Tman seems to have nothing better to do. We are merely giving our opinion on the correct actions of excluding you. Plus our reasons for believing this is the correct action (supporting you goal of removal) and informing the reader of the background of TMAN  so that they may reach the optimal opinion themselves. Tman is pushing (we believe) incorrect information on your thread. Do you want that to stand unanswered?

The reader must be given all available information to allow them to form the optimal opinion on such matters. Anything thing else is sub-optimal.

We support your exclusion. What more assistance can we give? sorry for helping.


@actmyname

This seems off topic. However, we maintain that you are INCORRECT to claim we are seriously hyperbolizing this . There are far wider implications that you may not have considered. Especially with instances where initial distribution of tokens could be involved as bounties.

We believe first you should read some of our prior posts where this was explained in detail and there was no refutation. We already discussed this with HCP on the hhampuz possible stealing of 0.5btc thread.

We wish to say that our point still stands and that hhampuz should be excluded.

This is not the thread for that debate. If you read our prior posts (very recent with hhampuz or on his thread) and are not satisfied then we can start another thread to debate it with you.

I'm sure many of the DT that enjoy being part of the "select few" that seemingly are auto eligible to new highly paid sig campaigns have a low expectation of the trouble the current sig campaing managers should be expected to go to regarding the selection process. Not that we say you perhaps of all persons on this thread would not be suitable even should the entire board be give FAIR and EQUAL consideration. We find you to be of a far higher quality than most even if we have found you to be in our opinion incorrect in a few instances.

We risk having the post deleted if it goes off onto campaign manager best practices. This is hhampuz wanting to get excluded. We endorse his desire to be excluded.

Sometimes if you want to be in a position of trust you must face many chores to cast aside reasonable doubts of other members when called on to do so.

We endorse hhampuz being excluded from DT.

The reader of this thread should have some background to consider.

TMAN you mean highly probable scammers such as yourself and your friend lauda (well he is a proven scammer)??

Senior members that are abusing the trust system to line their own pockets will not be missed at all.

Let's take a moment to read over some observable instances from Tmans and hhmapuz own histories.

First TMAN.  

The reader should be aware that TMAN has been involved in prior behaviors such as these mentioned by one of the most TRUSTED users on this forum ognasty. We quote ognasty below in red

Harassed user zeroxal as part of a confirmed and documented extortion scheme.

More details on the situation can be found here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757.0

TMAN used minerjones to anonymously auction a KIALARA and then attempted to manipulate the auction by stating, "wow this has to be a record low for a sub #100 serial. if I didn't have so many I would be snapping this up"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1931778.msg19286369#msg19286369

Admission it was his auction:
"Dude I haven't crossed paths with OG in over 6 months, it wasn't until he derailed my auction hosted by MJ that this kicked off."
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1946142.msg19349060#msg19349060

He also claimed I was trying to "pretend" my casascius coins were loaded: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1945817.0

He then sent BTC to my publicly known address unsolicited and claimed I was trying to self escrow: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1946305.0

I don't trust this user, and his behavior on this forum in the time period from 6/2/17-6/4/17 should make that clear to anyone.

Not to mention this dumb ass admits he has never made an original thought inspiring post that he will dare present for analysis. He claims his MERIT SCORE is warranted due to his ENTERTAINMENT value with comprises of some childish swearing and sexual deviance smeared all over the board. He has no merit. He is a low functioning untrustworthy dreg that deserves no merit at all.

Even THEYMOS has excluded TMAN and his dumb ass scamming friend lauda from DT.



Next let us consider hhampuz.

1. He refuses to be transparent regarding his selection process for his sig campaigns. Thus opening himself, his projects and those he employs open to criticism and doubt. Putting the entire board at possible risk under certain conditions.  WHY NOT BE TRANSPARENT??

2. He supported the doxing of a forum treasurer. The doxing was provided by the idiot VOD posting here in this thread (that should really be banned for such a stupid and vicious attack)

3. There is a matter of 0.5btc possibly being stolen from a project that he was working with. He has not answered to clear this matter up even if it is not true. The truth is still not known.


So yes, it is best HHampuz is excluded and so should TMAN and Lauda.

We notice suchmoon is here trying to snipe at Theymos again who she back stabbed in public because he DARED to SUGGEST that we don't want PROVEN scammers and trust abusers on DT. LOL  Some believe this is an alt of lauda.

Actually this entire thread is full of those that are SHADY or support or have supported in the past SHADY individuals and included them into DT.

The reader should take note that these SAME people all seem to be creaming off the BEST PAID sig spots on the board and therefore not so happy about the new trust system that essentially rolls back their power to abuse and game the current systems to ensure these BEST PAID spots go to THEMSELVES.

Good to see this bunch crying about the new changes that mean you can't give out scam tags to whistle blowers any longer.

The reader should exclude Hhampuz not just because he requests it, but because you only want those that are willing to be transparent and honest. Same for TMAN. Get these dirt bags out.

The reader should look up a few posts to our prior informational post regarding your own history here. It is no advisable to take the word of one with such a dark looking history. Both hhampuz and tman and their pal lauda have VERY shady looking histories. Hhampuz is perhaps not look quite as bad as the other 2. But until the "truth" is known regarding the 0.5btc then it is best not to make any assumptions either way. The matter in our opinion when you consider the OTHER less than ideal behaviors looks CONCERNING.

Tman just repeating his known "pal" is fine and it's all bollocks along with his usual MO of childish swearing plus obsession with smelly vaginas and other hygiene issues that seem to crop up frequently in his posts means NOTHING.

This is one to take note of and observer future behaviors of transparent and fair campaign management and indeed any other financially related behaviors.

These are obviously assumptions and we also state false accusations.

The reader should be aware that TMAN has been involved in prior behaviors such as these mentioned by one of the most TRUSTED users on this forum ognasty. We quote ognasty below in red

Harassed user zeroxal as part of a confirmed and documented extortion scheme.

More details on the situation can be found here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757.0

TMAN used minerjones to anonymously auction a KIALARA and then attempted to manipulate the auction by stating, "wow this has to be a record low for a sub #100 serial. if I didn't have so many I would be snapping this up"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1931778.msg19286369#msg19286369

Admission it was his auction:
"Dude I haven't crossed paths with OG in over 6 months, it wasn't until he derailed my auction hosted by MJ that this kicked off."
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1946142.msg19349060#msg19349060

He also claimed I was trying to "pretend" my casascius coins were loaded: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1945817.0

He then sent BTC to my publicly known address unsolicited and claimed I was trying to self escrow: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1946305.0

I don't trust this user, and his behavior on this forum in the time period from 6/2/17-6/4/17 should make that clear to anyone.


Along with these prior examples of shady behaviors Tman is vouching for hhampuz here. Let's not forget hhampuz is the person who supported the public dox of ognasty and refuses to be transparent regarding his hiring and firing during his campaign management.

When you have people like Tman showing up to "vouch" for you NOT stealing that is not essentially a good sign. Coupled with the other prior behaviors of hhampuz then it is reasonable NOT to just give him the benefit of the doubt. The truth would be better known and until it is then caution should be advised.

Tman is also making many other false claims regarding our own motivation for requesting hhampuz is TRANSPARENT in many areas. There is no personal affiliation with QS and visa versa.  QS has also made it clear our support is not appreciated since he does not approve of our more direct and at times less diplomatic methods. Sadly we take no council from any other members when it comes to supporting FAIR and TRANSPARENT rules that apply EQUALLY to ALL members.

If we believe QS is correct then we will support his argument regardless of his or anyone else wishes that we stay clear. If we believe he is INCORRECT or that his argument does NOT support a fair and transparent system we will refute his points. He seems to operate under the same MO. I don't believe it is reasonable to believe QS or ourselves are types that care for making friends. If something is correct then it gets supported. If it is incorrect then it gets opposed.

In this case although there is no PROOF of wrongdoing we feel it prudent that it was brought to light and that this can be added to the list of shady or unknown actions of hhampuz for a reference. Perhaps at another time hhampuz will be transparent over this matter.

@HCP

there was no parting pop shot. It is quite clear and sensible to suggest that a person that has gained what they want with the status quo will not push for changes that increase the competition. Stating human nature is human nature is not something I'm sure the reader will take as a revelation.

If you wish to deny that could be part of your motivation, then that is fine. It is possible. Perhaps you wish there were transparent rules for provably fair competition and fair distribution.

Delete 12

strange delete from the middle of an on topic, relevant and observable instance based post debating 1miau's suitability of merits source due to his behavior; that seems to suggest 1miau is trust abusing accounts in an attempt to silence whistle blowing on observably financially motivated shady behaviors.

He could NOT meet our challenges to demonstrate the negative trust was valid and eventually ran away from the debate.

He was reduced to calling observable instances "bullshit" and "nonsense"


This is clear evidence that 1miau does not have the capacity to be a merit source and is possibly also high risk to the member of this board.

His trust abuse is based on the FACT that we were asking hhampuz if he was  AWARE of the observable instances of such shady looking behaviors, and asking him if he did indeed employ those involved.

Later 1miau also tried to cast doubt on the observable instances surrounding nutildahs account sale .........


Removing our on topic and relevant post from that 1miau merit source application thread does deprive the reader of important information that could lead them to fail to reach the optimal opinion.

Even you snitchmoon are not this retarded. Well actually....

Now we see all these scum bags here ALREADY trying to discredit and misrepresent what the OP has said ... we are getting the popcorn ready.

Look chunky trunks he is claiming 20 + took the "vacation" at the SAME TIME. So we need to wait for the reveal before you can start with your usual totally unfunny moronic japes.

Tman says he met 20 people from the forum in RL

You were not on vacation with them were you by any chance tman?

No.

I wouldn't start drawing too many direct comparisons between legitimate organisations that are accountable for their actions legally and an anonymous forum, anonymous projects, anonymous employers and anonymous employees. This is a very different situation and to ensure people are treated fairly (as much as possible and there is not gaming , abuse and discrimination) you will need to take a bit of a different approach.

There can be NO ARGUMENT for not having TRANSPARENT rules and thresholds.

You are correct first come first served is not OPTIMAL. However if you want to select the very BEST posters that post the most objectively valuable content then you will need only the VERY SMARTEST campaign managers that can recognize the most valuable post. This makes the work load far larger.

Set a minimum post quality level and go first come first served cuts the workload dramatically and allows the less able minds to be campaign managers.

You claiming campaign managers can use HIDDEN ARBITRARY rules means you are  leaving this entire arena WIDE OPEN TO GAMING AND ABUSE. This leave the projects themselves open to legitimate criticism ESPECIALLY with initial token distribution resulting in collusion and market making. The campaign managers are also open to legitimate criticism regarding kick backs, bribes and favoritism. It leaves the ENTIRE BOARD open to scamming via collusion and market making with regard initial distribution of tokens (if not a btc based payout)

TRANSPARENT RULES that are applied equally to all members is the ONLY way to avoid such criticism and ensure fair opportunities to all members.

You want the very best posters then you better have the VERY SMARTEST campaign managers matching people against TRANSPARENT CRITERIA.

You want a good standard of posters you better have  a good standard of campaign managers matching people against TRANSPARENT CRITERIA.

You want gaming, backhanders, colluding, market making, unfair treatment of all members except those paying back handers, bribes, colluding, "pals" that are not even meeting in most cases a basic level of posting value. Then continue screaming for the right of campaign managers to use HIDDEN ARBITRARY PERSONAL reasons to hire and fire.

NO. Sorry. TRANSPARENT RULES that are applied equally to all persons. THE ONLY FAIR WAY TO ENSURE FAIR TREATMENT AND PROTECT PROJECTS AND CAMPAIGN MANAGERS AND THE ENTIRE BOARD OF INVESTORS. Since if you allow the initial distributions of projects to be gamed then you bring the danger to every person here.

"hidden arbitrary rules like....errr must be called tman, cabalism13  LOL or some other low functioning schmuck " lol

No thanks. Transparent criteria ALL members are matched against EQUALLY.

Hhampuz REFUSES to be transparent. Hhampuz opens himself and his projects up to legitimate criticism.

This is going off topic. So to bring it back on topic let' agree to take this debate off to another thread if you do not believe I have demonstrated you are incorrect.

This is only partially relevant to this thread and the matter of hhampuz potentially taking 0.5btc that was not his to take. If he was not refusing to be transparent with regard his selection process. I think that would cause the readers here to feel it "less" likely he was stealing the money for himself and perhaps there was another more legit explanation. Same the with supporting of doxxing the forum treasurer. If people see a pattern of potentially shady behaviors then that can cast a shadow other ambiguous behaviors... possibly.

We notice also you happen to be one of the lucky few chosen to wear the chipmixer sig? this the reader should also factor into the possible motives for wishing for these hidden arbitrary "reasons" for the selection process to remain AS THEY ARE NOW.  People generally that benefit from the status quo are generally loath change for the "better".  We do NOT say that IS your reason. Perhaps you believe the specious argument you presented for real. Hopefully now we have given you cause to reconsider and have helped you see it would be far better for ALL if it was more PROVABLY FAIR.

K

So..

You disappointed us again !!! you have no excuses or alternatives to the nutildah vs notildah ... you were just talking shit again.  We were ready to listen and accept any valid rebuttal or refutation to our points. No, you come empty handed as always. Full of shit and bluster that crumples and is easily destroyed with any kind of scrutiny.

There is NO OTHER opinion possible.

Well done

The End.

We will bring it up whenever it is on topic and relevant.

Hate is good. It is a strong motivator.

Valid reasons? I think you will struggle to present ANY valid reasons that are not motivated by their desire to prevent TRANSPARENT FAIR RULES THAT ARE APPLIED EQUALLY TO ALL MEMBERS.

those are valid only to scumbags and their supporters.

However of course as you say that is a point and a very strong point. It is IMPOSSIBLE to prove 100%, but 20 accounts is a powerful indicator if there are enough connections alongside the dates of absence. Enough cause perhaps for theymos to unravel the merit abuse and black list from DT.

Anyway - all speculation at this point. The observable instances are those which will count.

Merit = subjective meaningless garbage. Nobody with anything other than a feeble mind would even try to mount an argument to the contrary.

It is also the dangerous "carrot" to accompany the old "stick" of red trust that leads to group think and suppression of free speech and natural flow.

Most merit is given on political grounds especially on meta and rep (where HUGE amounts of merit are given to a tiny fraction of the board)

MOST huge merit holders can not even present 5 examples of their best posts that are not just totally mediocre garbage or worse. In debate most of them crumble under any kind of pressure and reveal their minds are 3rd rate at best.

Some of the very best and most important posts have zero merit. Some of the smartest people on this board have hardly any earned merits.

Bogus, dangerous , misleading junk.

Merit on top of all this allows select groups of scum to entrench themselves in power to cream off the best sig spots and hold others out from competing fairly for those spots with these bogus and gamed metrics of merit and trust.

There can be no denial of this.

Read here for an excellent insight into MERIT and TRUST - that was BEFORE merit became for some weird reason TRUST also.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5088852.0

Luckily theymos just pulled the rug from the trust abusers to a large degree (not totally) BUT you will find that their corrupt campaign managers will still try to probably use the OLD gamed part to refuse entry to their gamed sig campaigns.

Which... SURPRISE SURPRISE  are filled (top paying btc ones) with MERIT SOURCES and merit cyclers and DT members - what a fucking shock

Are these the most capable posters here LOL  these are mostly low functioning fools who spout random crap that suits their agendas that fall apart under mild scrutiny. They then scream "trolling" or "bullshit" because they KNOW they have no chance to defeat your valid and independently verifiable instances that you present that crush their spurious arguments. Then when that fails they will try to weaponize anything they can to silence your or get you banned.

Meta board is a WASTE OF TIME. Since most that frequent it are already enjoying the spoils of gaming these foolish systems they will NEVER agree that they need changing. Of course not that would mean they have to compete fairly against ALL other members. They would not want that.


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5088852.0

read, understand , accept.

The never ending stream of low functioning dregs....

AGAIN

Present the parts which you "claim" are nonsense and present your argument as to WHY they are nonsense?

FAILURE to do so should inform the reader that your claims are not credible and should be struck from this thread.

1miua is not suitable for merits source or DT. We have clearly demonstrated this in this thread.

If 20 accounts all stopped posting between certain dates AND there were other clear connecting factors (merit cycling, dt includes, excludes, threads where they are together adopting the same argument etc) then that would be a STRONG case of alts although of course it could never be PROOF.

Opinion 1 - you are nutildah
Opinion 2 - you are not nutildah

what other opinion is there?

You know we are very open minded; willing to engage any person in debate and examine their "opinions".


Or did you mean bob please stop letting them keep posting observable instances I want to remain hidden?

Can you present the "trolling" now?  because it seems you are trolling trolling.

Yobit is a CLEAR SCAM.

It switches off its wallets trapping traders coins on plummeting markets. Some have been off line for years with no response even when devs are contacting them.
These are coins that have fully working wallets there is no reason for them to take them off line.

Total shit hole should be blacklisted from this forum. Damages the entire movement when exchanges get to advertise here that are pulling this shit.

Strange we never hear your support FOR these FAIR AND TRANSPARENT RULES THAT ENSURE EVERY MEMBER IS TREATED EQUALLY before? 

NO, we mean simply MORE wealthy that those that NEED To take loans out. Look it is simple. Perhaps we must accept people in financial difficulties MAY be MORE likely to feel pressure to do what they believe is essential to survive.

The clear goal here should be FAIR AND TRANSPARENT RULES THAT ENSURE EVERY MEMBER IS TREATED EQUALLY.  So if hhampuz is saying NO i will not be transparent about who and why i hire certain people, and now it looks like 0.5 BTC it could have been liberated from a  projects funds - then perhaps we need people that are not in debte or not needing to borrow money in small amounts from other people.  Both of these things do not look great.

Really it does not matter who is a campaign manager.. so long as if people meet a certain posting standard and are not scammers they get to join the campaign first come first served and they get paid for their posts as per the transparent rules. ANYTHING else is rightly to be termed SHADY and should be rejected.

I very much doubt REAL wealthy people are going to do all this annoying shit that campaign managers have to deal with. Wealthy compared to those in perhaps dire situations financially that could be factors that prevent the fair system we are pushing for.

If ANYONE is not prepared to be transparent and treat all members fairly and not take money that is not theirs then they are NOT a good choice for campaign manager.

Good to know you HCP are now fully going to help pushing for transparent fair standards for all members.

You mean that you read it but too scared to continue the argument since we just crushed your pathetic excuses for the trust abuse.

Just from this brief probing of your mind it is clear you are not worthy of being a merit source. The only people supporting you are either likely to be your merit cycling fellow DT chums or those with an even more fragile mind than your own.

You failed all of the challenges. Your "opinions" are demonstrated to bogus. You called bullshit and nonsense on observable instances you now REALIZE you can not refute or debunk. So you looks stupid there. You claim it is to sully hhmapuz's reputation (which he has already destroyed himself) and all he needed to say was that he was not aware or be transparent about his actions towards those people involved.

He flat out says he REFUSES to be transparent regarding his selection process.

The entire purpose of that thread is to PUSH for TRANSPARENT FAIR RULES THAT ARE APPLIED EQUALLY TO ALL MEMBERS.  Which hhampuz says he will not be willing to do.

Now that you can also be observed in other threads calling DIFFERENT observable instances of financially motivated wrongdoing again nonsense and such terms trying to cast doubt upon them. It is quite clear that you are deliberately trying to prevent whistle blowing.

Therefore not only should you not be a merit source you should not be on DT either.

These are undeniable behaviors on your part.

The reader may notice we just ignore the member asche - that is because it is such a low functioning sig spammer from the same chipmixer group we just feel ZERO satisfaction from crushing it's feeble mind in public. It is a pitiful moron, never achieved anything of note and seems to have ass kissed its way on to DT. It would be worrying if this idiot was a merit source but since tman is a merit source there are no lower thresholds here it would seem.

I think his post seems clear. He is saying that 20 accounts ALL took the SAME break.  I am waiting to see who these accounts are. So we can look for OTHER connecting factors. Let's not start to form opinions before the data is presented.

So you read this link and also click the original links in that post and read it all back to when it all went down?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5134507.msg50719875#msg50719875

So you are now saying

1. You can tell everyone that it is EVIL and that they are facilitating scammers and scams and that you are even going to make your own list of account sellers to make sure these EVIL and scam facilitating members are punished.

BUT THEN you will commit these evil scam facilitating behaviors  for 0.3btc and that is still TRUSTWORTHY BEHAVIOR?  this is trustworthy to you??

We are not claiming to believe it is evil and facilitates scamming (although that part is likely true) NUTILDAH himself is claiming it.

2. You can claim you ARE the original nutildah when you DEFINITELY 100% NOT (because if you are not you go back to scenario 1 in that case) - and you would remain trustworthy? so telling a PROVEN LIE is trustworthy?

Are you sure you have thought about this. Have you read the links we posted and investigated those observable instances?

The trap is impossible to escape and he set it for himself.

Also perhaps best to clarify what you find trustworthy and not trustworthy at this stage before tagging further because those seem entirely independent of what would reasonably be trustworthy and not trustworthy.


I mean telling 100% proven lie would usually NOT be trustworthy.

Telling people you believe they are evil and helping scammers by acting in a certain way and then acting in that way yourself for payment again would usually NOT be trustworthy.


You need to understand the concept here that it has to be 100% proven LIE beyond doubt because if you say okay you believe him then he goes back to scenerio 1.

It is only possible that he is or he is NOT nutildah. Each side of that is waiting a certain untrustworthy action.

It is IMPOSSIBLE TO DENY.

Please review this information, think about it more and then comment. Your reply is currently OBSERVABLY incorrect.

Scenario 2 seems less dangerous for the board but still 100% proven liar, but still he wants to stick to scenario 1?

But for 0.3BTC what might you do?

Trolling as you know is the repetitive presentation of clearly debunked material as being true.

I have said we can not PROVE if the account was sold or not.  That does not mean it has been debunked. It is simply impossible to prove either way.

If we accept scenario 1 then we feel that is worse than scenario 2 really. So it is your own choice? you are sticking with scenario 1?

If you believe you can compare yourself to the prior achievements of a true legend like Cryptohunter then you are clearly unhinged. These 2 bit scammers you " claim" to be stopping are nothing more than enticements for the very most stupid or the very most greedy.  

People who by their own words will turn EVIL or willingly facilitate scamming for 0.3btc don't get to be "trustworthy" because they claim they are stopping some 2 bit scammers later on. Whilst abusing the accounts of real legends and REAL scam fighters.

We are presenting the TRUTH regarding your past.  That does not mean we are unhinged. Sorry we are simply amused by your specious defense oh EVIL ONE. lol

" In the past I may have gone evil and willingly chosen to facilitate other members being scammed for the price of 0.3btc, but now i have highlighted some other scammers you can trust me again" is that what you are saying?  

No sorry, especially now that you have decided to trust abuse others to we believe deter others from whistle blowing on such things. That is very dangerous behavior.

LOL  at this low functioning idiot.  This is not off topic. If you are unable to grasp even simple concepts like this how can you be trusted to apply merit to posts of value???

You can't just say that is your opinion and that makes it correct. You are speculating on our intentions. You have clearly demonstrated you are too stupid to form reliable opinions. We are asking you to now demonstrate you are capable of forming a reliable opinion that does not fall apart under even mild scrutiny. This is vital for merit to one day have any meaning here.

NOW RE READ AND ANSWER SPECIFICALLY.

You are repeating FALSE ACCUSATIONS that you made earlier. We are challenging them directly. Your LACK of ability to recognize these direct challenges is evidence that  you are too stupid to be a merit source.

1. Bring the specific " unproven nonsense" that we were asking Hhampuz if he had direct knowledge of - that clearly demonstrates our intention was to damage hhampuz reputation. You need to understand that you are dealing with observable instance, events that undeniably took place.

You do understand you can not cast those aside as simply "bullshit" , "nonsense"  "our opinions"  and then those observable instances vanish just like that.

A low functioning dreg such as yourself ( I say that based on the clear evidence in this thread) can not speculate on the intentions of those far smarter. You are UNABLE to provide any refutation to those observable instances we were asking hhampuz if he had knowledge of but now you claim those instances  are bullshit nonsense??

Do you not see how stupid you appear?

You don't just get to say it's my opinion that these observable instances are bullshit nonsense LOL  and now I will say you are untrustworthy for asking if someone that may be directly employing these people are aware of these observable instances?? haha

How does that sully hhampuz reputation?? all he has to say is I WAS NOT AWARE or NOW THAT I AM AWARE I WILL NO LONGER EMPLOY THEM or I WILL GIVE A TRANSPARENT ANSWER AS TO MY ACTIONS REGARDING THEM.

Your entire argument that hinges on YOUR OPINION falls to pieces in our hands, with just a gentle probing. Bit like your mommy would.

NOW TRY AGAIN.

Demonstrate you are capable of understanding even very simple concepts.

You want to CLAIM something is bullshit, or nonsense then you must be able to demonstrate that. You have zero hope of doing that when someone is only presenting observable instances.

Now delete your merit source application until you can grasp simple concepts like this. You have no business trying to fathom where values lays in any specific thread. Back to school silly bitch.

Can you not see how we are crushing your feeble mind in public to any reader with even an average level of intelligence?  we almost feel sorry for you. Please stop forcing us to do it to you 1moron.

HHampuz subsequent to that thread has sullied his own reputation.

1. He refuses to be transparent about his selection process (seems shady, why not be transparent if you have nothing to hide)?
There should be transparent and fair rules for sig campaigns that ensure ALL members are treated equally.
2. He supported doxing of the forum treasurer placing him and the boards funds at risk
3. He is now implicated in a possible 0.5btc theft a projects funds - there has been NO CLEAR explanation as far as we can see.


Your "opinions" are laughable. Since his selection process he REFUSES to make transparent, then again is simply your opinion and that is obviously just a joke.


1miau to stupid to be a merit source. Also looks to be deliberately attempting to silence whistle blowing or the presentation of observable instances that demonstrate "some members" are involved with financially dangerous behaviors.

Can you publish your top 20 merit fans and recipients? also those that include your on DT? thanks.