|
So, did both FTC and PXC already implement the code for NeoScrypt already? Is there a gpu miner in the works? Would not be very ideal if this algo stayed too long as a cpu only, that just make it botnet friendly.
|
|
|
|
|
How to use the same login credentials for all the NG pools?
|
|
|
|
If there are ones experiencing sync issues please use the following new nodes:
addnode=108.61.222.8
addnode=107.191.58.93
addnode=108.61.250.95
addnode=108.61.213.82
addnode=108.61.209.89
addnode=108.61.210.98
addnode=108.61.193.150
addnode=108.61.197.85
addnode=108.61.198.235
addnode=108.61.194.171
addnode=107.191.51.73
addnode=173.199.124.49
So, the old nodes shouldn't be used anymore? addnode=209.173.116.103:4156 addnode=50.243.222.197:4156 addnode=209.73.144.179:61388 addnode=80.240.134.52:4156 addnode=69.122.233.171:35979 addnode=31.48.43.248:4156 |
|
|
|
HI everyone, we are btc38. Here is our address http://en.btc38.comWe are open to receive good idea about how to operating an exchange. If there is a good essay, we will translate it into chinese and publish it on our main page www.btc38.comWhat's your opinion about following question: 1, If you were leader of exchange, what will you do facing so many coin? 2, It is wise to do voting? 3, what trait do you think a good should have？ 4, what would you like to say to chinese? 5, what should we do will attract you do transaction on our website. etc. Please don't reserve your view.  you can write down your precious advice, viewpoint or any question you want to know following this thread or send to support@mail.btc38.comLet us get things better and better. Thanks all for supporting us. I didn't know you have an english version of the site. lol So, the english one doesn't require to login with QQ, but with Facebook? Is there another way, I just don't like the idea of using facebook to login and possible giving my personal info from it. You should use coins that are in the top 50 and/or have a voting system that has a vote and have people explain why they voted for the coin. |
|
|
|
Added the release. It works on bbr.farm:1111 and makes about 80% of solo version. 1. I didn't change the get_whole_scratchpad so if it has a bug (looks like it has) it's better to contact the main branch developer as well.
2. m_job.difficulty shouldn't be zero. If it is - something's wrong with a pool. I added a return from the worker thread as it doesn't make any sense to search for nonce having wrong data.
updated github
Thanks. Can you post another windows release with this please? I don't have an environment ready to make a build and someone was asking me for it. Edit: Actually this makes it so it never gets work it looks like.. unless it's just me Right on.... Any plans on making this working with CryptoNote multiminer instead? |
|
|
|
|
5% fee doesn't bother me from Claymore's miner, but the performance could be %50 or more would be more satisfactory....
Anyone having some success in compile a better version for CryptoNight algo? Even in alpha form?
|
|
|
|
I think a donation fee is ok. Its fair to give developer a share, and this way everyone donates proportional to their "income".
5% is not okay though because we have electricity to pay for too ... Why not?! A miner which gives you 2x the speed of regular one (if any!) and you think 5% is too much? Don't use it then. Its a win-win for the developer AND users. Until better way to reward devs is found we have to cover electricity costs 5% is too much and he charges that much because he knows we don't have any other option, if i'm not going to profit (electricity is 80% of my mining revenue + 5% dev fee + 2% pool fee) after paying for electricity then what is the point ..... also 2 x faster 100 x faster difficulty will normalize that when everybody starts using that miner devfee should never be over 1 ~ 2 % as a maximum because tons of users will be using that miner and hash for him at no electricity cost so why be greedy, i mean the dev will still end with a huge amount of electricity free hashes ... Honestly, a dev for a miner will get more at 2% or lower dev fee, because people will more likely give a donation that will surpass the 5% from the richer miners/investors. This is my opinion though. Noooooooooope. If I was a more wealthier miner/investor, I would donate 10% of my earnings. But that's how I think...Guess others don't think like that....I did say it's my opinion, to re-quote it.... |
|
|
|
I think a donation fee is ok. Its fair to give developer a share, and this way everyone donates proportional to their "income".
5% is not okay though because we have electricity to pay for too ... Why not?! A miner which gives you 2x the speed of regular one (if any!) and you think 5% is too much? Don't use it then. Its a win-win for the developer AND users. Until better way to reward devs is found we have to cover electricity costs 5% is too much and he charges that much because he knows we don't have any other option, if i'm not going to profit (electricity is 80% of my mining revenue + 5% dev fee + 2% pool fee) after paying for electricity then what is the point ..... also 2 x faster 100 x faster difficulty will normalize that when everybody starts using that miner devfee should never be over 1 ~ 2 % as a maximum because tons of users will be using that miner and hash for him at no electricity cost so why be greedy, i mean the dev will still end with a huge amount of electricity free hashes ... Honestly, a dev for a miner will get more at 2% or lower dev fee, because people will more likely give a donation that will surpass the 5% from the richer miners/investors. This is my opinion though. |
|
|
|
|
Anyone running 0.39.0 and transfer and receive funds with no issues? I tried and it just hangs trying to send funds to poloniex.
|
|
|
|
{
"pools" : [
{
"name" : "DOOM_Suprnova",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://doom.suprnova.cc:5112",
"user" : "XXXXXXX",
"pass" : "x",
}
]
,
"kernel" : "doom" <===="This is what I corrected to make it finally work"
"device" : "0",
"intensity" : "18",
"vectors" : "1",
"worksize" : "256",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192",
"gpu-vddc" : "1.1",
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "120",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"gpu-threads" : "4",
"gpu-fan" : "100",
"gpu-powertune" : "0",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"no-submit-stale" : true,
"queue" : "1",
"scan-time" : "30",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"shares" : "0",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin"
}djm sure optimized the miner for luffa, runs a little hotter than x11 but still way cooler than scrypt or scrypt-n. Wonder if this improve mining for other algos that run luffa in them, ie. all the X series algos and a few others... |
|
|
|
i use sapphire r9 280x vaporx..
I'm using an MSI 280x....But can stop getting rejected shares....I'm going to try another 30 minutes, if no success, I quit....I don't need to be wasting power for no results... GPU miners are so new we are working on brand new settings so no one will have all the info yet, the one person who may be able to help is DJM34 if he sees your post or PM him. These are the growing pains of new algo/sgminer settings. Try lowering intensity to 15 first then work your way up if you are crashing. I finally got it, I had to use "kernel" : "doom", in the conf....lmfao....I looked at the sample conf.....I feel dumb.... THANKS everyone for the help!!!!  |
|
|
|
i use sapphire r9 280x vaporx..
I'm using an MSI 280x....But can stop getting rejected shares....I'm going to try another 30 minutes, if no success, I quit....I don't need to be wasting power for no results... |
|
|
|
Think they are pimped now..  @SpeedDemon13: iam also using 280x - but .bat file. I = 20 w = 128, no thread-concurrency, try to simplify and then go on  Still getting rejected share "above shares"....Thanks for the help guys so far, maybe my card is crap...lol think that you need 24000 threads, try it and gpu threads put to 2. If I don't put the tc, it auto uses 22400 for tc..I used 2 for thread and I=20 , but same results and the driver crashes... I might just give up and just keep mining XMR.....  |
|
|
|
Think they are pimped now.. @SpeedDemon13: iam also using 280x - but .bat file. I = 20 w = 128, no thread-concurrency, try to simplify and then go on your fans will work maybe 1 month and thats it...lower your fans and lover hrate it will last longer I have an aftermarket Arctic cooler extreme 7970, those run at 1900 rpm and run quiet...lol |
|
|
|
Think they are pimped now.. @SpeedDemon13: iam also using 280x - but .bat file. I = 20 w = 128, no thread-concurrency, try to simplify and then go on Still getting rejected share "above shares"....Thanks for the help guys so far, maybe my card is crap...lol |
|
|
|
Having hardware errors and shares above issue. Come on, a lot of you peeps are mining fine, share the knowledge and don't be greedy. I help people out when they have problems. {
"pools" : [
{
"name" : "DOOM_Suprnova",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://doom.suprnova.cc:5112",
"user" : "XXXXXXX",
"pass" : "x",
"algorithm" : "luffa"
}
]
,
"device" : "0",
"intensity" : "18",
"vectors" : "1",
"worksize" : "256",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192",
"gpu-vddc" : "1.1",
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "120",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"gpu-threads" : "1",
"gpu-fan" : "100",
"gpu-powertune" : "0",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"no-submit-stale" : true,
"queue" : "1",
"scan-time" : "30",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"shares" : "0",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin"
}here is my working config : I found that using intensity lower than 20 does not work though
],
"kernel" : "doom",
"api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1",
"api-listen" : true,
"expiry" : "120",
"failover-only" : true,
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin",
"log" : "5",
"queue" : "1",
"scan-time" : "60",
"auto-fan" : true,
"gpu-threads" : "1",
"gpu-engine" : "980,985",
"gpu-fan" : "0-85,0-85",
"gpu-memclock" : "1280,1280",
"gpu-memdiff" : "0,0",
"gpu-powertune" : "-20,-18",
"intensity" : "18,18",
"temp-target" : "71,71",
"temp-overheat" : "81,81",
"temp-cutoff" : "82,82",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"vectors" : "1,1",
"worksize" : "256,256",
"lookup-gap" : "2,2",
"thread-concurrency" : "26000,26000"
}
I'm on a 280x....That's for a 290/290x conf huh? |
|
|
|
Having hardware errors and shares above issue. Come on, a lot of you peeps are mining fine, share the knowledge and don't be greedy. I help people out when they have problems. {
"pools" : [
{
"name" : "DOOM_Suprnova",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://doom.suprnova.cc:5112",
"user" : "XXXXXXX",
"pass" : "x",
"algorithm" : "luffa"
}
]
,
"device" : "0",
"intensity" : "18",
"vectors" : "1",
"worksize" : "256",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192",
"gpu-vddc" : "1.1",
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "120",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"gpu-threads" : "1",
"gpu-fan" : "100",
"gpu-powertune" : "0",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"no-submit-stale" : true,
"queue" : "1",
"scan-time" : "30",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"shares" : "0",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin"
}On 280x.... All help is greatly appreciated.... |
|
|
|
|
Getting share above issue, even after setting the diff share at 256 and 512. This is happening on both suprnova and hashharder, this it really a headache at the moment. Any solutions please?
|
|
|
|
|
Seems like the pool still has issue with Claymore's miner. I'm getting a lot of json rpc errors and with that, 1/4th the hash rate. So, I end up going to crypto-pool.fr and it's running fine there on stratum.
|
|
|
|
cpu miner work for me 6hr get 30+block How many cpu cores/threads are you using? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
