Bitcoin Forum
May 23, 2024, 04:18:51 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 [56] 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 ... 161 »
1101  Economy / Exchanges / Re: This transaction is a fraud on: June 30, 2019, 10:39:45 PM
somebody hacked my yahoo account and kraken credentials
an unauthorized withdrawal was acceptad
i don't know how to recover my money but that's all!!!

That sucks. Sorry for your loss. Undecided

You should stop using Yahoo immediately. Billions of Yahoo accounts have been compromised in multiple hacks. I recommend a more secure email provider like Gmail.

Like others have said, the money is gone. At this point, you need to worry about securing your computer and accounts. I would follow TheWolf666's instructions regarding cleaning or formatting your PC. I would back up anything important and then format myself. Change your passwords, switch to a more secure email provider, and start using 2FA on your exchange accounts.
1102  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: How long realistically before global mandatory kyc on all exchange/VASP? on: June 30, 2019, 10:29:36 PM
FATF rules aren't accepted all around the world. Even within the EU some countries do not participate in this "project" so it's not the end of the world yet.

Very true. I was initially under the impression that compliance was pretty widespread. It's the opposite really. Many dozens of monitored countries fail to implement the majority of FATF rules. This is decades after these standards were initially put in place. Often times, a mere pledge by a country to work towards implementing some of the standards is enough to stave off FATF pressure for years.

That means we'll probably see non-compliant exchanges persist for many years. My biggest concern is how compliant exchanges will interface with customers who send coins from non-compliant exchanges.

Let's say BitMEX continues their no-KYC policies in the face of these rules. What happens when you send a few bitcoins from your BitMEX account to your Gemini account? Will Gemini close your account? Seems possible to me.
1103  Other / Off-topic / Re: Kleiman v. Wright case 6/28/19 (show cause) hearing likely open... follow 'live' on: June 30, 2019, 07:50:19 PM
I trust that you are familiar with the current libel cases from CSW against members of the Bitcoin community and/or the patents being presented by CSW / nChain, as well as the potential ramifications of successfully enforcing these said patents?

I was under the impression that none of these are serious legal threats. I've only been following the Craig Wright saga very loosely, but I recall seeing some legal analysis suggesting his suits were frivolous.

As for the patents, what do you think he'll accomplish?
1104  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: Taxes on crypto on: June 30, 2019, 07:20:21 PM
If you convert the bitcoin or altcoins for cash in hand, then they cannot do the tracking.

If you're in the US and trade for cash at meaningful volumes or as a business, be very careful. Law enforcement agents have infiltrated P2P trading platforms. They have arrested many people at this point for unlicensed money transmission just for trading on Localbitcoins. The IRS has been involved in some of the larger cases too.

Better to do it through multiple venues (not just Localbitcoins) and in lower amounts not approaching the $10,000 CTR threshold to stay off their radar.
1105  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: Avoiding Tax on Capital Gains from Bitcoin on: June 28, 2019, 11:20:14 PM
if it starts on 'bitmex' or the countless other anon exchange,

Thanks for the info. It seems like I could just wash the BTC funds on Bitmex, by sending to my anon Bitmex account, and then withdrawing to a separate BTC offline wallet?

What are some of the other top anon exchanges?

Binance, Bitfinex, and Deribit are a few other options that allow unverified accounts.

So it sounds like using Coinjoin, you can cover the trail on the blockchain, and basically make the BTC anonymous.

You can certainly make your tracks more difficult to follow. If you properly shield your IP address and cascade enough transactions, you might be anonymous.

In the USA capitol gains are an arguably unfair tax that favors the wealthy, not an unfair tax that is too high. You will likely pay twice the tax on the money you worked for as you will pay on your bitcoin gains. It could be as high as 20% or as low as 0%.

That's only for long term capital gains, where you held for more than a year. Short term capital gains are taxed at your ordinary tax rate, up to 37%.
1106  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Poloniex's taking money from its customers to cover its loss on: June 28, 2019, 11:05:14 PM
Now getting legal advice, I've been told that proving there was a fraud would be very difficult, unless having access to Poloniex's whole data, but there was definitely a mistake. Things like this, that CLAM crash because of crazy margin trading, should never happen.

I wouldn't think fraud would be the angle here. Something like negligence with regard to capital and margin requirements, maybe.

Does anyone know what jurisdiction this case would fall under? Did the lawyer you spoke to say? As a US company, capital and margin requirements would normally be covered by CFTC regulations. Since US persons aren't allowed to lend or margin trade on Poloniex, I'm not sure they apply here.
1107  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Cash out after having investment trippled in bitcoin! on: June 27, 2019, 10:05:13 PM
My brother had invested in bitcoin where market price has down to 3K usd. Seeing the current market and the needs arisea, my brother had cash out already and I am not surprise that he trippled his money investment. Good for.him but I think it must be hold still if I were on his side.

To each his own. There's absolutely nothing wrong with tripling one's investment and walking away. I personally think we're going much higher over the next several years -- which is why most of my bitcoins are in cold storage -- but it's a free market. If he wants to lock in his dollar gains, he should.

Who among you here does not hold btc anymore and afraid of investing to bitcoin? Did you regret of not investing on bitcoin too?

I always feel regret looking back at how much I spent or sold at much lower prices.

I never regretted investing in Bitcoin, but I was also lucky with timing. I never lost any of my initial investment in the 2014 and 2018 corrections. I'm sure it's different for people who bought closer to the tops and had to wait out the bear markets.
1108  Economy / Exchanges / Re: What's up with Binance and US customers? on: June 27, 2019, 09:51:37 PM
I'm pretty sure you have to be KYC verified to trade on Kucoin.
https://kucoin.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360015207533-Why-Get-KYC-Verified-on-KuCoin-

Nope, not yet anyway. Right on the link you provided, they state the verification tiers:

Quote
The specific rules are as follows:

· Verified Individual Account: 100 BTC per 24hr

· Verified Institutional Account: 500 BTC per 24hr

· Non-verified Account: 2 BTC per 24hr

KYC verification is not compulsory, which means if the client chooses not to complete his/her KYC, the client can continue to trade on the platform.

This is what a KuCoin rep said on Reddit regarding US traders about a month ago:

Quote
Hi there! We do apologize as KuCoin does not offer KYC for users in the USA as of the moment and there is no official statement yet whether it will be available soon. However, you may still continue to perform transactions on KuCoin even if the account isn't KYC verified. The only limitation for non-verified accounts is the limit of 2 BTC every 24 hours. Thank you!

I don't think anything has changed since that time.
1109  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: How long realistically before global mandatory kyc on all exchange/VASP? on: June 27, 2019, 08:07:39 AM
If we are talking about laws then this might take a while because international laws are just some kind of set standard where the country still has some choice to follow the rest or not, still domestic laws are what most follow if we are only talking about that certain country.

The FATF expects countries to begin implementing domestic laws within a year. They'll be reviewing compliance in June 2020. The G20 countries already pledged to implement the rules, so we'll probably see most of them passing laws -- or at least in the process of it -- by then.

Most monitored countries are still noncompliant with existing FATF rules, though. So there will probably be plenty of places where non-KYC exchanges can still set up shop.

The big question then becomes, how will highly compliant and tightly regulated exchanges (like Gemini) deal with noncompliant exchanges? Will they close your account for depositing coins from them? Gemini already prohibits mixing services, for example.
1110  Economy / Exchanges / Re: coinbase on: June 27, 2019, 07:50:00 AM
I am very new to this group. I think this is the right place to post this, if not I'm sorry.

I tried to link my bank account with coinbase and they asked for my Login/Password for my online banking? It just felt wrong. The first thing people are told is not to give this info out. Is this something I should be ok with? I know coinbase is one of the biggest. Like I said it just felt wrong...

I wouldn't do it.

Coinbase and Gemini both do this, and supposedly it's secure -- they don't actually have access to your credentials. Like you said, though, it just feels wrong and seems unnecessary.

You can do manual bank verification. They'll make two small deposits < $1 to your bank account and you'll verify by reporting the amounts. I forget the exact process but I just did it when I switched banks on there a few weeks ago. Just click through the option that says you can't/won't verify using your bank login.
1111  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: CFTC Approves LedgerX LLC as a Designated Contract Market on: June 27, 2019, 07:41:06 AM
I really don't understand though Bakkt making like 'self-cerfication' and scheduling a July UAT, do they smell that a approval is already in the horizon?

According to Bakkt, they've been in close discussions with the CFTC and have made significant changes to their product to reach compliance. So I'm assuming they believe the CFTC is no longer a significant obstacle. I just hope they aren't underestimating the licensing process with the New York Department of Financial Services, who are notoriously difficult to deal with -- see BitLicense.
1112  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Ready to sue the miners? on: June 27, 2019, 07:24:57 AM
We don't need fees. If the miners aren't getting enough from the coin they mine, they can sit on it, and supply and demand should raise the price.

You're only considering newly mined coins, not the 17+ million other bitcoins in circulation. With each passing day, miners comprise a smaller and smaller portion of the total supply. Since they don't dictate the supply, the market doesn't move to their whims.

In your vision, what do you expect to happen when block rewards approach zero?
1113  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Ready to sue the miners? on: June 26, 2019, 08:09:43 AM
Why did Bitcoin fall the first time, from $20,000 at the end of 2017, to $3,500 by the end of 2018?

Basically because of miner's fees. Transacting in Bitcoin wasn't profitable, because miners got together and raised their fees so high that it wasn't worth trading Bitcoin.

So, it was the miners' fault that Bitcoin fell.

Miners aren't the only ones enforcing the 4MB block weight limit. The entire network of full nodes is. And it's limited block space that drives fees up when there is strong demand for transactions.

So it's all Bitcoin users -- or at least node operators -- who are to blame, at least according to your theory.

Here's the thing, though. Why do you think it was high fees that caused price to fall? Previous bubbles burst the exact same way.
1114  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: CFTC Approves LedgerX LLC as a Designated Contract Market on: June 26, 2019, 07:50:09 AM
Quote
Washington, DC — The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced today that it has approved the application of LedgerX LLC (LedgerX) for designation as a contract market. LedgerX is a Delaware limited liability company located in New York City, and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ledger Holdings, Inc.

If I'm not mistaken, CFTC cleared Ledger X to offer 'physical bitcoin future contracts'. So I speculate that this could be a good news for investors as this is not the same cash-settled contracts being offered by CME or CBoE. It is not only offered to institutional investors but for retail clients as well. I think this news was one factors to the current rise in the last 24 hours. So let's see how it goes.

I'm not sure how big LedgerX's futures market will get... their brand remains fairly small among institutional exchanges. This is potentially huge, though. With the cash-settled CME markets, there is no arbitrage mechanism to bring the spot markets in line. With physical settlement on LedgerX (and eventually Bakkt), the derivative markets become a real avenue for institutions to accumulate bitcoins. If demand is strong, that should have a tangible effect on the global spot rates because of arbitrage.
1115  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Localbitcoins.com -- Update on Cash Trades, Verification 25/6/19 on: June 26, 2019, 07:42:20 AM
I wonder if LocalBitcoins is going to start going after those cash offers listed as ATM deposits soon, or if they'll just leave those offers alone. I find it more likely they'll take action against those sorts of trades than not personally, but glad to see there's still some people trying to offer cash trades out there.

It's obviously a violation of their terms. If it becomes really prevalent, they'll start suspending or terminating the accounts of these users. Hopefully not though -- I'm all for workarounds like this.

Inevitably though, we need to move beyond Localbitcoins for P2P trading. They got too big and regulators are breathing down their neck. It's only going to get worse, not better.
1116  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Native SegWit question on: June 26, 2019, 07:20:54 AM
What I want to know is can I send funds FROM my segwit bc1 address TO both legacy and wrapped segwit addresses without issue? I don't want to try and send funds from my bc1 address to an address that starts with a 3, only to have it get lost in the ether.

Yes, there's no issue with that at all. Electrum supports all the above formats, so you can easily send bitcoins from your native Segwit wallet to legacy and P2SH wallets, and vice versa.

Secondly, is it possible to transfer funds between my two wallets, which are on the same computer, locally... without sending and having to pay fees?

You can't import private keys using a wallet that has a seed. You can sweep them, but that obviously incurs fees.

In the current version of Electrum, it appears the only options are to create a wallet from seed or use imported keys. If you create a wallet from imported keys, you won't be generating new keys for use.

The best option is probably just to use the two wallets separately and when needed, send/sweep coins between them.
1117  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Coinbase freezing my funds at every opportunity. Any work around? on: June 26, 2019, 07:11:14 AM
Is Coinbase Pro available where you live? It's a separate interface and may require additional verification beyond Coinbase's normal site. Once verified, deposit/trading limits on Coinbase Pro are unlimited and withdrawals are limited to $10,000 per day.
1118  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: How long realistically before global mandatory kyc on all exchange/VASP? on: June 25, 2019, 01:50:45 AM
It's unlikely to become a global phenomenon, in my opinion, because of the fact that countries such as Japan, Malta, etc. now have somewhat of a vested interest when it comes to regulating bitcoin businesses positively, because they're actively gaining revenue from these activities and firms.

Japan is a member of the G20. All G20 members have already pledged to implement the recently published FATF rules.

Why do people think Japanese regulation is so great anyway? The FSA has been clamping down on privacy coins as a requisite for licensing, and their self-regulatory agency is prohibiting exchanges from listing them. Now they are taking things even further with new nanny state regulations:

Quote
Further, any company even storing cryptocurrency will be considered a “cryptographic asset exchange” and thus required to register and maintain what experts believe will be an expensive license.

“Smaller companies will need abundant funds if more stringent management systems are required. It may be impossible to maintain existing business unless it changes,” said Masahiro Yasu, CEO of ALIS, token-based social media system that will be affected by the change.

The new law, which had been in the works for months, will also limit margin trading in cryptocurrency.
1119  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Solotoshi is Satoshi on: June 25, 2019, 01:34:40 AM
Why had satoshi disappeared from 2011 and why hasn't his large funds moved? It' because he is in jail.
The internet has found Satoshi.

This has been discussed at length already. See this thread.

The "evidence" -- if you could call it that -- is entirely circumstantial and unconvincing. Internet sleuthing at its worst. We still have no idea who Satoshi is.
1120  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Using BTC to send funds cross-border (in current day) on: June 24, 2019, 08:45:59 PM
He could use Bisq to sell BTC in Malaysia face to face or any bank account or whatever.

I don't think Bisq has a market for BTC/MYR. It's not listed here under their active markets. Hodl Hodl also has no listings in Malaysia. P2P liquidity is hard enough to find in the United States and Europe. I don't think there are many options in Malaysia outside of Localbitcoins and Paxful.

Paxful is possible without KYC for under $1,500 in trade volume. I'm not sure how much the OP is trying to send, but maybe the recipient could do it in increments through different accounts. I'm sure that's a violation of Paxful's terms, though.
Pages: « 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 [56] 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 ... 161 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!