I've removed my feedback. Glad you got your account back!  And feedback has been added for Pelk.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=mlist;sa=search
Uncheck everything except "Search by Position" and then type in "Legendary" and hit search.

I believe there are roughly 1,360 legendary accounts.

FTFY - I removed the "l" in "over-clocked" in case my hilarious joke isn't obvious  

There is certainly a market for old mining devices to be reused as something. I'm not sure a personal masturbator is one of them, but I'm sure someone out there is brainstorming ideas as we speak.

I usually can't find enough proof to bring myself to tag anyone for those 3 things, how do you determine abuse of a signature campaign?  Most of the posts I see can be considered "on topic" but are utterly useless posts or just repetitions of some other post in the thread, same content, different words. In my mind it is a tough thing for a DT user to come up with real proof or justification for leaving feedback. I believe moderators/admins have a better shot at mitigating it because they probably have more insight but I'm sure there is a good amount of work and time involved for them as well.... but aren't they the ones getting paid?   

Just put multiple captcha codes on every post, then you'd have to be really determined to post something. 

If you haven't already, click the "Report to Admin" button on the PM itself.

The Jalapussy is born, size of hole depends on how many coins you send. Available in 2 weeks. Send me BTC!  

DT Users could start tagging spammers but for a serious spam cleanup this type of moderation would have to happen on a higher level, from moderators. Tagging them at least removes their profit potential from most campaigns and would probably "burn" the account enough for them to stop using it. But I don't believe this is what the trust system is meant to be used for. I would report more spam posts if I could but my time is usually limited and I try to use it wisely... I'd spend more than half my time reporting posts and wouldn't have time to look or do much else.      

Some of the others here on this forum must not work or have a life because they seem to have way too much time on their hands.   

Wouldn't this just be from the prior database hack, nothing new, just someone trying to use the data... I never put any real e-mail into BTCTalk until somewhat recently - maybe sometime in Jan/Feb this year, I did so to try and conform to the new forum but my e-mail was never in the database that was hacked, and I have not received this phishing e-mail that everyone else seems to be getting. I feel a little left out  

The domain name itself has nothing to do with the "include=" of the SPF record. Including amazonses.com just authorizes anything covered in the SPF/MX records of amazonses.com as being authorized, not the domain itself. The fact that it's coming from a server with amazonaws.com makes no difference as it is more about the IP address it's coming from.

The same IP address your listing in your SPF fail was passed by Gmail's SPF check not too long (April 20th is the last time I saw a message pass) my first SPF failure happened on the 27th but I don't have any messages to look at between those dates.

SPF's are failing for this IP as of right now but to my knowledge Amazon has only ever required including the amazonses.com in the SPF record to pull in those servers. (http://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/DeveloperGuide/spf.html)

Based on the dates, my only guess might be that theymos modified or removed an A record when dealing with recent DDoS issues here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1880126.msg18689262#msg18689262

And that maybe it included the IP that is now failing the SPF check?  52.45.214.107

Verified. I've left feedback. Good luck on getting your account back. 

Nothing shocking here. Assuming everything escrow.ms is saying is true, which I don't know if it is at this point, I could certainly understand the reaction.

I've seen the xbee hack before using a rpi... Kill-a-watt makes a wifi model out of the box but it's not elegant and probably only works out of the box with its own display/receiver and likely has minimal tracking, I doubt it is anything you could pull the data from remotely if that is what your trying to do?  I believe placing the device after the inverter should effectively monitor "production" in the sense that it is monitoring the energy coming out of the inverter

TED 5000C and eMonitor are some others you might want to look at
and "The Owl" might be another manufacturer to look at.

I've used kill-a-watt's before to measure energy consumption, it just measures the flow passing between the outlet & the device(s).

I'd be curious why barrysty1e agreed to repay/refund BTC?  If he had a working client, why offer to refund the majority back?

Is there any proof of him agreeing to pay back .2BTC?

That's a fair point, I'm not entirely familiar with the legal system in India so I can't comment one way or the other but there is certainly a different definition of "justice" in some areas around the world. I'm at least doubtful he is going to get that same treatment in this community.

When I read things like:
"Bhardwaj revealed to us that Sheikh would procure data related to debit/credit cards through his sources," said DCP (crime) Bhisham Singh. "His associates would clone the cards and withdraw the money and send it to Delhi. Sheikh instructed Bhardwaj to transmit the money to Dubai through the bitcoin route."

and

"The probe revealed that he had handed over the money he received to a person on the basis of code words sent from Mumbai.
Bhardwaj was identified as the receiver."

It seems like you were aware something wasn't right... code words when receiving the funds? And it appears you knew your source was procuring data for cards?  Where did you think he was getting this data???  

You probably can't say much, but the trial should be interesting. If you are truly innocent and got caught up in the wrong crowd, I wish you the best.

That's probably true, sadly... do you have something personal against secondstrade? 

Quoting for reference.

There still appear to be missing parts of this conversation but, regardless, the OP asked you to provide an HTML version of the PSD. Your screenshots prove that you did not provide this, you provided different versions that were similar looking but nowhere near the same. I have no idea why you have an issue creating this, I assume you just do not know how to use the slice tool in photoshop or are using some type of HTML generator that requires a specific template?

I'm surprised your choosing to break a deal over such a small amount but you are certainly not being professional and it appears to me that you are not providing the work that was agreed to. Based on your original agreement and the screenshots you provided, the OP seems to have a legitimate reason to be upset.

I've tagged the account but you should use the "Report to Admin" link on the PM itself to alert a moderator, the link is in the lower-right corner of the message.