Ah, I've had whitebait before in Japan, although those were much much smaller which threw me off. Either that or the scale in the background is not 0.5 cm per square like I'm used to. Or perhaps NZ whitebait is overall larger the ones in Japan, or Japan uses them even younger. Uhh.

Was about to say, time to take out another mortgage.


Isn't the average user generally just a follower? As much as I'm sure that there are some, I can't think of an example where the average user/consumer actually drives anything without being coerced to do so in one way or another.

Shitcoins have no fiat pairing. So if Bitcoin bleeds they bleed by default. The apparent fiat bleeding for shitcoins triggers people to flee the shitcoin markets to get out into BTC, fiat and/or stable shitcoins, which causes further collapse. Then once BTC starts climbing again, more shitcoin FOMO money flows into BTC, which is yet a third cause for shitcoins to collapse. There are as always exceptions, but they are manipulated, hyped, or just the ultra-rare coin that happens to have delivered something.

After this scenario we'll get to what the goose has claimed, namely the bull-run leading up to 2020 or whatever new current year.

The stealth grapist.

Is that a real animal?

I second this.



Am I getting this tl;dr right by the way?

Nemgun's version: Tonbi changing the modalities of the original whitepaper and ICO proposal to a point where they have to split.

Tonbi's version: Nemgun can't code/doesn't deliver code and needs to deliver or leave.

Also, can someone confirm or deny?
Nemgun took 75 BTC out of his allocated X share.
Tonbi took ~600 BTC out of his allocated Y share. What are X/Y and how much of the paid money is left?




Without trying to jump the gun, sounds like Ton is the twat in this case unless he pays back what he took. If he spent it then he's an even bigger failure for spending funds before delivering, especially on that scale.



Edit: Asking about funds gets immediate kicks from Ton on Telegram. It seems pretty clear what is going on here, a slimy "CEO" with no skills of his own duping a dev with a potentially too grand vision. Correct me if I'm wrong, which I doubt I am as any decent person would admit to their failures without flailing around. In this case one person took millions of funds and either spent or hid them long before delivering without any intention of refunding what he already took (other than what is left in the escrow, how convenient).

I was getting bored, now I'm getting excited. Is Bitcorn trying to be a recreational substance?

Is there any place to catch up on any news?

Wealth has been, is and always will be centralized. It's called Pareto's law and it applies to pretty much every situation in nature and society, not just money. It's a fundamental and integral part of reality.

The appeal of Bitcoin isn't forced "equalization" of the monetary supply, but the impossibility of just arbitrarily pulling coins out of some fat turd's ass. Basically, centralization of funds is fine, centralization of full power over a system is not (the later is the problem with fiat and the former is a perfectly fine).

There are numerous bets in the altcoin market that are more sensible than betting on Bitcoin in the very short term. Especially since you can swing back into BTC once the trend finally reverses and thus increase your stash from multiple sources. Still wouldn't move my cold storage corns around though, that train left in winter.
If we actually near $3-4k territory I'll probably be liquidating some of my hardware and/or equity though for extra corn though.

Highly doubt it but I'll take it.

All of the standard indicators that you have access to with commercial trading tools are going to be largely useless. After all, the people who create those types of indicators already have them priced in whilst also having much more sophisticated algorithms to raze down the hordes of people that use the publicly available indicators.

I fail to see how SegWit is confusing. It solved some problems and the plebs who would get confused by it don't really have to use it (or realize that they are using it).

And regardless, once mainstream adoption is actually possible everything will be so dumbed down that even knowing what SW or LN are will be completely redundant for daily use. Or rather, unless an understanding of the back-end becomes 100% irrelevant Bitcorns won't become mainstream.

Can you recommend a manufacturer of rope?

You just used the term though, so I guess the next rally can just about begin?

The GODL frog: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31N892GN4Yk

Did you nibble on some of the wrong mushrooms on your bearish adventures?

But what about the page count? We need to increase it to raise the price of Bitcorns.

I do not consent to this.

Some people think on Wednesday (since the next Q&A session is on that day), but as far as I recall the open beta was guaranteed within May.

I'm thinking of keeping mine away from schools and the internet while leaving games open. Of course, since they wouldn't know any better there'd only be a handful of games for them to play until they've matured enough to just let them loose online.

With the right games you're definitely bound to get more brainy though, my brother hasn't played in a try-hard kind of way as I have and there are marked differences between the two of us as a result.

But that's mostly down to attitude I would say (which I got from specific games that I didn't want to put down but that required you to keep trying to figure out how things work). So as long as a person is encouraged (through whatever means) to think up different scenarios and to compare them it'll most likely become second nature into adulthood.