Hello guys, im browsing the gambling section on the forums, i bet on soccer from time to time, 1x2, whenever i try to bet more then 200-300$ on a single bet they limit me, so im wondering, if there is a safe platform that i can bet 1-2-5k$ per bet on soccer, that will pay me out in the end  If someone helps me find it, ill tip him $50  Unbelieveable this thread is full of BS without giving you straight up answers. No, Stake won't let you bet $5k a single bet all the times. I can bet on the NBA maybe $100 - $200 max with them, they will quickly limit you if you win as well. What you're looking for is called a betting agent!Read this: https://gamblingfreebies.com/2020/12/23/how-to-use-betfair-from-anywhere/and this: https://gamblingfreebies.com/2022/10/03/how-to-place-lay-bets-on-horse-races-in-2023/Hopefully this would help you achieve what you wish to achieve. |
|
|
|
@Get-Paid.com Sent you a letter
Just posting here to confirm we got fully paid from BetNomi, thanks for your honesty and for getting back to us about this, it's highly appreciated. |
|
|
|
|
Guys,
Apologies for not uploading the letter, next time in the future would remember to include it here in the forum.
Once again apologies.
|
|
|
|
Freebitco team, I think it will be amazing if you add UFC fights in your events list to make bets on UFC fighters. I think that demand will be high, especially on top fights. Keep this in mind, please.
@wetsuit, @TheQuin, @Hhampuz
Finally agreeing with you on something. It'ssss timeee..... 5 rounds for the undisputed undefeated.... lol  |
|
|
|
yet it’s the reason why your site maintains a decent rating of 3.9 stars.
It's called being hands on and responding to user complaints. Of course they don't have to do that on every platform but they simply don't respond at all. If you get stuck you're stuck forever. |
|
|
|
Well, if that's the case, then what do you think, why Freebitco's ownership doesn't shut down their Faucet? Why do they keep running it? They should know that they are experiencing loss, so what should be the point to keep faucet alive? Maybe they give away much but they are also getting some back from gambling? I mean, some people roll it and then play dice.
It's a tough game, if you change/close the faucet you destroy years of hard work. It's not an easy decision to be taken lightly, it's a super hard business decision to take with lots at stake! FYI the weekly slow/auto withdrawal once again from our account, second time in a row:  But it's not surprising. We know we're not the only ones experiencing these delays, on our social media users share similar experiences. Again, it's not a walk in the park to change a faucet, it's a super tough decision to make, but in our view with this structure it's a must. |
|
|
|
For God's sake, he equated the casino owner with a terrorist and called him one of the most dangerous people on the planet. That was not a metaphor!
*metaphor = expressions that mean something different from their literal definition Yes, he did take a very extreme approach, he was exaggerating for sure with his words. |
|
|
|
I may likely deviate also from the open water is where the writer mentioned gambling as a tool for terrorism, this is quite confusing a bit for me
The writer was using a sort of a metaphor. Terrorists kill people and destroy things. He was implying Eddie supposedly is killing an entire generation by getting them addicted. Hope it makes sense now. |
|
|
|
It might be too high but they are still paying (allthough they are some issues nowadays). When giving away free money, you will have a lot of abusers and scammers but they can weed out a lot of them with their minimum payout (30 000 satoshis).
30,000 sats sounds like a difficult amount to reach with one single account but fraudsters don't play this game like this. They would open an account today, tomorrow, next week, and will simply run a script, they don't even bother logging into the account. As a faucet operator from your perspective these are all "genuine" accounts but in fact these are people draining your faucet and they won't stop, it would only intensify. Isn't this the sign withdrawals are reviewed manually by the platform before being processed, therefore working as an efficient anti-bot/cheater system? Maybe they take their time to check the account which is demanding the cashout, which other accounts might be connected to it, how often it claims from the faucet, so they conclude if it's a genuine user or not.
Depending the moment the withdrawal was executed by the user, it has always delayed more or less, even when choosing instant mode. I already had withdrawals which took longer and others which were launched faster on the blockchain.
The delays we're referring to are not blockchain delays. The issue is not with the Bitcoin blockchain and fees, although from time to time it's also becoming a small issue but it's easy to get over it. Again, this is really not the issue here. You're asking: Isn't this the sign withdrawals are reviewed manually by the platform before being processed, therefore working as an efficient anti-bot/cheater system? No, unfortunately not, when you reach a position where you have too many users to pay to and you have to check these accounts manually, it's not only time consuming but almost impossible to detect which one is genuine and which one is not. It's a tough situation unfortunately. |
|
|
|
If the reward is low in terms of per unit then they have less to worry about all the concerns with multi accounting
They don't go under 1 satoshi, that is $0.00062 right now - sounds so little but it's not. It's hard to see it as a user, but as a faucet operator these "peanuts" can grow so fast into huge numbers. In our faucet btw we went under 1 satoshi, we had no choice. |
|
|
|
But there have been no such talk from them and no sign of problems.
You're slightly wrong about it. Lots of users exeprienced recently delayed withdrawals, they eventually were paid but there were delays and it was quite unusual. Hopefully it's just a blip and no more. We're investors in this project just like users invested in ours, whether it's via 100k referrals or holding FUN, investors can express what they think is best. And people are reading our blog or watching our channel, maybe not in 5-6 digits but a few thousands - yes. That's enough for us. The message is conveyed. |
|
|
|
 WTF moment at bc.game Played on crash and targeted 1.4x but crashed at 1.39x. This is very annoying because the difference is only 0.01 points. This is the second time I've had a WTF moment on a bc.game crash game. Do you also often play game crash? Are there any special tricks you have? Btw, the RIO contest is almost over, have you got a lot of RIO guys? Dang....!!! Truly feels annoying but it is what it is, better luck next time |
|
|
|
Of course I know what happened with FreeDoge. It was an unprofitable business so they allocated resources elsewhere. I don’t need a low effort blog post to explain it to me, which it doesn’t even do because it’s just stuffed with random nonsense for SEO purposes and speculative arguments.
If you have a problem with a speculative argument then that's your problem, but great to hear you know what happened and you're once again feel like you know it all. SEO isn't taboo. FreeBitco did the same thing when they just launched, was this a problem or you have personal vendetta specifically against us somehow? Your description of what happened to CoinPot (or CoinPayU) is once again a proof you're indeed a kind of person who feels like he/she knows it all, sorry to burst your bubble, and let's just stop there, you're not worth any further attention. I appreciate your response too but maybe they have machanism to cope with bots and service abuse? Don't get me wrong, you have 6+ years of experience as a faucet owner but if I recall correctly, freebitco is the first faucet out there or at least one of the most experienced one. Can't talk much about delayed withdrawals, I have no idea.
I don't know what to say, if their current business model wasn't profitable, they wouldn't run signature campaign and wouldn't keep website the way it is right now. They have enough money and probaly enough staff (or will hire if they want) to make significant changes.
Thanks so much firstly for posting with a more positive attitude unlike this TrueVision who thinks he/she knows it all. Look, The business model of FreeBitco, gambling, speculative things - it's fun and it's great, we like it, perhaps they could have added a more new-ish graphic element to it, but they don't have to - that's not the issue, the issue is not about their games and all which are great. The issue is the faucet itself, these guys have thousands of Bitcoin, but they are giving away too much free bitcoin ... 1 satoshi seems like a joke to many of you, a grain of sand, but imagine thousands of users grabbing it, if you look at the web you would see hundreds of different bots already built with one design and purpose - to drain FreeBitco's faucet. They exist even now, it's impossible to stop them just with IP address or with a "fingerprint" system, we tried it all with so many versions, it's just so damn hard, you can't really stop these bad guys. The only thing you can do is change your business model, don't feed these bad guys with 1 satoshi every hour, you might have the budget to pay them all but if you check your books, check your profits - the faucets "eat" too much from your revenue, and it's not becoming just 1% or 5% where you can say "nah, it's small potatoes, let's just forget about it". With their size it's becoming a monster, the elephant in the room - so yes, that's why we talked about it. Anyway back to the point - CoinPot didn't shut down just because of the rising price of DOGE, CoinPayU for sure not ... did you see how many ads are showing now on autofaucet-dutchycorp? You can't even see the faucet... FireFaucet is another example where you have to go up levels to make it worthwhile so basically you have to "prove" you're a genuine person even though it might scare off some users - long run it works. Dutchy/Fire didn't do it because they want to bother the users, the revenue from ads isn't the same as it was before for them and the amount of users claiming is only growing and growing. FreeBitco is no different, it has a bad negative book eating up a huge chunk of Bitcoin on a daily basis, this is unfortunately not a speculative argument, TheQuin/Wetsuit would tell you the same thing if they were here. We're all in this together, the goal of big faucets is to sustain themselves and provide value for their users, the value is being diminished when more and more bots eat up the profits. In FreeBitco's case they might have enough budget to live with that, but it's a growing problem, just like a cancer, so in order to fix the problem from its root - you change the business model, and then it's a win-win for everyone, long term for sure. |
|
|
|
Unfortunately, they are allowed to make such decisions. If you want to bet without these limits use a betting agent, and even then do so with a careful investigation of which agent you're using, because even betting agents can steal your funds - for example: BetInAsia Scam: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5473582.0Alternatively try having accounts with 9-10 sportsbooks and then this way if one limits you, then you'd be able to place the bet with another. However, if you truly want to win - getting limited is actually good for you, you mentioned you lost a lot, so maybe it's not worth it for you?  |
|
|
|
Yes, I'm aware the user still claims that one of his deposits wasn't credited. However, for objectivity, I prefer not to draw conclusions based on a single complaint without attached evidence. It could be a legitimate issue or a simple misunderstanding.
We're not here to discuss one particular case or another, we're calling them to change their business model. This case is just one example. You're happy with their product and it's great, we're happy to hear it. |
|
|
|
@Get-Paid.com Sent you a letter
Thanks, already replied to it and waiting to hear back, thanks again. |
|
|
|
Seriously, what's your point? What do you want to say? Okay, understood that, as you say, freebitco will fail but why is that your problem? This is one of the oldest and well-trusted bitcoin faucet and casino, why should it fail? This website is not solely bitcoin faucet like it was years ago, so, they have already changed their business model, faucet is just an addition. There are many crypto casinos that have bitcoin faucet, similar to freebitco's faucet and they haven't failed.
If you get paid from them with 128k+ referrals, then what's your problem? Maybe you are wrong and their business model works perfectly.
The points: 1) A call for them to fix the broken faucet. 2) Sharing experience as faucet owners for the past 6+ years. 3) Referring to the experience of delays with withdrawals, we know where it's coming from. At least thanks for posting straightforward here without BS, it's appreciated. |
|
|
|
Previously you have raised withdrawal thresholds dramatically without warning. But I never complained because transparency is not promised.
There is actually transparency about that from 2022 and it was posted many times on our social media channels: https://freebitcoin.io/articles/our-guarantee"Against this guarantee we are taking the liberty to change the withdrawal threshold in any of our sites between $0 to $20 anytime, without any notification whatsoever." One or two people with a deposit issue out of thousands is exactly cherry picking.
No, it's not cherry picking. Not everyone knows about Bitcointalk. Not everyone is a crypto fan. https://www.trustpilot.com/review/freebitco.in1) Eric, 5 Reviews (seems to be credible), "Where is my FUN? I have sent many messages, but have not received any response" Date of experience: February 05, 2024 2) https://x.com/sundaypeter8110/status/1763262951467720766?s=20Recent response to a recent tweet 3) https://www.mouthshut.com/websites/Freebitco-reviews-925917644"they will keep everything and close your account. They scammed me out of more than$600 dollars" Here are a few more cherry picks for you, all recent, and there are lots more, these are just from the top 3 from Google on the web when searching for "freebitco.in reviews". Do you honestly think all these people know a website called Bitcointalk exists and they will file a scam accusation? One way or another: We are not the ones tarnishing their reputation, they are doing it by themselves when they're leaving so many users stranded. We want them to succeed, we're not against them, but whatever they're doing now is wrong, it's a fact, not an assumption. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
