|
"bestshare": 1870674813.055633, on a V9 here..
Shame the miner don't seem to show me the best share in GUI so I have to do with the stats on the pool.
one billion, eight hundred seventy million, six hundred seventy-four thousand, eight hundred thirteen!
and a electric bill that could stretch from the UK to China lol
|
|
|
|
Stuck some miners here. Come on block. Save me..  |
|
|
|
4296658863483 is the actual bestshare of the pool since last block. And because there is no bestever in http://solo.ckpool.org/pool/ it has to be the highest share of the actual possible block. As far as i understand: if the total shares of a user are nearly equal to the bestever, the personal luck is 100%. If the highest share is bigger you had more luck and if bestever is under your total shares, your luck is under 100%. If my shares are nearly 3times higher than my bestever my personal luck is about 30-40%.  I know that it does not matter as far as my bestshare is not above difficulty target. But it would be nice to see a higher share  The best share is not that of all the workers on the "pool" as its solo mining here so what is shown is the highest Best Share submitted by a user. The term "pool" throws people a little it makes people think that they are working together to solve a block and the block finder get's the reward. Where as you are working on your own to find and submit a block and no other work on the pool is related to your attempt. Edit. Also shares have no value in solo mining the stats are only there to show you that your miner is actually submitting something so just ignore the total shares submitted as they are meaningless.  |
|
|
|
My bestever has not changed since last found block. My shares are nearly 3 times higher than the best share I think the luck is not on my side. I don't think the best share has moved at all since the last block find. seems to have been at "bestshare": 4296658863483, since very low diff % with no change even with almost 100ph push the other day by someone. Just need to keep pushing on someone will find one soon enough. |
|
|
|
|
Still working great rates and quick turnaround.
Coins, ICO's, Masternodes, Block explorer, Pools,
PM For my discord.
|
|
|
|
Slaughtered bitmain via email? Would that count as a sacrifice? |
|
|
|
|
Thanks CK I kind of guessed that would be the answer.
Last time I buy bitmain products that for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
Is there any way to fix the "bestshare" showing as 0 on antminers?
Got a batch and none of them show any best share in the gui.
Sent bitmain email asking about it and they told me " Its the pool not the miner" which I know to be false..
I know this is down to the shitty fork bitmain did of of CK's fantastic work.
CK I would be forever in your debt if you could help me fix this please.
|
|
|
|
I have been playing the lotto here for a long time with no luck. + I have been mining here for around 2 years with 1-4th on at any time must of burned my fair share here "hashrate1m": "0", "hashrate5m": "0", "hashrate1hr": "0", "hashrate1d": "64.3G", "hashrate7d": "8.73T", "lastshare": 1537276143, "workers": 1, "shares": 13574582220, "bestshare": 11836169821.62613, "bestever": 11836169821, "worker": [ and my new one { "hashrate1m": "915G", "hashrate5m": "2.3T", "hashrate1hr": "4.58T", "hashrate1d": "1.97T", "hashrate7d": "728G", "lastshare": 1537554284, "workers": 3, "shares": 129671914, "bestshare": 1870674813.055633, "bestever": 1870674813, "worker": [ |
|
|
|
Time since last block here! Someone's got to get lucky sooner or later! 61 days or 8 weeks and 5 days or 16.71% of 2018 |
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the reply Pandaminer look forward to seeing them hitting the market!
|
|
|
|
Daily bump  |
|
|
|
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2012/Feb/0I revert to this OLD post regarding exploit that could have allowed something like this to occur. A powerful attacker could definitely exploit this; timestamps in the future are rejected and Bitcoin won't generally accept a version of history in which time goes backwards, but otherwise a 51% attacker can choose whatever timestamps they like and can delay releasing their version of the chain to meet the "less than 10 seconds" requirement. (note screenshots up to 45 sec) It's a very expensive attack but far from impossible. I cannot find where this change was made to allow timestamps in the future. But it was never allowed in the early versions of the software. More funny commits i guess. *edit* https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/b14bd4df58171454c2aa580ffad94982943483f5
|
|
|
|
This is a very interesting topic, over the past few week I have notice many blocks with timestamps "Ahead" of time. Seems to be only 3 pools that are broadcasting there block finds with timestamps "ahead" of time! I captured a few screen shots and created a post asking about this (it was swiftly removed!) Now for the strange part.. I know that the code allows for time issues but what is this is a new type of attack that is being pushed at the network? Seems only a few pools are doing this then they suddenly switch back to the correct time. 1. why would they change the timestamps for X-amount blocks then change back to the correct time. So for a 2nd time.. Here are the screen shots. https://imgur.com/a/bQgCyDEDeleted post... https://imgur.com/a/gIxtYY0 |
|
|
|
Never mind testnet. When block  Someone was throwing like 13ph on the pool last night. "shares": 10507108386, |
|
|
|
2 weeks in silence??
This is where we find out he spent 2 weeks cleaning up the oil after the fishtank broke haha Hopefully not though very keen on knowing how this turns out. |
|
|
|
Shocking. always wondered if bitmain paid for cgminer in there devices seems like a dick move to not even reach out to the creator. Don't worry CK one day Ill find a block in the solo pool (mabey) and the tip will be mega |
|
|
|
Said with such grace The IPO has bad news all over it but that's a debate for another time. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
