And we got another dismissive meaningless answer because you can't find any explanation. I think it is quite clear from this point how will your project perform and brings profit/loss to their investors. I advise to anyone reading about this project to read these exchange of informations carefully and decide yourself.

If that's the case, that the role you're going to take is as a "complimentary product" of the existing fiat system and not their substitute/replacement, what's your bargaining power, then? I mean, by having a role as an alternative payment system, you're not different at all from other existing (and more established, more adopted, more known, more and other more things) crypto payment. Take ether or btc for example, or if we want to struck closer, the tether or binance's stable coin. In fact, your feature could be said ad significantly worse because you're on an isolated system which didn't offers flexibility.

For the multi chain chart support, although it is quite handy, wouldn't it rather useless? I mean, wouldn't usually project owners adopt a system to automatically balance their rate (USD wise) on each chain? Thus, the graph (if seen in USD) will not make much difference?

I am curious with the reason that made you realized that your previous answer is dismissive and mostly used as a last resort by a project team who doesn't know a good answer. I was going to reply to that answer but I had other things to do at that time.


As for this reply,


So, now you're going to be an alternative payment method? Last time you're going to force the govt to switch (from their fiat) to your currency as payment method because... together, we are the bank.

This is the solution for the situation? You'll force each nations' official financial body to accept your token as the main payment method? Because yeah, I can see that will works very nicely. Govts has never tried to intervene and regulate crypto through laws before. Ever. So I can see they'll be very much welcome the proposal to abandon their native monetary system to a new one, especially if you asked them nicely

The problem here doesn't simply root from the decision to change the project's name because you see them better with other, there are project who find them in need to rebrand at one point in their life, and that's fine. The problem that you have here came from the fact how you easily decide to change it without proper and necessary factors.

If I am somewhat not clear enough, the problem is not the name itself, but the indecisive team who choose the names. It shows a very lack of preparation and thought, even implying a hasty let's-chase-the-current-trend. If you didn't put so much thought into the face of your product, what'll happen with the insides of it? The technicalities, the roadmaps. God forbid when a roadmap failed to b achieved, you simply said, "oh here, we just charted a new roadmap. Enjoy."

And by "the current financial system" you're referring to the entire world financial system? The USD, the EURO, etc? Interesting. What's your plan to convince the leader of nations to replace their monetary system to yours?

You will isolate your whole token and its ecosystem within itself? I.e. other than depositing fiat into your currency and withdrawing your currency into fiat (which may only happens in your system too) and use them for purposes above (buying,selling, exchanging between 0xcurrency), there will be no other (any other) crypto, token, and so on activities? No trading into btc or exchanging my usdxto busd?

Well, a post made by a bumping service, but... they held a nice valid point. CMC helps indexing price, many people went there to quickly check price of tokens on the market they're on instead of just going manually from one exchange to another. It offers awareness and boost (no matter how "illusive" it is) confidence on holders. Not only that, they also helps screen poor performance projects (no team details, poor website  low liquidity) with those who put more efforts into their token

The part that I marked in blue, isn't it sounds more corporate-centered and not community friendly? Your company decide every point you think would be best based on your opinion, and your community can only follow that decision

So its like a rebrand with a swap or a completely different project with the one being replaced? I have to agree with @julerz12, you can't just change projects whenever you want. And the fact thwt you did, let's just say you just sabotage your own project

What'll be the purpose and use of your token? You're hosting a social media like twitter and instagram, right? You're planning to... make people pay for posting?

According to the reviews of your app on playstore, you've been around for at least one year, and your website age is also been around since 2016. So why do you only conduct ICO now?

To conclude, although the project is welcome to everyone on every side of earth to join and invest, the project is still better suited for those who live in certain countries. And those who aren't, will mostly not enjoy any benefits, like ever? Or will there an event or two that (suppose I'm an Australian) didn't happen on the opposite side of me?

Wow. Is this what we should expect to be your response and attitude toward anything going forward? Including (let's say) to your token holders and players when they encountered some problems and came to you for solutions? Wow! Such a nice response, a definitely unique way to attract people. I bid you the greatest luck gaining customers.


You see, the problem is, your tokenomic and your statement is contradicting each other. What you spelled on your tokenomic what you said here is inconsistent. What'd you expect us to say?


No fraudsters will go to this forum? Oh my dear sweet sweet summer child. You sure you're competent with developing and launching a project? Unfortunately this is not a sarcasm, a bit cynical maybe, but I honestly asking your competence. Between your childish unprofessional response and your naivete, I would be surprised if the project didn't ends up rugpulling their investors or failed... or abandoned.


Lastly, that error is not a simple error that can be easily dismissed. It's fatal, and your way to address it like it was nothing big just made things worse. What happened was you allocate token for you and then coming here and bragging you didn't take anything for team. Many people would not consider that as a simple error, you can't accidentally typo-ing a whole page (and a graph, and the calculation of each part of the graph). I think it's rather deliberate, as in that was team's initial plan when composing and publishing the tokenomy, but then you changed your mind and wrote the opposite. Unless you want to say you forgot what you wrote on your tokenomy or didn't pay much attention to such important document that you couldn't recall that there is a section about team's token and private sale.

P.s.: And what's about this sudden change of attitude between the two posts? You're mad and angry at criticism thrown at you but later tried to play nice?

Just double checking, so it is correct that if people live in Asia and Australia and Africa, and countries in above continents that you mention, but didn't fall under the coverage of your reach, they'll not enjoy the feature? How will you attract these people? While for the coverd area, how many cars will be there exactly on each of those countries?

I can begin to see the very possible complications rised from this feature. It is not too far fetched to say that these free car rent is one of your feature, one that supposedly will attract buyers and holders to your NFT. But this feature will only be beneficial and appealing to people who lives around your proximity.

I don't know where you're located at, but let's say (to give a better illustration) you're in New York, your special selling point will rather be useless for people in New Zealand or London or Singapore.

It could even backfire into a situation where people from every other part of the world refrained from owning your NFT because they think it's rather useless as they can't use the feature, which effectively narrowed your market into people in your proximity only

And these cars are free to "rent" 15 days in a year just by having the NFT? For whatever and wherever the holders want to or will it be only to and from their place to the venue where the even is being held?

Wait... were you talking about lending your company car as in real world or a car in your metaverse? And what events are these that you talk about?

I'm sorry for the misunderstanding, let me reword everything into a new sentence. What I want to know is whether your project works as a "patch" (i mean a 3rd party app that engulf the other apps and improve their performance, maybe kinda like mozilla's "add-on", or a VPN that works with your browser to override content restrictions) or a stand alone all-in-one program?

I.e. suppose I have telegram, brave, and trustwallet, does your app act as a complimentary by adding extra security to prevent data theft, or do we need to solely use your very own app and feature (for example) teledog, browserdog, and cypherdogwallet to use your service?