I don't think there is a need for regulation. We are all friends in this community, I hope. I wrote Garr a PM and appealed to his respect for other asset issuers. He doesn't seem to be a bad guy and thus I'm sure he won't do any bad mouth talk in the future anyway.

I kinda feel the same way as some of you and it seems the latest update came a bit short of notice. So my suggestion: when every miner is up, it might be a good idea to publish another news post on btct.co which summarizes all the sweet stuff from the last days: doubleing the hashrate again and hashing with more than 900 GH/s, everything running smooth, another Avalon waiting, 1k in reserves etc.. Pictures are always a good thing, too.

But it's up to creativex though.

Vbs, Streets 2.0 and the others: great job!

The next barrier to overcome will probably be the convertion of Bitcoin -> USD. One of the reasons (besides expenses) for the issuing of the last 500k shares was a falling BTC/USD price and KS last calculation was done with 93.30, but he also mentioned he has a puffer now.

Such huge amounts create a wide spread, potentially move the market and there is the probability, that KS gets goxed. Furthermore and this is very important as well: there are daily and monthly withdrawal limits and large amounts need additional verification, i.e. notarized documents.

Another episode of ASIC PORN... wow! Sorry to interrupt the discussion and hijack the thread, I just wanted to say: great picuteres! Good luck with your project!

It's loss/loss now, as this would hurt those who sold after his announcement of new shares on the weekend at 0.0025. Anyway, let's move forward and improve next time.

Great (smallish) portfolio by the way.

Just some brainstorming on this idea (still not sure if the idea itself needs to be done):

 - Every user has a second identificator (4 char hash for example)
 - Sender starts transfer to username as usual
 - btct.co asks for confirmation and displays username and second identifier

This would eliminate the need of entering the second identifier with almost the same outcome.

The current two times input + pin is much more than we get from a Bitcoin tx though. I tried to send a share to a non existing username and all it shows is "invalid user", so this case is covered already and they don't get lost in limbo.

xubingde: I don't understand the loophole you mentioned and I feel sorry for your loss. What would you like to happen to "solve" your problem?

First thing that came into my mind, too. I'm still wondering...

So it's a "if price is x, place order" bot, correct?

Would you confirm that you are going to sell roughly about 10k Bitcoin? When would that happen? Are you aware, that you won't get the current highest bid price, as such an amount (if sold as market order) would have a large spread? Or do you intend to place a 10k wall on 93.40?

I don't want to create an OT discussion, but only one fact: Bitcoin land is "oversaturated" with Bitcoins to spend and use, implying "overvalued" assets.

SD holders received the payout in Bitcoin via MPEx in 20 batches within 5-10 minutes 13-14 hours ago. It's unclear, when the BTC were purchased and if at all as we only could spot 20-30k coming into MPEx in a shorter timeframe before payout and more chucks some days and weeks before. I'm not very familiar with the amounts on MPEx, but people say it's not something very special, when such amounts arrive there.

The only reasonable scenario I see for buying those 130+k BTC after the payout would be a super whale who has both large amounts of BTC and fiat and who speculated to cause a selloff with the payout - 130k coins which could possibly be dumped on BTC/USD.

Click it!

But CB could get a bit larger.. there are still some pixels in height left, before interfering with the surrounding layout.

^ This..  

There was a >600 bid wall which was finished by the above mentioned 350+ shares sell.

Edit: could also be someone with a huge stack of coins and shares who just wanted to sell and buy back lower. Wall set up to drive the price higher, sell into the wall, to induce a selloff. But half of it got eaten before.. hmm.. well. Wild speculation only, I guess.

Maybe that's related.

I might have spotted some strange behavior in availability checking. I could reproduce this:

1. Own shares
2. Write call options
3. (optional) Cancel options
4. Recall options

= Shares are still reserved.

But they can be placed via API and after canceling the new placed API order, they are available again.

I did this with all shares of an asset. If I only place a portion of them as option and recall, they are still shown as reserved in the order placing window, but the order gets placed the same as via the API. It's problematic, if it's done with all shares, because "there is no way to force the placement" because the buttons are disabled.

+1 for btct.co..

Update..



I think the 381 wall was a bit scratched and then pulled, wasn't it?

That sleep is well deserved. Good night!

SatoshiDice shareholders received the final payment: http://mpex.co/?mpsic=S.DICE

Let the fun begin...

A wild ask order appeared.. or to be more precise: 381 @ 0.779990 BTC on the book now.

I'm not sure how BTC-TC handles this, but I think FIFO. There are multiple ask orders sitting on 0.0025:


The one getting chewed is #52 with ~1950 BTC total left. So.. maybe, just maybe (I didn't read through the AM thread), someone placed another huge load on 0.0025 to create the impression, the wall is higher as it is. Well, the height is the same, but ... I think you get my point.

There are 9000 call options available for S.DICE-PT on btct.co with a premium of 0.00001155 and a strike of 0.03100000. That's 10x too much, because of a missing 0.

1000 were already sold and exercised...


That poor guy paid 27.5 Bitcoin too much.