Yobit is a clear clam site. They deactivate coins wallets even when there are 100% working versions on other exchanges and do not even engage with the project developers when they try to contact them.

They take coins off line and will not reactivate the wallets. Some have been offline for years.

They create their own isolated markets and steal from those that deposited their coins there in good faith.

Have a read and try and understand it is an undeniable result of the set up we now have. Read the entire thread. Make a refutation or just accept what he is telling you there.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5088852.0

Perhaps you consider it an incentive to get red trust for simply bring attention to observable untrustworthy events from a DT's past?

Don't play dumb. I hope you're playing.

Precisely why the board can not continue allowing DT members, with observably untrustworthy behaviors in their past, to use red trust to prevent other members mentioning those behaviors. This the inverse to the purpose of red trust.

kiss ass for merit somewhere else,the board is full of dumb 3rd world pajeets that will say anything for their next merit morsel.  

Review the evidence. The truth is not rubbish.  These people make money from abusing others, lying, scamming and other means. If they are decent to you then you will do well here for now.

You found a flaw in the evidence provided?


Owlcatz and tman sound very similar. Are you two alts of each other? I see you 2 and lauda always operating as a untrustworthy team ready to use red trust to silence any person that even brings up observable events from your past? You are either colluding to work as a team or you are the same person. This is not going away whilst you continue to abuse the trust system.

What about your other claim? we cleared that up for you now?

Merits? no wonder we deleted those. They can successfully be targeted in many real debates, to locate the most misleading net negative shit posts. This is how we spot them so easily. You mean the conspiracy theories that are undeniable, and make you look foolish repeatedly when you tried to deny them?

Low brows often create straw men they believe exist. We did not whine about the lack of responses. We stated nobody had made any attempt to refute or deny the evidence we presented.

I see you missed the part where we mentioned they may present those deleted posts in the meta thread to theymos directly tomorrow.

Do you wish to discuss the evidence presented in this thread? If not we will delete you.

I prefer scotch generally.

You could not afford all of those luxuries. Stop dreaming and get back in that cardboard box with the pharmacist. People who need to spam sigs are obviously not that wealthy. Those that try to extort people are certainly taking a lot of risk for no reason if they can survive with out doing so.

Back on topic please keep to posting relevant material. Will you post your dummies guide to extorting other members on bitcointalk or not?  Or how to be an observable scammer and liar and still get on to highly paid sig campaigns. You may need help from your friend lauda to complete this guide for those wanting to make a living via untrustworthy methods here on bitcointalk.

So we have you can farm accounts and sell or try to sell them like nutildah.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1622642.5

You can possibly try to extort people like tman lauda and owlcatz here

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757.0

You can lie about scams that you profit from to mislead other potential investors , like lauda did here

This is regarding a project that announced a fair pow launch (no premine/instamine)

lauda then lied and constantly tried to deny the instamine took place. Lying for financial or unfair reward or advantage is scamming.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=560138.msg7535561#msg7535561


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=560138.msg6748208#msg6748208

So yeah, if you are corrupt, untrustworthy and willing to lie and scam people, and extort them; the financial rewards can be enough to live on.

I would rather suggest, that you use the forums wealth of information, to pick out the real projects that have a great team and a real use case. that have completed a large chunk of their road map and get in early on those projects. You will make far more money, and you will have competed fairly against others on this board.You can be proud of your rewards and not live in constant fear of your untrustworthy and greedy actions being thrown in your face.

Thank you for confirming, that you clearly realize I am neither thule or cryptohunter.

Are you claiming those posts contained a refutation to any of our points, or questions, in the OP? those deleted were valueless noise? they can post them once again in the meta thread addressed to theymos tomorrow if they believe that they were unfairly deleted.

We are simply stating, that in 24 hours, if those DT member that left red trust have not reviewed the evidence provided within this thread, and removed the red trust ( they left apparently because the questions asked there were accompanied by 0 evidence). Then we will bring it to the attention of admin, for them to either remove it, or explain why red trust can be used to silence those that ask legitimate questions about the observable past of DT members. Red trust can not be used as a weapon by scammers and scammers friends to silence the reporting or questioning of their own observably untrustworthy behavior.

It will serve as an appeal thread. Although trust is not moderated. We think it serves as a perfect example of trust being used by scammers and their friends to cover their tracks.

That's a lot for you to take in. Take your time. Your part in defending them continually. although you are in full knowledge of their actions. has not escaped our notice.

Please stop making false accusations. Keep to your general pattern of swearing and crying. I find that more entertaining. So yes, my post is on topic where as most of your own and your friends posts are completely off topic, untrue and irrelevant to the initial post.

I make more than a living from the forum.

I mean you make a threadbare  living from the board I know. You sig spam constantly some low brow noise. I heard from others, you like to extort other members for their bitcoins also by harassing their parents? that sounds quite profitable? or perhaps it was some under cover agents story. That was funny. You could sell these excuses as comedy sketches when your untrustworthy schemes break down.

How about explaining how that revenue stream from the board operates, and the hilarious story to tell when you get busted.

Why don't you try robbing a bank. Then when you run into the cops on the way out you can tell them it was a security test?

No need to take it back. Just continue to look very foolish to any that can review his history here. Be my guest. I feel he was not the type to shy away from telling others of his successes in the recent months to those he knew would be very jealous, people may verify those claims for themselves, or not. I'm sure he does not care.

Let us not detract from what we can clearly see. Nutildah sold/offered for sale his account for 0.3BTC ,  the new owner is recently begging for 0.02btc loans. This person is a DT. I believe that makes nutilldah account a very high risk selection. This post is validating that DT's handing out red trust supported by untrustworthy and dubious accounts must be viewed with caution. This is an opportunist right here.

Oh look, snitchmoon appears,  to add her only 2cents worth. Taking this thread more off topic. I will report her post and see if it gets deleted.
Reading those words of the true legend makes me laugh. That guy has you obsessed with him by messing with you . What a character. Sad that he is no longer with us. The 2 000 000 000 dollar legend all gone, never to return, all because he told the truth about the untrustworthy pasts of suchmoons friends and they wanted to shut him up.  I feel snitchmoon knows the true legend even more than we do such is her extensive continuous reading of his illustrious past. I know who she thinks about when shes alone in the evening.

But enough obsessing over TRUE LEGENDS who fought for fairness and equality for all. Let us focus on the fake legends like nutildah who purchased their accounts for 0.3 BTC or less and now beg for 0.02btc loans whilst supporting observable scammers and liars. Who don't have red trust and find themselves on DT putting honest members at risk far more than justiceforyou another VIP contributor that was trust abused by these red trust  DT bullies.

@ the smarmacist

How can one be derailing the thread by tackling in that thread the very people the initial post is complaining about, whilst they are attempting the same tactics he is mentioning in the initial post? That is quite a stretch even by your own convoluted reasoning

It is fun to see the same faces time and time again, defending their untrustworthy actions, and trying to deflect and derail the focus away from an examination or THEIR behavior.

That would be very unlikely, given what is publicly available to read in his post history. Only a jealous fool such as yourself could believe that was true. Keep spamming your gambling sig for some btc crumbs, chump. Fortune jack really does seem to employ some dubious characters. We must look into your past.

Yes, I do believe you would do that. Like I believe you would red trust persons for telling the truth about your observably untrustworthy deeds. Or perhaps calling people parents up and extorting them.
Do I believe convicted thieves would attempt to take things that were not their own?
Please contain your childish insults, they are off topic and irrelevant.

Sounds exciting. Still only yesterday he had a valid gripe and got slapped with red trust for mentioning it. Now the red trust is gone, 30 merits appeared and the gripe was all a big mistake and he is sorry to have made it ?It is possible, but it is plausible the carrot and stick of merit and trust could have been responsible for the change or heart. Just mentioning it and noting it down. We are studying the merit and trust systems and those that control them.

Is that from spamming your signature?  or do you do something that provides value for the forum?

That is not an insignificant amount to someone in the 3rd world.

Can you please provide some of your very best posts here for perusal. That others may learn from your original thought inspiring contributions?  I have been looking, alas I could not locate anything that I would care to put up as examples for others to follow. We all wait for you to produce some fine examples of your original thought inspiring contributioins, that have earned you these merits,and this btc crumbs each month.

This will be very interesting and also serve as a great guide to others seeking to earn money here.  Just 5 examples of your finest original thought inspiring posts. Then others can see the benchmark required for the few hundred dollars per month.

You believe Cryptohunter bought the nutildah account?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1622642.5

I do not think that someone of Cryptohunter's said wealth would be begging for 0.02btc loans, like whatever broke down peasant has nutildah's account now.

Could it be that a  30 merit carrot, and large red trust stick were used to create a 180 degree turn around from this member? The guy went from feeling confident enough that he was the injured party to create an appeal thread?  now is very very sorry and grateful?

We noted his red trust was removed and 30 merits added.

We note the same persons: lauda, tman, owlcatz, lesbian cow  were involved with this change of heart.  These people seem to be very convincing.

Merit and trust. Very useful tools in the WRONG hands.

Could the initial poster clarify: so in this specific case you now realize you were in the wrong? or that on the basis of their previous kind works you decided to just forgive and forget?

bump


We do not notice any denial from those that have seen this thread, taken the time to try to silence us with red trust, but know it is futile to deny the evidence that is there for all to observe.

We will be taking to meta board soon, to request theymos remove the red trust on our account, or give an explanation as to why there is a trust system that allows persons to be given red trust by observable :scammers, liars, and probable extortionists, simply for examining in public their previous behavior?  Red trust is supposed to be used to highlight these untrustworthy individuals, not be a weapon for scammers, liars and probable extortionists to silence whilst blowers.

The evidence has been submitted on this thread. The guilty members and their friends have 24 hours to remove the red trust else we will repeatedly ask  admin for a public examination and comment on the matter. We need to ensure that theymos is aware that red trust is being perverted in this manner and placing in danger the entire board.

We will repeatedly push for red trust abusers to be blacklisted from the trust system.

Hhampuz was invited to clear up the question, whether or not he did employ or directly sponsor these individuals. He indicated he did not directly sponsor Lauda. We invited him to comment on the other members so that his name could be removed from this public investigation.

It is clear that Fortune Jack are directly or indirectly sponsoring scammers, liars, and probable extortionists. We will create a separate thread later repeatedly calling for their public comment.

That is speculation, just like we are speculating you are not the original nutildah, because that account was listed for sale for 0.3BTC, and the new owner is recently begging for 0.02BTC loans. That kind of poverty spec legend, does not sound like someone from 2014 and a previous dark coin scam shill.  

Besides, it does not matter who delivers observable events or factual information. The information is still valid.

Your account notildah, not having red trust, is just another demonstration that the DT trust scum, are gaming the systems and pushing double standards on the other members of this board.

Let's hope admin takes some action, before this observably untrustworthy bunch of DT members, pulls a huge scam or extortion, and the admin get dragged down for knowingly allowing them into positions of trust when it could have been prevented.

Adding "Keywords" to the list of words you are spamming, along with your signature. Moronbozo.

@snitchmoon,

Look, you will never get your hands on Bradley Cooper with an ass filled with that junk food. I'm not going to be helping you burn those calories off, so no point begging me.

This observably demonstrates, that you are unnaturally slow. I have been trying my "uttermost" to continue the true legends work, in his true image. Thank you for the late recognition. Please let me know, if I make any posts that are not instantly recognizable as cryptohunter's style. When, and if, I notice him posting again. Then I will continue only with his explicit permission.. What;s with all the wolf people, and cat enthusiasts in meta? I am making an concerted effort, to address you all with the titles true legend cryptohunter bestowed upon you. I see no title for you. Sorry if I have missed that somewhere.


You are misrepresenting what happened on the thread. So no, those are not insults. They are statements of important truth. You are taking it out of context, you are misleading people. There are 2 options. You are stupid and do not realize what you are doing. Or you are being sneaky. Can you suggest a 3rd option?

Calling a liar a liar is not an insult when they are lying. That is telling an important truth. Saying someone is misleading others if they are misleading them, is not an insult it is an important piece of information.

My point stands. The very people complaining about personal attacks are those attacking others trust scores and their threads FIRST. Often with false accusations and groundless insults, that fall apart under examination. I guess politeness and insults are different things again, that is a different debate.
Personal attacks should be avoided, by all parties, if possible. However, imagine being at a party, and 4 different guys are offering a drunk girl a lift home. You know 1 has been convicted of rape and murder previously. At times a conversation or debate may require certain past events to be mentioned for the optimal solution. Eventually after listening to the convicted rapist and murderer explain he lives closer, it is less out of his way, and he has a faster car. Then you may need to mention something off topic and irrelevant like : but didn't you rape and murder the last girl you gave a lift home from a party? I know it is insulting and spoils the mood, but if you want the optimal solution or outcome; then at times, factual historical events must be mentioned and presented for consideration. I know it is a personal attack, but if you have evidence and it is important, then in those cases it can be warranted. You must present a compelling case with evidence and a strong connection ensuring the optimal outcome.

When things appear not to makes sense, it is then the most untrustworthy thrive and flourish.  I will not violate any rules, so that would seem unlikely to happen. This" it does not make sense" is a common defense of the guilty.

How can I be banned? I have not broken any rules? I will not be banned unless I do. Please bring video evidence, if you must continue making, such frivolous accusations.
I had heard it said, that it was perhaps you that was dishonest and untrustworthy? something regarding not paying for mining equipment and getting doxed ? again no video proof, so I will not say that alone is enough to convince me of your corrupt and untrustworthy heart.
Although, combined with your observable double standards,  support of liars, scammers and probable extortionists, then I don't think using sock puppets is the worst of your actions.  Just be honest suchmoron, you obsess over the true legend cryptohunter because he broke you down publicly and made you look foolish many times, then demonstrated you are largely a bag of air with no real achievements for all of your snitching and your most original thought inspiring post is not something you would even dare to present for us to laugh at. Don't be a bad sport, just accept that the $2000000000 USD legend was your superior in every conceivable way. If you are responsible for his ban, then you can add that to your list of net negative actions. We will make sure that he is never forgotten. We are here to stay.

It is not  the poster, but the content of the post on it's own merit, that one should take note of. The posts individual value should be measured apart from its author.
Stop crying my little DT members, just change your abusive ways and stick to red trusting scammers and those you can build a strong case are likely to scam. That is your purpose, not to control the free speech on this board, so that SOME people may feel required to hide from retribution their main accounts when speaking out against unfair and unjust actions.