. Given the millions they cost I can not personally recommend them until they give a full accounting of what happened. Particularly with the chips as many a good DIY developer tanked and are still in dire troubles as a result. If they were somehow able to rectify some of that I'd be more inclined to support Avalon but as it stands I don't think it is appropriate to recommend supporting a company that did so much damage. Sometimes it is probably best to avoid companies like this entirely in the hopes they do suffer the same fate they caused so many people... that fate... bankruptcy. Not unlike HashFast, Bitmine, and others that have failed to properly compensate people that is why I place Avalon in the thumbs down. Also given there are more reputable players without such baggage why bother with Avalon?

Although I will review any and all information you have on their current patterns I think they still have a lot to do to make up for what has transpired beyond shipping some units on time in the last few months.

My question is when do you trust a bad player given the damage ranged into the millions of USD? Ever? 3 Months? When Yifu left?

What do you think is an appropriate rehabilitation of this companies reputation given there are still people in debt as a result of their failures and they have not compensated those people properly? (Asking seriously here... maybe there is room for me to move my opinion but is just shipping today enough?)


Title: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on August 15, 2014, 11:23:54 AM
Added this good link to the original OP for miners interested in the topic ROI and USB Miners. Should help you make your decision easier.

 Some rants about Financial ROI by TheRealSteve (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=464496.msg6540642#msg6540642)

----

 In other news  (http://www.bitell.com/t/2034)

Quote
16:36 Aug.15 2014

Announcement from official Weibo of multiple cryptocurrency exchange Bter.com:

"Someone hacked Bter's NXT central account and stole 50m NXT. We are working with the dev for a plan. We will keep you updated."

The current price of NXT is around 0.2073 Yuan/NXT which means around 1.63million USD was stolen. So far, NXT transaction has been suspended on Bter.com.


Title: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on August 17, 2014, 01:44:01 PM
http://www.iasicminer.com/index.php/action-channel-name-home  

Adding this on the Thumbs up. Posted by FriedCat in the forums  here. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=735728.msg8310763#msg8310763)


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: aerobatic on August 20, 2014, 09:04:19 PM
Why are AsicMiner and AsicMiner Tube separately listed companies?  Surely, the former is the company and the latter is just the latest of their numerous products?   you didnt list any of the other company's products separately so i believe this is a confusing entry.



Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Biostar on August 20, 2014, 11:38:33 PM
Maybe you should concentrate on wasp rather than proving than no one will ever be happy with any answer anyone comes up with, even one as basic as good or bad.
A little competition never hurt anyone.

I am not in competition with his version.

I am posting this as a guide to people who may not want to spend an inordinate time reading all the reasons why he arrived at a score and then ignore the consumers who have complained about company X or Y. Let me make it brutally clear that this is a biased guide that is CONSUMER CENTRIC not MANUFACTURER CENTRIC unlike his guide.  

Again it is always on the consumer to make the choice. I hope what I provide is the starting point for people to make a better informed decision. I don't know anyone with any time spent in these forums that is going to complain much about this "system" because I am willing to actually listen to people if they have concerns about my ratings and change them. Unlike those that think they have a system without bias or a personal skew. Don't take my word for it. Just go read his thread... plenty of justifiable complaints there.



Shut up Dicknellski.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Flying Hellfish on August 21, 2014, 12:55:50 AM
Maybe you should concentrate on wasp rather than proving than no one will ever be happy with any answer anyone comes up with, even one as basic as good or bad.
A little competition never hurt anyone.

I am not in competition with his version.

I am posting this as a guide to people who may not want to spend an inordinate time reading all the reasons why he arrived at a score and then ignore the consumers who have complained about company X or Y. Let me make it brutally clear that this is a biased guide that is CONSUMER CENTRIC not MANUFACTURER CENTRIC unlike his guide.  

Again it is always on the consumer to make the choice. I hope what I provide is the starting point for people to make a better informed decision. I don't know anyone with any time spent in these forums that is going to complain much about this "system" because I am willing to actually listen to people if they have concerns about my ratings and change them. Unlike those that think they have a system without bias or a personal skew. Don't take my word for it. Just go read his thread... plenty of justifiable complaints there.



Shut up Dicknellski.

Your Biostar scam didn't work why are you back on this account?  Why don't you fuck off you useless bag of shit.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on August 21, 2014, 07:25:02 AM
Why are AsicMiner and AsicMiner Tube separately listed companies?  Surely, the former is the company and the latter is just the latest of their numerous products?   you didnt list any of the other company's products separately so i believe this is a confusing entry.



I read it as two ventures as Friedcat / Asicminer is not the one doing the shipping / fabrication as noted below:

Contacts
Bitcointalk ID: phasebird
Email: sale@bitquan.com
Customer service: help@bitquan.com
Website: www.iasicminer.com
Customer service QQ IM ID: 1327503207

Have revised the Thumbs Up section to reflect that and made a note to review the 'legal' situation to find out what is really the case. Are The ASICMINER Project and IASICMINER one and the same entity? Uncertain. I will assume like putting reputable group buy sellers on the Thumbs Up that IASICMINER is in fact worthy of trust, given FriedCat has vouched for this company. Although I don't see evidence they are the same entity only that FC posted up the notice.



Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on August 23, 2014, 03:26:46 AM
Maybe you should concentrate on wasp rather than proving than no one will ever be happy with any answer anyone comes up with, even one as basic as good or bad.
A little competition never hurt anyone.

I am not in competition with his version.

I am posting this as a guide to people who may not want to spend an inordinate time reading all the reasons why he arrived at a score and then ignore the consumers who have complained about company X or Y. Let me make it brutally clear that this is a biased guide that is CONSUMER CENTRIC not MANUFACTURER CENTRIC unlike his guide.  

Again it is always on the consumer to make the choice. I hope what I provide is the starting point for people to make a better informed decision. I don't know anyone with any time spent in these forums that is going to complain much about this "system" because I am willing to actually listen to people if they have concerns about my ratings and change them. Unlike those that think they have a system without bias or a personal skew. Don't take my word for it. Just go read his thread... plenty of justifiable complaints there.



snip

Your Biostar scam didn't work why are you back on this account?  Why don't you fuck off you useless bag of shit.

Ignoring yet another multi of some dipshit that doesn't like being added to the Thumbs Down. Guesses who this biostar really is? Loshia or some sort AMT link I guess or Technobit. Either or steer clear of anyone on the Thumbs Down and keep the to Thumbs Up and you should avoid most problems that have come up in the last  few years of miner sales.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Und3rd0g on August 24, 2014, 04:24:35 AM
Bicknellski, know that your efforts here are appreciated!  Kudos to you on behalf of the mining community!


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on August 24, 2014, 04:43:13 AM
Bicknellski, know that your efforts here are appreciated!  Kudos to you on behalf of the mining community!

We all do our part I hope and thanks for the mention.

This is always a communal effort to help the community, especially new people in bitcointalk, avoid pitfalls of those companies who are really in this game to maximize their profit at the expense of the consumer then fail to provide hardware on time and to spec as promised. If you use the Thumbs Up companies you will have less problems. We all know this if you have spent any time on these forums. It might be overly simplistic but you know what it works.



Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on August 26, 2014, 04:49:45 PM
The situation for some of these Thumbs Down companies seems to improve very little and the same things keep happening repeatedly. There is good reason not buy at Technobit or AMT given the recent trend.

Marto.. update please.. Over 6 weeks now :(

 Its one thing to be late.. but this is getting out of hand. Its not like your holding 20+th/s a sec or anything. That is just me. No telling how many others were in GB 1. This aint looking good man. I requested you keep us updated, and since then not a peep. I am hitting a wall. I paid on paypal and lord knows I do not want to reverse this charge, but you are going over. Luckily my cc covers me over that date.


 We need a serious update man.. shit looking slim here stateside.

http://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/news/amt-ceo-joshua-zipkin-naughty-nice-list/2014/08/25

Quote
Joshua Zipkin Plays Santa Claus

Joshua tried to ship “naughty” customers their miners without PSUs in order to cut costs. He only stopped once his lawyers told him it could end up relating to a “faulty hardware claim.” He also isn’t sending units with tracking numbers because they’re “too lazy to do that.” He also claims that due to his decision to ship about 70 units without PSUs that the miners got held up in Hong Kong.

[7/30/2014 10:37:33 AM] Joshua: we halted them in Hong Kong because we made like a naughty and nice list of clients right and that’s how we formed the batches. The naughty list didn’t have PSUs.
[7/30/2014 10:37:59 AM] Joshua: the lawyers said we had to ship with PSUs so we bought PSUs and have been installing them in all day in Hong Kong

[8/6/2014 2:42:52 PM] Joshua: cause we were going to ship several.. like 70 without PSUs cause [honestly] we don’t have [the] cash
[8/6/2014 2:43:11 PM] Joshua: the lawyers said it [could] relate to a faulty-hardware claim


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: cloverme on August 26, 2014, 04:56:54 PM
Hahahah love the name of the guide... although, you need to up your bias factor, you're clearly missing a signature campaign pushing a re-seller of some type. You left out all the ponzi, I mean cloud mining companies though... You'd need to state "legit" every other line though.  The purchasing decision map in your signature is priceless though! Well done dude...  hahahah nice.  ;D



Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on August 26, 2014, 05:15:09 PM
Hahahah love the name of the guide... although, you need to up your bias factor, you're clearly missing a signature campaign pushing a re-seller of some type. You left out all the ponzi, I mean cloud mining companies though... You'd need to state "legit" every other line though.  The purchasing decision map in your signature is priceless though! Well done dude...  hahahah nice.  ;D



That is all pure copy paste on the purchasing decision tree... Go check the BFL Fucked Us Over Again thread for that one great work .

More BIAS? That is what the Caveat Emptor thread Gmaxwell wrote is for right? Don't buy miners at all basically that be pure 100% consumer advocacy I think but the community never reads good advice like that do they?

Although this is a tongue and cheek thread there is some value in just avoiding the Thumbs Down if you still think buying miners is somehow a good idea. The best advice would seem to be look at ways to bootstrap the coin other than mining and find a niche you can carve out in cryptocurrencies well beyond Bitcoin and sell your services and wares.

If you don't have cheap hydro and ambient temps that give you an advantage year round and the right hardware in significant volume then please don't do mining.


 How Late is the Monarch?  (http://games.webgamedesign.com/free/counter2-1.swf?title=Monarch%20Late&count=up&time=1387015200000&bgc=0x0077cc&bgb=1&bgd=0&bc=0xcccccc&bb=1&bd=0&tc=0xcccccc&tb=1&td=1&uc=0x99ccff&ub=1&ud=2&nc=0x333333&nb=1&nd=0)




Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: opieum2 on August 26, 2014, 05:34:48 PM
The worst part about all this is that Josh actually denied these conversations ever happened despite the obvious truth of them. It pissed me off that he has been such a liar. Hence the need to publicly out him. I am glad the bitcoin press has run with this.

I am hoping all these companies get hung out to dry. They are robbing people blind and its imperative we keep the pressure on more than ever to expose them. They send faulty hardware to get a quick buck, all the while finding alternative methods to enrich themselves at our expense. AMT has their so called "cloud" mining operation on their site....for anyone who is interested, its a backroom of a warehouse with a bunch of miners they hand configure to mine with. No instant activation or the kind of features one would expect with a full service like that.

We need more honest companies out there to do the right thing by their customers and to stop using pre-orders.

The situation for some of these Thumbs Down companies seems to improve very little and the same things keep happening repeatedly. There is good reason not buy at Technobit or AMT given the recent trend.

Marto.. update please.. Over 6 weeks now :(

 Its one thing to be late.. but this is getting out of hand. Its not like your holding 20+th/s a sec or anything. That is just me. No telling how many others were in GB 1. This aint looking good man. I requested you keep us updated, and since then not a peep. I am hitting a wall. I paid on paypal and lord knows I do not want to reverse this charge, but you are going over. Luckily my cc covers me over that date.


 We need a serious update man.. shit looking slim here stateside.

http://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/news/amt-ceo-joshua-zipkin-naughty-nice-list/2014/08/25

Quote
Joshua Zipkin Plays Santa Claus

Joshua tried to ship “naughty” customers their miners without PSUs in order to cut costs. He only stopped once his lawyers told him it could end up relating to a “faulty hardware claim.” He also isn’t sending units with tracking numbers because they’re “too lazy to do that.” He also claims that due to his decision to ship about 70 units without PSUs that the miners got held up in Hong Kong.

[7/30/2014 10:37:33 AM] Joshua: we halted them in Hong Kong because we made like a naughty and nice list of clients right and that’s how we formed the batches. The naughty list didn’t have PSUs.
[7/30/2014 10:37:59 AM] Joshua: the lawyers said we had to ship with PSUs so we bought PSUs and have been installing them in all day in Hong Kong

[8/6/2014 2:42:52 PM] Joshua: cause we were going to ship several.. like 70 without PSUs cause [honestly] we don’t have [the] cash
[8/6/2014 2:43:11 PM] Joshua: the lawyers said it [could] relate to a faulty-hardware claim


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on August 27, 2014, 09:08:40 AM
The worst part about all this is that Josh actually denied these conversations ever happened despite the obvious truth of them. It pissed me off that he has been such a liar. Hence the need to publicly out him. I am glad the bitcoin press has run with this.

I am hoping all these companies get hung out to dry. They are robbing people blind and its imperative we keep the pressure on more than ever to expose them. They send faulty hardware to get a quick buck, all the while finding alternative methods to enrich themselves at our expense. AMT has their so called "cloud" mining operation on their site....for anyone who is interested, its a backroom of a warehouse with a bunch of miners they hand configure to mine with. No instant activation or the kind of features one would expect with a full service like that.

We need more honest companies out there to do the right thing by their customers and to stop using pre-orders.

The situation for some of these Thumbs Down companies seems to improve very little and the same things keep happening repeatedly. There is good reason not buy at Technobit or AMT given the recent trend.

Marto.. update please.. Over 6 weeks now :(

 Its one thing to be late.. but this is getting out of hand. Its not like your holding 20+th/s a sec or anything. That is just me. No telling how many others were in GB 1. This aint looking good man. I requested you keep us updated, and since then not a peep. I am hitting a wall. I paid on paypal and lord knows I do not want to reverse this charge, but you are going over. Luckily my cc covers me over that date.


 We need a serious update man.. shit looking slim here stateside.

http://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/news/amt-ceo-joshua-zipkin-naughty-nice-list/2014/08/25

Quote
Joshua Zipkin Plays Santa Claus

Joshua tried to ship “naughty” customers their miners without PSUs in order to cut costs. He only stopped once his lawyers told him it could end up relating to a “faulty hardware claim.” He also isn’t sending units with tracking numbers because they’re “too lazy to do that.” He also claims that due to his decision to ship about 70 units without PSUs that the miners got held up in Hong Kong.

[7/30/2014 10:37:33 AM] Joshua: we halted them in Hong Kong because we made like a naughty and nice list of clients right and that’s how we formed the batches. The naughty list didn’t have PSUs.
[7/30/2014 10:37:59 AM] Joshua: the lawyers said we had to ship with PSUs so we bought PSUs and have been installing them in all day in Hong Kong

[8/6/2014 2:42:52 PM] Joshua: cause we were going to ship several.. like 70 without PSUs cause [honestly] we don’t have [the] cash
[8/6/2014 2:43:11 PM] Joshua: the lawyers said it [could] relate to a faulty-hardware claim

Even more phenomenal was that Marto and Josh were buddy buddy on trying to "FIX" AMT hardware issues right? That is the chat text I want to see leaked. BFL smells and so do a few others... can't trust half of the mining sellers at this point which says an awful lot about the nature of mining.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on August 31, 2014, 04:00:40 AM
If you are new to forums you might not know the sordid history of BFL and the number of shills they once had promoting their lies and bs. It really is amazing that even today knowing what we all know as fact that some employees of that company still try to defend this company. Steer very clear of BFL products either hardware or cloud mining they are not to be trusted in any capacity with anyones money or bitcoins.


It's funny that the man who said it would be "ludicrous" if the difficulty hit the 27Billion (the next projected dif) was able to mine $500K worth of BTC.  That's quite a bit of success for someone who makes such ludicrous statements.

Either it was taken from BFL's assets or Josh has been making a tidy profit mining on customer's hardware.  KC might as well be Denmark because something is rotten...
I find it kind of amazing how intentionally blind you people are... Josh was on the mining scene long before BFL was ever thought of, yet no one seems to think he had the presence of mind to hold onto some of that?  Wasn't EMC created way back in June 2011?  Wouldn't that house purchase just be a drop in the bucket from all those coins mined back in 2010/2011 before he ever created that pool?  What about the sale of the pool back when the price of BTC was ~$10?  10K BTC would buy a lot today.  But no, that means all the FUD you're trying to put out there must be wrong, can't have the truth getting in the way of the mob mentality.  Logic has no place in these arguments because you're only willing to use the emotional content to spread your lies.

If anyone has blinders on it's your good sir.  You're working for a company that has horrible customer service and resorts to name calling of it's customer.  Even if everything that is claimed to be immoral and unethical is untrue their very behavior is something that should have been quelled in kindergarten.... and yet you continue your employment with them.  Guess times are tough in KC that you must resort to working for them.

I was on these forms for 6 months before I registered, and unless you had another account before your bcp19 account I'm pretty sure I know more about EMC on the public front that you do.  It's possible that he mined 10K if he had a large farm, but everything he posted back then indicated otherwise.  My assertion was how can a man who was as you claim so in-tune with the mining ecosystem that also melded into blockchain as pure energy claim that it would be "ludicrous" for the difficulty to hit the levels that it has.  Either he was being facetious with customers to sell more BFL ASICs or he is ignorant.  One or the other - can't have it both ways.

So BCP19 are you here to offer conjecture or to tell us something that we don't know.  Sounds like you're reaching... in court they would say "Objection.  Not substantiated. Request to strike from the record."


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on August 31, 2014, 04:04:56 AM
Adding Minersource to the list...

Unfortunately there are more and more people coming forward and coupled with the Technobit fiasco for the GB for fabrication of compensation chips into boards there is no one really surprised they should avoid dealing with Minersource at this time.


Minersource is going the way of MtGox and folding under their own weight. Minersource was robbed by a Chinese company named Black Arrow, who promised mining machines to american customers through Minersource on a preorder basis. Americans preordered and Black Arrow under-delivered 5 months past due. In trying to obtain a refund for myself, I was informed that Minersource had sent absolutely every last bit of their money to China in exchange for miners we will likely never receive. Now, myself and a few hundred others are in the process of seeking legal action against Minersource for violating Federal Mail order fraud laws. They can't pay refunds because they sent all the money to China and they're going to have a hard time paying for a defense attorney. As of this week, the financial situation at Minersource has turned absolutely dire, they have run out of money and had to disconnect their phones. Which I'm guessing also means that they had to fire that little sex-kitten the woman that answered the phones for them.

So let this be a lesson to anyone trying to buy hardware from them in the near future. If it's not on-hand and shipping immediately, don't bother, because this company won't be around long enough to fill many more orders.


I have a pre-order from December 2013 that is unfulfilled with no known delivery date.
My refund request has been denied and subsequent contact so far has been ignored.

So, yeah, do not order from Minersource.net  >:(



Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Und3rd0g on September 01, 2014, 03:45:21 AM
Bicknellski, at the "end of the day", aren't all the producers of mining equipment at this point just scamming the people that want @home miners????


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on September 01, 2014, 07:50:46 AM
Bicknellski, at the "end of the day", aren't all the producers of mining equipment at this point just scamming the people that want @home miners????

Addressed that issue in this thread go back and read through.

One could argue that. One has argued that. Many have argued that many many many moons ago right up until this very moment and probably well into 2015 and probably until the end of BTC or as BTC prices remain below cost of production for a small miners.

Suffice to say that good money will continue to chase bad ideas. At least you can warn people off the VERY worst abusers and get something for their investment in choosing the lesser of evils. Scamming or is it poor and inadequate consumer education with regards to mining at home? Clearly if you are not spending millions to get economies of scale then home mining is really a hobby and should be treated as such.

There is really no need for this section of the forum if it is only geared to the small, hobby or home miner given the major fabricators are actually selling farm quantities use the smaller consumers as a dumping ground more and more for obsolete equipment. I think that was the case for AM and their earlier offerings of block erupters since they couldn't house all of their mining equipment they over produced.

The hobbiest or home miners should have stopped buying earlier in 2014 to be brutally honest. Then again, I just bought a small amount of SP30's and S2's so I am not even taking my own advice or listening to the many people like yourself rightfully pointing out the fact that there is no ROI in these units at this stage. I think there are any number of uses for mining equipment especially if you are targeting altcoins.



Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on September 04, 2014, 03:27:35 PM
How bad is BFL?

The worst?

It's like the kid on the playground saying "I know something that you don't.  Neener Neener Neener".  It's pointless to argue with him.  I have officially given up.
That was not the intent of it... *you* put out the circumstances, 1) BFL shipped on time, 2) 300 units per day 3) the claim of making 1500BTC from a 60gh miner.  I used the information available to me and told you that you were wrong and gave examples, but rather than accept the fact that I knew what I was talking about, you claimed I was using bad information and then changed the subject to Avalon and now you are going on about AM and protocols and Josh and other things that were not part of your original claim.

While I may not have known that there was a 4x limit on increases, I do have an understanding of how the process works and have several spreadsheets that I used for differing values of GH added to the network.  In addition, I made a mistake with K9 since you were talking about 1500BTC from a single and he jumped in with 1000BTC from a mini-rig and I didn't stop to think.  I have never claimed to be perfect and I do make mistakes.

I'll just ask one question and leave it there... At 300 units per day, how many days did you think it would take to complete the day 1 orders?

As someone who worked for BFL long before your tour of Willy Wonka's chocolate factory and whoring yourself out BCP, I actually feel sorry for you. At first I was angry at your obvious shilling and knew you were on the payroll before everyone else did here. I was once in your position to an extent, but on a managerial level. I too thought it was a wonderful place to be and defended BFL everywhere I could, but then one day I woke up and looked in the mirror and realized what I was doing. I took a call from a soldier who was about to retire who wanted to spend all his retirement money on a minirig and as a former soldier, I just couldn't do it. My moral compass, conscience, and empathy for the common man took over and I realized that our customers weren't the greedy one's that we treated with contempt but that they just wanted their products. BFL was the greedy entity. So I left with no backup plan or job in waiting, nothing, because I couldn't do it anymore. I didn't believe anymore, but I didn't leave without a fight to do the right thing, they just didn't want to do it.

I know you feel you are doing the right thing here by defending them, but you're not. No points will ever be made and accepted by anybody here. Your company will still be the bane of the Bitcoin mining world no matter what you say your claims are dubious enough after you've been caught being dishonest here before and making strawmen. Any frontrunning, Apple-inspired design by BFL has been lost on the consumers due to lies, obfuscation and lateness. A website had to be bought to bring down the negative google searches. The Monarch is a late, hideous Frankenstein of a miner that should never have taken that long to build if your company didn't focus so much on aesthetics instead of delivering products to their customers, or investors as I like to call it. I know how all the finances went down there and one day when BFL shutters its doors I will write a book about it and the mining industry as a whole due to my experience with many different companies.

Having said that, there are some good people who work there at BFL who I still maintain friendships with. From what I have gathered from your posts, you are not one of them. But you still have time to change.

In the future, I suggest we ignore BCP's posts as they add nothing to the discussion and only deflect attention away from BFL, which is the point. No arguments will be won, so why try? The facts alone are damning enough without his input.

Be awesome.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on September 06, 2014, 06:26:35 AM
Technobit continues to disappoint customers.

Shipped my order within Europe. So, I expect more B1 orders will ship soon.  ;)

Edit: If anyone need some Arctic Freezer 7 rev2 coolers, I have 20 for sale at $16 each. PM me if interested.
Those ship from the US, right?

Happy 7-weeks-since-ordering-paying-Anniversary to all! Anyone ordered/paid before 17th July?


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on September 06, 2014, 06:22:24 PM
Making zero zilch or nothing off copying and pasting your truth here. As for thriving? If people learn a lesson from your remark then it is you that thrives not me. Your reputation increases not mine. If you don't want to be quoted, then don't post. Clearly the reason for Marto74 to be discussed here in this thread is evident to all who have followed his career right? So you can stop your feigning indignation at me for collating his customers comments. Direct your banter at someone who really doesn't care what you think Marto.

What is worse are the people who continually cover up and evade what this guy has done for years now. Straight up theft in some cases.

Reductio ad Hitlerum is a form of association fallacy or ad McCarthy and says a lot more about you than me. Maybe you should go worry about your lost investments and leave me be so I can post in this thread in an effort to save someone the same folly you made and let them have a few more dollars for their kids' xmas presents this year.

And thanks for clearly pointing out he has FAILED to deliver as promised. Here is hoping anyone reading these posts takes that nugget out of all this and if they are still tempted to buy miners they choose from the Thumbs Up list as a starting point.

Technobit continues to disappoint customers.

Shipped my order within Europe. So, I expect more B1 orders will ship soon.  ;)

Edit: If anyone need some Arctic Freezer 7 rev2 coolers, I have 20 for sale at $16 each. PM me if interested.
Those ship from the US, right?

Happy 7-weeks-since-ordering-paying-Anniversary to all! Anyone ordered/paid before 17th July?
Wow, having a follower here, too bad it is a McCarthy style imbecile like you. I don't like shops/manufacturers making claims they can't hold, I hate fools like you that thrive on that a thousand times more. Now, gfy okay?


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on September 07, 2014, 04:53:52 AM
Ignored. Very clearly stated in the title of the thread. BIASED & OPINIONATED. Opt to ignore thread and me problem solved. Simple and easy.

Go fix the fact that Marto74 has lied to his customers yet again which is no bloody surprise if you have been following his antics for the past few years here. That is all you need you to worry about. Not about who wants to point it out so that new users don't fall into that trap.

Feel free to keep bumping the thread so more people see it. Works for me just note I won't be "following" your every word. If you think Marto74 cares about you and your order then I guess you should go ahead and order more. Thought not, thus proving the point you can't trust him to deliver on time as promised. You are not the first person to fall victim and unfortunately you won't be the last.

The fact that he uses multiple accounts to pad his own trust rating and post in his own threads to "change" the perception is pretty transparent to most people that follow his threads. You don't just lie and rip people off and think you can get away with it right? Or maybe you think that is ok as long as you get your stuff right? Funny you want to engage me rather than the person lying to your face openly numerous times.

Bottomline here:

Don't buy any hardware or services from Technobit. Just look at the record you don't even have to use your complaints. Here is just one more 'satisfied' customer posting again for service. There are literally 100s of these posts asking for clarification, answers, service support etc. Obviously the community needs to be informed about this considering it continues on and on without end.


I'll check the outside images and links

Marto, Please check you email regarding the rma return i got. 1 miner is working the other one not. i have been mailing you for the last week.

A week further no response from Technobit.. martin/Marto is hiding?


No response from you.



Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: marto74 on September 07, 2014, 02:22:02 PM
Ignored. Very clearly stated in the title of the thread. BIASED & OPINIONATED. Opt to ignore thread and me problem solved. Simple and easy.

Go fix the fact that Marto74 has lied to his customers yet again which is no bloody surprise if you have been following his antics for the past few years here. That is all you need you to worry about. Not about who wants to point it out so that new users don't fall into that trap.

Feel free to keep bumping the thread so more people see it. Works for me just note I won't be "following" your every word. If you think Marto74 cares about you and your order then I guess you should go ahead and order more. Thought not, thus proving the point you can't trust him to deliver on time as promised. You are not the first person to fall victim and unfortunately you won't be the last.

The fact that he uses multiple accounts to pad his own trust rating and post in his own threads to "change" the perception is pretty transparent to most people that follow his threads. You don't just lie and rip people off and think you can get away with it right? Or maybe you think that is ok as long as you get your stuff right? Funny you want to engage me rather than the person lying to your face openly numerous times.

Bottomline here:

Don't buy any hardware or services from Technobit. Just look at the record you don't even have to use your complaints. Here is just one more 'satisfied' customer posting again for service. There are literally 100s of these posts asking for clarification, answers, service support etc. Obviously the community needs to be informed about this considering it continues on and on without end.


I'll check the outside images and links

Marto, Please check you email regarding the rma return i got. 1 miner is working the other one not. i have been mailing you for the last week.

A week further no response from Technobit.. martin/Marto is hiding?


No response from you.

Hey troll.
Just out of curiosity can you name at least one of the members that posted in my trust rating that is my fake acount.
Can you ?
And please avoid writing about my family.
I know the fact I like women is strange for you ;)


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on September 08, 2014, 12:06:35 PM
Don't buy from Marto74 of Technobit. Thumbs down. Steer clear of his hosting offers as well. Thanks for the bump back to the top of the page.


I have not used technobit myself, but I have seen that he is very fast on designing new miners. Why thumbs down?

There are a number of unresolved issues with some customers as well as scores of customers that were poorly treated and lied to directly and this is well documented in the threads. I can not recommend a company that is unwilling to resolve customer complaints. If those who were burned are made whole then I am more than willing to change my opinion. At this point I don't see how that is going to happen given the stance of the company towards some of their customers. Given what passes as customer service it is not a company I would recommend based on even present threads in the last few weeks with regards to RMA's.

This is not a guide on how fast you come to market. It is a guide on how well you deal with the consumer bottomline and there are clearly persistent issues with this company and their treatment of consumers. I would never personally recommend a company that has outstanding issues with the community especially when you might even have suspicions they use multiple accounts to misrepresent their customer service. There is clearly an inordinate amount of NEW members posting on how great the Technobit service is. It is an anomaly that doesn't go unnoticed by senior members and should give you pause about the reality with that company especially given how many complaints there are right up to today.

As an example Avalon would be thumbs down until we are given the whole story of what went down during the chip fiasco last year. You can't rely on a company that has willfully ignored the community asking for accountability. As such you are much better off dealing only with companies that have proven trustworthy. Again my opinion but there is certainly less risk involved dealing with companies on the THUMBS UP side vs. the THUMBS DOWN side.

Bitmain or Rockminer does very well shipping almost real time with minimal delays / pre-order and at a reasonable price. Why not use them over a company that could be suspect? That to me is why you use this guide. You cut through the crap and get to the point. Who is reliable all the time. The pattern continues... be warned.


Update.
The boards are populated and tested @ this stage.
@ the moment each board is tested with heatsink and cooler.
This is a slow process. Then the boards pass 2 hour test each.
Hopefuly will manage to start shipping in Saturday.
Our shipping girl will start contacting you all tommorow for transport details
Anything happening in the shipping department Marto?

Has anyone been contacted by Technobit yet?


Nor I, the bankwire thing that he instructed us to do if we were apart of the group buy hasn't even gone through yet.

My BA order got into Bulgaria on the 8th of August and since then the delivery looks like it has not been picked up yet.

-No update from Marto on this (multiple messages sent in the past week)
-No processing of my order since I made it on the 5th of August and because of that:
-No reference number to send to Marto for him to look into


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on September 09, 2014, 08:23:27 AM
Why is Spondoolies Tech a company in the Thumbs Up section?

I can attest to this personally but there a many happy customers like these posting in the forums.

Is Spondoolies a trusted company? Somebody got their miniers?

Ty for answers.

Leo

I own and operate an SP10 and two SP30s. Totally brilliant units. Spondoolies-Tech gear is top notch "server grade" equipment, and their customer service is the absolute best that I have encountered in the industry.

Just so you know, I've been mining 24x7 for the last 444 days*, and I also own gear from ASICMINER, Bitmain, Bitmine, BFL, and KnCMiner.

Since Spondoolies-Tech started selling miners I haven't found myself purchasing from another vendor. Not saying I won't (I quite like variety), but ever since I got my first SP10 I've been addicted to the build quality, form-factor, efficiency, and customer service.

And yes, they have always shipped on time. They cut it fine with the August Group buy, but I did personally receive my SP30s in the month of August, albeit at the very end of August... but still August. Some other companies (I won't mention who) will keep telling you that they will deliver in Two Weeks™, and deliver 6 months to 1 year late (you think I'm joking... I'm not). Then of course there are the scams that take your money and never deliver a product.

* I calculated the date I started mining and by pure chance as I post this it is 444 days since then.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on September 11, 2014, 04:28:44 PM
The hits keep rolling in on Technobit. Thumbs Down... and down and further down.

And again 5 days have gone by and NO RESPONSE from technobit...
How can we solve this issue.... Do you want me to send the miner back or is that useless???

Please respond i'm getting rather fedd up by you and your company...

Little reminder:
2 miners went for rma you send me two back after 2 months. One miner is working the other one is not working.
When i connect it to the power supply it will not start no fan spinning nothing. The other miner on the same power supply is working.




Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Dallas5 on September 11, 2014, 07:13:45 PM
Agree on Minersource, they never communicated the delay of Blackarrows hardware. They promised to refund me on two seperate occasions and I still got nothing! Be careful if you do business with them, they're happy to take your money but don't follow consumer protection rules.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on September 13, 2014, 09:55:13 AM
Some interesting posturing by SPTech. Will the Chinese competition in 2015 get crushed? Leaving us only one superpower in miner production?

I have respect to AM and Bitmain past achievements, but they're not high on my list. I don't believe China will be able to compete in 2015

Can you elaborate as to why?
I'm under NDA with various parties, so I can't give concrete information.

In general, to win in 2015 you'll need in descending order of importance:
1) Team or access to team with years of circuit design experience in advance nodes.
2) Access to cheap electricity - sub 0.03 $/KWh or less
3) Cheap production

From what I was able to learn, the Chinese teams (including some publically unknown) has only (3) above.
Some of them are rushing to bleeding edge nodes (TSMC 16 or Samsung/GF 14) but it's not enough.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: marto74 on September 13, 2014, 09:49:44 PM
Bick..
You should rename the tread to Technobit fuck us over again
You are in Action mode again
all this will not change the fact your hardware design efforts are failure
:D


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Operatr on September 14, 2014, 04:04:58 AM
Bick..
You should rename the tread to Technobit fuck us over again
You are in Action mode again
all this will not change the fact your hardware design efforts are failure
:D

You're a dumb piece of shit and a terrible businesman marto, what say you to that?


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on September 14, 2014, 05:46:07 AM
Still unhappy customers in Minersource / Technobit Group Buy...


@Marto: I paid over €4000 at the €-BTC rate of 07-17-2014. If I opt for a refund, will I get the equivalent of the € price in BTC at the €-BTC rate on the date of the refund, or at the date of paying (as in: the same BTC number as paid on 07-17)?

@Bobsag3, since the 07-22-2014 message I would be sent a check, no word has reached me through your broken Zen system, I had a reply by pm from Thomas my tickets and even your emails (minersource's) never came in or went out, and a fair number of checks did not reach their destinations. I asked to be updated on what is next for my case, but nothing since. What should I do next to get this moving?
Bump
We started to ship and problem solved even with hand replacement of MCU's
Your order is for EU so will be out tomorrow or in Monday.
As far all the boards are produced for the assembly service batch1 no refunds will be available for now.
second sending for minersource is out today/tomorrow too

 Marto.. Please go back to page 2 as I was one of the first to request your service and paid you in full conversion (no chip exchange) for 200 chips. I am seeing people with orders WAY after mine posting pics of machines in hand. Something is not right. Now you talk of MS second shipment. I do not get it at all man. Why have you not shipped my order?

Only person fucking himself over is Marto74. As soon as everyone gets a taste of his brand of biz you might see fewer and fewer examples like above. Simply use more reputable companies and you won't have a problem with delivery, RMA etc. Just start with the companies on the Thumbs Up list and be free of the BS. Funny how a lot of these companies seem to work together or have side deals? It is boggles the mind why anyone would buy from these companies given the alternatives.

How hard would it be to actually get things delivered without excuses? Simple as avoiding those companies on the Thumbs Down list.

Problems in the past continue today... nothing much has changed.

Might as well jump in here too.

Marto, through a botched Group Buy scammed me out of 1.43BTC

If you look at the details in his trust you will see many people have lost money to this guy.

In my case, he ran a group buy then 6 months later, decided to cancel it due to avalon not delivering,
and instead of PMing everyone in the group buy he leaves a message in a 6 month old thread telling everyone if they don't send him a message to him by a certain time and date with a special signature that you were out of luck.

In that very same thread month or more earlier I asked for a refund and he did not provide it.

Then when I finally saw his little message he said I was too late and all he was willing to do was ship me chips, which he claimed to do in October of 2013. You know what Avalon Gen 1 chips were worth in Oct 2013? NOTHING!

But even then he said he shipped them, they never arrived and he tried to get ANOTHER 0.10 BTC from me to pay for special shipping.

be an informed buyer, read the threads where he does business you have about a 90% chance, in my opinion of getting screwed in some way, late shipment (usually 3 months), No shipment,  lost shipment.

This is someone you NEVER want to do business with. EVER.




Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on September 14, 2014, 06:02:34 AM
<SNIP>

You're a dumb piece of shit and a terrible businesman marto, what say you to that?


Guessing you wouldn't recommend his services then Operatr given your review of him here.

and the complaints of 0 information keep occurying will multiple accounts try to post positive reviews of Technobit. What a joke. Pretty transparent who is posting that eh Marto?

Amazingly Martin has time to post here but no time to answer his customers questions. Sad. :'(

Marto - Can you please give us an update on sending the customer list to Minersource for batch 1 customers?  I asked this same question almost 24 hours ago and it went unanswered.  Please let us know where you are at with this list because these delays are really hurting our ROI on these boards.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on September 14, 2014, 01:32:15 PM
There is a growing backlash against  a number of fabricators. It is important that is reported to everyone so I will be updating here any significant posts that call out manufacturers who are failing to support their customers. Unfortunately there seems to be elements that want to suppress or ignore these facts and give our community a false impression about many of these fabricators.

======

More complaints towards Minersource.

I totally agree. Avoid this company at all costs! Minersource has been avoiding direct emails and posts on the Facebook page regarding the pre-orders for the X1's and X3's  - The last update as of today was from 08/06/2014 which is the same rehashed useless information on when and what kind of compensation if any, we will get from BA.  They have also started deleting posts on their Facebook page that not only ask relevant questions about our orders but also criticizing them.  I have paid for my order in April and all I got was one email when I initially inquired almost two months ago - the same tired excuse that we will be shipping soon crap!  I never even got another response when I recently contacted them a few days ago and others on the Facebook page have the same zero results to our questions.  I am going to file a complaint and I have suggested others do so with the Denver, CO BBB.  For those interested, here is the direct link:


https://www.bbb.org/consumer-complaints/file-a-complaint/find-business/name/Miner+Hosting+LLC/80207/


I also requested a refund numerous times in the past and was denied.  They are NOT a professionally run business and I consider them an illegitimate operation.

Hey Gezellig4Geld,

I've given Minersource a deadline and I will be filling a complaint to the FTC and the BBB next week if they don't send a refund. Let us know if you ever got your money back.


Edit update: Marto74 and Minersource not communicating very well at all.

Marto are you behind in shipping (you said last week you would ship me Friday or last Monday) or in updating our technobit accounts to "shipped" status?
We ship as soon we have ready boards.
your order ref ?
Please quit dodging the question, do you have a list for minersource ready or not?

Others are organizing to act against KnC.

Have you ordered a KnCMiner Titan or Neptune?
Are you fed up with them and are interested in legal action and possibly a class action?

I'm trying to judge whether a class action suit would be a possible. Can you please state what you had ordered and why you would sue them?

Do you know a good lawyer or are a resident in Sweden? It would be helpful to have a contact there.

For example, I ordered a KnCMiner Titan. I am a consumer and would like to get a refund, because their products are unsafe (fire hazard, no CE marking), they have made false representations (Q2/Q3 delivery, 800Watt), and because they act in direct conflict with their customers (Batch 1 vs Batch 2).

My other thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=781435) collects information on replies from authorities and lawyers. Please contribute if you can!


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Zelek Uther on September 14, 2014, 09:15:07 PM
Because it's a major discussion in the S3 Thread:

Is Spondoolies-Tech using the latest version of cgminer (v4.6.0) in all their products?

We pull latest cgminer from github every time we build.
Spondoolies is the ONLY company remaining that is in sync with the mainline cgminer code and always push upstream any driver changes.
Quote above is from the primary developer of cgminer.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on September 15, 2014, 05:23:39 AM
Because it's a major discussion in the S3 Thread:

Is Spondoolies-Tech using the latest version of cgminer (v4.6.0) in all their products?

We pull latest cgminer from github every time we build.
Spondoolies is the ONLY company remaining that is in sync with the mainline cgminer code and always push upstream any driver changes.
Quote above is from the primary developer of cgminer.

That says a lot for SPTech...

How would that affect say the ratings for others who do not? Thoughts?


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on September 20, 2014, 11:24:53 AM
More Technobit woes. One more reason not to buy from them. https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/thumbdown.gif

Well Marto, I see you are online, why no comments on the out of order shipping, how can you ship batch 2 orders from 3 weeks old? What have you shipped so far, from MS' pictures it looks not even 25 to the USA?

Because he need to set up his own farm and cloud hashing first to recoup from the losses of buying ALOT of parts to manufacture the boards?
Martin got paid in chips, remember?  ::)

BULLSHIT. I paid in full. No conversion, no who's in inline shit. I paid straight up for 50. Got the PSU's, breaker boards, fans, all that. Converted half my breaker box to 240... and still nothing. 4 weeks my ass.

I should have had 50 boards here, yet difficulty is up another 20% yet again.

Marto... please, and I beg you deliver. Timeline for this venture is running out. :(

And BFL rumors of a raid. One more reason not to buy from BFL. https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/thumbdown.gif

I understand that there may be a large contingency of people who do not believe what I posted earlier or will not believe it until they see it in the news or a government agency confirms it. But I hold in my hands a 33 page ex parte temporary restraining order filed by the FTC against BFL on 9/18/14 that names three individuals associated with BFL in it, specifically. I am not releasing it at this time for two reasons: 1) the person who gave it to me hasn't given me the permission yet, 2) it says "*Sealed*" on the bottom of the page next to the case number. I believe the fact that it is sealed is the reason government agencies have not commented on it at this point.

I went by BFL for the first time in a year today to see what was going on as well after I heard the news and I didn't see any agents, however I have received confirmation this afternoon from another completely independent source who was scheduled to have a meeting with BFL today before it was abruptly cancelled who went by and ran into agents there. This other source is a reliable and established name in the Bitcointalk forum and they can back up my claim publicly if they wish to, but I am not pushing them. I know what I have seen and heard from my sources and people can believe what they want until it is officially confirmed.


As to what Tech... is posting is all 100% factually true, I cannot be completely sure. I can confirm that Tech... is former BFL, just as I am. Tech..'s initial info from the same sources from whom I received my info, since my source told me that they had also spoken with Tech.... Nobody is pulling your legs here. This shit happened. Now, the US Marshals KC office was denying any connection to this action at least as of 4:30 pm CST, but they may have had reasons to withhold that info temporarily. I'm not too familiar with the US Marshal Service's protocol. Still, they entered the office around 10 am CST, and had employees leave all computers and any other equipment, files, and basically whatever wasn't personal property. They interviewed employees, too. I won't go into the nature of those interviews as reported to me, since I'm sure all of that will be disclosed in the case ahead. There have supposedly been two arrests. I believe there is at least one additional warrant at this, and it will be rather hard to serve.

There's a group of BFL ex-pats who, while employed at BFL, believed that company was doing things in so many wrong ways that it was difficult to keep count. IF you voiced dissent (and god could I tell you stories - I'm somewhat combative, which Tech.. can attest to, if he figures out who I am lol), your days were numbered. Tech... and I were not the best of friends, but got on well, and had at least some level of respect for each other. Tech... isn't the type to jump on and feed the community a bunch of bullshit. Sure, I've seen some ranting  and venting, and maybe even some posts that were written without the backing of solid info, but those are few.

This is no bullshit. BFL is being taken to task.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg8895169#msg8895169


Black Arrow and Minersource more disappointments. https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/thumbdown.gif

Well I can confirm that I invested a lot more than 10k with BA through Minersource. Currently I have tried to work out something with Minersource but they have stopped responding to my messages. I will probably end up suing Minersource if they don't get their act together.

If there are any other people in the same situation as myself - please contact me, thank you.

Sue Minersource for what exactly? Im pretty hes even more screwed than everybody else, cause it was this guy's main business. He will likely be declaring bankruptcy, at least we can just write it off.

In other news, Black Arrow responded to an email yesterday saying they cant ship my miner because they had to recall the power supplies, which I am aware of, but does anybody know if I just ask to receive it without a power supply installed will they ship to me as is?

Its an expensive paperweight, a novelty item which Im planning on keeping as a testament to my own hubris.



Well you see, to start because they have not refunded me a dime and I have asked for a refund in June. They did offer me some BTC Garden miners but that was not a viable option for me due to space and power requirements (my X3 order was to be hosted with Minersource).

Then it would be the small matter of BA refusing to honor (according to MS) some of the promotions they have ran in the past that were part of my contract with Minersource. They didn't bother letting me know - maybe because they conveniently forgot or they were just afraid I would have asked for a refund right away since not keeping your promises is a clear indication of a shady company - once they have your money they suddenly forget all the promises/promotions/deadlines, etc.

And third, because they have stopped communicating and therefore how can you expect any amiable resolution with someone that doesn't even want to communicate with you?


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: marto74 on September 20, 2014, 02:28:59 PM
Bick,
I missed you lately ;)
How  the LED design goes :D

I dare you again , please point one member posting positive about us that is part of "many " by your words our accounts.
Can you TROLL ????


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: marto74 on September 20, 2014, 02:39:22 PM
Bick..
You should rename the tread to Technobit fuck us over again
You are in Action mode again
all this will not change the fact your hardware design efforts are failure
:D

You're a dumb piece of shit and a terrible businesman marto, what say you to that?
:)
thank you for the input


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: marto74 on September 20, 2014, 07:50:10 PM
Again back your accusation: name at least one of my fake accounts .
..... Or spend less time here or making up faux accounts and posts to persuade people to get in line and WAIT for his latest product that will be late. .....

Can you ?


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: bitgeek on September 20, 2014, 09:41:41 PM
What about this company?
https://www.mining-asics-technologies.com/

They were advertising a lot in the last few months but didn't deliver.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on September 21, 2014, 02:51:06 AM
If only Marto spent his time answering his customers questions eh? Or spend less time here or making up faux accounts and posts to persuade people to get in line and WAIT for his latest product that will be late. Simple if you are still in the market for miners. AVOID TECHNOBIT... order from people that ship now and on time and RMA without excuses. THUMBS UP suppliers in this thread do that. Technobit does not.

Thumbs down. Do not buy from Technobit. https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/thumbdown.gif

Well Marto, I see you are online, why no comments on the out of order shipping, how can you ship batch 2 orders from 3 weeks old? What have you shipped so far, from MS' pictures it looks not even 25 to the USA?

Because he need to set up his own farm and cloud hashing first to recoup from the losses of buying ALOT of parts to manufacture the boards?
Martin got paid in chips, remember?  ::)

BULLSHIT. I paid in full. No conversion, no who's in inline shit. I paid straight up for 50. Got the PSU's, breaker boards, fans, all that. Converted half my breaker box to 240... and still nothing. 4 weeks my ass.

I should have had 50 boards here, yet difficulty is up another 20% yet again.

Marto... please, and I beg you deliver. Timeline for this venture is running out. :(


I check my status of order at Technobit today. It is already shipped (16.09.2014 16:40 Sofia (BG)). I am from Europe and Batch2.

Order from 20.8.2014, chips delivered 28.8 - so about 3 weeks.

 This is not cool at all! I was one of the first from batch 1!

Who is Macher?

Seems funny that many of the posts that are positive in regards to technobit work are from newbs sub 39 posts glowing praise of how great shipping is or how great the rma was or how great the units or how great the communication is. Maybe just maybe this guy is not even a customer and his post is meant to dispel fears that not much of anything has actually shipped.


I check my status of order at Technobit today. It is already shipped (16.09.2014 16:40 Sofia (BG)). I am from Europe and Batch2.

Order from 20.8.2014, chips delivered 28.8 - so about 3 weeks.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on September 21, 2014, 02:51:43 AM
Considered them a straight up scam as they never delivered so not even on the list.

I will remove companies eventually that are not shipping as well to tidy up the list. 6 months no new shipping and I will axe them.

What about this company?
https://www.mining-asics-technologies.com/

They were advertising a lot in the last few months but didn't deliver.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on September 21, 2014, 04:30:25 AM
The Plot Thickens at BFL... was it a raid, investigation were arrest warrants served? https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/thumbdown.gif

As the rumor persists without denial or confirmation your best move would be TO AVOID BFL at all costs.

Usually I would feel this is false until proven. Given my disdain for BFL, I've made calls and sent emails to the office -- and the lack of response would indicate something is going on.

Circle responds to a top reddit post about some stupid decimal bug in their system which is closed beta. I know "nobody cares about you", wouldn't Inaba just love to prove this whole thing wrong?

I might as well make a "Hitler Finds out about BFL Bankruptcy" video now. Put a fork in em, IMO. Or prove us wrong BCP.



Just my BTC .02 but in *every other* online / mail order forced closure by the FTC / IRS / local tax man / local government I have dealt with in the last 15+ years. All the websites were taken down or had a noticed pasted on them and the phones had a message changed to please call this # for more information.

Now, w/o more info we don't know what happened. But it just seems odd that there is no information.

If there was a not a "raid" but it was just for the government coming to take files to gather information or get documentation then is a different story. They are not closed, but just under investigation.

-Dave

Here's how the incident was described to me, and it was not a raid (if I used that specific word in earlier posts, i must apologize for my negligence, since you're certainly correct, there is a distinction): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=788886.40   - it's the second post down on that page.

you're not the only one to mention the fact that their website is still up. one of the earlier posts i read yesterday over in the 'Legal' forum pointed this out, and i even made a mock order last evening before submitting a post, and mention that i did so.

still, with regard to your post, while i admittedly may well be reading affect where there is none, but what i'm reading is that if it was a raid, that is very serious, but if they are simply being investigated by the FTC, that's nearly as big of a deal. is that correct, or close? just trying to understand. if my understanding is correct, while i'd concede that an investigation is not the same as a raid where US Marshals bust in with their weapons drawn, and treat everyone as suspect, i still think it's a big deal when in the morning hours the district court sends someone from a prosecution team to seize property and documents - if only temporarily, send employees home, and do not tell them when or if they are coming back. Furthermore, I've heard that the three people who were served arrest warrants were Sonny V., Jody "Darla" Drake , and Nasser, the CTO. Nasser lives outside the US, and I kind of doubt he'll be extradited. I'm also not sure why he would be implicated, other than he had a different title up until the company did some restructuring starting in the middle of last year. That would be the only reason why I could understand Nasser taking the fall instead of Bruce Bourne (sp?). It's also surprising that Jeff Ownby wasn't implicated. very surprising. It may also be that, given that even the US Marshals office in the KC metro has not confirmed any involvement, that property was seized to look info some of these other players as well, as the case against them wasn't quite strong enough. there are even a few others who i am surprised are not on the hook.

the document that Tech.. has mentioned, and that i've also acknowledged, was only filed yesterday. there is a case number, and even if it wasn't currently "sealed" it would take a few days before the document was publicly available. anyone that has the document and is interested in seeing the investigation play out with the hope that those deserving of punishment get their share shouldn't make it available yet. i don't think any of us who have been relaying information we've received are really all that concerned if you believe us right at this moment. since i can only really speak for myself, i can certainly say that i am not. it's been many months since i worked for that outfit, and i have no dog in this fight. i do think that many of their business practices, both during my time there and after, were/are pretty abhorrent. still, believe me or don't, it doesn't matter. every BFL  employee that was there at the time got the same document that Tech... and i have mentioned. I've seen the first few pages where it mentioned who they wanted to arrest, and why they were closing down BFL for the investigation. either the feds, a former employee, or someone who has obtained the documents  through other means will eventually post them. I don't mean "2 or more months" from not either. within a week, maybe two, the community will get some meat.

and yet still, i'm surprised at all the skepticism by many that this all actually took place, or even that it is some kind of BFL conspiracy. they are facing a similar problem regarding shipping as they did with the 65 nm products. the reason those even made it out by the end of November is because the company was given a stern warning by the FTC. that wasn't the only warning, and not the only time the FTC has looked into the company. all of that info is public, save perhaps for the timeline given to the company to finish shipping those firs-generation ASICs. this shouldn't surprise. every day that BFL isn't shipping, it exacerbates the problems they have with the FTC, as the problem never should have gotten out of hand like this after already having gone through the same fucking experience! my guess will be that instead of roaming the halls of BFL in his same old blue sweatpants that Bruce will be sitting at home in said sweatpants. even f this is only an investigation the outcome will not prove positive for the company.


 From the BFL Forums in late August 2013: (https://forums.butterflylabs.com/pre-sales-questions/3675-refund-policy-13.html) https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/thumbdown.gifhttps://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/thumbdown.gifhttps://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/thumbdown.gif

Quote
08-23-2013, 11:22 PM #127
DisabledVet


After reading through the BFL forums the last few days, one thing is most evidently clear to me: people are not satisfied at all. I want a refund and legally I have every right to a refund on an internet purchase. I sent an email to Jody and was denied a refund. I am not at all happy about this as it is unethical and very poor business practice. Any legitimate business would issue a prompt refund and an apology immediately.

I wanted to believe in this company and have been patient for long enough. What's fair is fair. We paid, you haven't delivered, give us our money back.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: marto74 on September 21, 2014, 07:55:52 PM
Bick
Still no answer ???
Can you point at least one our fake account or paid shil ??????
I am asking this a few times already and no answer, why?
Because you can not
We never did this.
The reason you insist on telling this in most of your post is that you are not able to accept there are people that do not share your hate .
Small man


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Qeu on September 21, 2014, 08:40:36 PM
Bick
Still no answer ???
Can you point at least one our fake account or paid shil ??????
I am asking this a few times already and no answer, why?
Because you can not
We never did this.
The reason you insist on telling this in most of your post is that you are not able to accept there are people that do not share your hate .
Small man
Marto
Still no answer??
Can you point out at least why you ship batch 2 orders of 3 weeks old before 2 month old batch 1 orders?
I've asked this a few times already and no answer, why?


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: marto74 on September 21, 2014, 08:52:30 PM
Bick
Still no answer ???
Can you point at least one our fake account or paid shil ??????
I am asking this a few times already and no answer, why?
Because you can not
We never did this.
The reason you insist on telling this in most of your post is that you are not able to accept there are people that do not share your hate .
Small man
Marto
Still no answer??
Can you point out at least why you ship batch 2 orders of 3 weeks old before 2 month old batch 1 orders?
I've asked this a few times already and no answer, why?
yougot youranswer in the proper tread
and now you folow Bick`s lead and post a few full pages writing what scam I`m
Best Martin


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Qeu on September 21, 2014, 09:02:56 PM
Bick
Still no answer ???
Can you point at least one our fake account or paid shil ??????
I am asking this a few times already and no answer, why?
Because you can not
We never did this.
The reason you insist on telling this in most of your post is that you are not able to accept there are people that do not share your hate .
Small man
Marto
Still no answer??
Can you point out at least why you ship batch 2 orders of 3 weeks old before 2 month old batch 1 orders?
I've asked this a few times already and no answer, why?
yougot youranswer in the proper tread
and now you folow Bick`s lead and post a few full pages writing what scam I`m
Best Martin
I never wrote you are a scam, I wrote what an incompatent hardware producer you are that makes promises after promises without keeping them. "I'll ship your order Friday or Monday" and you even did not know the order number for that promised shipping.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: marto74 on September 21, 2014, 09:07:42 PM
great
You are right
now send Bick a PM.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Gyrsur on September 21, 2014, 09:11:16 PM
appreciate your good work OP. thanks!


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Qeu on September 21, 2014, 09:29:53 PM
great
You are right
now send Bick a PM.
No need to, I did sent you a message through your Technobit contact system though.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: marto74 on September 21, 2014, 10:10:55 PM
I got it.
it is nice formal letter and the proper way to reach what you want


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: marto74 on September 21, 2014, 11:52:04 PM
IF you ask Bick he can provide you with more than 1000 pages .
So go ahead


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Unacceptable on September 22, 2014, 12:15:38 AM
IF you ask Bick he can provide you with more than 1000 pages .
So go ahead

Wow  :o   Nice "customer service" !!!!!  ::)


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on September 22, 2014, 01:05:15 AM
IF you ask Bick he can provide you with more than 1000 pages .
So go ahead

Wow  :o   Nice "customer service" !!!!!  ::)


Ya... he really has nailed it. He should give a master class in customer service.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on September 22, 2014, 01:05:49 AM
Money Laundering by BFL?  Gleb making a case for it. I wonder if the IRS will be interested in any of this... or maybe they already are?

AVOID BFL... there is just no reason to buy anything from them.

You wanna hear a really scary thought? Best be sitting down for this one. What if... are you sitting?... What if Sonny Vleisides was the backbone of Bitcoin all along, and now that he's in the hoosegow with you... Holy fuck! Who's feeding her chickens?

Well, that is a good one...

I want to believe that all those scammers and crooks that infest the bitcoin ecosystem were independently attracted to it by the unique features of bitcoin -- anonymity, lack of regulation, transfer anywhere in the world without going through banks, a naive community with money to spare, ...  I assumed that each scammer recognized the other scammers "by smell", and cooperated with them instinctively, by a natural tacit agreement -- "You will pretend not tp see my scam, and I will pretend not to see yours." So it was, I thought, that Danny Brewster "helped" Ukyo to "resolve" the BitFunder affair, and that the Bitcoin Foundation never had a bad word to say about any scammer.

But indeed there is another possibility: that all those scammers were part of a single gang, that saw the "potential" of bitcoin years ago, and recruited suitable soldiers to run the individual scams and occupy key posts in the system...

(Dang, I am running out of tinfoil.)

Damn, I knew I should've purchased more shares of Alcoa last Thursday.  ::)

Here's some more shit to ponder:

Just ordered another single with bitcoins ... looks like they're using bit-pay now

http://s8.postimg.org/pgccbcnf9/imgur_the_simple_ima.jpg (http://s8.postimg.org/pgccbcnf9/imgur_the_simple_ima.jpg)

The blanked Bitcoin address is 1jyAQDoog4F4UFDt8nQCc2bTDGKcWydXd (http://blockexplorer.com/address/1jyAQDoog4F4UFDt8nQCc2bTDGKcWydXd)

People, you can't expect to protect your addresses if you talk about the amount of BTC that was involved in the transaction, and/or if you give the time of the transaction. Remember that the blockchain is public...

Note the address: 1jyAQDoog4F4UFDt8nQCc2bTDGKcWydXd

A question was once asked: 4.) Who owns the 18UxwNVLPo7vyRkCgs5wusUfhhbMYhApAu address? Is that Eclipse? (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg7027843#msg7027843)

That address was first used on 2012-04-04 03:09:07 GMT as shown here: https://blockchain.info/tx/be7b4664076706e55b6c81a4790f3f0032a1f7520e8edbbc22ad5ac9eb2a3c00

It's the second transaction I choose to use for illustration purposes: https://blockchain.info/tx/301a6cc7ba014d6cd966c94398203384a23bb29696d13c8f96928cef292ead12 at 2012-04-04 11:54:36 GMT.

It received funds from https://blockchain.info/address/1CQDJ8j7qRzPqT5PfDNGxgqA1J5ovUrMCd at 2012-04-04 11:54:36 GMT.

In turn, the above received funds from https://blockchain.info/address/1FQ7RTfXxXUBrWg1UUJ6r2j8SxfMUsUEQL at 2012-04-04 03:48:49 GMT.

And finally, the above received its sole funds from https://blockchain.info/address/1jyAQDoog4F4UFDt8nQCc2bTDGKcWydXd also at 2012-04-04 03:48:49 GMT. (proof below)

https://c4.staticflickr.com/4/3925/15118621230_2f8e79b983_b.jpg

https://blockchain.info/address/1jyAQDoog4F4UFDt8nQCc2bTDGKcWydXd is 100% one of BitPay's bitcoin wallet address, they even coming to the tread verifying such, so that's a given. It has had only 28 transactions to date, currently with a 0 BTC balance.

It's this address https://blockchain.info/address/1MgotZQSJC2zSim2Vp8rjmz3p6frf7EACo that was used to pay for the BitForce SHA256 Single to BFL via BitPay at 2012-04-04 01:49:29 GMT (shown below).

https://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5556/15118830798_5c8d8f5c15_b.jpg

Pause: There's nothing nefarious about the transaction above. It's only used to show that a miner was purchased from BFL by a Bitcoiner on this forum and that BitPay was used for the transaction. That's all! It's the subsequent transactions that I'll be using to state my case.

So, to recap the transactions thus far:

1MgotZQSJC2zSim2Vp8rjmz3p6frf7EACo ---> 1jyAQDoog4F4UFDt8nQCc2bTDGKcWydXd @ 2012-04-04 01:49:29 GMT
1jyAQDoog4F4UFDt8nQCc2bTDGKcWydXd ---> 1FQ7RTfXxXUBrWg1UUJ6r2j8SxfMUsUEQL @ 2012-04-04 03:48:49 GMT
1FQ7RTfXxXUBrWg1UUJ6r2j8SxfMUsUEQL ---> 1CQDJ8j7qRzPqT5PfDNGxgqA1J5ovUrMCd @ 2012-04-04 03:48:49 GMT
1CQDJ8j7qRzPqT5PfDNGxgqA1J5ovUrMCd ---> 18UxwNVLPo7vyRkCgs5wusUfhhbMYhApAu @ 2012-04-04 11:54:36 GMT

Bombo999 posted at April 03, 2012, 09:09:31 PM CST after placing his order at 8:49:29 PM CST, 9:49:29 in Atlanta, GA, well past normal operating hours, ergo all transactions up to the last one above can safely be assumed were done automatically via some set parameters. The last transaction's time equates to 2012-04-04 @ 6:54:36 AM CST as in Kansas City.

1MgotZQSJC2zSim2Vp8rjmz3p6frf7EACo: Bombo999
1jyAQDoog4F4UFDt8nQCc2bTDGKcWydXd: BitPay
1FQ7RTfXxXUBrWg1UUJ6r2j8SxfMUsUEQL and 1CQDJ8j7qRzPqT5PfDNGxgqA1J5ovUrMCd: Assume BitPay
18UxwNVLPo7vyRkCgs5wusUfhhbMYhApAu: ? (not sure yet)

Next, we have this: https://web.archive.org/web/20130625050854/http://sonofodi.weebly.com/

Quote
1Hq2t6dJcxqZjGda919p4c4tmopNRLciAJ  - chip sales

Safely assume that sonofodi is none other than Sonny Vleisides as proven beyond a shadow of a doubt here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg7027843#msg7027843

According to: view-source:https://web.archive.org/web/20130625050854/http://sonofodi.weebly.com/

Quote
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/web/20130625050854cs_/http://cdn2.editmysite.com/css/sites.css?buildTime=1371752720" type="text/css" /><link rel='stylesheet' type='text/css'

1371752720 equates to Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:25:20 GMT. On the archived site is the following pic:

https://web.archive.org/web/20130625050856im_/http://sonofodi.weebly.com/uploads/1/9/2/9/19299185/3349976_orig.jpg
https://web.archive.org/web/20130625050854/http://sonofodi.weebly.com/

Note the flood and golf course. Now, watch this: Deer Creek Golf Course flooded by rain: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vm4aEeHJ_4E According to the following, the flood occurred on the morning of May 31, 2013: http://www.kshb.com/news/news-photo-gallery/photos-high-water-in-and-around-kansas-city-after-morning-thunderstorm-may-31-2013

Now, check this out: http://static.squarespace.com/static/52829703e4b0920e1902d6c4/t/5292ceebe4b0af26b639a671/1385352939859/EOYC%20BoD%20Minutes%205.20.13.pdf

Quote
Paul   Foltz   (Fundraising)
- Paul   now   has   tax-exempt   form   for   sales   tax.   Alec   will   attach   the   form   on   the   
e-mail   with   the   minutes.   
- Paul   Foltz,   Bob   Andrews   and   Tom   Vleisides   (Annunciation)   have   been   
working   to   complete   EOYC   Camp   Policies   Document   that   Annunciation   has   
been   requesting.   It   is   close   to   completion.   
o Intro   paragraph:   Legal   names   of   KC   churches   will   be   included.
o 2.   Insurance:   Last   line,   we   would   like   to   drop   “per   person”.
o 4.   Staffing:   “best   effort”   was   changed   to   “EOYC   shall   provide”.
- Golf   Tourney   info:   We   are   going   to   move   to   Deer   Creek.   Cost   is   $40   per   head.   
Drink   and   food   can   be   donated   for   $10   per   person
- Sept.   28th is   the   date.   Alec   will   get   the   contract   signed   this   week.

From the above, we've gleaned:

  • May 31, 2013: Flood in KC
  • June 20, 2013: Sonofodi site created
  • June 25, 2013: Sonofodi site archived
  • A Vleisides, as most are, are affiliated with the Greek Orthodox Church in KC
  • Tom Vleisides was instrumental in a fundraising campaign in said church
  • The fundraising event consisted of a Golf outing at Deer Creek
  • Deer Creek was flooded prior to the creation of the Sonofodi site owned by Sonny Vleisides
  • Sonny Vleisides is related to Tom Vleisides

The only thing I've yet to accomplish is find the house depicted and its owner, connecting said to Sonny. The one thing we can probably say for sure is that the flood depicted in the image occurred on May 31, 2013, in KC.

Now, back to that address: https://web.archive.org/web/20130625050854/http://sonofodi.weebly.com/

Quote
1Hq2t6dJcxqZjGda919p4c4tmopNRLciAJ  - chip sales

https://blockchain.info/address/1Hq2t6dJcxqZjGda919p4c4tmopNRLciAJ has only 4 transactions. Here's the first one: https://blockchain.info/tx/ce1000c2b32d26f472730d9e6e0c92da946c7beda8e7bdbe654194ea4925f49d at 2013-06-25 04:15:52

As pointed out by some other - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg7027843#msg7027843 - the 1Hq2t6dJcxqZjGda919p4c4tmopNRLciAJ bitcoin wallet address was never advertised elsewhere excepted on the archived site linked above, yet it was able to garner funds prior to the creation of Sonny Vleisides' site to the tune of 159.9273 BTC.

Looking at the final three transactions: https://blockchain.info/address/1Hq2t6dJcxqZjGda919p4c4tmopNRLciAJ

https://c4.staticflickr.com/4/3876/15283090026_7a2da40d39_b.jpg

Note the 1QAHVyRzkmD4j1pU5W89htZ3c6D6E7iWDs bitcoin wallet address. Also note the 1DiPE4TnBczmPVoy53tffrd1iNPq87B3PB address: https://blockchain.info/address/1DiPE4TnBczmPVoy53tffrd1iNPq87B3PB

Also 12uyvDAC8LNU8yGcW8dYLGPToSD2JenVfH: https://blockchain.info/address/12uyvDAC8LNU8yGcW8dYLGPToSD2JenVfH

Both addresses (in bold) funds go to 1QAHVyRzkmD4j1pU5W89htZ3c6D6E7iWDs the very next day as seen here: https://blockchain.info/tx/827063279c43c50c3f4c690dbf491071386d80068115f48d0beee7e80b4c7f2f

https://c4.staticflickr.com/4/3856/15305847682_0a82861df8_b.jpg

Doing a taint analysis of the 1QAHVyRzkmD4j1pU5W89htZ3c6D6E7iWDs bitcoin wallet address, we discover: https://blockchain.info/taint/1QAHVyRzkmD4j1pU5W89htZ3c6D6E7iWDs

https://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5551/15283413966_96e5879124_b.jpg

Notice the 18UxwNVLPo7vyRkCgs5wusUfhhbMYhApAu bitcoin wallet address at the very top? That's the same that Bombo999's bitcoins gravitated to within hours of him transferring coins via BitPay. (scroll up a tad if you missed it)

Hopefully, I've established that both Bombo999 bitcoins used to purchase a miner from BFL and Sonny Vleisides' 1Hq2t6dJcxqZjGda919p4c4tmopNRLciAJ address used to amass BTC from the sale of chips, gravitated to the 1QAHVyRzkmD4j1pU5W89htZ3c6D6E7iWDs bitcoin wallet address.

Now, what else is the 1QAHVyRzkmD4j1pU5W89htZ3c6D6E7iWDs address known for?

This:

https://c4.staticflickr.com/4/3870/15299307081_2090f5fcb4_b.jpg

As seen here - http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/10/prweb11283333.htm - the 1QAHVyRzkmD4j1pU5W89htZ3c6D6E7iWDs address was used as the infamous $1M USD down payment for the purchase of BFL Monarchs by HashTrade. But, clearly that's an impossibility, for that wallet address either belongs to BFL or BitPay, and I'm assuming the former. If the latter, then there be some 'splainin' to do on BitPay's part. And we sure the hell don't want that, for they're one of the few good guys playin' here in the Bitcoin space, and I love them, Tony, et al.

The bottom line is that NO FUCKIN' WAY does the 1QAHVyRzkmD4j1pU5W89htZ3c6D6E7iWDs bitcoin wallet address belong to HashTrade, and we can safely assume that BFL and HashTrade were/are pullin' a fast one, and, furthermore, BFL has a stash of bitcoins that's being kept from pryin' eyes, e.g., the IRS and Sonny's probation officer, for clearly there's some money laundering going on here, and you can bet your bottom satoshi that Josh Zerlan is smack dab in the middle of it.

It was Coinware's HashTrade, et al., that I was just starting to dig into when Josh, once again, called me out as a liar, going as far as offering up a 1 BTC bet that I couldn't go a month without lying. I proposed 10 BTC and two months, whereupon the bet was sealed. Then, in spite of others telling me to hush for two months, I continued to post even more, but had to be very mindful of what to post in BFL's threads for fear of losing the bet, but I did post plenty of safe posts. Come January, Josh did pay up, but for two months, then forward for a few more months, CoinWare, et al., was not discussed much till most recently, now that I've revived it.

If this goes to trail, at its end there'll be 12 angry monumental assholes convening for only a short while prior to coming back to the court room with their verdict - GUILTY!

~Bruno Kucinskas


Title: Re: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: SolarWindMiningCompany on September 22, 2014, 12:13:26 PM
Thanks Bick for hosting this thread and the hard work it must take to maintain it.

... By the way, KNC is placed in its righteous place...

Posted From bitcointalk.org Android App


Title: Re: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on September 22, 2014, 01:28:05 PM
Thanks Bick for hosting this thread and the hard work it must take to maintain it.

... By the way, KNC is placed in its righteous place...

Posted From bitcointalk.org Android App

 ;)


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on September 22, 2014, 01:30:16 PM
More evidence to NEVER buy from Bitmine.  https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/thumbdown.gif

 September 22, 2014  (http://bestp2pool.wordpress.com/2014/09/22/do-not-trust-bitmine-ch/)

Quote
06.12.2013 I ordered 1xCoinCraft Desk (Shipping February week 5) for $2,448.00 (order #4018). Because I didn´t get unit as they promised, I asked for refund. Until today I didn´t get unit or money. They do not answer to my emails. I never experience so high level of ignorance.

They still offering miners but how they can do that? If they are not able to deliver unit or return money for almost a year, how they can still selling something.

They have motto: “For serious miners”. But think twice before you order anything from them. I just showed you how they works and I am not alone.

You can find more information on following sites:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=524837.60
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=486808.860


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Zelek Uther on September 23, 2014, 07:57:19 PM
One more reason not to buy from BFL: the US Government have shut them down.

Where is bcp19 now? Surely he has a way to deflect this?

Where is BFL_Josh / Inaba? Surely he can tell the FTC that everything is ok and all deliveries and refunds will be processed in Two WeeksTM?


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Unacceptable on September 23, 2014, 10:52:44 PM
http://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2014/09/ftcs-request-court-halts-bogus-bitcoin-mining-operation

"Where in the world is Josh Zerlan"  ???

http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h148/Bigblock462/Joshfound_zps616874eb.jpg (http://s63.photobucket.com/user/Bigblock462/media/Joshfound_zps616874eb.jpg.html)  

                        ;D :D


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: sbogovac on September 25, 2014, 11:01:34 AM
IMPORTANT PSA for BFL former and current customers:

[...]
[...]

And don't forget...:

[...]PS@Bicknellski: owe you my sincere apologies and gratitude "dude"...  :)


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: vipgelsi on September 25, 2014, 11:10:06 AM
BFL finnaly got what it deserved.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: marto74 on September 25, 2014, 11:25:39 AM
Here is the original post :
BFL finnaly got what it deserved.

Here is quoted post from Bick
Has customer service improved yet here?


NOPE. Not at Technobit.

Hahahah
What a Joke


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: marto74 on September 25, 2014, 11:33:24 AM
p.p.s.
Bick
We have different tread for every project we made and that works.
That is why there are 10 treads.
how are your design efforts going lately :D


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: marto74 on September 25, 2014, 11:38:16 AM
I just wonder can you use bigger RED letters please?

I'm done with you for now boy

Have a nice day


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: sbogovac on September 25, 2014, 11:43:38 AM
[...]PS@Bicknellski: owe you my sincere apologies and gratitude "dude"...  :)
[...]sbogovac <--- Ya good post. Other than that... don't care much.[...]
Thanks, but well - sorry - I do care. If people read this fora back a couple of months they might stumble across a discussion we had considering BFL where I "defended" them. You turned out to be right, and I would have been saved a lot of time, effort and misery if I hadn't been such a noob and just paid attention. So - again - my apologies for that and my gratitude for you relentless efforts in helping us al!

Just take this forum for instance; it's called "Biased & Opinionated" and still some manufacturers take more time and effort to react here then to spend their time making customers happy...?!? This was a big sign on the wall with BFL, and probably is for all other "companies" behaving in the same way... Too bad, seems like you'll have something to do yet...


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: marto74 on September 25, 2014, 01:35:42 PM
oppps
.......


Meanwhile while Marto and his paid shill or multiple account Loshia continue to spam threads.. Technobit ignores another customer. Best to avoid this company people don't risk your BTC. Buy elsewhere.

......................
. Here comes his BCP look alike Loshia... yet another PAID SHILL for Technobit.


Bick
again are you stating that loshia is paid by us or our account ????
am I getting apology if this is not the case ?
I dare you pathetic  BOY ;)
grow up , please :D



Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: marto74 on September 25, 2014, 01:49:09 PM
Hey , BOY
anything new ?
Please investigate , really do.
And then again I expect your apologies .
And please report back  the child of your design efforts lately ;)


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: marto74 on September 25, 2014, 02:38:20 PM
aaand the Bicknelsky guide tread is over now :D
Just like WASP project tread :D
Just personal hate and usual Bick's way
enjoy TROLL


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: marto74 on September 25, 2014, 02:47:10 PM

I hope lot of people order this new miner, so Martin can send refund for older undelivered miners.
Care to check what happened ?
Or just twist it as usualy ....


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: marto74 on September 25, 2014, 02:49:01 PM
OK, I GUESS WE HAVE TO GET REALLY LOUD FOR YOUR DUMB ASS TO PHUCKING LISTEN

WHERE THE PHUCK IS MY ORDER?  WHAT IS MY ORDER STATUS? Your damn website STILL says I have not paid.

Am I gonna have to run to bulgaria and snatch a kink in your ass?

FUCKING RESPOND dipshit...

EDEGSUOLY
Care to check ?
Ohhh nooooo you just need to back your hate
small twisted boy :D

Ooooh ,nooooooo
you are killing me , Bick
hahahhaha
:D


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: marto74 on September 25, 2014, 02:58:38 PM
Spending time here trying to pretend I am the bad guy is time wasted.

Go do some actual work that helps your customers get products on time and to specification.

You have spent hours here already and there are still a number of customers in the last few days who have asked for answers on shipping and delivery. Why do you insist on ignoring your customers?
I do this is just my cofee time TROLL.
In fact next project is on the way.
What about you ?
Did you make working miner yet ?

You do not understand do you?
Puting technobit and me in your posts everyday for months , only because your project failed is going to cost you.
I'll use my cofee time to turn your treads in sheet.
I was silent for 3 months , but you never stopped.
You even dare to write about my wife . I understand that family is something strange for you ;)
Together with this we'll continue to design new projects.
Something you are not able to :D

Good bye for today TROLL.
Tommorow I'll be back


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Unacceptable on September 25, 2014, 10:03:42 PM
Bick,keep up the good work  ;D

Marto,ship to those who have paid,some customers can be dicks,work with them anyhow  ::)


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Und3rd0g on September 26, 2014, 03:47:59 AM
Wow.  Unfortunately this thread has gone down hill.  My condolences to those who have been ripped off.  :(


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: marto74 on September 26, 2014, 09:14:58 AM
Good morning dear troll
enjoy your ruined guide :D

As far you move your posts in the bottom here you are mine :
IMPORTANT PSA for BFL former and current customers:


Latest update on the BFL homepage:

"BF Labs, Inc. has been placed in a temporary receivership pursuant to court order, Case No. 4:14-cv-00815-BCW. There will be a hearing on September 29, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. at the Charles Evans Whittaker Courthouse in Kansas City, Missouri. At the hearing, the court will consider this matter. Questions may be directed to the temporary receiver at: eljreceiver@spencerfane.com or 816-292-8316."

Please people, this aint over "till the fat lady sings"; contact the receiver and explain your position in this!

(My story is something like: ordered in jan. expected delivery in march/april, due to BFL's non-delivery I missed this much BTC income by the time BFL refunded me [after another 45 day wait] in august and I finally could divert that investment to another producer [Antminer] who did deliver in two weeks, in the mean time BFL banned me permanently off the forum so I could not communicate properly with either them or other customers.)


The shut down of BFL is reaching pretty much every major media venue now... On Forbes.

 Meanwhile, according to FTC attorney Helen Wong, the company’s owners were using company credit cards for personal shopping outings at Nordstroms and Bed, Bath & Beyond; to get massages; go to saunas; and to buy guns. That last one could only be a business expense if the owners were preparing for customers descending on them with pitchforks.

They should have been called Bitfarce machines. Over 20,000 customers ordered them but none had received them over a year later, according to the FTC complaint. In November 2013, Butterfly Labs claimed all the Bitforce machines had shipped but “consumers continued to file complaints about not receiving their prepaid BitForce mining machine,” says the FTC.  (http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2014/09/23/ftc-butterfly-labs-paypal/)


Meanwhile... Technobit ignores another customer. Best to avoid this company people don't risk your BTC. Buy elsewhere.

Post yesterday...

Marto can you give me an update on my order?

Post today... ignores questions on orders so regularly why would anyone bother ordering shit from Marto... insanity.

simple Setup guide for *(yet another product that some of his customers have to ask when will arrive.)

So busy failing to respond to customers yet has time to always post here over and over again. Takes two seconds to lie to your customer... excuse number 34 we sent it but the shipping company sent it to the wrong location... then evidence shows you never sent it. Remember that one Marto? Why is that? His behavior is so much like Josh you'd think they were soul mates. Both Zerlan and Zipkin. Forget the fact that his wife and Zipkin's wife are friends... nothing to see here. Move along. Wasn't wrong about BFL not wrong about Technobit. Do no buy from this guy. He uses the same tactics for ignoring customers and abusing customers just like BFL has in the past. Don't be fooled by this company. There are plenty of complaints and the faux accounts he created to mask it along with 10 threads of product placement here to distract you from what happens when things are not delivered is not that hard to pick up on.

There are many other places to shop. Avoid Technobit.
As far you edit and move your posts on the bottom here are mine connected to you twisted writings :
First post :
I think that when you quote somebody , you are not supposed to edit or add words.
Ohhh I forget that you like to twist and bend facts and quotes in order to prove your point that is just a pure hate .
I feel sad for you
Small man

Best

Second one :
Because I love you boy ;)

p.s. I'm still waiting for you to point @ least one member that gave positive feedback for us that is our fake account or paid shill .
Can you?
AS far you mention this number of times already , maybe it is time to back your accusations .
Or I'll accept you apologies about that lie

Third one :
Ohhhh,
we got personal again wright.
When you get our of arguments you come down to the level of Zipkin and his sock puppets.
My wife again , realy? So pathetic
You just move your posts :)
Then you add to them :)
hahaha I feel sorry for you .
Listen F***** ,Stay away from  my family .


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Unacceptable on September 26, 2014, 11:15:48 AM
Oh oh,I think marto went all

http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h148/Bigblock462/Brokebackminers1_zps2aa8455a.jpg (http://s63.photobucket.com/user/Bigblock462/media/Brokebackminers1_zps2aa8455a.jpg.html)


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: marto74 on September 26, 2014, 11:35:21 AM
Coffee time Bick
Do you need update on my wife's whereabouts?



Again
p.p.s.
Bick
We have different tread for every project we made and that works.
That is why there are 10 treads.
how are your design efforts going lately Cheesy


Here is the original post :
BFL finnaly got what it deserved.

Here is quoted post from Bick
Has customer service improved yet here?


NOPE. Not at Technobit.

Hahahah
What a Joke


oppps
.......


Meanwhile while Marto and his paid shill or multiple account Loshia continue to spam threads.. Technobit ignores another customer. Best to avoid this company people don't risk your BTC. Buy elsewhere.

......................
. Here comes his BCP look alike Loshia... yet another PAID SHILL for Technobit.


Bick
again are you stating that loshia is paid by us or our account ????
am I getting apology if this is not the case ?
I dare you pathetic  BOY ;)
grow up , please :D


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: marto74 on September 26, 2014, 12:37:05 PM
This time I'll have cappucino
;)
I love you boy

p.s. I'm still waiting for you to point @ least one member that gave positive feedback for us that is our fake account or paid shill .
Can you?
AS far you mention this number of times already , maybe it is time to back your accusations .
Or I'll accept you apologies about that lie


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Qeu on September 26, 2014, 02:06:01 PM
Here we go again.

Again?Meanwhile while Marto and his paid shill or multiple account Loshia continue to spam threads... What does Technobit do? They ignore another customer. Best to avoid this company people don't risk your BTC. [/size]
Meanwhile, he shipped my stuff Tuesday. I admit he needed a little pushing, but it happened. He actually did what he has done for long, produce and ship hardware. Now it's your turn to get something going bick, fees from others or collecting other people's comments, twisting words and adding a lot of lies to build some sort of authority, it ain't working.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: loshia on September 26, 2014, 02:24:22 PM
Here we go again.

Again?Meanwhile while Marto and his paid shill or multiple account Loshia continue to spam threads... What does Technobit do? They ignore another customer. Best to avoid this company people don't risk your BTC. [/size]
Meanwhile, he shipped my stuff Tuesday. I admit he needed a little pushing, but it happened. He actually did what he has done for long, produce and ship hardware. Now it's your turn to get something going bick, fees from others or collecting other people's comments, twisting words and adding a lot of lies to build some sort of authority, it ain't working.

Nice said are you paid shill like me buddy ;)
Marto has a big PR pocket obviously :D


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: marto74 on September 26, 2014, 03:45:18 PM
Coffee  time bick.
we are almost ready to test avalon 4 project.
any news on your latest HW failures
 :P


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Qeu on September 26, 2014, 04:19:31 PM
Here we go again.

Again?Meanwhile while Marto and his paid shill or multiple account Loshia continue to spam threads... What does Technobit do? They ignore another customer. Best to avoid this company people don't risk your BTC. [/size]
Meanwhile, he shipped my stuff Tuesday. I admit he needed a little pushing, but it happened. He actually did what he has done for long, produce and ship hardware. Now it's your turn to get something going bick, fees from others or collecting other people's comments, twisting words and adding a lot of lies to build some sort of authority, it ain't working.

Nice said are you paid shill like me buddy ;)
Marto has a big PR pocket obviously :D
lol, we must make that he pays us better, still on an old amd xp laptop here. Marto!!!!!

Did you all see how he removes comments from his technobit fucks us over thread where I posted the same message as one page back? Talking to himself, lol.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: loshia on September 26, 2014, 05:04:57 PM
Here we go  ;D ;Dagain.

Again?Meanwhile while Marto and his paid shill or multiple account Loshia continue to spam threads... What does Technobit do? They ignore another customer. Best to avoid this company people don't risk your BTC. [/size]
Meanwhile, he shipped my stuff Tuesday. I admit he needed a little pushing, but it happened. He actually did what he has done for long, produce and ship hardware. Now it's your turn to get something going bick, fees from others or collecting other people's comments, twisting words and adding a lot of lies to build some sort of authority, it ain't working.

Nice said are you paid shill like me buddy ;)
Marto has a big PR pocket obviously :D
lol, we must make that he pays us better, still on an old amd xp laptop here. Marto!!!!!

Did you all see how he removes comments from his technobit fucks us over thread where I posted the same message as one page back? Talking to himself, lol.
We know that dude:)
He is very good at moving posts that is all he does and blinking LEDs of course ;D
Teacher as I sugested go and find a gifted YOUNG boy to write a bot for you ;)
You gona loose we are many you are alone even JOE left the fight


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on September 26, 2014, 05:14:38 PM
FTC on shutdown of fraudulent Bitcoin equipment company

Great interview of an FTC official about this BFL situation.

 Wednesday, September 24, 2014 10:56 p.m. by Raymond Neupert (http://wsau.com/podcasts/newsmaker-interviews/53/ftc-on-shutdown-of-fraudulent-bitcoin-equipment-company/)


 Possible excuse or reason why it took the FTC so long? ARS follow up info. Check it out. (http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/09/feds-label-bitcoin-miner-maker-butterfly-labs-as-systematic-deception/)

Quote
Wong also noted that in this action—the FTC's first involving Bitcoin—seeks "full consumer redress," which, if successful, would result in refunds payable in US dollars.

NOTE... not even the FTC will refund the BTC. Jerks! That be something to ask about eh?

VINDICATE BITCOIN? WTF... their crap has been putting thousands and thousands to question the very nature of Bitcoin because of their MASSIVE FRAUD.

I hope they get the FULL impact of losing control of BFL permanently then when Sonny goes to jail for violating parole the next bit of action to take place needs to be criminal charges for anyone involved in this fiasco.

Quote
UPDATE 2:15pm CT: Butterfly Labs' spokesman, Charles Zinkowski, sent Ars this statement, declaring that the company was "disappointed in the heavy-handed actions" of the FTC.

"Butterfly Labs intends to defend our business and our nascent and promising industry," the company said. "The government wants to shut Butterfly Labs down, and we are not going away without a fight to vindicate bitcoin, our company, and our employees."

Zinkowski also did not respond to further questions.


[...]PS@Bicknellski: owe you my sincere apologies and gratitude "dude"...  :)
[...]sbogovac <--- Ya good post. Other than that... don't care much.[...]
Thanks, but well - sorry - I do care. If people read this fora back a couple of months they might stumble across a discussion we had considering BFL where I "defended" them. You turned out to be right, and I would have been saved a lot of time, effort and misery if I hadn't been such a noob and just paid attention. So - again - my apologies for that and my gratitude for you relentless efforts in helping us al!

Just take this forum for instance; it's called "Biased & Opinionated" and still some manufacturers take more time and effort to react here then to spend their time making customers happy...?!? This was a big sign on the wall with BFL, and probably is for all other "companies" behaving in the same way... Too bad, seems like you'll have something to do yet...

There were 100 people right well before I was.

Happens.

Not the only one that got bamboozled.

I am thinking there are plenty more crooks to watch for as well.

We are all good.

Just here like others trying to fight the good fight. There are plenty of people still being taken for a ride but the easiest solution is to just avoid anyone with a taint or smell. BFL was easy to spot for many there are plenty of others that attempt to cover and evade or often than not ignore their customers more probing questions. If you see one person ripped off you might see another and another... at some point there is enough evidence to warn people off a company.

Where we need to be clear with people is pointing out behaviors that are really scummy and for the most part screw people over. You don't have to ship 100% of product on time and perfectly to spec to get on the thumbs up list here. Just have to make amends when you do screw up. The community remembers that and should call fabricators out when they do not live up to deal they have posted.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on September 26, 2014, 05:16:04 PM
Boo! Technobit https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/thumbdown.gif

What do you see frequently in a Technobit thread before it is either deleted or buried in posts of miracle technical resolution from a newbie miner?

Marto any news when batch 2 will be shipped, its been over a month now since you received my chips. ive emailed you on your site, 2 weeks ago and no reply.
would like to know whats happening with those.

you going to be offering any compensation for late deliveries now. awaiting 25 boards  >:( and counting

 No offense Guyver, but he hasn't even shipped batch one out. Hopefully he will not ship out anymore batch 2 like the mistake made last week. I just got my first partial shipment today 6 of 50. I know its been over a month for you and I hate it, but it has been over 10 weeks for some of us.

And yet he has time to shadow this thread for 2 days now?

Define LATE shipping please someone Marto74 still doesn't get it. Thumbs Down. Do not buy from Technobit.

Serious people ignore less than serious threads like this and do the work. Rather than resolving issues for customers Martin has once again ignored them and done little to offer compensation or relief. Typically if the customers do not "behave" they are often ignored and never refunded.

This has happened and is documented. Here is hoping were are not seeing yet another group of people hurt by this company.

More sad news for Technobit Customers.  https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/thumbdown.gif

scrappy do, dam so shipments are just trickling out. i would of thought at least batch 1 would of been completed by now

I haven't received a single one of my 88 boards. My chips have been at technobit since July 17th.

This is not the first incident nor the last. Please people avoid Technobit.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on September 26, 2014, 05:20:57 PM
What does a THUMBS UP company see as feedback in their thread? Something like this.

Personally, I like your direct no-nonsense approach.

The main thing is that the CEO is active right here on the forum... so communication is happening, questions are answered, responses are being made. We've got great tech support right here too.

It's like night and day compared to many other manufacturers.

On the discussion previously... are all mining companies currently selling negative ROI units?

Based on the hashrate increase and how consumers are still buying over priced miners, I now think that overall mining will go negative ROI for a while until people realize that they are losing money. Home miners don't think like business miners and may not realize they are losing $ in small bits here and there.

So while the max hashrate/BTC calculations have value, I don't think many individuals will actually shut down if they already have the equipment.

Gonna be a rough ride for a while.


That is a good thread to comment and go nuts on if you think ROI is impossible.

Example...

Buy the cheaper miners out there. Add a heat sink just to cool the latest heat pig chip, with PSU, Shipping etc... what is the ROI on that?


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on September 26, 2014, 05:21:41 PM
IMPORTANT PSA for BFL former and current customers:

sbogovac <--- Ya good post. Other than that... don't care much.

Latest update on the BFL homepage:

"BF Labs, Inc. has been placed in a temporary receivership pursuant to court order, Case No. 4:14-cv-00815-BCW. There will be a hearing on September 29, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. at the Charles Evans Whittaker Courthouse in Kansas City, Missouri. At the hearing, the court will consider this matter. Questions may be directed to the temporary receiver at: eljreceiver@spencerfane.com or 816-292-8316."

Please people, this aint over "till the fat lady sings"; contact the receiver and explain your position in this!

(My story is something like: ordered in jan. expected delivery in march/april, due to BFL's non-delivery I missed this much BTC income by the time BFL refunded me [after another 45 day wait] in august and I finally could divert that investment to another producer [Antminer] who did deliver in two weeks, in the mean time BFL banned me permanently off the forum so I could not communicate properly with either them or other customers.)


The shut down of BFL is reaching pretty much every major media venue now... On Forbes.

 Meanwhile, according to FTC attorney Helen Wong, the company’s owners were using company credit cards for personal shopping outings at Nordstroms and Bed, Bath & Beyond; to get massages; go to saunas; and to buy guns. That last one could only be a business expense if the owners were preparing for customers descending on them with pitchforks.

They should have been called Bitfarce machines. Over 20,000 customers ordered them but none had received them over a year later, according to the FTC complaint. In November 2013, Butterfly Labs claimed all the Bitforce machines had shipped but “consumers continued to file complaints about not receiving their prepaid BitForce mining machine,” says the FTC.  (http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2014/09/23/ftc-butterfly-labs-paypal/)


Meanwhile while Marto and his paid shill or multiple account Loshia continue to spam threads... Technobit ignores another customer. Best to avoid this company people don't risk your BTC. Buy elsewhere.

Post yesterday...

Marto can you give me an update on my order?

Post today... ignores questions on orders so regularly why would anyone bother ordering shit from Marto... insanity.

simple Setup guide for *(yet another product that some of his customers have to ask when will arrive.)

So busy failing to respond to customers yet has time to always post here over and over again. Takes two seconds to lie to your customer... excuse number 34 we sent it but the shipping company sent it to the wrong location... then evidence shows you never sent it. Remember that one Marto? Why is that? His behavior is so much like Josh you'd think they were soul mates. Both Zerlan and Zipkin. Forget the fact that his wife and Zipkin's wife are friends... nothing to see here. Move along. Wasn't wrong about BFL not wrong about Technobit. Do no buy from this guy. He uses the same tactics for ignoring customers and abusing customers just like BFL has in the past. Don't be fooled by this company. There are plenty of complaints and the faux accounts he created to mask it along with 10 threads of product placement here to distract you from what happens when things are not delivered is not that hard to pick up on. Here comes his BCP look alike Loshia... yet another PAID SHILL for Technobit.


Oh oh,I think marto went all

http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h148/Bigblock462/Brokebackminers1_zps2aa8455a.jpg (http://s63.photobucket.com/user/Bigblock462/media/Brokebackminers1_zps2aa8455a.jpg.html)

Josh and BCP did the same thing to me. Bet you dollars to donuts Loshia on the payroll.


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: marto74 on September 26, 2014, 05:26:10 PM
Dinner time troll

Any news ?
Do you have something else twisted to write about my family ?

BTW any news on WASP project  ;D


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: loshia on September 26, 2014, 05:53:37 PM
Wow.  Unfortunately this thread has gone down hill.  My condolences to those who have been ripped off.  :(
BickLEDsky is like a plague.
When there are no easy money around and nothing to steal (Chris work for example or FAMOUS AMT KNOW HOW ;D ;D) there is nothing left for him except trolling.
BickLEDsky is a complete ZERO. His WASP Balloon project proves this. His relations with scammers is another prove also. He is acting like a pancake. When he realizes that he can not suck money or dividends from particular person or company he begins to troll. He has zero technical skills also.
That is what he is.
I am enough with this shit and I will make sure that my posts will be always the last ones (“AKA BickLEDsky style”) so everybody new this!!!!

Happy trolling LEDBOY
Hey LED you have to start to edit and move your posts up and down immediately hurry up  ;D
Led boy,
Christmas i coming and wall mart is waiting for you fancy LEDs hurry up ;)
PS:
Meanwhile it is about time you to find a young gifted boy  ;D ;D ;D to write a webbot for you so your posts always to be the latest ones
What about it teacher?


Title: Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
Post by: Bicknellski on September 27, 2014, 01:36:08 AM
Technobit Still... https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/thumbdown.gif


More evidence surfaces of late and only a small 'trickle' of shipping for some customers.

Technobit has Loshia to post on this thread they don't need a bot he works for cheap.

Why it is certainly amazing that Technobit has all this time to confront the reality of their failure to communicate here but why not directly with their customers?

BFL / AMT like in so many ways.

Meanwhile BlackArrow https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/thumbdown.gif

BA has upgraded their customer post deletion bot; it now scans the thread several times a second looking for customer posts to delete.