we don't need to speak about Synereo strategy differenciation in details here to point its relevance in the market: getting paid to do what you do with facebook.
(snip)
tsu.co is trying just that. I have an account there that I use to communicate with exactly one person. From what I've seen so far, paying people for using their social network dramatically decreases the quality of the content, plus, increases reposts, at least if you base earnings on activity. Are users joining Tsu because of the revenue or because of the lack of ad spam? I presume it is the latter and an ideological motivation to support a social network that will stop spamming them and lowering the quality of the social network experience. The compelling niche in this case are those who hate ad spam enough to lose all their Facebook contacts, which frankly is apparently not most people. I posit it is possible to remove that ad spam and do it in a more compelling niche that will have more users and thus more economies-of-scale to scale up and challenge the centralized behemoths: I'm linking to the OP in my upcoming crowdfunding campaign. An excerpt from the rough draft is quoted below:  
Decentralize Social Distribution with JAMBOX
Many attempts[1] such as Diaspora* have failed to disrupt centralized social networking, because users didn’t have a compelling reason to adopt them; and some features of centralized social networks can’t be implemented in a decentralized paradigm[2]. Successful centralized alternatives to Facebook such as Twitter, LinkedIn, and OdnoklassnikiVkontakte, pursue compelling untapped niches of sufficient scale. The prior decentralization paradigm attempts didn’t pursue a compelling niche which only a decentralized paradigm can fulfill.
I’m Shelby Moore III, a repeat offender of creating “million user” software[3], seeking crowdfunding to apply my significant marketing and programming experience in an untapped aspect of social distribution of music and mobile games that requires a decentralized paradigm. This untapped niche is large enough to scale up a $billions decentralized paradigm that should be potentially capable[4] of disrupting the centralized behemoths that spam us with ads, disrespect our privacy, control our software choices, and don’t maximally empower widespread “indie” (independent) musicians and developers.
We will provide a more efficient and effective platform for indie musicians, mobile game developers, and their fans to synergize, monetize, distribute and foster discovery through social sharing.
My overarching conceptual goal is to enable millions of creative people to work independently, fulfilling the prediction of my autodidact macro-economic theories about the inability to finance, top-down profit, and parasite on the creativity of others[5] in a coming cataclysmic shift[6] from the dying top-down, fixed capital investment economies-of-scale Industrial Age to a decentralized, maximum division-of-labor self-improvement Knowledge Age.
There is currently no free music streaming without advertising that is both integrated with [...]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_software_and_protocols_for_distributed_social_networking
[2] http://motherboard.vice.com/blog/what-happened-to-the-facebook-killer-it-s-complicated
[3] https://www.linkedin.com/in/shelby-moore-iii-b31488b0
http://relativisticobserver.blogspot.com/2015/11/rapidly-growing-niche.html?showComment=1458863526651#c5360070863037191067
[4] http://techcrunch.com/2011/06/28/sean-parker-on-why-myspace-lost-to-facebook/
[5] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=355212.0
[6] http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2459986,00.asp
https://www.technologyreview.com
|
|
|
|
I'm linking to the OP in my upcoming crowdfunding campaign. An excerpt from the rough draft is quoted below:
Decentralize Social Distribution with JAMBOX
Many attempts[1] such as Diaspora* have failed to disrupt centralized social networking, because users didn’t have a compelling reason to adopt them; and some features of centralized social networks can’t be implemented in a decentralized paradigm[2]. Successful centralized alternatives to Facebook such as Twitter, LinkedIn, and OdnoklassnikiVkontakte, pursue compelling untapped niches of sufficient scale. The prior decentralization paradigm attempts didn’t pursue a compelling niche which only a decentralized paradigm can fulfill.
I’m Shelby Moore III, a repeat offender of creating “million user” software[3], seeking crowdfunding to apply my significant marketing and programming experience in an untapped aspect of social distribution of music and mobile games that requires a decentralized paradigm. This untapped niche is large enough to scale up a $billions decentralized paradigm that should be potentially capable[4] of disrupting the centralized behemoths that spam us with ads, disrespect our privacy, control our software choices, and don’t maximally empower widespread “indie” (independent) musicians and developers.
We will provide a more efficient and effective platform for indie musicians, mobile game developers, and their fans to synergize, monetize, distribute and foster discovery through social sharing.
My overarching conceptual goal is to enable millions of creative people to work independently, fulfilling the prediction of my autodidact macro-economic theories about the inability to finance, top-down profit, and parasite on the creativity of others[5] in a coming cataclysmic shift[6] from the dying top-down, fixed capital investment economies-of-scale Industrial Age to a decentralized, maximum division-of-labor self-improvement Knowledge Age.
There is currently no free music streaming without advertising that is both integrated with [...]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_software_and_protocols_for_distributed_social_networking
[2] http://motherboard.vice.com/blog/what-happened-to-the-facebook-killer-it-s-complicated
[3] https://www.linkedin.com/in/shelby-moore-iii-b31488b0
http://relativisticobserver.blogspot.com/2015/11/rapidly-growing-niche.html?showComment=1458863526651#c5360070863037191067
[4] http://techcrunch.com/2011/06/28/sean-parker-on-why-myspace-lost-to-facebook/
[5] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=355212.0
[6] http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2459986,00.asp
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/519241/report-suggests-nearly-half-of-us-jobs-are-vulnerable-to-computerization/
|
|
|
|
|
So to make it clear. The likelihood that the float of Dash is significantly owned by those in the instamine and who likely owned masternodes hence thus maintaining their share of the coin supply is what in your estimation?
|
|
|
|
Well, not even Monica will claim that Bill fucked her, so.
When I hear "these two had sex", or "I had sex with the X person", I understand it to be sex, not a bj.
But that's just me I guess.
Oral sex. Phone sex. (see what I did there?) Yeah you proved my point. Thanks. So even if he had phone sex with her, he would be lying to say he didn't have sex with that woman. But in your sneaky world where intent of the questioner (analogously the n00b investor) is not considered, Clinton could only have assumed one meant vaginal or anal intercourse. Btw, Clinton said he didn't have "sexual relations with that woman". Any way I am contented our discussion has sufficiently devolved to fart jokes so we are best buddies now at a slumber party. See the pic of me arm slung over shoulder of Evan next post ( with his dick up my ass). Cheers. |
|
|
|
Well, not even Monica will claim that Bill fucked her, so.
When I hear "these two had sex", or "I had sex with the X person", I understand it to be sex, not a bj.
But that's just me I guess.
Oral sex. |
|
|
|
Let's suppose that one day Synereo provide exactly the same as facebook exept that users get rewarded by using the social network
I already documented the economics of that. Ad revenue would never pay enough to motivate users to share. They share for much more valuable reasons. No one is going to work for $1 to $10 per day. Ads in developing countries pay less, because people spend less. (without speaking about huge privacy issues in centralised social networks), isn't that enough for people to switch to Synereo ?
No. That is what the past experiments of many decentralized attempts have shown. Moreover, the russian social network Odnoklassniki got destroyed by facebook and Vkontakte which did not provide added value, which annile your point of needing a niche.
Facebook won because it had more users or Odnoklassniki won because of Russian language niche and Russian culture focus. This proves the point of why you can't beat Facebook at its own game. You have to have an untapped demanded niche. |
|
|
|
I think it's clear that Duffield at the least messed up really badly. Why at least as much is not acknowledged by AlexGR et al is puzzling.
How do you figure that I'm not acknowledging it when even Evan himself acknowledged it and proposed to fix the problem with an airdrop? The community* voted it down (I voted it down too) for several reasons, settling the issue once and for all. The rehashing of the same issue is from outsiders that have interests in defaming dark and gaining marketplace at its expense. However the act got old by now and investors saw that those who tried to gain the moral high ground against Evan and Darkcoin, simply ripped them off - and just used Darkcoin's issues to pump their selves up in order to conduct their scams and leave, while Evan is still here coding and improving Darkcoin / now DASH - which is ultimately what gives the coin its value. * If Evan had proceeded unilaterally, we'd hear that Evan screwed everyone over and that he is a scammer for airdropping new coins that diluted coin supply (and by extension fucked investors). Now that he put the issue and final say to the community vote, we hear ..."sockpuppets". There is nothing that he could do that can please everyone. There are all kind of angles that can be used, maliciously, where one could be termed a scammer for anything he does. That's simply the nature of the beast. Oh blame it on the fabricated community that is beholden to the instamine which wasn't premeditated.  And we acknowledge all these deceptions because we are so upfront with our disclosures.  And don't forget to add what the definition of 'is' is. It is clear that, "you did not have sex with that woman". She was just cleaning the underside of your desk with her tongue. |
|
|
|
we don't need to speak about Synereo strategy differenciation in details here to point its relevance in the market: getting paid to do what you do with facebook. Even if it would just try to kill facebook, we could consider facebook as a pre-paragmatic design and Synereo as a paragmatic design of social network (even thought an improved design could be created). If you would go to war, would you use the old first WW weapon design or the latest weapon design of war against ISIS ? I made my choice. I repeat you need a niche to scale up against Facebook, else no one will even bother to use Synereo. I've read your post (fartbags, please re-login) and there was nothing but your doubts that mean no thing.
Thanks in advance for your detailed rebuttals of each of my detailed points at the linked thread. Until then, your hot air is as useless as fartbags. |
|
|
|
Did he have deceiving/thieving/criminal intent from the get-go? I'm not sure but he's at least sloppy like Mark Karpeles.
If he didn't have anyone monitoring the debasement rate for 7 hours during the early launch phase, then he is has to be retarded. But we can clearly see he is articulate and not retarded. If some developer he was depending on flaked out on him, he should tell us who it was so we can ask that developer. This is why I suggested dividing the list into "clearly malevolent intent" and "maybe no malevolent intent":
Even though I don't agree that applies to Evan and I don't think we can prove that applies to Mark Karpeles, so I really don't see the point. Even in the very small chance it wasn't intentional of Mark, it became intentional when he was continuing to perpetrate the crime/scam/ripping off. By making two such categories, you are saying that continuing the scam when it is obvious to you is somewhat excusable because you maybe didn't intend to get into the mess. The only perhaps excusable action is to immediately disclose the mess you've unintentionally made as soon as you realize you made it. Be very careful. I fell into that trap over the past years and almost justified some shady ideas because "the entire system is scam". That is sliding into a criminal mindset and forsaking any ethical backbone. With that attitude, we all steal from each other and end up in a clusterfuck Dark Age. Step back from the ledge before it is too late and recover the ethics you learned as a child perhaps from your grandparents who came from the honorable generation before the boomers (assuming you are my age or older). Well thought, but I think you are operating under the assumption of moral relativism -- the idea that we can't know right and wrong via logic/rationality... but we can. It's called Natural Law, based on the non-aggression principle, or simply the understanding of "do no harm". What did I write that was different from advocating non-aggression  I think you are going to be suprised how much the world changes towards coordinated government action across the G20 and beyond. There is a massive contagion underway that will really kick into high gear in 2018.
I think you will find that totalitarianism will increase for many years before it finally implodes around 2033. I think this will mean the governments will join together and double-down on boots on throats. I would not want to have your attitude.
Why 2033? Does the timeframe "2025-2033" suggest anything to you? 2025 - 2033 will be the final collapse of the West as it finally abandons socialism and by 2033 the financial center of the world will have completed its shift to Asia. This is Armstrong's model. The USA is fucked up and it will need to break up into separate regions where those who have shared values can congregate. There are big changes coming to world accelerating as of 2018. You mean as of 2016! Major changes in the fall this year, I'd say. By 2018 things will be so different it's hardly imaginable. I'd also say that Europe is more fucked (being destroyed faster) than the USA. See these: https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/why-europe-is-failing-the-difference-between-eu-usa/https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/future-forecasts/political-change-in-2020-or-2016/Please forgive me for my slow responses today, as I can barely see. I gorged on pizza last night (delicious like coming upon an oasis in the desert after eating oatmeal & broccoli for weeks) and made me nearly blind this morning. I really need to stick with my strict diet. i am squinting and everything is so incredibly blurry. (Also tuna often has high methylmercury) Large tuna from the area of the Pacific I am in doesn't have statistically significant mercury. And I am eating smaller tuna (e.g. 3 kilos) which thus has no mercury. |
|
|
|
This is the issue we are facing here with every coin, including Bitcoin. there probability of being used by a broad population is very low, but as bitcoin showed and still showing, as times passe the latter probability increase.
Don't forget that we are speaking about a disruptive innovation here, that is better in all ways that what we currently use.
Bitcoin started with a niche use case. Synereo will go no where without one. Ditto every other altcoin. … hence all the "it's not money, it's something else"/Blockchain as a Service-coins popping up, like ETH, Lisk, Waves and so on. I'm curious to see where this is going. Yeah but those niches need to actually work technically and exist. We've done a thorough job of destructing ETH in the Ethereum Paradox thread. I did an initial analysis of Synereo's niche and afaics is based on flawed concepts such as the value of paying social network users to share which I think is entirely undesired and uneconomic for the same reason that ads have a reputation of being mostly spam (linked upthread). I don't know enough about Lisk and Waves to comment meaningfully on them. Well, if you take it all together, you can see that something is cooking... r0ach, smooth, I, and some others think the only killer app of blockchains is probably currency because of the self-referential requirement of what a block chain can reach consensus on securely. Thus technically we think all the other crap won't work, unless it is using a centralized block chain and then what is the point of that? Bitcoin locked up large $ transfers. Monero has locked up anonymity. I am going after micro-transactions. |
|
|
|
This is the issue we are facing here with every coin, including Bitcoin. there probability of being used by a broad population is very low, but as bitcoin showed and still showing, as times passe the latter probability increase.
Don't forget that we are speaking about a disruptive innovation here, that is better in all ways that what we currently use.
Bitcoin started with a niche use case. Synereo will go no where without one. Ditto every other altcoin. … hence all the "it's not money, it's something else"/Blockchain as a Service-coins popping up, like ETH, Lisk, Waves and so on. I'm curious to see where this is going. Yeah but those niches need to actually work technically and exist. We've done a thorough job of destructing ETH in the Ethereum Paradox thread. I did an initial analysis of Synereo's niche and afaics is based on flawed concepts such as the value of paying social network users to share which I think is entirely undesired and uneconomic for the same reason that ads have a reputation of being mostly spam (linked upthread). I don't know enough about Lisk and Waves to comment meaningfully on them. |
|
|
|
This is the issue we are facing here with every coin, including Bitcoin. there probability of being used by a broad population is very low, but as bitcoin showed and still showing, as times passe the latter probability increase.
Don't forget that we are speaking about a disruptive innovation here, that is better in all ways that what we currently use.
Bitcoin started with a niche use case. Synereo will go no where without one. Ditto every other altcoin. |
|
|
|
Not updating that website has no relationship to my coding skills. For you to make such a statement indicates you jump to irrational assessment based on insufficient data.
And of course I never said it has. This is just your usual bullshitting. I said, it indicates how tragicomical is, and how delusional you are having such website and in the meantime you lecture other software engineers in 24/7 about UI design. I can't erase the website from the Webarchive. Why do I have to erase coolpage.com in order to not be tragicomical. That makes no sense. I've moved on to other things as I explained to you. Of course you deleted my post in order to keep bullshitting.
I quoted your venom. No need for two copies of it. The rest about your skills and accomplishments are irrelevant.
Why don't you tell that to the 1 million users who downloaded CoolPage and 335,000 websites that were confirmed created by Altavista as of 2001. A one man company! Do you have any idea how much work that was! Why don't you tell that to the Painter 3.1-J version which shipped a $million in its first month in Japan in the mid-1990s. Why don't you tell that to EOS Systems and claim to them that the 3D Viewer work I did was "useless and irrelevant" in 1996. Why don't you tell that to the 30,000+ users of my WordUp software in the 1980s, which if compared to internet distribution we have now was on the order of a million users. And of course I saw your few Github files - that indicates nothing special at all.
You didn't look closely then or you probably don't even understand what is clever in that C code I wrote. And that is just local cleverness. You'd need to look at my larger code bases to see how I apply holistic design cleverness. When a 51 years old software professional quotes his minuscular CSS standard contribution as a major accomplishment
Back when you were recruiting me, you were stating my reputation would be a boon to GadgetCoin. Now you are cutting me down to size eh. Well I never claimed those were monumental contributions I made to the W3C. I do claim that they conflated the framing and data layers for WebSockets and didn't adhere to correct design principles which I argued for and made a technical proposal for. then that says all about you.
Yep appears it does. Repeat offender of real world accomplishments. Now, it is clear, all your talk and contribution is just to build up & market a professional profile for the next P&D. Your P&D is coming - after all you promised a P&D to your "angel investors" don't you
I have not done that. I will not do that. And this will be the last time you will post in my thread, because you are not writing rationally. |
|
|
|
My point is that we don't build a society by stealing from each other, regardless of that the big fish are stealing from us. Two wrongs don't make it right. We see the big fish stealing, so we copy them and steal too, then we wonder why 600 year Dark Ages come about. |
|
|
|
Hm. Diversification is a good point. The thing about twitter, instagram, tumblr and so on is, that none of them was supposed to be a "facebook killer", but filled it's own niche.
Astute. That is precisely the only way to scale up. |
|
|
|
I've never seen you make any deep technical comments that would indicate to me you have strong programming skills. That is not to say that I know for sure you don't, but I just haven't seen any indication. Perhaps I missed those posts of yours if there were any. Yes, I have programming skills, most likely more than you will ever have.
Bold claim with no evidence provided. I saw very little from your codes...
You are making frequent comments about UI design and how skilled UI developer you are. In the meantime, your 1997 theme web site that promotes your previous (last?) software is still online, in fact you frequently quote that link during your debates. Now, any non-delusional software developer would understand how tragicomical is to claim great UI design skill and in the meantime display a fucking 1997 design theme on your website.
I think the Webarchive can confirm I made no significant changes to that website after I was attacked on Dec. 1, 1999, lost vision in my eye, and spent many months in surgeries to save the 95% blinded eye. You are correct the site has not been updated. Not updating that website has no relationship to my coding skills. For you to make such a statement indicates you jump to irrational assessment based on insufficient data. I spent 2001 - 2002 producing the last upgrade to CoolPage which added the Objects Windows, Applets, Events, etc.. We also created another website CoolPageHelp.com to teach these new features (and I forgot to renew the domain recently so that site is now gone except on the Web Archive). I had an offer from CoffeeCup to buy us out, but I declined and milked the sales for few more years. From 2003 on, I stopped working on that business, because I was in a maelstrom of problems with my ex and deciding where to live with kids and what to do with my life being blinded in one eye, having a failed marriage, two young kids which I was the one at home watching in 2002 in Texas, etc. The sales ceased entirely afair approximately 2010 but had dwindled to a trickle a couple years before. I don't do day to day programming in the last 10 years. I have never worked on any crypto project nor I ever will (I am only the supporter of the great idea of Satoshi and super intelligent developers like gmaxwell and I have no plan to work on any crypto software), but based on what I have seen from you I predict, if I want, I can write a better software than you any time.
Yeah. Yeah. Ego is For Little People. You are very smart, very articulate of course which indicates a very intelligent individual, you have lots of experience in technology and some in business, so of course you are better than the children who release all kind of shambles in this crypto screen including CfB the IOTA wanker who released 12 poorly written Java files in exchange for the $500K of the idiots who invested in IOTA, or I could say many other developers in this place who scams the idiots with not even mediocre software, but I am sure you would agree that the measure of skill is not to be better than these wankers are.
I think talk is cheap. All I know about you is your talk. I have posted my accomplishments on my LinkedIn. You are welcome to share yours on your profile. I have some small amount of crypto code on my GitHub already. So I am sorry, even if you wanted I would never write software with you. If I write software then I deliver - you don't
Explain my resume of accomplishments then. (The rest of your post is pretty much accurate and spot on. Yes, I hoped you will work with the GadgetCoin developers because they were struggling at the time, but it seems they have got their acts together and what you display here indicates anyway that you wouldn't be an asset to an ethical team. I am still friendly to you because you made valid and good points in many interesting topics, I understand you have a lot more good bone in your body than bad ones, it seems you are a very nice guy when you have a good mood, when your head is clear you contribute a lot to the crypto currency idea, but in the meantime you are building/maintaining relationship with scammers,
I presume you are referring to me helping TierNolan and jl777 on getting the correct design for decentralized exchange per the link I provided in my prior reply to you. I want DE to be available. If he is the first to implement it correctly, then he is. I don't understand how presenting the logic of the correct design to him and TierNolan means I am scamming I can't write in a thread where jl777 writes without being called a scammer By your logic then the well-respected TierNolan is associating with a scammer too. you are forgiving and understanding with blatant scams like IOTA, LISK, etc., by saying that there is nothing wrong with them
You should review my post history over the past week or two. I have not minced my words w.r.t. to Iota. I am not beholden to you. I am independent. altcoinUK, I respectfully request you do not post in my thread again. I don't need the drama. Thanks. Good luck in all your endeavors. |
|
|
|
Classic. A troll who trolls himself. Lol. We've been trolled by the Communist brigade < snip >
^^It uses royal plural   |
|
|
|
|
We've been trolled by the Communist brigade that has discovered how to sell ICOs and instamine premines and doesn't like it when they are called out for doing so. They don't respect our securities laws in the USA.
They troll any one who points this out.
|
|
|
|
Sorry I am not going to teach you economics.
No prob. Didn't mean to interrupt your batshit delirium. Continue ranting pl0x. The delirium is yours. It is senseless for me to argue with an indoctrinated Communist. Also senseless for anyone as far gone as yourself to do anything but crawl to the nearest nuthouse & beg to be committed, and yet here we are  Well good to see you get that off your chest. You can exhale now Stalin. |
|
|
|
Positing a theory about culture, has nothing do with race. If you are too dumb to understand the difference between culture and race, and theory and accusation, then I don't think there isn't an Iota of hope for ya.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_racism *tripple facepalm meme* Append racism to the end of culture and pretend you knew any fuck what you were talking about. There isn't even a quark of hope for ya. If one can't compare cultures, let's just burn the Sociology books also. Funny how I don't threaten people with legal action when they make negative statements about Americans as you have in our past discussion. Instead I agree or refute as I have to you and even in this thread. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
