Both are invalid bids. Minimum increment is 0.001BTC.
Also, OP 0.0000001 BTC isn't 1 satoshi, it is 10 satoshis. And the first bidder is bidding 10 satoshi, which is the only valid bid now.

I see that blockchain.info have some bug on showing unconfirmed txs, they only show 17k txs for now (but it is still a large number).And at this page it is showing 66k transactions! And there are some f... miners who still mining empty blocks (at block 364389 and the latest 364399 at the time or writing). I wonder when my tx with 2000 satoshi fee will be confirmed

You are asking a loan, though paying no interest?! I'm sure that no one will do that. Edit the amount or lock the topic, or your account could be tagged by negative trust.

Agree. That account have a balance of $139 but OP is selling it for just $6 starting, that's just 4.3% of the amount. The reasonable price should be a 20-80% discount (I don't see this kind of trades before, so the data is taken from other trades), which the reasonable price should be at least $28. However since there's someone already bidding on it, OP can't withdraw the offer.

It is (likely) a screenshot in German. Can you make a English screenshot? Or no one could read what is exactly in it (except those who know German).
BTW the ICQ No. is a new one (ICQ Nos. 650 000 000-699 999 999 can still be registered new), hence the account may just be a throwaway. Be careful.

Today I've just forgot about the stress test spamming, and I've sent a tx with just 2000 satoshi fees (which could confirm in normal periods). The tx haven't been confirmed yet, together with 12k other transactions. So I could almost prove that the stress test spammers are still working till now.

I think that cash isn't a safe thing, as their values drop by time (inflation). However with bitcoin there is no such problem (there is a limit on total amount of BTC, which is 21m) and their value could stand.
BTW bitcoin have a larger security over cash, because when some thief steal some cash, no one can prove the cash is yours. However with bitcoin's signed message, we can proof that the address (and hence the coins) belongs to the message-signer.

Just made a successful login there. Locking this thread, until I can't login there again.
P.S. I only have less then 0.1 BTC at blockchain.info, so it is safe for now.

Here is my story:

I've signed up a blockchain.info wallet months ago and I've been using it for no problem. At one point I've added my email to improve my security, however since that point I need to confirm my email before EVERY login. Yesterday I'm still doing this with no issues. However, when I tried to login to my blockchain wallet today, I don't receive the confirmation email even for submitting the login form few times. However without its email, I can't login to the wallet and hence I've lost control of 2 empty addresses which I haven't backuped.

Fortunately I've got a backup of non-empty addresses from them a week ago. Then I could still have control of my addresses, and having no loss in bitcoin. I don't recommend everyone using blockchain.info wallet.

Also a noob question here: I have private keys (in both compressed and uncompressed formats) and wanted to import them to another wallet which allows me to sign message. Can anyone give me a suggestion on this?

Why would you could still be scammed? BitLaunder.com and other sites from Morality is well known scam sites. You should check scam accusation of the sites before you use it. (I've lost few dollars worth of altcoin a month ago just because I don't check the scam accusation board )
BTW sorry for your 0.28 BTC. You should check this board every time you use a new service.

Registered 2004?! I'll buy that for 100 BTC if you do have it. Or if this is an error then please just fix it. BTW does your account have potential activity? If it does then the account should worth more.

Anyway, this thread doesn't belongs to 'Bitcoin Discussion'. This can be classified as either Beginners and Help, or Meta (which is a board for discussion of the forum). So better choose a better board before posting, or you may risk being banned on this forum, especially when you are going to join a signature campaign.

This thread should be moved to 'Meta' board. BTW to reach the 'Member rank', you need 60 activity points, which you should make at least 60 posts in 5 14-day-periods (unfortunately, the new 14-day-period just started 10 minutes before your post ). So you will reach 'Member' rank in exactly 8 weeks.

I don't get any 'spam' transactions yet. I hope I can get them, because (though) it is a low amount of money, it is still a lot better than using faucets. Also the advertisement is only visible on blockchain.info. They are not visible on other block explorers. So that's not a big problem for me and I can get free money which I need to get from faucets for a long time. How good is them

Me too. When I was making a reply on another topic, it can't load, and I can't even return to the homepage... In fact I found this forum was running slow earlier today. Hope the problem will be solved soon.

High ranking members aren't rude. We/they are just talking about the truth under forum rules, and prevent the forum from spammers.
Will ignore you after this post.

That's why some signature spammers also received a permanent ban.
Here are one of them: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1107698.0
There are a lot more of those, however I can't find them in hurry.
Also many signature posters are making constructive posts (like me?) and help the forum, like spot the spammers/scammers. They are useful to the forum.
P.S. Do the community thinks my posts are constructive or not or medium?

At least this user made some HQ post like this:
It's a post with 974 characters, which is a lot more than the average requirement of a signature campaign, which is at 70-75 characters. He contributes to the forum, while all your 'contribution' to the bitcoin community is in fact benefiting yourself.
Just looking forward to when the account is going to be banned again.

He have banned for so many times, however he is just doing ban evasion.
I've listed some (not all, as there are too many, and I can't search for all) in my previous post here. I'm sure that this account is going to be banned soon.

I also don't quite agree on this, but it is the rule of the forum. It is because in the Gambling section and the Investor-based Games section etc. where scammers occur the most, the is already a warning of:Also scammers will be tagged by trusted member, by giving them negative trust and hence a warning tag will shown on their profile. Thus the account is no use of scammers. This is already a 'ban' on them.
For spammers the most effective way to ban them is of course, don't let them to post. So that's why spammers are not allowed to post, for either 7/14/30/60 days, or permanently.