thx for the link!!! its good that there are some news.. but they are bad news indeed, and when it comes to voting(wtf?), everybody who chooses option 3 is giving up their right in their stake
|
|
|
It seems out of your list that item 3 is the real reason for their concern: "Accepting bitcoins can be perceived as making a value judgement about Bitcoin, which they are hesitant to do." So they have concerns about BTC, but none about paid admins? Yeah, sounds just like the usual Wikiganda.
|
|
|
Deal sounds sweet, but they always do.
|
|
|
Bitpit. They died and took some of my coins with them.
What do you mean they died? They made a run for it, when it was at the highest.
|
|
|
ozco.in spam me with miner off mails since weeks, but miners are always on
same here
|
|
|
You guys saw this. Check BTC100: BTC has long arrived in China and is there to stay.
|
|
|
Since i couldnt make it, id at least like a video. Will you post it here?
|
|
|
Personally I have no problem with governmental regulation at the exchanger level, because its super easy to launder the Bitcoins after or before exchanging in or out. USD can already be easily tracked, so it makes sense to make the exchange process as clean as possible.
Can you provide a hypothetical example explaning how bitcoins can be laundered? To get started, let's assume I have been milking my neighbour's cows and selling the raw milk for bitcoins, falsely advertising it as mother's milk. There are several more-or-less illegal aspects of my business. I need to launder those coins. Please enlighten me. Let your creativity run wild. The end goal is to have the coins laundered, meaning I can convincingly demonstrate that my coins in fact originate from some sort of legal business. 1. You open a webstore where you sell spells 2. Mix the coins 3. You buy yourself a lot of spells 4. ... 5. Profit! Spells? Like in Harry Poter?
|
|
|
This might be the real DPR(or rather simply SR), but certainly not the current owner. There have been between 2-5 owners since the Gawker article.
|
|
|
Could you guys please stop releasing a new version every 3 days? Soon there will be a new version before one had the chance to sync the old one.
|
|
|
Wir sind nun an einem Punkt, an dem es die einzig „richtige“ Lösung nicht mehr geben kann. Es stehen folgende Optionen zur Verfügung:
1. keine Auszahlungen bis zur endgültigen Freigabe aller Gelder 2. nach Vorliegen von Informationen und Akteneinsicht Auszahlung von geprüften und berechtigten Forderungen 3. Auszahlung an alle Kunden in Höhe einer bestimmten Quote. Diese Quote entspricht dem Verhältnis des freigegebenen zum beschlagnahmten Teil des Geldes. Befriedigung der restlichen Beträge nach Freigabe des Geldes
Wir sind aber auch der Ansicht, dass eine befriedigende Gesamtlösung nur mit Hilfe der Kunden zu finden ist. Aus diesem Grund wird unsere Mandantin eine Abstimmungsmöglichkeit zur Verfügung stellen über die wir zeitnah informieren werden. http://www.rdp-law.de/presse.htmlWäre interessant zu wissen, wie dann diese Quote aus Punkt 3. aussehen würde. Die Gesamtquote lag ja bei 5kk+ und der beschlagnahmte Teil bei <1kk, also müsste jeder logischerweise 80%+ bekommen. Trotzdem würde ich, wenn es zu einer Abstimmung(wtf?) kommt, jedem empfehlen nicht diese Lösung zu wählen, da dadurch jegliche Rechtsansprüche verfallen. Ausserdem werden alle Anteile, der sich aus offensichtlichen Gründen nicht meldenden Kunden, von BTC24 und ihren Möchtegernanwälten eigestrichen, anstatt diese zu verteilen. P.S: Echt scheisse gelaufen für Simon, aber seine Noobadvokaten kriegen keinen Cent von mir.
|
|
|
http://www.rdp-law.de/presse.htmlWenigstens wird da schon erwähnt, dass jeder mit Einbussen zu rechnen hat. Am meisten ärgert mich, dass Simon BTC an die Kriminellen ausgezahlt hat, die könnte man jetzt prima gebrauchen, um die Löcher bei FIAT zu stopfen.
|
|
|
War da nicht die Rede von "1 Überweisung alle 20 Tage" oder so? Also würden die theoretisch erst nach 40 Tagen + Zeit für Bearbeitung nach dem 24.09 überhaupt erst die 3te Überweisung(garantiert die grössere) bearbeiten.
|
|
|
OMG, i just got a living sign from them in the form of an emergency message. OFC its concerning they fucked up trading engine, so no need to panic.
|
|
|
Unfortunately the bank does not issue AUD cards, which means Aussies would have to pay the 2.8% conversion fee.
|
|
|
Now what fun would that be if Gox communicated and told the truth for a change? I love how they just set the same milestones every few months and then forget about them.
|
|
|
Even Mt.Gox lets people deposit and withdraw bitcoins without supplying any personal information.
That is most definitely false. Gox requires ID for BTC withdraws. I withdrew my last BTC from Mt.Gox no more than 3 months ago. I have never sent them any documents. IIRC ID was only required for people who wanted to withdraw >100 BTC per day and splitting it into smaller chunks solved the problem. And this still hasnt changed. Concerning Bitstamp, they are certainly going way over the top, especially since there are no AML/KYC regulations regarding this. Also they now sit on 26254 unanswered tickets, since they failed to inform their customers. Welcome to Gox 2.0.
|
|
|
USD debit cards are sold out and there is not enough interest to order a new batch. You can still cash out to an EUR debit card for free and then pay the 2.8% conversion fee when you spend the cash.
|
|
|
|