I'm not sure if someone already posted this, but Masterluc posted last night: I would like to remind you that the following levels will definitely be returned: 1) broken support triangle ($ 6000) 2) weekly ma 20 3) daytime ma 200
Week ma 200 (about $ 3000) I think this is Stalingrad. It can not be pierced in the medium term.
So I think it's about time to buy. If you have money))
|
|
|
I've been seeing quite a few people calling for triple digits. Just like the last bear market, when half of people were calling for double digits. Meet the new bears. Same as the old bears.
|
|
|
Everyone is making fun of Bitcoin and holders, Forbes is writing about it failing and everyone is panicing that it's going to be worthless. Seems like it's not just another breather.
That sounds exactly like every other bitcoin bear market.
|
|
|
Would you people calm down already. It's almost like this is your first rodeo.
To be fair, it is for most of them. From what I gather, even many veterans of this thread bought their first BTCs during the bear market of 2014-2015. So, this might actually be the first full bear market they've had to endure.
|
|
|
Yikes. I haven't been able to peer into this thread much over the long holiday weekend. I see the trolls have been out in full force though. Deletions Incoming
|
|
|
Meet the new bottom. Same as the old bottom.
|
|
|
Infofront, are you really meriting Eliott Wavers? It's impossible for them to be correct because so much market activity is simply long and short squeezes. If they are counting on some random bullshit to happen at X count, but the entire market is on the same side of the trade and long or short there, then the market is going the exact opposite way.
It kind of falls back to the self fulfilling prophecy narrative that Eliott wave will work if every market maker on the planet uses that instead of something else (lol?). But counts are also subjective on top of that, making it even worse. Did I mention the inventor of Eliott wave died broke?
I like to merit TA here. I don't see much of a difference between EW and other analytical methods as far as your criticisms are concerned. If they work at all, none of them work in isolation. Those days died in the 80s. Anyway, EW is one more tool that puts the past into context, and shows future possibilities.
|
|
|
how's it going old friends? haven't really said anything here since 2014.
4 year cycles and all that....
blitz u still around? shroomsie? richie? risto?
Some of the old faces are still here in bitcointalk, not necessarily this thread. I think Risto is living like a king in his Castle. He’s always on Monero thread. I haven’t been here a lot recently but I pop back. Risto has been AWOL on the Monero thread too. He went crazy again, and basically lost everything, AFAIK. From what I hear, Richie went crazy and ran to the bcash forum. Niggaz be goin crazy up in hurrr. It's the WO curse.
|
|
|
Happy Thanksgiving!
I'm thankful for the best bitcoin old boys' club on the interwebs.
|
|
|
I'll start buying when 500 breaks
Get ready, Hairy!
|
|
|
I'm glad this is happening so it will finally be over and done with.
I think we will have reached our new ATL since the last ATH within a day or 3.
Bwahaha. It doesn't happen that easily. We're going to keep grinding lower for months. There will be a few rallies to the upside, just to raise your spirits a little bit. Once you see a glimmer of hope, the Bogdanoffs will sell again and crush it. Rinse and repeat. It will only end when our spirits have been utterly decimated, and our souls nearly destroyed. This thread will be nothing but tumbleweeds and r0ach posts. That's when you know we're starting to head back up. It will take a few months for anyone to even realize we're in recovery mode. We won't have time to read charts at that point anyway. We'll be too busy tying nooses and working overtime at McDonald's. Then the bull returns and we get to do it all over again. Choo choo motherfuckers.
|
|
|
The new poll is almost fucked already. This is like last November, just going in reverse.
|
|
|
Truth.
|
|
|
I don't believe a single one of the people claiming a desire to eat out of her various orifices would actually do it given the chance. Humans simply do not work that way. A fee beers in and they sure would. Look, man. I get that, for some folk, ass-eating can be fun and taboo and whatnot, but I honestly don't understand people that derive pleasure from eating ass. Eating pussy. Sucking dick. I get that. Eating ass just isn't right. Ass to mouth is absolutely uncivilized. Some of us have standards, Goddamnit. I'm not gonna lie. Eating [freshly showered] ass is one of my favorite sex acts.
|
|
|
New poll. Short duration again.
|
|
|
I don't believe a single one of the people claiming a desire to eat out of her various orifices would actually do it given the chance. Humans simply do not work that way. Way to rain on our gmilf parade.
|
|
|
Christie Brinkley also says she may be a bit older even than that Ok My models say the following "61 is the new 44" Who was it who said never go down on a girl? I’d eat her for breakfast, lunch & dinner! Who is she? If that´s her, then... she´s 64. What is it with some of you and grannies? She has a fertile-looking body still.
|
|
|
But...if the price is crashing so much...what about the tax revenue for the US war machine?
Please don't sell at a loss...think of the poor third world children that have never seen the glow of phosphorous before.
Don't worry. Saudi Arabia is picking up the slack.
|
|
|
I’m starting to think this bullshit battle between BCHABC & BCHSV is all a big scheme for those in the know to get rich & crash the price of bitcoin so they can load up even more bitcoin’s.
It’s too much of a coincidence, all of this. It’s just so coordinated.
Now this Tether bull shit, it’s just all so coordinated, obviously planned.
Jihan Wu half-joked that CSW might've been sent by "Core" to destroy bcash. What if he was sent by Wall Street to destroy bitcoin and bcash, or just to lower the prices? Maybe his mission is just to make sure ICE gets cheap BTC. It's fun to think about, anyway.
|
|
|
|